## Summary
Fixed false-positive on the rule `PLW1641`, where the explicit
assignment on the `__hash__` method is not counted as an definition of
`__hash__`. (Discussed in #10557).
Also, added one new testcase.
## Test Plan
Checked on `cargo test` in `eq_without_hash.py`.
Before the change, for the assignment into `__hash__`, only `__hash__ =
None` was counted as an explicit definition of `__hash__` method.
Probably any assignment into `__hash__` property could be counted as an
explicit definition of hash, so I removed `value.is_none_literal_expr()`
check.
## Summary
Closes#10228
The PR makes the blank lines rules keep track of the cell status when
running on a notebook, and makes the rules not trigger when the line is
the first of the cell.
## Test Plan
The example given in #10228 is added as a fixture, along with a few
tests from the main blank lines fixtures.
## Summary
Closes#10337.
I've fixed the code to count usage of variable.
Usage count inside the block is reset when there is a following
statement.
- continue
- break
- return
## Test Plan
Add test case.
## Summary
The fix for PYI025 is currently marked as unsafe in non-global scopes
for both `.py` and `.pyi` files, on the grounds that all global-scope
symbols in Python are implicitly exported from the module, so changing
the name of something in the global scope could break other modules that
import the module we're fixing. Unlike in `.py` files, however, imported
symbols are never implicitly re-exported from stub files. Symbols are
only understood by static analysis tools as being re-exported from stubs
if they are marked as explicit re-exports, which take three forms:
```py
from foo import * # all symbols from foo are re-exported from the stub
# the "redundant" alias marks it as an explicit re-export
# (note that the alias needs to be identical to the symbol's "actual" name
# in order for it to be a re-export)
from bar import barrr as barrr
# inclusion in __all__ also marks it as an explicit re-export,
# just like in `.py` files
from baz import bazzz
__all__ = ["bazzz"]
```
This is [specc'd in PEP
484](https://peps.python.org/pep-0484/#stub-files), and means that we
can mark the fix for PYI025 as safe in more cases for `.pyi` files.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`. An existing test case goes from being an unsafe fix to a
safe fix in a `.pyi` fixture. I also added a new fixture so we have
coverage of global-scope imports that are marked as re-exports using
"redundant" `from collections.abc import Set as Set` aliases.
## Summary
This error was found browsing
https://github.com/qarmin/Automated-Fuzzer/actions/runs/8396966850.
Which failed when trying to autofix the PT014 violation in the following
code:
```python
@pytest.mark.parametrize('data, spec', [(1.0, 1.0), (1.0, 1.0)])
def test_numbers(data, spec):
...
```
Investigation revealed that the implementation was not properly tested,
when the duplicate value was also the last in the list. In particular
the following function, which is in charge of finding the comma
following an element to create the suggested fix,
0a99bd84ce/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_pytest_style/rules/parametrize.rs (L647-L651)
would find the next comma even if it was outside the list itself leading
to a lot of code being deleted.
This PR fixes that.
## Test Plan
Added misbehaving code to the test fixture.
## Summary
Ensures that we use the raw identifier as provided in the source code,
rather than the normalized Unicode identifier.
This _does_ mean that we treat these as two separate identifiers, and
_don't_ merge them, even though Python will treat them as the same
symbol:
```python
import numpy as ℂℇℊℋℌℍℎℐℑℒℓℕℤΩℨKÅℬℭℯℰℱℹℴ
import numpy as CƐgHHHhIILlNZΩZKÅBCeEFio
```
I think that's fine, this is super rare anyway and would likely be
confusing for users.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10528.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
In https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10341, we fixed some false
positives in `.pyi` files, but introduced others. This PR effectively
reverts the change in #10341 and fixes it in a slightly different way.
Instead of changing the _bindings_ we generate in the semantic model in
`.pyi` files, we instead change how we _resolve_ them.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10509.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fix `E231` bug: Inconsistent catch compared to pycodestyle, such as when
dict nested in list. Resolves#10113.
## Test Plan
Example from #10113 added to test fixture.
## Summary
This PR fixes a panic in the linter for `W605`.
Consider the following f-string:
```python
f"{{}}ab"
```
The `FStringMiddle` token would contain `{}ab`. Notice that the escaped
braces have _reduced_ the string. This means we cannot use the text
value from the token to determine the location of the escape sequence
but need to extract it from the source code.
fixes: #10434
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and update the snapshots.
## Summary
We're seeing failures in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10470
because `resolve_qualified_import_name` isn't guaranteed to return a
specific import if a symbol is accessible in two ways (e.g., you have
both `import logging` and `from logging import error` in scope, and you
want `logging.error`). This PR breaks up the failing tests such that the
imports aren't in the same scope.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10470.
