This is a small refactor that helps centralize the
logic for how we gather, convert and possibly filter
completions.
Some of this logic was spread out before, which
motivated this refactor. Moreover, as part of other
refactoring, I found myself chaffing against the
lack of this abstraction.
Refs https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/544
## Summary
Takes a more incremental approach to PEP 613 type alias support (vs
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/20107). Instead of eagerly
inferring the RHS of a PEP 613 type alias as a type expression, infer it
as a value expression, just like we do for implicit type aliases, taking
advantage of the same support for e.g. unions and other type special
forms.
The main reason I'm following this path instead of the one in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/20107 is that we've realized that
people do sometimes use PEP 613 type aliases as values, not just as
types (because they are just a normal runtime assignment, unlike PEP 695
type aliases which create an opaque `TypeAliasType`).
This PR doesn't yet provide full support for recursive type aliases
(they don't panic, but they just fall back to `Unknown` at the recursion
point). This is future work.
## Test Plan
Added mdtests.
Many new ecosystem diagnostics, mostly because we
understand new types in lots of places.
Conformance suite changes are correct.
Performance regression is due to understanding lots of new
types; nothing we do in this PR is inherently expensive.
This is a very conservative minimal implementation of applying overloads
to resolve a callable-type-being-called down to a single function
signature on hover. If we ever encounter a situation where the answer
doesn't simplify down to a single function call, we bail out to preserve
prettier printing of non-raw-Signatures.
The resulting Signatures are still a bit bare, I'm going to try to
improve that in a followup to improve our Signature printing in general.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/73
As far as I know this change is largely non-functional, largely because
of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1601
It's possible some of these like `Type::KnownInstance` produce something
useful sometimes. `LiteralString` is a new introduction, although its
goto-type jumps to `str` which is a bit sad (considering that part of
the SpecialForm discourse for now).
Also wrt the generics testing followup: turns out the snapshot tests
were full of those already.
## Summary
Eagerly evaluate the elements of a PEP 604 union in value position (e.g.
`IntOrStr = int | str`) as type expressions and store the result (the
corresponding `Type::Union` if all elements are valid type expressions,
or the first encountered `InvalidTypeExpressionError`) on the
`UnionTypeInstance`, such that the `Type::Union(…)` does not need to be
recomputed every time the implicit type alias is used in a type
annotation.
This might lead to performance improvements for large unions, but is
also necessary for correctness, because the elements of the union might
refer to type variables that need to be looked up in the scope of the
type alias, not at the usage site.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
This PR generalizes the signature_help system's SignatureWriter which
could get the subspans of function parameters.
We now have TypeDetailsWriter which is threaded between type's display
implementations via a new `fmt_detailed` method that many of the Display
types now have.
With this information we can properly add goto-type targets to our inlay
hints. This also lays groundwork for any future "I want to render a type
but get spans" work.
Also a ton of lifetimes are introduced to avoid things getting conflated
with `'db`.
This PR is broken up into a series of commits:
* Generalizing `SignatureWriter` to `TypeDetailsWriter`, but not using
it anywhere else. This commit was confirmed to be a non-functional
change (no test results changed)
* Introducing `fmt_detailed` everywhere to thread through
`TypeDetailsWriter` and annotate various spans as "being" a given Type
-- this is also where I had to reckon with a ton of erroneous `&'db
self`. This commit was also confirmed to be a non-functional change.
* Finally, actually using the results for goto-type on inlay hints!
* Regenerating snapshots, fixups, etc.
#21414 added the ability to create a specialization from a constraint
set. It handled mutually constrained typevars just fine, e.g. given `T ≤
int ∧ U = T` we can infer `T = int, U = int`.
But it didn't handle _nested_ constraints correctly, e.g. `T ≤ int ∧ U =
list[T]`. Now we do! This requires doing a fixed-point "apply the
specialization to itself" step to propagate the assignments of any
nested typevars, and then a cycle detection check to make sure we don't
have an infinite expansion in the specialization.
This gets at an interesting nuance in our constraint set structure that
@sharkdp has asked about before. Constraint sets are BDDs, and each
internal node represents an _individual constraint_, of the form `lower
≤ T ≤ upper`. `lower` and `upper` are allowed to be other typevars, but
only if they appear "later" in the arbitary ordering that we establish
over typevars. The main purpose of this is to avoid infinite expansion
for mutually constrained typevars.
