Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Igor Drokin 54df73c9f7
[`pyupgrade`] Apply `UP008` only when the `__class__` cell exists (#19424)
## Summary

Resolves #19357 

Skip UP008 diagnostic for `builtins.super(P, self)` calls when
`__class__` is not referenced locally, preventing incorrect fixes.

**Note:** I haven't found concrete information about which cases
`__class__` will be loaded into the scope. Let me know if anyone has
references, it would be useful to enhance the implementation. I did a
lot of tests to determine when `__class__` is loaded. Considered
sources:
1. [Python doc
super](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#super)
2. [Python doc classes](https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/classes.html)
3. [pep-3135](https://peps.python.org/pep-3135/#specification)

As I understand it, Python will inject at runtime into local scope a
`__class__` variable if it detects references to `super` or `__class__`.
This allows calling `super()` and passing appropriate parameters.
However, the compiler doesn't do the same for `builtins.super`, so we
need to somehow introduce `__class__` into the local scope.

I figured out `__class__` will be in scope with valid value when two
conditions are met:
1. `super` or `__class__` names have been loaded within function scope
4. `__class__` is not overridden.

I think my solution isn't elegant, so I would be appreciate a detailed
review.

## Test Plan

Added 19 test cases, updated snapshots.

---------

Co-authored-by: Igor Drokin <drokinii1017@gmail.com>
2025-09-09 14:59:23 -04:00
Dan Parizher 221edcba5c
[`pyupgrade`] Keyword arguments in `super` should suppress the `UP008` fix (#19131)
## Summary

Fixes #19096
2025-07-09 15:13:22 -04:00
Robsdedude a3638b3adc
[`pyupgrade`] Mark `UP008` fix safe if no comments in range (#18683)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary
Mark `UP008`'s fix safe if it won't delete comments.

## Relevant Issues
Fixes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/18533

---------

Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-30 09:42:05 -04:00
Victor Hugo Gomes cff5adf324
[`pyupgrade`] Suppress `UP008` diagnostic if `super` symbol is not builtin (#18688)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

Fixes #18684
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

## Test Plan

Add regression test
<!-- How was it tested? -->
2025-06-16 15:09:31 -04:00
chiri dbb0d60caa
[`pyupgrade`] Fix `super(__class__, self)` detection in UP008 (super-call-with-parameters) (#18478) 2025-06-12 08:52:45 +02:00
Charlie Marsh 998bfe0847
Avoid recommending no-argument super in `slots=True` dataclasses (#12530)
## Summary

Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12506.
2024-07-26 10:09:51 -04:00
Charlie Marsh 5849a75223
Rename `ruff` crate to `ruff_linter` (#7529) 2023-09-20 08:38:27 +02:00