## Summary
Give red-knot the ability to infer int literal types. This is quick and
easy, mostly because these types are a convenient way to observe
control-flow handling with simple assignments.
## Test Plan
Added test.
* Add a module type, `ModuleTypeId`
* Add an attribute lookup method `get_member` for `Type`
* Only implemented for `ModuleTypeId` and `ClassTypeId`
* [x] Should this be a trait?
*Answer: no*
* [x] Uses `unwrap`, but we should remove that. Maybe add a new variant
to `QueryError`?
*Answer: Return `Option<Type>` as is done elsewhere*
* Add `infer_definition_type` case for `Import`
* Add `infer_expr_type` case for `Attribute`
* Add a test to exercise these
* [x] remove all NOTE/FIXME/TODO after discussing with reviewers
## Summary
Lots of TODOs and things to clean up here, but it demonstrates the
working lint rule.
## Test Plan
```
➜ cat main.py
from typing import override
from base import B
class C(B):
@override
def method(self): pass
➜ cat base.py
class B: pass
➜ cat typing.py
def override(func):
return func
```
(We provide our own `typing.py` since we don't have typeshed vendored or
type stub support yet.)
```
➜ ./target/debug/red_knot main.py
...
1 0.012086s TRACE red_knot Main Loop: Tick
[crates/red_knot/src/main.rs:157:21] diagnostics = [
"Method C.method is decorated with `typing.override` but does not override any base class method",
]
```
If we add `def method(self): pass` to class `B` in `base.py` and run
red_knot again, there is no lint error.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
This PR vendors typeshed!
- The first commit vendors the stdlib directory from typeshed into a new crates/red_knot/vendored_typeshed directory.
- The second commit adjusts various linting config files to make sure that the vendored code is excluded from typo checks, formatting checks, etc.
- The LICENSE and README.md files are also vendored, but all other directories and files (stubs, scripts, tests, test_cases, etc.) are excluded. We should have no need for them (except possibly stubs/, discussed in more depth below).
- Similar to the way pyright has a commit.txt file in its vendored copy of typeshed, to indicate which typeshed commit the vendored code corresponds to, I've also added a crates/red_knot/vendored_typeshed/source_commit.txt file in the third commit of this PR.
One open question is: should we vendor the stdlib and stubs directories, or just the stdlib directory? The stubs/ directory contains stubs for 162 third-party packages outside the stdlib. Mypy and typeshed_client1 only vendor the stdlib directory; pyright and pyre vendor both the stdlib and stubs directories; pytype vendors the entire typeshed repo (scripts/, tests/ and all).
In this PR, I've chosen to copy mypy and typeshed_client. Unlike vendoring the stdlib, which is unavoidable if we want to do typechecking of the stdlib, it's not strictly necessary to vendor the stubs directory: each subdirectory in stubs is published to PyPI as a standalone stubs distribution that can be (uv)-pip-installed into a virtual environment. It might be useful for our users if we vendored those stubs anyway, but there are costs as well as benefits to doing so (apart from just the sheer amount of vendored code in the ruff repository), so I'd rather consider it separately.
* Add `decorators: Vec<Type>` to `FunctionType` struct
* Thread decorators through two `add_function` definitions
* Populate decorators at the callsite in `infer_symbol_type`
* Small test
## Summary
This PR changes the `DebugStatistics` and `ReleaseStatistics` structs so
that they implement a common `StatisticsRecorder` trait, and makes the
`KeyValueCache` struct generic over a type parameter bound to that
trait. The advantage of this approach is that it's much harder for the
`DebugStatistics` and `ReleaseStatistics` structs to accidentally grow
out of sync in the methods that they implement, which was the cause of
the release-build failure recently fixed in #11177.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot` and `cargo build --release` both continue to
pass for me locally
* Adds `Symbol.flag` bitfield. Populates it from (the three renamed)
`add_or_update_symbol*` methods.
* Currently there are these flags supported:
* `IS_DEFINED` is set in a scope where a variable is defined.
* `IS_USED` is set in a scope where a variable is referenced. (To have
both this and `IS_DEFINED` would require two separate appearances of a
variable in the same scope-- one def and one use.)
* `MARKED_GLOBAL` and `MARKED_NONLOCAL` are **not yet implemented**.
(*TODO: While traversing, if you find these declarations, add these
flags to the variable.*)
* Adds `Symbol.kind` field (commented) and the data structure which will
populate it: `Kind` which is an enum of freevar, cellvar,
implicit_global, and implicit_local. **Not yet populated**. (*TODO: a
second pass over the scope (or the ast?) will observe the
`MARKED_GLOBAL` and `MARKED_NONLOCAL` flags to populate this field. When
that's added, we'll uncomment the field.*)
* Adds a few tests that the `IS_DEFINED` and `IS_USED` fields are
correctly set and/or merged:
* Unit test that subsequent calls to `add_or_update_symbol` will merge
the flag arguments.
* Unit test that in the statement `x = foo`, the variable `foo` is
considered used but not defined.
* Unit test that in the statement `from bar import foo`, the variable
`foo` is considered defined but not used.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
`cargo build --release` currently fails to compile on `main`:
<details>
```
error[E0599]: no method named `hit` found for struct `ReleaseStatistics` in the current scope
--> crates/red_knot/src/cache.rs:22:29
|
22 | self.statistics.hit();
| ^^^ method not found in `ReleaseStatistics`
...
145 | pub struct ReleaseStatistics;
| ---------------------------- method `hit` not found for this struct
error[E0599]: no method named `miss` found for struct `ReleaseStatistics` in the current scope
--> crates/red_knot/src/cache.rs:25:29
|
25 | self.statistics.miss();
| ^^^^ method not found in `ReleaseStatistics`
...
145 | pub struct ReleaseStatistics;
| ---------------------------- method `miss` not found for this struct
error[E0599]: no method named `hit` found for struct `ReleaseStatistics` in the current scope
--> crates/red_knot/src/cache.rs:36:33
|
36 | self.statistics.hit();
| ^^^ method not found in `ReleaseStatistics`
...
145 | pub struct ReleaseStatistics;
| ---------------------------- method `hit` not found for this struct
error[E0599]: no method named `miss` found for struct `ReleaseStatistics` in the current scope
--> crates/red_knot/src/cache.rs:41:33
|
41 | self.statistics.miss();
| ^^^^ method not found in `ReleaseStatistics`
...
145 | pub struct ReleaseStatistics;
| ---------------------------- method `miss` not found for this struct
```
</details>
This is because in a release build, `CacheStatistics` is a type alias
for `ReleaseStatistics`, and `ReleaseStatistics` doesn't have `hit()` or
`miss()` methods. (In a debug build, `CacheStatistics` is a type alias
for `DebugStatistics`, which _does_ have those methods.)
Possibly we could make this less likely to happen in the future by
making both structs implement a common trait instead of using type
aliases that vary depending on whether it's a debug build or not? For
now, though, this PR just brings the two structs in sync w.r.t. the
methods they expose.
## Test Plan
`cargo build --release` now once again compiles for me locally
Carl Meyer
Alex Waygood
plredmond
github-actions[bot]
Charlie Marsh
Micha Reiser
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer