[ty] Default-specialization of generic type aliases (#21765)

## Summary

Implement default-specialization of generic type aliases (implicit or
PEP-613) if they are used in a type expression without an explicit
specialization.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1690

## Typing conformance

```diff
-generics_defaults_specialization.py:26:5: error[type-assertion-failure] Type `SomethingWithNoDefaults[int, str]` does not match asserted type `SomethingWithNoDefaults[int, DefaultStrT]`
```

That's exactly what we want ✔️ 

All other tests in this file pass as well, with the exception of this
assertion, which is just wrong (at least according to our
interpretation, `type[Bar] != <class 'Bar'>`). I checked that we do
correctly default-specialize the type parameter which is not displayed
in the diagnostic that we raise.
```py
class Bar(SubclassMe[int, DefaultStrT]): ...

assert_type(Bar, type[Bar[str]])  # ty: Type `type[Bar[str]]` does not match asserted type `<class 'Bar'>`
```

## Ecosystem impact

Looks like I should have included this last week 😎 

## Test Plan

Updated pre-existing tests and add a few new ones.

crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/implicit_type_aliases.md

@@ -190,14 +190,10 @@ def _(
     reveal_type(type_of_str_or_int)  # revealed: type[str] | int
     reveal_type(int_or_callable)  # revealed: int | ((str, /) -> bytes)
     reveal_type(callable_or_int)  # revealed: ((str, /) -> bytes) | int
-    # TODO should be Unknown | int
+    reveal_type(type_var_or_int)  # revealed: Unknown | int
-    reveal_type(type_var_or_int)  # revealed: T@TypeVarOrInt | int
+    reveal_type(int_or_type_var)  # revealed: int | Unknown
-    # TODO should be int | Unknown
+    reveal_type(type_var_or_none)  # revealed: Unknown | None
-    reveal_type(int_or_type_var)  # revealed: int | T@IntOrTypeVar
+    reveal_type(none_or_type_var)  # revealed: None | Unknown
-    # TODO should be Unknown | None
-    reveal_type(type_var_or_none)  # revealed: T@TypeVarOrNone | None
-    # TODO should be None | Unknown
-    reveal_type(none_or_type_var)  # revealed: None | T@NoneOrTypeVar
 ```
 
 If a type is unioned with itself in a value expression, the result is just that type. No
@@ -529,28 +525,18 @@ def _(
     annotated_unknown: AnnotatedType,
     optional_unknown: MyOptional,
 ):
-    # TODO: This should be `list[Unknown]`
+    reveal_type(list_unknown)  # revealed: list[Unknown]
-    reveal_type(list_unknown)  # revealed: list[T@MyList]
+    reveal_type(dict_unknown)  # revealed: dict[Unknown, Unknown]
-    # TODO: This should be `dict[Unknown, Unknown]`
+    reveal_type(subclass_of_unknown)  # revealed: type[Unknown]
-    reveal_type(dict_unknown)  # revealed: dict[T@MyDict, U@MyDict]
+    reveal_type(int_and_unknown)  # revealed: tuple[int, Unknown]
-    # TODO: Should be `type[Unknown]`
+    reveal_type(pair_of_unknown)  # revealed: tuple[Unknown, Unknown]
-    reveal_type(subclass_of_unknown)  # revealed: type[T@MyType]
+    reveal_type(unknown_and_unknown)  # revealed: tuple[Unknown, Unknown]
-    # TODO: Should be `tuple[int, Unknown]`
+    reveal_type(list_or_tuple)  # revealed: list[Unknown] | tuple[Unknown, ...]
-    reveal_type(int_and_unknown)  # revealed: tuple[int, T@IntAndType]
+    reveal_type(list_or_tuple_legacy)  # revealed: list[Unknown] | tuple[Unknown, ...]
-    # TODO: Should be `tuple[Unknown, Unknown]`
+    # TODO: should be (...) -> Unknown
-    reveal_type(pair_of_unknown)  # revealed: tuple[T@Pair, T@Pair]
-    # TODO: Should be `tuple[Unknown, Unknown]`
-    reveal_type(unknown_and_unknown)  # revealed: tuple[T@Sum, U@Sum]
-    # TODO: Should be `list[Unknown] | tuple[Unknown, ...]`
-    reveal_type(list_or_tuple)  # revealed: list[T@ListOrTuple] | tuple[T@ListOrTuple, ...]
-    # TODO: Should be `list[Unknown] | tuple[Unknown, ...]`
-    reveal_type(list_or_tuple_legacy)  # revealed: list[T@ListOrTupleLegacy] | tuple[T@ListOrTupleLegacy, ...]
-    # TODO: Should be `(...) -> Unknown`
     reveal_type(my_callable)  # revealed: @Todo(Callable[..] specialized with ParamSpec)
-    # TODO: Should be `Unknown`
+    reveal_type(annotated_unknown)  # revealed: Unknown
-    reveal_type(annotated_unknown)  # revealed: T@AnnotatedType
+    reveal_type(optional_unknown)  # revealed: Unknown | None
-    # TODO: Should be `Unknown | None`
-    reveal_type(optional_unknown)  # revealed: T@MyOptional | None
 ```
 