However, that restriction doesn't help us here, because only applies
when `lower` and `upper` _are_ typevars, not when they _contain_
typevars. That distinction is important, since it means the restriction
does not affect our expressiveness: we can always rewrite `Never ≤ T ≤
U` (a constraint on `T`) into `T ≤ U ≤ object` (a constraint on `U`).
The same is not true of `Never ≤ T ≤ list[U]` — there is no "inverse" of
`list` that we could apply to both sides to transform this into a
constraint on a bare `U`.
## Summary
Updated `S508` (snmp-insecure-version) and `S509`
(snmp-weak-cryptography) rules to support both old and new PySNMP API
module paths. Previously, these rules only detected the old API path
`pysnmp.hlapi.*`, but now they correctly detect all PySNMP API variants
including `pysnmp.hlapi.asyncio.*`, `pysnmp.hlapi.v1arch.*`,
`pysnmp.hlapi.v3arch.*`, and `pysnmp.hlapi.auth.*`.
Fixes#21364
## Problem Analysis
The `S508` and `S509` rules used exact pattern matching on qualified
names:
- `S509` only matched `["pysnmp", "hlapi", "UsmUserData"]`
- `S508` only matched `["pysnmp", "hlapi", "CommunityData"]`
This meant that newer PySNMP API paths were not detected, such as:
- `pysnmp.hlapi.asyncio.UsmUserData`
- `pysnmp.hlapi.v3arch.asyncio.UsmUserData`
- `pysnmp.hlapi.v3arch.asyncio.auth.UsmUserData`
- `pysnmp.hlapi.auth.UsmUserData`
- Similar variants for `CommunityData` in `S508`
Additionally, the old API path `pysnmp.hlapi.auth.*` was also missing
from both rules.
## Approach
Instead of exact pattern matching, both rules now check if:
1. The qualified name starts with `["pysnmp", "hlapi"]`
2. The qualified name ends with the target class name (`"UsmUserData"`
for `S509`, `"CommunityData"` for `S508`)
This flexible approach matches all PySNMP API paths without hardcoding
each variant, making the rules more maintainable and future-proof.
## Test Plan
Added comprehensive test cases to both `S508.py` and `S509.py` test
files covering:
- New API paths: `pysnmp.hlapi.asyncio.*`, `pysnmp.hlapi.v1arch.*`,
`pysnmp.hlapi.v3arch.*`
- Old API path: `pysnmp.hlapi.auth.*`
- Both insecure and secure usage patterns
All existing tests pass, and new snapshot tests were added and accepted.
Manual verification confirms both rules correctly detect all PySNMP API
variants.
---------
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1571.
I realised I was overcomplicating things when I described what we should
do in that issue description. The simplest thing to do here is just to
special-case call expressions and short-circuit the call-binding
machinery entirely if we see it's `NotImplemented` being called. It
doesn't really matter if the subdiagnostic doesn't fire when a union is
called and one element of the union is `NotImplemented` -- the
subdiagnostic doesn't need to be exhaustive; it's just to help people in
some common cases.
## Test Plan
Added snapshots
## Summary
The `.expect()` call here:
5dd56264fb/crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/instance.rs (L816-L827)
is the direct cause of the panic in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1587. This patch gets rid of the
panic by refactoring our `Protocol` enum so that the
`Protocol::FromClass` variant holds a `ProtocolClass` instance rather
than a `ClassType` instance (all the `.expect()` call was doing was
attempting to convert form a `ClassType` to a `ProtocolClass`).
I hoped that this would provide a fix for
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1587, but we still panic on the
provided reproducible examples in that issue even with this PR.
Nonetheless, I think this PR is a worthwhile change to make because:
- It's probably slightly more efficient this way (we no longer have to
re-verify that the wrapped class in a `Protocol::FromClass()` variant is
a protocol class every time we want to access its interface)
- It's nice to get rid of `.expect()` calls where possible, and this one
seems definitely unnecessary
- The _new_ panic message on this PR branch makes it much clearer what
the underlying cause of the bug in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1587 is:
<details>
<summary>New panic message</summary>
```
error[panic]: Panicked at
/Users/alexw/.cargo/git/checkouts/salsa-e6f3bb7c2a062968/a885bb4/src/function/execute.rs:321:21
when checking `/Users/alexw/dev/ruff/foo.py`: `ClassLiteral < 'db
>::explicit_bases_(Id(4c09)): execute: too many cycle iterations`
info: This indicates a bug in ty.
