Allow `repeated-equality-comparison` for mixed operations (#12369)

## Summary

This PR allows us to fix both expressions in `foo == "a" or foo == "b"
or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar)`, but limits the rule to consecutive
comparisons, following https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7797.

I think this logic was _probably_ added because of
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12368 -- the intent being that
we'd replace the _entire_ expression.

crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pylint/repeated_equality_comparison.py

@@ -61,3 +61,7 @@ foo == "a" or "c" == bar or foo == "b" or "d" == bar  # Multiple targets
 foo == "a" or ("c" == bar or "d" == bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
 
 foo == "a" or foo == "b" or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
+
+foo == "a" or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+
+foo == "a" and "c" != bar or foo == "b" and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pylint/rules/repeated_equality_comparison.rs

@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-use std::ops::Deref;
-
 use itertools::Itertools;
 use rustc_hash::{FxBuildHasher, FxHashMap};
 
@@ -72,60 +70,66 @@ impl AlwaysFixableViolation for RepeatedEqualityComparison {
 
 /// PLR1714
 pub(crate) fn repeated_equality_comparison(checker: &mut Checker, bool_op: &ast::ExprBoolOp) {
-    if bool_op
-        .values
-        .iter()
-        .any(|value| !is_allowed_value(bool_op.op, value, checker.semantic()))
-    {
-        return;
-    }
-
     // Map from expression hash to (starting offset, number of comparisons, list
-    let mut value_to_comparators: FxHashMap<HashableExpr, (TextSize, Vec<&Expr>, Vec<&Expr>)> =
+    let mut value_to_comparators: FxHashMap<HashableExpr, (TextSize, Vec<&Expr>, Vec<usize>)> =
         FxHashMap::with_capacity_and_hasher(bool_op.values.len() * 2, FxBuildHasher);
 
-    for value in &bool_op.values {
+    for (i, value) in bool_op.values.iter().enumerate() {
-        // Enforced via `is_allowed_value`.
+        let Some((left, right)) = to_allowed_value(bool_op.op, value, checker.semantic()) else {
-        let Expr::Compare(ast::ExprCompare {
+            continue;
-            left, comparators, ..
-        }) = value
-        else {
-            return;
         };
 
-        // Enforced via `is_allowed_value`.
+        if matches!(left, Expr::Name(_) | Expr::Attribute(_)) {
-        let [right] = &**comparators else {
+            let (_, left_matches, index_matches) = value_to_comparators
-            return;
+                .entry(left.into())
-        };
-
-        if matches!(left.as_ref(), Expr::Name(_) | Expr::Attribute(_)) {
-            let (_, left_matches, value_matches) = value_to_comparators
-                .entry(left.deref().into())
                 .or_insert_with(|| (left.start(), Vec::new(), Vec::new()));
             left_matches.push(right);
-            value_matches.push(value);
+            index_matches.push(i);
         }
 
         if matches!(right, Expr::Name(_) | Expr::Attribute(_)) {
-            let (_, right_matches, value_matches) = value_to_comparators
+            let (_, right_matches, index_matches) = value_to_comparators
                 .entry(right.into())
                 .or_insert_with(|| (right.start(), Vec::new(), Vec::new()));
             right_matches.push(left);
-            value_matches.push(value);
+            index_matches.push(i);
         }
     }
 
-    for (value, (start, comparators, values)) in value_to_comparators
+    for (value, (_, comparators, indices)) in value_to_comparators
         .iter()
         .sorted_by_key(|(_, (start, _, _))| *start)
     {
-        if comparators.len() > 1 {
+        // If there's only one comparison, there's nothing to merge.
+        if comparators.len() == 1 {
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        // Break into sequences of consecutive comparisons.
+        let mut sequences: Vec<(Vec<usize>, Vec<&Expr>)> = Vec::new();
+        let mut last = None;
+        for (index, comparator) in indices.iter().zip(comparators.iter()) {
+            if last.is_some_and(|last| last + 1 == *index) {
+                let (indices, comparators) = sequences.last_mut().unwrap();
+                indices.push(*index);
+                comparators.push(*comparator);
+            } else {
+                sequences.push((vec![*index], vec![*comparator]));
+            }
+            last = Some(*index);
+        }
+
+        for (indices, comparators) in sequences {
+            if indices.len() == 1 {
+                continue;
+            }
+
             let mut diagnostic = Diagnostic::new(
                 RepeatedEqualityComparison {
                     expression: SourceCodeSnippet::new(merged_membership_test(
                         value.as_expr(),
                         bool_op.op,
-                        comparators,
+                        &comparators,
                         checker.locator(),
                     )),
                 },
@@ -133,18 +137,16 @@ pub(crate) fn repeated_equality_comparison(checker: &mut Checker, bool_op: &ast:
             );
 