## Test Plan
I added a `bindings.reverse()` to `resolve_qualified_import_name` to
ensure that the tests pass regardless of the binding order.
## Summary
This adds automatic fixes for the `PT007` rule.
I am currently reviewing and adding Ruff rules to Home Assistant. One
rule is PT007, which has multiple hundred occurrences in the codebase,
but no automatic fix, and this is not fun to do manually, especially
because using Regexes are not really possible with this.
My knowledge of the Ruff codebase and Rust in general is not good and
this is my first PR here, so I hope it is not too bad.
One thing where I need help is: How can I have the transformed code to
be formatted automatically, instead of it being minimized as it does it
now?
## Test Plan
Using the existing fixtures and updated snapshots.
## Summary
In issue https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6785 it is reported
that a docstring in the form of `''"assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''`
is autocorrected to `"""assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''` (note the
triple quotes one only one side), which breaks the python program due
`undetermined string lateral`.
* `Q002`: Not only would docstrings in the form of `''"assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` (single quotes) be autofixed wrongly, but also
e.g. `""'assert' ' SAM macro definitions '''` (double quotes). The bug
is present for docstrings in all scopes (e.g. module docstrings, class
docstrings, function docstrings)
* `Q000`: The autofix error is not only present for `Q002` (docstrings),
but also for inline strings (`Q000`). Therefore `s = ''"assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` will also be wrongly autofixed.
Note that situation in which the first string is non-empty can be fixed,
e.g. `'123'"assert" ' SAM macro definitions '''` -> `"123""assert" ' SAM
macro definitions '''` is valid.
## What
* Change FixAvailability of `Q000` `Q002` to `Sometimes`
* Changed both rules such that docstrings/inline strings that cannot be
fixed are still reported as bad quotes via diagnostics, but no fix is
provided
## Test Plan
* For `Q000`: Add docstrings in different scopes that (partially) would
have been autofixed wrongly
* For `Q002`: Add inline strings that (partially) would have been
autofixed wrongly
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6785
Fixes#10426
## Summary
Fix rule B030 giving a false positive with Tuple operations like `+`.
[Playground](https://play.ruff.rs/17b086bc-cc43-40a7-b5bf-76d7d5fce78a)
```python
try:
...
except (ValueError,TypeError) + (EOFError,ArithmeticError):
...
```
## Reviewer notes
This is a little more convoluted than I was expecting -- because we can
have valid nested Tuples with operations done on them, the flattening
logic has become a bit more complex.
Shall I guard this behind --preview?
## Test Plan
Unit tested.
## Summary
Implement `singledispatchmethod-function` from pylint, part of #970.
This is essentially a copy paste of #8934 for `@singledispatchmethod`
decorator.
## Test Plan
Text fixture added.
## Summary
Short-circuit implementation mentioned in #10403.
I implemented this by extending C400:
- Made `UnnecessaryGeneratorList` have information of whether the the
short-circuiting occurred (to put diagnostic)
- Add additional check for whether in `unnecessary_generator_list`
function.
Please give me suggestions if you think this isn't the best way to
handle this :)
## Test Plan
Extended `C400.py` a little, and written the cases where:
- Code could be converted to one single conversion to `list` e.g.
`list(x for x in range(3))` -> `list(range(3))`
- Code couldn't be converted to one single conversion to `list` e.g.
`list(2 * x for x in range(3))` -> `[2 * x for x in range(3)]`
- `list` function is not built-in, and should not modify the code in any
way.
## Summary
Trailing ellipses in objects defined in `typing.TYPE_CHECKING` might be
meaningful (it might be declaring a stub). Thus, we should skip the
`unnecessary-placeholder` (`PIE970`) rule in such contexts.
Closes#10358.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Given `del X`, we'll typically add a `BindingKind::Deletion` to `X` to
shadow the current binding. However, if the deletion is inside of a
conditional operation, we _won't_, as in:
```python
def f():
global X
if X > 0:
del X
```
We will, however, track it as a reference to the binding. This PR adds
the expression context to those resolved references, so that we can
detect that the `X` in `global X` was "assigned to".
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10397.
## Summary
Ignoring all lines until the first logical line does not match the
behavior from pycodestyle. This PR therefore removes the `if
state.is_not_first_logical_line` skipping the line check before the
first logical line, and applies it only to `E302`.
For example, in the snippet below a rule violation should be detected on
the second comment and on the import.
```python
# first comment
# second comment
import foo
```
Fixes#10374
## Test Plan
Add test cases, update the snapshots and verify the ecosystem check output
## Summary
This PR updates the `StringLike::FString` variant to use `ExprFString`
instead of `FStringLiteralElement`.
For context, the reason it used `FStringLiteralElement` is that the node
is actually the string part of an f-string ("foo" in `f"foo{x}"`). But,
this is inconsistent with other variants where the captured value is the
_entire_ string.
This is also problematic w.r.t. implicitly concatenated strings. Any
rules which work with `StringLike::FString` doesn't account for the
string part in an implicitly concatenated f-strings. For example, we
don't flag confusable character in the first part of `"𝐁ad" f"𝐁ad
string"`, but only the second part
(https://play.ruff.rs/16071c4c-a1dd-4920-b56f-e2ce2f69c843).
### Update `PYI053`
_This is included in this PR because otherwise it requires a temporary
workaround to be compatible with the old logic._
This PR also updates the `PYI053` (`string-or-bytes-too-long`) rule for
f-string to consider _all_ the visible characters in a f-string,
including the ones which are implicitly concatenated. This is consistent
with implicitly concatenated strings and bytes.
For example,
```python
def foo(
# We count all the characters here
arg1: str = '51 character ' 'stringgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg',
# But not here because of the `{x}` replacement field which _breaks_ them up into two chunks
arg2: str = f'51 character {x} stringgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg',
) -> None: ...
```
This PR fixes it to consider all _visible_ characters inside an f-string
which includes expressions as well.
fixes: #10310fixes: #10307
## Test Plan
Add new test cases and update the snapshots.
## Review
To facilitate the review process, the change have been split into two
commits: one which has the code change while the other has the test
cases and updated snapshots.
## Summary
Fix "TRIO115 false positive with with sleep(var) where var starts as 0"
#9935 based on the discussion in the issue.
## Test Plan
Issue code added to fixture
## Summary
I used `codespell` and `gramma` to identify mispellings and grammar
errors throughout the codebase and fixed them. I tried not to make any
controversial changes, but feel free to revert as you see fit.
## Summary
When negating an expression like `a or b`, we need to wrap it in
parentheses, e.g., `not (a or b)` instead of `not a or b`, due to
operator precedence.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10335.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
This PR fixes the following false positive in a `.pyi` stub file:
```py
x: int
y = x # F821 currently emitted here, but shouldn't be in a stub file
```
In a `.py` file, this is invalid regardless of whether `from __future__ import annotations` is enabled or not. In a `.pyi` stub file, however, it's always valid, as an annotation counts as a binding in a stub file even if no value is assigned to the variable.
I also added more test coverage for `.pyi` stub files in various edge cases where ruff's behaviour is currently correct, but where `.pyi` stub files do slightly different things to `.py` files.
## Summary
Fixes#10295.
`E225` (`Missing whitespace around operator`) and `E275` (`Missing
whitespace after keyword`) try to add a white space even when the next
character is a `)` (which is a syntax error in most cases, the
exceptions already being handled). This causes `E202` (`Whitespace
before close bracket`) to try to remove the added whitespace, resulting
in an infinite loop when `E225`/`E275` re-add it.
This PR adds an exception in `E225` and `E275` to not trigger in case
the next token is a `)`. It is a bit simplistic, but it solves the
example given in the issue without introducing a change in behavior
(according to the fixtures).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` and the `ruff-ecosystem` check were used to check that the
PR's changes do not have side-effects.
A new fixture was added to check that running the 3 rules on the example
given in the issue does not cause ruff to fail to converge.
## Summary
The code later in this file that checks for slices relies on the stack
of brackets to determine the position. I'm not sure why format strings
were being excluded from this, but the tests still pass with these match
guards removed.
Closes#10278
## Test Plan
~Still needs a test.~ Test case added for this example.
## Summary
Given a format string like `"{x} {x}".format(x=foo())`, we should avoid
converting to an f-string, since doing so would require repeating the
function call (`f"{foo()} {foo()}"`), which could introduce side
effects.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10258.
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10039
The [recommendation for typing stub
files](https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/source/stubs.html#blank-lines)
is to use **one** blank line to group related definitions and
otherwise omit blank lines.
The newly added blank line rules (`E3*`) didn't account for typing stub
files and enforced two empty lines at the top level and one empty line
otherwise, making it impossible to group related definitions.
This PR implements the `E3*` rules to:
* Not enforce blank lines. The use of blank lines in typing definitions
is entirely up to the user.
* Allow at most one empty line, including between top level statements.
