## Summary
Infer a type of `Self` for unannotated `self` parameters in methods of
classes.
part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/159
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1081
## Conformance tests changes
```diff
+enums_member_values.py:85:9: error[invalid-assignment] Object of type `int` is not assignable to attribute `_value_` of type `str`
```
A true positive ✔️
```diff
-generics_self_advanced.py:35:9: error[type-assertion-failure] Argument does not have asserted type `Self@method2`
-generics_self_basic.py:14:9: error[type-assertion-failure] Argument does not have asserted type `Self@set_scale
```
Two false positives going away ✔️
```diff
+generics_syntax_infer_variance.py:82:9: error[invalid-assignment] Cannot assign to final attribute `x` on type `Self@__init__`
```
This looks like a true positive to me, even if it's not marked with `#
E` ✔️
```diff
+protocols_explicit.py:56:9: error[invalid-assignment] Object of type `tuple[int, int, str]` is not assignable to attribute `rgb` of type `tuple[int, int, int]`
```
True positive ✔️
```
+protocols_explicit.py:85:9: error[invalid-attribute-access] Cannot assign to ClassVar `cm1` from an instance of type `Self@__init__`
```
This looks like a true positive to me, even if it's not marked with `#
E`. But this is consistent with our understanding of `ClassVar`, I
think. ✔️
```py
+qualifiers_final_annotation.py:52:9: error[invalid-assignment] Cannot assign to final attribute `ID4` on type `Self@__init__`
+qualifiers_final_annotation.py:65:9: error[invalid-assignment] Cannot assign to final attribute `ID7` on type `Self@method1`
```
New true positives ✔️
```py
+qualifiers_final_annotation.py:52:9: error[invalid-assignment] Cannot assign to final attribute `ID4` on type `Self@__init__`
+qualifiers_final_annotation.py:57:13: error[invalid-assignment] Cannot assign to final attribute `ID6` on type `Self@__init__`
+qualifiers_final_annotation.py:59:13: error[invalid-assignment] Cannot assign to final attribute `ID6` on type `Self@__init__`
```
This is a new false positive, but that's a pre-existing issue on main
(if you annotate with `Self`):
https://play.ty.dev/3ee1c56d-7e13-43bb-811a-7a81e236e6ab❌ => reported
as https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1409
## Ecosystem
* There are 5931 new `unresolved-attribute` and 3292 new
`possibly-missing-attribute` attribute errors, way too many to look at
all of them. I randomly sampled 15 of these errors and found:
* 13 instances where there was simply no such attribute that we could
plausibly see. Sometimes [I didn't find it
anywhere](8644d886c6/openlibrary/plugins/openlibrary/tests/test_listapi.py (L33)).
Sometimes it was set externally on the object. Sometimes there was some
[`setattr` dynamicness going
on](a49f6b927d/setuptools/wheel.py (L88-L94)).
I would consider all of them to be true positives.
* 1 instance where [attribute was set on `obj` in
`__new__`](9e87b44fd4/sympy/tensor/array/array_comprehension.py (L45C1-L45C36)),
which we don't support yet
* 1 instance [where the attribute was defined via `__slots__`
](e250ec0fc8/lib/spack/spack/vendor/pyrsistent/_pdeque.py (L48C5-L48C14))
* I see 44 instances [of the false positive
above](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1409) with `Final`
instance attributes being set in `__init__`. I don't think this should
block this PR.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Shaygan Hooshyari <sh.hooshyari@gmail.com>
## Summary
Allow declared-only class-level attributes to be accessed on the class:
```py
class C:
attr: int
C.attr # this is now allowed
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/384
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/553
## Ecosystem analysis
* We see many removed `unresolved-attribute` false-positives for code
that makes use of sqlalchemy, as expected (see changes for `prefect`)
* We see many removed `call-non-callable` false-positives for uses of
`pytest.skip` and similar, as expected
* Most new diagnostics seem to be related to cases like the following,
where we previously inferred `int` for `Derived().x`, but now we infer
`int | None`. I think this should be a
conflicting-declarations/bad-override error anyway? The new behavior may
even be preferred here?
```py
class Base:
x: int | None
class Derived(Base):
def __init__(self):
self.x: int = 1
```
## Summary
Note this modifies the diagnostics a bit. Previously performing
subscript access on something like `NotSubscriptable1 |
NotSubscriptable2` would report the full type as not being
subscriptable:
```
[non-subscriptable] "Cannot subscript object of type `NotSubscriptable1 | NotSubscriptable2` with no `__getitem__` method"
```
Now each erroneous constituent has a separate error:
```
[non-subscriptable] "Cannot subscript object of type `NotSubscriptable2` with no `__getitem__` method"
[non-subscriptable] "Cannot subscript object of type `NotSubscriptable1` with no `__getitem__` method"
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/625
## Test Plan
mdtest
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Fix some issues with subtying/assignability for instances vs callables.
We need to look up dunders on the class, not the instance, and we should
limit our logic here to delegating to the type of `__call__`, so it
doesn't get out of sync with the calls we allow.
Also, we were just entirely missing assignability handling for
`__call__` implemented as anything other than a normal bound method
(though we had it for subtyping.)
A first step towards considering what else we want to change in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/491
## Test Plan
mdtests
---------
Co-authored-by: med <medioqrity@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Alex Waygood
David Peter
Renkai Ge
Suneet Tipirneni
Carl Meyer
InSync
Micha Reiser