             // Grab the remaining comparisons.
-            let (before, after) = bool_op
+            let [first, .., last] = indices.as_slice() else {
-                .values
+                unreachable!("Indices should have at least two elements")
-                .iter()
+            };
-                .filter(|value| !values.contains(value))
+            let before = bool_op.values.iter().take(*first).cloned();
-                .partition::<Vec<_>, _>(|value| value.start() < *start);
+            let after = bool_op.values.iter().skip(last + 1).cloned();
 
             diagnostic.set_fix(Fix::unsafe_edit(Edit::range_replacement(
                 checker.generator().expr(&Expr::BoolOp(ast::ExprBoolOp {
                     op: bool_op.op,
                     values: before
-                        .into_iter()
-                        .cloned()
                         .chain(std::iter::once(Expr::Compare(ast::ExprCompare {
                             left: Box::new(value.as_expr().clone()),
                             ops: match bool_op.op {
@@ -159,7 +161,7 @@ pub(crate) fn repeated_equality_comparison(checker: &mut Checker, bool_op: &ast:
                             })]),
                             range: bool_op.range(),
                         })))
-                        .chain(after.into_iter().cloned())
+                        .chain(after)
                         .collect(),
                     range: bool_op.range(),
                 })),
@@ -174,7 +176,11 @@ pub(crate) fn repeated_equality_comparison(checker: &mut Checker, bool_op: &ast:
 /// Return `true` if the given expression is compatible with a membership test.
 /// E.g., `==` operators can be joined with `or` and `!=` operators can be
 /// joined with `and`.
-fn is_allowed_value(bool_op: BoolOp, value: &Expr, semantic: &SemanticModel) -> bool {
+fn to_allowed_value<'a>(
+    bool_op: BoolOp,
+    value: &'a Expr,
+    semantic: &SemanticModel,
+) -> Option<(&'a Expr, &'a Expr)> {
     let Expr::Compare(ast::ExprCompare {
         left,
         ops,
@@ -182,31 +188,31 @@ fn is_allowed_value(bool_op: BoolOp, value: &Expr, semantic: &SemanticModel) ->
         ..
     }) = value
     else {
-        return false;
+        return None;
     };
 
     // Ignore, e.g., `foo == bar == baz`.
     let [op] = &**ops else {
-        return false;
+        return None;
     };
 
     if match bool_op {
         BoolOp::Or => !matches!(op, CmpOp::Eq),
         BoolOp::And => !matches!(op, CmpOp::NotEq),
     } {
-        return false;
+        return None;
     }
 
     // Ignore self-comparisons, e.g., `foo == foo`.
     let [right] = &**comparators else {
-        return false;
+        return None;
     };
     if ComparableExpr::from(left) == ComparableExpr::from(right) {
-        return false;
+        return None;
     }
 
     if contains_effect(value, |id| semantic.has_builtin_binding(id)) {
-        return false;
+        return None;
     }
 
     // Ignore `sys.version_info` and `sys.platform` comparisons, which are only
@@ -221,10 +227,10 @@ fn is_allowed_value(bool_op: BoolOp, value: &Expr, semantic: &SemanticModel) ->
                 )
             })
     }) {
-        return false;
+        return None;
     }
 
-    true
+    Some((left, right))
 }
 
 /// Generate a string like `obj in (a, b, c)` or `obj not in (a, b, c)`.

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pylint/rules/repeated_isinstance_calls.rs

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ pub struct RepeatedIsinstanceCalls {
     expression: SourceCodeSnippet,
 }
 
-// PLR1701
+/// PLR1701
 impl AlwaysFixableViolation for RepeatedIsinstanceCalls {
     #[derive_message_formats]
     fn message(&self) -> String {

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/pylint/snapshots/ruff_linter__rules__pylint__tests__PLR1714_repeated_equality_comparison.py.snap

@@ -292,48 +292,6 @@ repeated_equality_comparison.py:26:1: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple comp
 28 28 | # OK
 29 29 | foo == "a" and foo == "b" and foo == "c"  # `and` mixed with `==`.
 