info: If you could open an issue at
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/new?title=%5Bpanic%5D, we'd be
very appreciative!
info: Platform: macos aarch64
info: Version: ruff/0.14.5+60 (18a14bfaf 2025-11-19)
info: Args: ["target/debug/ty", "check", "foo.py",
"--python-version=3.14"]
info: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to show the full
backtrace information
info: query stacktrace:
0: cached_protocol_interface(Id(6805))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/protocol_class.rs:790
1: is_equivalent_to_object_inner(Id(8003))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/instance.rs:667
2: infer_deferred_types(Id(1409))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer.rs:141
cycle heads: infer_definition_types(Id(140b)) -> iteration = 200,
TypeVarInstance < 'db >::lazy_bound_(Id(5803)) -> iteration = 200
3: TypeVarInstance < 'db >::lazy_bound_(Id(5802))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types.rs:8734
4: infer_definition_types(Id(140c))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer.rs:94
5: infer_deferred_types(Id(140a))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer.rs:141
6: TypeVarInstance < 'db >::lazy_bound_(Id(5803))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types.rs:8734
7: infer_definition_types(Id(140b))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer.rs:94
8: infer_scope_types(Id(1000))
at crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer.rs:70
9: check_file_impl(Id(c00))
at crates/ty_project/src/lib.rs:535
Found 1 diagnostic
WARN A fatal error occurred while checking some files. Not all project
files were analyzed. See the diagnostics list above for details.
```
</details>
## Test Plan
All existing tests pass.
This patch lets us create specializations from a constraint set. The
constraint encodes the restrictions on which types each typevar can
specialize to. Given a generic context and a constraint set, we iterate
through all of the generic context's typevars. For each typevar, we
abstract the constraint set so that it only mentions the typevar in
question (propagating derived facts if needed). We then find the "best
representative type" for the typevar given the abstracted constraint
set.
When considering the BDD structure of the abstracted constraint set,
each path from the BDD root to the `true` terminal represents one way
that the constraint set can be satisfied. (This is also one of the
clauses in the DNF representation of the constraint set's boolean
formula.) Each of those paths is the conjunction of the individual
constraints of each internal node that we traverse as we walk that path,
giving a single lower/upper bound for the path. We use the upper bound
as the "best" (i.e. "closest to `object`") type for that path.
If there are multiple paths in the BDD, they technically represent
independent possible specializations. If there's a single specialization
that satisfies all of them, we will return that as the specialization.
If not, then the constraint set is ambiguous. (This happens most often
with constrained typevars.) We could in the future turn _each_ of the
paths into separate specializations, but it's not clear what we would do
with that, so instead we just report the ambiguity as a specialization
failure.
We were previously normalizing the upper and lower bounds of each
constraint when constructing constraint sets. Like in #21463, this was
for conflated reasons: It made constraint set displays nicer, since we
wouldn't render multiple constraints with obviously equivalent bounds.
(Think `T ≤ A & B` and `T ≤ B & A`) But it was also useful for
correctness, since prior to #21463 we were (trying to) add the full
transitive closure to a constraint set's BDD, and normalization gave a
useful reduction in the number of nodes in a typical BDD.
Now that we don't store the transitive closure explicitly, that second
reason is no longer relevant. Our sequent map can store that full
transitive closure much more efficiently than the expanded BDD would
have. This helps fix some false positives on #20933, where we're seeing
some (incorrect, need to be fixed, but ideally not blocking this effort)
assignability failures between a type and its normalization.
Normalization is still useful for display purposes, and so we do
normalize the upper/lower bounds before building up our display
representation of a constraint set BDD.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <sharkdp@users.noreply.github.com>
We're seeing flaky test failures on macos, which seems to be caused by
different Salsa ID orderings on the different platforms. Constraint set
BDDs order their internal nodes based on the Salsa IDs of the interned
typevar structs, and we had some code that depended on variable ordering
in an unexpected way.
This patch definitely fixes the macos test failure on #21414, and
hopefully fixes it on #21436, too.
## Summary
Add a set of comprehensive tests for generic implicit type aliases to
illustrate the current behavior with many flavors of `@Todo` types and
false positive diagnostics.