## Test Plan
Added unit tests (It may look odd that many snapshots are empty but the
point is that the rule should no longer emit diagnostics)
## Summary
This PR changes the `E3*` rules to respect the `isort`
`lines-after-imports` and `lines-between-types` settings. Specifically,
the following rules required changing
* `TooManyBlannkLines` : Respects both settings.
* `BlankLinesTopLevel`: Respects `lines-after-imports`. Doesn't need to
respect `lines-between-types` because it only applies to classes and
functions
The downside of this approach is that `isort` and the blank line rules
emit a diagnostic when there are too many blank lines. The fixes aren't
identical, the blank line is less opinionated, but blank lines accepts
the fix of `isort`.
<details>
<summary>Outdated approach</summary>
Fixes
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10077#issuecomment-1961266981
This PR changes the blank line rules to not enforce the number of blank
lines after imports (top-level) if isort is enabled and leave it to
isort to enforce the right number of lines (depends on the
`isort.lines-after-imports` and `isort.lines-between-types` settings).
The reason to give `isort` precedence over the blank line rules is that
they are configurable. Users that always want to blank lines after
imports can use `isort.lines-after-imports=2` to enforce that
(specifically for imports).
This PR does not fix the incompatibility with the formatter in pyi files
that only uses 0 to 1 blank lines. I'll address this separately.
</details>
## Review
The first commit is a small refactor that simplified implementing the
fix (and makes it easier to reason about what's mutable and what's not).
## Test Plan
I added a new test and verified that it fails with an error that the fix
never converges. I verified the snapshot output after implementing the
fix.
---------
Co-authored-by: Hoël Bagard <34478245+hoel-bagard@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
This PR fixes for `invalid-first-argument` rules.
The fixes rename the first argument of methods and class methods to the
valid one. References to this argument are also renamed.
Fixes are skipped when another argument is named as the valid first
argument.
The fix is marked as unsafe due
The functions for the `N804` and `N805` rules are now merged, as they
only differ by the name of the valid first argument.
The rules were moved from the AST iteration to the deferred scopes to be
in the function scope while creating the fix.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Fixes#10174 by allowing match cases to be enclosing nodes for
suppression comments. `else/elif` clauses are now also allowed to be
enclosing nodes.
## Test Plan
I've added the offending code from the original issue to the `RUF028`
snapshot test, and I've also expanded it to test the allowed `else/elif`
clause.
## Summary
This fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7868.
Support isort's `default-section` feature which allows any imports that
match sections that are not in `section-order` to be mapped to a
specifically named section.
https://pycqa.github.io/isort/docs/configuration/options.html#default-section
This has a few implications:
- It is no longer required that all known sections are defined in
`section-order`.
- This is technically a bw-incompat change because currently if folks
define custom groups, and do not define a `section-order`, the code used
to add all known sections to `section-order` while emitting warnings.
**However, when this happened, users would be seeing warnings so I do
not think it should count as a bw-incompat change.**
## Test Plan
- Added a new test.
- Did not break any existing tests.
Finally, I ran the following config against Pyramid's complex codebase
that was previously using isort and this change worked there.
### pyramid's previous isort config
5f7e286b06/pyproject.toml (L22-L37)
```toml
[tool.isort]
profile = "black"
multi_line_output = 3
src_paths = ["src", "tests"]
skip_glob = ["docs/*"]
include_trailing_comma = true
force_grid_wrap = false
combine_as_imports = true
line_length = 79
force_sort_within_sections = true
no_lines_before = "THIRDPARTY"
sections = "FUTURE,THIRDPARTY,FIRSTPARTY,LOCALFOLDER"
default_section = "THIRDPARTY"
known_first_party = "pyramid"
```
### tested with ruff isort config
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.isort]
case-sensitive = true
combine-as-imports = true
force-sort-within-sections = true
section-order = [
"future",
"third-party",
"first-party",
"local-folder",
]
default-section = "third-party"
known-first-party = [
"pyramid",
]
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
Fixes#6611
## Summary
This lint rule spots comments that are _intended_ to suppress or enable
the formatter, but will be ignored by the Ruff formatter.
We borrow some functions the formatter uses for determining comment
placement / putting them in context within an AST.
The analysis function uses an AST visitor to visit each comment and
attach it to the AST. It then uses that context to check:
1. Is this comment in an expression?
2. Does this comment have bad placement? (e.g. a `# fmt: skip` above a
function instead of at the end of a line)
3. Is this comment redundant?
4. Does this comment actually suppress any code?
5. Does this comment have ambiguous placement? (e.g. a `# fmt: off`
above an `else:` block)
If any of these are true, a violation is thrown. The reported reason
depends on the order of the above check-list: in other words, a `# fmt:
skip` comment on its own line within a list expression will be reported
as being in an expression, since that reason takes priority.
