## Summary
This avoids a panic inside `TypeInferenceBuilder::infer_type_parameters`
when encountering generic type aliases:
```py
type ListOrSet[T] = list[T] | set[T]
```
To fix this properly, we would have to treat type aliases as being their own
annotation scope [1]. The left hand side is a definition for the type parameter
`T` which is being used in the special annotation scope on the right hand side.
Similar to how it works for generic functions and classes.
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/reference/compound_stmts.html#generic-type-aliasescloses#14307
## Test Plan
Added new example to the corpus.
When we look up the types of class bases or keywords (`metaclass`), we
currently do this little dance: if there are type params, then look up
the type using `SemanticModel` in the type-params scope, if not, look up
the type directly in the definition's own scope, with support for
deferred types.
With inference of function parameter types, I'm now adding another case
of this same dance, so I'm motivated to make it a bit more ergonomic.
Add support to `definition_expression_ty` to handle any sub-expression
of a definition, whether it is in the definition's own scope or in a
type-params sub-scope.
Related to both #13693 and #14161.
## Summary
Use the memory address to uniquely identify AST nodes, instead of
relying on source range and kind. The latter fails for ASTs resulting
from invalid syntax examples. See #14313 for details.
Also results in a 1-2% speedup
(https://codspeed.io/astral-sh/ruff/runs/67349cf55f36b36baa211360)
closes#14313
## Review
Here are the places where we use `NodeKey` directly or indirectly (via
`ExpressionNodeKey` or `DefinitionNodeKey`):
```rs
// semantic_index.rs
pub(crate) struct SemanticIndex<'db> {
// [...]
/// Map expressions to their corresponding scope.
scopes_by_expression: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, FileScopeId>,
/// Map from a node creating a definition to its definition.
definitions_by_node: FxHashMap<DefinitionNodeKey, Definition<'db>>,
/// Map from a standalone expression to its [`Expression`] ingredient.
expressions_by_node: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, Expression<'db>>,
// [...]
}
// semantic_index/builder.rs
pub(super) struct SemanticIndexBuilder<'db> {
// [...]
scopes_by_expression: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, FileScopeId>,
definitions_by_node: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, Definition<'db>>,
expressions_by_node: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, Expression<'db>>,
}
// semantic_index/ast_ids.rs
pub(crate) struct AstIds {
/// Maps expressions to their expression id.
expressions_map: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, ScopedExpressionId>,
/// Maps expressions which "use" a symbol (that is, [`ast::ExprName`]) to a use id.
uses_map: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, ScopedUseId>,
}
pub(super) struct AstIdsBuilder {
expressions_map: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, ScopedExpressionId>,
uses_map: FxHashMap<ExpressionNodeKey, ScopedUseId>,
}
```
## Test Plan
Added two failing examples to the corpus.
## Summary
Fixes a failing debug assertion that triggers for the following code:
```py
match some_int:
case x:=2:
pass
```
closes#14305
## Test Plan
Added problematic code example to corpus.
## Summary
Resolves#13217.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR improves the fix for `PYI055` to be able to handle nested and
mixed type unions.
It also marks the fix as unsafe when comments are present.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
`pytest-raises-too-broad (PT011)` should be raised when
`expected_exception` is provided as a keyword argument.
```python
def test_foo():
with pytest.raises(ValueError): # raises PT011
raise ValueError("Can't divide 1 by 0")
# This is minor but a valid pytest.raises call
with pytest.raises(expected_exception=ValueError): # doesn't raise PT011 but should
raise ValueError("Can't divide 1 by 0")
```
`pytest.raises` doc:
https://docs.pytest.org/en/8.3.x/reference/reference.html#pytest.raises
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Unit tests
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
## Summary
- Emit diagnostics when looking up (possibly) unbound attributes
- More explicit test assertions for unbound symbols
- Review remaining call sites of `Symbol::ignore_possibly_unbound`. Most
of them are something like `builtins_symbol(self.db,
"Ellipsis").ignore_possibly_unbound().unwrap_or(Type::Unknown)` which
look okay to me, unless we want to emit additional diagnostics. There is
one additional case in enum literal handling, which has a TODO comment
anyway.
part of #14022
## Test Plan
New MD tests for (possibly) unbound attributes.
## Summary
This adds a new diagnostic when possibly unbound symbols are imported.
The `TODO` comment had a question mark, do I'm not sure if this is
really something that we want.
This does not touch the un*declared* case, yet.
relates to: #14022
## Test Plan
Updated already existing tests with new diagnostics
## Summary
Apart from one small functional change, this is mostly a refactoring of
the `Symbol` API:
- Rename `as_type` to the more explicit `ignore_possibly_unbound`, no
functional change
- Remove `unwrap_or_unknown` in favor of the more explicit
`.ignore_possibly_unbound().unwrap_or(Type::Unknown)`, no functional
change
- Consistently call it "possibly unbound" (not "may be unbound")
- Rename `replace_unbound_with` to `or_fall_back_to` and properly handle
boundness of the fall back. This is the only functional change (did not
have any impact on existing tests).
relates to: #14022
## Test Plan
New unit tests for `Symbol::or_fall_back_to`
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Related to #970. Implement [`shallow-copy-environ /
W1507`](https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user_guide/messages/warning/shallow-copy-environ.html).
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Unit test
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon Brugman <sbrugman@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The implicit namespace package rule currently fails to detect cases like
the following:
```text
foo/
├── __init__.py
└── bar/
└── baz/
└── __init__.py
```
The problem is that we detect a root at `foo`, and then an independent
root at `baz`. We _would_ detect that `bar` is an implicit namespace
package, but it doesn't contain any files! So we never check it, and
have no place to raise the diagnostic.
This PR adds detection for these kinds of nested packages, and augments
the `INP` rule to flag the `__init__.py` file above with a specialized
message. As a side effect, I've introduced a dedicated `PackageRoot`
struct which we can pass around in lieu of Yet Another `Path`.
For now, I'm only enabling this in preview (and the approach doesn't
affect any other rules). It's a bug fix, but it may end up expanding the
rule.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13519.
## Summary
It's only safe to enforce the `x in "1234567890"` case if `x` is exactly
one character, since the set on the right has been reordered as compared
to `string.digits`. We can't know if `x` is exactly one character unless
it's a literal. And if it's a literal, well, it's kind of silly code in
the first place?
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13802.
Simon Brugman
David Peter
Carl Meyer
Charlie Marsh
David Salvisberg
InSync
Harutaka Kawamura
Alex Waygood
w0nder1ng
Dhruv Manilawala
renovate[bot]
Randolf Scholz