Fix incorrect placement of leading function comment with type params (#12447)

crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@statement__class_definition.py.snap

@@ -230,6 +230,28 @@ class QuerySet(AltersData):
 
     as_manager.queryset_only = True
     as_manager = classmethod(as_manager)
+
+
+# Decorators
+@decorator
+# comment
+class Foo1: ...
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+class Foo2(Foo1): ...
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+class Foo3[T]: ...
+
+@decorator  # comment
+class Foo4: ...
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+@decorato2
+class Foo5: ...
 ```
 
 ## Output
@@ -489,7 +511,30 @@ class QuerySet(AltersData):
 
     as_manager.queryset_only = True
     as_manager = classmethod(as_manager)
+
+
+# Decorators
+@decorator
+# comment
+class Foo1: ...
+
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+class Foo2(Foo1): ...
+
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+class Foo3[T]: ...
+
+
+@decorator  # comment
+class Foo4: ...
+
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+@decorato2
+class Foo5: ...
 ```
-
-
-

crates/ruff_python_formatter/tests/snapshots/format@statement__function.py.snap

@@ -442,6 +442,28 @@ def function_with_variadic_generics(*args: *tuple[int],): ...
 
 # Generic arguments (PEP 695)
 def func[T](lotsoflongargs: T, lotsoflongargs2: T, lotsoflongargs3: T, lotsoflongargs4: T, lotsoflongargs5: T) -> T: ...
+
+
+# Decorators
+@decorator
+# comment
+def foo[S](x: S) -> S: ...
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+def foo(x: S) -> S: ...
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+def foo() -> S: ...
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+@decorator2
+def foo(x: S) -> S: ...
+
+@decorator # comment
+def foo(x: S) -> S: ...
 ```
 
 ## Output
@@ -1041,6 +1063,32 @@ def func[T](
     lotsoflongargs4: T,
     lotsoflongargs5: T,
 ) -> T: ...
+
+
+# Decorators
+@decorator
+# comment
+def foo[S](x: S) -> S: ...
+
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+def foo(x: S) -> S: ...
+
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+def foo() -> S: ...
+
+
+@decorator
+# comment
+@decorator2
+def foo(x: S) -> S: ...
+
+
+@decorator  # comment
+def foo(x: S) -> S: ...
 ```