The lint suggests removing the comment as an unsafe fix, regardless of
the reason.
## Test Plan
A snapshot test has been created.
## Summary
Currently, rule `RUF015` is not able to detect the usage of
`list(iterable).pop(0)` falling under the category of an _unnecessary
iterable allocation for accessing the first element_. This PR wants to
change that. See the underlying issue for more details.
* Provide extension to detect `list(iterable).pop(0)`, but not
`list(iterable).pop(i)` where i > 1
* Update corresponding doc
## Test Plan
* `RUF015.py` and the corresponding snap file were extended such that
their correspond to the new behaviour
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9190
---
PS: I've only been working on this ticket as I haven't seen any activity
from issue assignee @rmad17, neither in this repo nor in a fork. I hope
I interpreted his inactivity correctly. Didn't mean to steal his chance.
Since I stumbled across the underlying problem myself, I wanted to offer
a solution as soon as possible.
## Summary
It is a convention to use the `_()` alias for `gettext()`. We want to
avoid
statement expressions and assignments related to aliases of the gettext
API.
See https://docs.python.org/3/library/gettext.html for details. When one
uses `_() to mark a string for translation, the tools look for these
markers
and replace the original string with its translated counterpart. If the
string contains variable placeholders or formatting, it can complicate
the
translation process, lead to errors or incorrect translations.
## Test Plan
* Test file `RUF027_1.py` was extended such that the test reproduces the
false-positive
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10023.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Update PLR1714 to ignore `sys.platform` and `sys.version` checks.
I'm not sure if these checks or if we need to add more. Please advise.
Fixes#10017
## Test Plan
Added a new test case and ran `cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Allows, e.g.:
```python
import os
os.environ["WORLD_SIZE"] = "1"
os.putenv("CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES", "4")
import torch
```
For now, this is only allowed in preview.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10059
## Summary
Closes#10031
- Detect commented out `case` statements. Playground repro:
https://play.ruff.rs/5a305aa9-6e5c-4fa4-999a-8fc427ab9a23
- Add more support for one-line commented out code.
## Test Plan
Unit tested and tested with
```sh
cargo run -p ruff -- check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/eradicate/ERA001.py --no-cache --preview --select ERA001
```
TODO:
- [x] `cargo insta test`
## Summary
Fixes#9895
The cause for this panic came from an offset error in the code. When
analyzing a hypothetical f-string, we attempt to re-parse it as an
f-string, and use the AST data to determine, among other things, whether
the format specifiers are correct. To determine the 'correctness' of a
format specifier, we actually have to re-parse the format specifier, and
this is where the issue lies. To get the source text for the specifier,
we were taking a slice from the original file source text... even though
the AST data for the specifier belongs to the standalone parsed f-string
expression, meaning that the ranges are going to be way off. In a file
with Unicode, this can cause panics if the slice is inside a char
boundary.
To fix this, we now slice from the temporary source we created earlier
to parse the literal as an f-string.
## Test Plan
The RUF027 snapshot test was amended to include a string with format
specifiers which we _should_ be calling out. This is to ensure we do
slice format specifiers from the source text correctly.
## Summary
Ignore `async for` loops when checking the SIM113 rule.
Closes#9995
## Test Plan
A new test case was added to SIM113.py with an async for loop.
## Summary
Implement [implicit readlines
(FURB129)](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/implicit_readlines.py)
lint.
## Notes
I need a help/an opinion about suggested implementations.
This implementation differs from the original one from `refurb` in the
following way. This implementation checks syntactically the call of the
method with the name `readlines()` inside `for` {loop|generator
expression}. The implementation from refurb also
[checks](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/implicit_readlines.py#L43)
that callee is a variable with a type `io.TextIOWrapper` or
`io.BufferedReader`.
- I do not see a simple way to implement the same logic.
- The best I can have is something like
```rust
checker.semantic().binding(checker.semantic().resolve_name(attr_expr.value.as_name_expr()?)?).statement(checker.semantic())
```
and analyze cases. But this will be not about types, but about guessing
the type by assignment (or with) expression.
- Also this logic has several false negatives, when the callee is not a
variable, but the result of function call (e.g. `open(...)`).
- On the other side, maybe it is good to lint this on other things,
where this suggestion is not safe, and push the developers to change
their interfaces to be less surprising, comparing with the standard
library.
- Anyway while the current implementation has false-positives (I
mentioned some of them in the test) I marked the fixes to be unsafe.