-repeated_equality_comparison.py:59:1: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple comparisons: `foo in ("a", "b")`. Use a `set` if the elements are hashable.
-   |
-57 | sys.platform == "win32" or sys.platform == "emscripten"  # sys attributes
-58 | 
-59 | foo == "a" or "c" == bar or foo == "b" or "d" == bar  # Multiple targets
-   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ PLR1714
-60 | 
-61 | foo == "a" or ("c" == bar or "d" == bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
-   |
-   = help: Merge multiple comparisons
-
-ℹ Unsafe fix
-56 56 | 
-57 57 | sys.platform == "win32" or sys.platform == "emscripten"  # sys attributes
-58 58 | 
-59    |-foo == "a" or "c" == bar or foo == "b" or "d" == bar  # Multiple targets
-   59 |+foo in ("a", "b") or "c" == bar or "d" == bar  # Multiple targets
-60 60 | 
-61 61 | foo == "a" or ("c" == bar or "d" == bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
-62 62 | 
-
-repeated_equality_comparison.py:59:1: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple comparisons: `bar in ("c", "d")`. Use a `set` if the elements are hashable.
-   |
-57 | sys.platform == "win32" or sys.platform == "emscripten"  # sys attributes
-58 | 
-59 | foo == "a" or "c" == bar or foo == "b" or "d" == bar  # Multiple targets
-   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ PLR1714
-60 | 
-61 | foo == "a" or ("c" == bar or "d" == bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
-   |
-   = help: Merge multiple comparisons
-
-ℹ Unsafe fix
-56 56 | 
-57 57 | sys.platform == "win32" or sys.platform == "emscripten"  # sys attributes
-58 58 | 
-59    |-foo == "a" or "c" == bar or foo == "b" or "d" == bar  # Multiple targets
-   59 |+foo == "a" or bar in ("c", "d") or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
-60 60 | 
-61 61 | foo == "a" or ("c" == bar or "d" == bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
-62 62 | 
-
 repeated_equality_comparison.py:61:16: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple comparisons: `bar in ("c", "d")`. Use a `set` if the elements are hashable.
    |
 59 | foo == "a" or "c" == bar or foo == "b" or "d" == bar  # Multiple targets
@@ -353,6 +311,28 @@ repeated_equality_comparison.py:61:16: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple com
    61 |+foo == "a" or (bar in ("c", "d")) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
 62 62 | 
 63 63 | foo == "a" or foo == "b" or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
+64 64 | 
+
+repeated_equality_comparison.py:63:1: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple comparisons: `foo in ("a", "b")`. Use a `set` if the elements are hashable.
+   |
+61 | foo == "a" or ("c" == bar or "d" == bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+62 | 
+63 | foo == "a" or foo == "b" or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
+   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ PLR1714
+64 | 
+65 | foo == "a" or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+   |
+   = help: Merge multiple comparisons
+
+ℹ Unsafe fix
+60 60 | 
+61 61 | foo == "a" or ("c" == bar or "d" == bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+62 62 | 
+63    |-foo == "a" or foo == "b" or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
+   63 |+foo in ("a", "b") or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
+64 64 | 
+65 65 | foo == "a" or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+66 66 | 
 
 repeated_equality_comparison.py:63:29: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple comparisons: `bar not in ("c", "d")`. Use a `set` if the elements are hashable.
    |
@@ -360,6 +340,8 @@ repeated_equality_comparison.py:63:29: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple com
 62 | 
 63 | foo == "a" or foo == "b" or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
    |                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ PLR1714
+64 | 
+65 | foo == "a" or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
    |
    = help: Merge multiple comparisons
 
@@ -369,3 +351,26 @@ repeated_equality_comparison.py:63:29: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple com
 62 62 | 
 63    |-foo == "a" or foo == "b" or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
    63 |+foo == "a" or foo == "b" or bar not in ("c", "d")  # Multiple targets
+64 64 | 
+65 65 | foo == "a" or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+66 66 | 
+
+repeated_equality_comparison.py:65:16: PLR1714 [*] Consider merging multiple comparisons: `bar not in ("c", "d")`. Use a `set` if the elements are hashable.
+   |
+63 | foo == "a" or foo == "b" or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
+64 | 
+65 | foo == "a" or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+   |                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ PLR1714
+66 | 
+67 | foo == "a" and "c" != bar or foo == "b" and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
+   |
+   = help: Merge multiple comparisons
+
+ℹ Unsafe fix
+62 62 | 
+63 63 | foo == "a" or foo == "b" or "c" != bar and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets
+64 64 | 
+65    |-foo == "a" or ("c" != bar and "d" != bar) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+   65 |+foo == "a" or (bar not in ("c", "d")) or foo == "b"  # Multiple targets
+66 66 | 
+67 67 | foo == "a" and "c" != bar or foo == "b" and "d" != bar  # Multiple targets