 For a type variable with a default, we use the default type:
@@ -563,10 +549,13 @@ MyListWithDefault = list[T_default]
 def _(
     list_of_str: MyListWithDefault[str],
     list_of_int: MyListWithDefault,
+    list_of_str_or_none: MyListWithDefault[str] | None,
+    list_of_int_or_none: MyListWithDefault | None,
 ):
     reveal_type(list_of_str)  # revealed: list[str]
-    # TODO: this should be `list[int]`
+    reveal_type(list_of_int)  # revealed: list[int]
-    reveal_type(list_of_int)  # revealed: list[T_default@MyListWithDefault]
+    reveal_type(list_of_str_or_none)  # revealed: list[str] | None
+    reveal_type(list_of_int_or_none)  # revealed: list[int] | None
 ```
 
 (Generic) implicit type aliases can be used as base classes:
@@ -601,7 +590,7 @@ Generic implicit type aliases can be imported from other modules and specialized
 ```py
 from typing_extensions import TypeVar
 
-T = TypeVar("T")
+T = TypeVar("T", default=str)
 
 MyList = list[T]
 ```
@@ -615,9 +604,13 @@ import my_types as mt
 def _(
     list_of_ints1: MyList[int],
     list_of_ints2: mt.MyList[int],
+    list_of_str: mt.MyList,
+    list_of_str_or_none: mt.MyList | None,
 ):
     reveal_type(list_of_ints1)  # revealed: list[int]
     reveal_type(list_of_ints2)  # revealed: list[int]
+    reveal_type(list_of_str)  # revealed: list[str]
+    reveal_type(list_of_str_or_none)  # revealed: list[str] | None
 ```
 
 ### In stringified annotations

crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types.rs

@@ -8263,6 +8263,16 @@ impl<'db> Type<'db> {
             _ => None,
         }
     }
+
+    /// Default-specialize all legacy typevars in this type.
+    ///
+    /// This is used when an implicit type alias is referenced without explicitly specializing it.
+    pub(crate) fn default_specialize(self, db: &'db dyn Db) -> Type<'db> {
+        let mut variables = FxOrderSet::default();
+        self.find_legacy_typevars(db, None, &mut variables);
+        let generic_context = GenericContext::from_typevar_instances(db, variables);
+        self.apply_specialization(db, generic_context.default_specialization(db, None))
+    }
 }
 
 impl<'db> From<&Type<'db>> for Type<'db> {

crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer/builder/annotation_expression.rs

@@ -144,7 +144,8 @@ impl<'db> TypeInferenceBuilder<'db, '_> {
                     )
                 }
                 _ => TypeAndQualifiers::declared(
-                    ty.in_type_expression(
+                    ty.default_specialize(builder.db())
+                        .in_type_expression(
                             builder.db(),
                             builder.scope(),
                             builder.typevar_binding_context,

crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer/builder/type_expression.rs

@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ impl<'db> TypeInferenceBuilder<'db, '_> {
             ast::Expr::Name(name) => match name.ctx {
                 ast::ExprContext::Load => self
                     .infer_name_expression(name)
+                    .default_specialize(self.db())
                     .in_type_expression(self.db(), self.scope(), self.typevar_binding_context)
                     .unwrap_or_else(|error| {
                         error.into_fallback_type(
@@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ impl<'db> TypeInferenceBuilder<'db, '_> {
             ast::Expr::Attribute(attribute_expression) => match attribute_expression.ctx {
                 ast::ExprContext::Load => self
                     .infer_attribute_expression(attribute_expression)
+                    .default_specialize(self.db())
                     .in_type_expression(self.db(), self.scope(), self.typevar_binding_context)
                     .unwrap_or_else(|error| {
                         error.into_fallback_type(