## Summary
Accept 0.0 and 1.0 as common magic values. This is in line with the
pylint behaviour, and I think makes sense conceptually.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pylint/magic_value_comparison.py`
## Summary
This PR ensures that if a list `x` is modified within a `for` loop, we
avoid flagging `list(x)` as unnecessary. Previously, we only detected
calls to exactly `.append`, and they couldn't be nested within other
statements.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9925.
## Summary
If these are defined within class scopes, they're actually attributes of
the class, and can be accessed through the class itself.
(We preserve our existing behavior for `.pyi` files.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9948.
## Summary
Currently these rules apply the heuristic that if the original sequence
doesn't have a newline in between the final sequence item and the
closing parenthesis, the autofix won't add one for you. The feedback
from @ThiefMaster, however, was that this was producing slightly unusual
formatting -- things like this:
```py
__all__ = [
"b", "c",
"a", "d"]
```
were being autofixed to this:
```py
__all__ = [
"a",
"b",
"c",
"d"]
```
When, if it was _going_ to be exploded anyway, they'd prefer something
like this (with the closing parenthesis on its own line, and a trailing comma added):
```py
__all__ = [
"a",
"b",
"c",
"d",
]
```
I'm still pretty skeptical that we'll be able to please everybody here
with the formatting choices we make; _but_, on the other hand, this
_specific_ change is pretty easy to make.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`. I also ran the autofixes for RUF022 and RUF023 on CPython
to check how they looked; they looked fine to me.
## Summary
If a generic appears multiple times on the right-hand side, we should
only include it once on the left-hand side when rewriting.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9904.
## Summary
This review contains a fix for
[D405](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/capitalize-section-name/)
(capitalize-section-name)
The problem is that Ruff considers the sub-section header as a normal
section if it has the same name as some section name. For instance, a
function/method has an argument named "parameters". This only applies if
you use Numpy style docstring.
See: [ISSUE](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9806)
The following will not raise D405 after the fix:
```python
def some_function(parameters: list[str]):
"""A function with a parameters parameter
Parameters
----------
parameters:
A list of string parameters
"""
...
```
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Mikko Leppänen <mikko.leppanen@vaisala.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Fixes#9857.
## Summary
Statements like `logging.info("Today it is: {day}")` will no longer be
ignored by RUF027. As before, statements like `"Today it is:
{day}".format(day="Tuesday")` will continue to be ignored.
## Test Plan
The snapshot tests were expanded to include new cases. Additionally, the
snapshot tests have been split in two to separate positive cases from
negative cases.
## Summary
Django's `mark_safe` can also be used as a decorator, so we should
detect usages of `@mark_safe` for the purpose of the relevant Bandit
rule.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9780.
These are for descriptors which affects the behavior of the object _as a
property_; I do not think they should be called directly but there is no
alternative when working with the object directly.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9789
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixes#8151
This PR implements a new rule, `RUF027`.
## What it does
Checks for strings that contain f-string syntax but are not f-strings.
### Why is this bad?
An f-string missing an `f` at the beginning won't format anything, and
instead treat the interpolation syntax as literal.
### Example
```python
name = "Sarah"
dayofweek = "Tuesday"
msg = "Hello {name}! It is {dayofweek} today!"
```
It should instead be:
```python
name = "Sarah"
dayofweek = "Tuesday"
msg = f"Hello {name}! It is {dayofweek} today!"
```
## Heuristics
Since there are many possible string literals which contain syntax
similar to f-strings yet are not intended to be,
this lint will disqualify any literal that satisfies any of the
following conditions:
1. The string literal is a standalone expression. For example, a
docstring.
2. The literal is part of a function call with keyword arguments that
match at least one variable (for example: `format("Message: {value}",
value = "Hello World")`)
3. The literal (or a parent expression of the literal) has a direct
method call on it (for example: `"{value}".format(...)`)
4. The string has no `{...}` expression sections, or uses invalid
f-string syntax.
5. The string references variables that are not in scope, or it doesn't
capture variables at all.
6. Any format specifiers in the potential f-string are invalid.
## Test Plan
I created a new test file, `RUF027.py`, which is both an example of what
the lint should catch and a way to test edge cases that may trigger
false positives.
## Summary
It turns out we saw a panic in cases when dedenting blocks like the `def
wrapper` here:
```python
def instrument_url(f: UrlFuncT) -> UrlFuncT:
# TODO: Type this with ParamSpec to preserve the function signature.
if not INSTRUMENTING: # nocoverage -- option is always enabled; should we remove?
return f
else:
def wrapper(
self: "ZulipTestCase", url: str, info: object = {}, **kwargs: Union[bool, str]
) -> HttpResponseBase:
```
Since we relied on the first line to determine the indentation, instead
of the first non-empty line.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Often, when fixing, we need to dedent a block of code (e.g., if we
remove an `if` and dedent its body). Today, we use LibCST to parse and
adjust the indentation, which is really expensive -- but this is only
really necessary if the block contains a multiline string, since naively
adjusting the indentation for such a string can change the whitespace
_within_ the string.
This PR uses a simple dedent implementation for cases in which the block
doesn't intersect with a multi-line string (or an f-string, since we
don't support tracking multi-line strings for f-strings right now).
We could improve this even further by using the ranges to guide the
dedent function, such that we don't apply the dedent if the line starts
within a multiline string. But that would also need to take f-strings
into account, which is a little tricky.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Follow-up to #9754 and #9689. Alternative to #9714.
Marks `TRY200` as removed and redirects to `B904` instead of marking as
deprecated and suggesting `B904` instead.
## Summary
This rule was added to `flake8-type-checking` as `TC010`. We're about to
stabilize it, so we might as well use the correct code.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9573.
## Summary
This rule was added to flake8-bugbear. In general, we tend to prefer
redirecting to prominent plugins when our own rules are reimplemented
(since more projects have `B` activated than `RUF`).
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
# Conflicts:
# crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/mod.rs
## Summary
Just like #6537 and #6538 but for the `default` second parameter to
`getenv()`.
Also rename "BAD" to "BAR" in the tests, since those strings shouldn't
trigger the rule.
## Test Plan
Added passing and failing examples to `invalid_envvar_default.py`.
## Summary
This review contains a fix for
[ASYNC101](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/open-sleep-or-subprocess-in-async-function/)
(open-sleep-or-subprocess-in-async-function)
The problem is that ruff does not take open calls from pathlib.Path into
account in async functions. Path.open() call is still a blocking call.
In addition, PTH123 suggests to use pathlib.Path instead of os.open. So
this might create an additional confusion.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6892
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
Tweaks PLR2004 to show the literal source text, rather than the constant
value.
I noticed this when I had a hexadecimal constant, and the linter turned
it into base-10.
Now, if you have `0x300`, it will show `0x300` instead of `768`.
Also, added backticks around the constant in the output message.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Given:
```python
from dataclasses import InitVar, dataclass
@dataclass
class C:
i: int
j: int = None
database: InitVar[DatabaseType] = None
def __post_init__(self, database):
if self.j is None and database is not None:
self.j = database.lookup('j')
c = C(10, database=my_database)
```
We should avoid marking `InitVar` as typing-only, since it _is_ required
by the dataclass at runtime.
Note that by default, we _already_ don't flag this, since the
`@dataclass` member is needed at runtime too -- so it's only a problem
with `strict` mode.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9666.
## Summary
Per https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9570:
> `dtype` are a bit of a strange beast, but definitely best thought of
as instances, not classes, and they are meant to be comparable not just
to their own class, but also to the corresponding scalar types (e.g.,
`x.dtype == np.float32`) and strings (e.g., `x.dtype == ['i1,i4']`;
basically, `__eq__` always tries to do `dtype(other)`.
This PR thus allows comparisons to `dtype` in preview.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9570.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This review contains a fix for
[RET504](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/unnecessary-assign/)
(unnecessary-assign)
The problem is that Ruff suggests combining a return statement inside
contextlib.suppress. Even though it is an unsafe fix it might lead to an
invalid code that is not equivalent to the original one.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5909
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
This review contains a fix for
[PIE810](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/multiple-starts-ends-with/)
(multiple-starts-ends-with)
The problem is that ruff suggests combining multiple startswith/endswith
calls into a single call even though there might be a call with tuple of
strs. This leads to calling startswith/endswith with tuple of tuple of
strs which is incorrect and violates startswith/endswith conctract and
results in runtime failure.
However the following will be valid and fixed correctly =>
```python
x = ("hello", "world")
y = "h"
z = "w"
msg = "hello world"
if msg.startswith(x) or msg.startswith(y) or msg.startswith(z) :
sys.exit(1)
```
```
ruff --fix --select PIE810 --unsafe-fixes
```
=>
```python
if msg.startswith(x) or msg.startswith((y,z)):
sys.exit(1)
```
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8906
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
This rule was just incorrect, it didn't match the examples in the docs.
(It's a very rarely-used rule since it's not included in any of the
conventions.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9452.
## Summary
Add a rule for defaultdict(default_factory=callable). Instead suggest
using defaultdict(callable).
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9509
If a user tries to bind a "non-callable" to default_factory, the rule
ignores it. Another option would be to warn that it's probably not what
you want. Because Python allows the following:
```python
from collections import defaultdict
defaultdict(default_factory=1)
```
this raises after you actually try to use it:
```python
dd = defaultdict(default_factory=1)
dd[1]
```
=>
```bash
KeyError: 1
```
Instead using callable directly in the constructor it will raise (not
being a callable):
```python
from collections import defaultdict
defaultdict(1)
```
=>
```bash
TypeError: first argument must be callable or None
```
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
When we are analyzing the implicit return rule this change add an
additional check to verify if the call expression has been annotated
with NoReturn type from typing module.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5474
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
Checks for unnecessary `dict` comprehension when creating a new
dictionary from iterable. Suggest to replace with
`dict.fromkeys(iterable)`
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9592
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
This PR introduces a new rule to sort `__slots__` and `__match_args__`
according to a [natural sort](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_sort_order), as was
requested in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/1198#issuecomment-1881418365.
The implementation here generalises some of the machinery introduced in
3aae16f1bd
so that different kinds of sorts can be applied to lists of string
literals. (We use an "isort-style" sort for `__all__`, but that isn't
really appropriate for `__slots__` and `__match_args__`, where nearly
all items will be snake_case.) Several sections of code have been moved
from `sort_dunder_all.rs` to a new module, `sorting_helpers.rs`, which
`sort_dunder_all.rs` and `sort_dunder_slots.rs` both make use of.
`__match_args__` is very similar to `__all__`, in that it can only be a
tuple or a list. `__slots__` differs from the other two, however, in
that it can be any iterable of strings. If slots is a dictionary, the
values are used by the builtin `help()` function as per-attribute
docstrings that show up in the output of `help()`. (There's no
particular use-case for making `__slots__` a set, but it's perfectly
legal at runtime, so there's no reason for us not to handle it in this
rule.)
Note that we don't do an autofix for multiline `__slots__` if `__slots__` is a dictionary: that's out of scope. Everything else, we can nearly always fix, however.
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`.
I also ran this rule on CPython, and the diff looked pretty good
---
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
Implement rule `mutable-fromkeys-value` (`RUF023`).
Autofixes
```python
dict.fromkeys(foo, [])
```
to
```python
{key: [] for key in foo}
```
The fix is marked as unsafe as it changes runtime behaviour. It also
uses `key` as the comprehension variable, which may not always be
desired.
Closes#4613.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR detects whether PLR0917 is being applied to a method or class
method, and if so, it ignores the first argument for the purposes of
counting the number of positional arguments.
## Test Plan
New tests have been added to the corresponding fixture.
Closes#9552.
## Summary
Long ago, we had a single `ruff` crate. We started to break that up, and
at some point, we wanted to separate the CLI from the core library. So
we created `ruff_cli`, which created a `ruff` binary. Later, the `ruff`
crate was renamed to `ruff_linter` and further broken up into additional
crates.
(This is all from memory -- I didn't bother to look through the history
to ensure that this is 100% correct :))
Now that `ruff` no longer exists, this PR renames `ruff_cli` to `ruff`.
The primary benefit is that the binary target and the crate name are now
the same, which helps with downstream tooling like `cargo-dist`, and
also removes some complexity from the crate and `Cargo.toml` itself.
## Test Plan
- Ran `rm -rf target/release`.
- Ran `cargo build --release`.
- Verified that `./target/release/ruff` was created.
## Summary
#5920 with a fix for the erroneous slice in `module_name`. Fixes#9547.
## Test Plan
Added `import bbb.ccc._ddd as eee` to the test fixture to ensure it no
longer panics.
`cargo test`
## Summary
This implements the rule proposed in #1198 (though it doesn't close the
issue, as there are some open questions about configuration that might
merit some further discussion).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`. I also ran this PR branch on the CPython
codebase with `--fix --select=RUF022 --preview `, and the results looked
pretty good to me.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
hikaru-kajita
Hoël Bagard
yt2b
Alex Waygood
Dhruv Manilawala
Auguste Lalande
Charlie Marsh
Aleksei Latyshev
Sergey Chudov
Sid
Robin Caloudis
Ottavio Hartman
Steve C
Tom Kuson
Mathieu Kniewallner
Samuel Cormier-Iijima
Micha Reiser
Gautier Moin
Jeremy Hiatt
Jane Lewis
Michael Merickel
Mikko Leppänen
Shaygan Hooshyari
Justin Sexton
Seo Sanghyeon
Arjun Munji
Daniël van Noord
Adrien Ball
Asger Hautop Drewsen
Jack McIvor
Zanie Blue
Christopher Covington
Bartosz Sławecki
Akira Noda
Thomas M Kehrenberg