The tests are partially based on the typing conformance suite, and the
expected behavior has been checked against other type checkers.
## Summary
Get rid of the catch-all todo type from subscripting a base type we
haven't implemented handling for yet in a type expression, and turn it
into a diagnostic instead.
Handle a few more cases explicitly, to avoid false positives from the
above change:
1. Subscripting any dynamic type (not just a todo type) in a type
expression should just result in that same dynamic type. This is
important for gradual guarantee, and matches other type checkers.
2. Subscripting a generic alias may be an error or not, depending
whether the specialization itself contains typevars. Don't try to handle
this yet (it should be handled in a later PR for specializing generic
non-PEP695 type aliases), just use a dedicated todo type for it.
3. Add a temporary todo branch to avoid false positives from string PEP
613 type aliases. This can be removed in the next PR, with PEP 613 type
alias support.
## Test Plan
Adjusted mdtests, ecosystem.
All new diagnostics in conformance suite are supposed to be diagnostics,
so this PR is a strict improvement there.
New diagnostics in the ecosystem are surfacing cases where we already
don't understand an annotation, but now we emit a diagnostic about it.
They are mostly intentional choices. Analysis of particular cases:
* `attrs`, `bokeh`, `django-stubs`, `dulwich`, `ibis`, `kornia`,
`mitmproxy`, `mongo-python-driver`, `mypy`, `pandas`, `poetry`,
`prefect`, `pydantic`, `pytest`, `scrapy`, `trio`, `werkzeug`, and
`xarray` are all cases where under `from __future__ import annotations`
or Python 3.14 deferred-annotations semantics, we follow normal
name-scoping rules, whereas some other type checkers prefer global names
over local names. This means we don't like it if e.g. you have a class
with a method or attribute named `type` or `tuple`, and you also try to
use `type` or `tuple` in method/attribute annotations of that class.
This PR isn't changing those semantics, just revealing them in more
cases where previously we just silently fell back to `Unknown`. I think
failing with a diagnostic (so authors can alias names as needed to avoid
relying on scoping rules that differ between type checkers) is better
than failing silently here.
* `beartype` assumes we support `TypeForm` (because it only supports
mypy and pyright, it uses `if MYPY:` to hide the `TypeForm` from mypy,
and pyright supports `TypeForm`), and we don't yet.
* `graphql-core` likes to use a `try: ... except ImportError: ...`
pattern for importing special forms from `typing` with fallback to
`typing_extensions`, instead of using `sys.version_info` checks. We
don't handle this well when type checking under an older Python version
(where the import from `typing` is not found); we see the imported name
as of type e.g. `Unknown | SpecialFormType(...)`, and because of the
union with `Unknown` we fail to handle it as the special form type. Mypy
and pyright also don't seem to support this pattern. They don't complain
about subscripting such special forms, but they do silently fail to
treat them as the desired special form. Again here, if we are going to
fail I'd rather fail with a diagnostic rather than silently.
* `ibis` is [trying to
use](https://github.com/ibis-project/ibis/blob/main/ibis/common/collections.py#L372)
`frozendict: type[FrozenDict]` as a way to create a "type alias" to
`FrozenDict`, but this is wrong: that means `frozendict:
type[FrozenDict[Any, Any]]`.
* `mypy` has some errors due to the fact that type-checking `typing.pyi`
itself (without knowing that it's the real `typing.pyi`) doesn't work
very well.
* `mypy-protobuf` imports some types from the protobufs library that end
up unioned with `Unknown` for some reason, and so we don't allow
explicit-specialization of them. Depending on the reason they end up
unioned with `Unknown`, we might want to better support this? But it's
orthogonal to this PR -- we aren't failing any worse here, just alerting
the author that we didn't understand their annotation.
* `pwndbg` has unresolved references due to star-importing from a
dependency that isn't installed, and uses un-imported names like `Dict`
in annotation expressions. Some of the unresolved references were hidden
by
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/main/crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer/builder.rs#L7223-L7228
when some annotations previously resolved to a Todo type that no longer
do.
Summary
--
This PR wires up the `Diagnostic::set_documentation_url` method from
#21502 to Ruff's lint diagnostics. This enables the links for the full
and concise output formats without any other changes.
I considered also including the URLs for the grouped and pylint output
formats, but the grouped format is still in `ruff_linter` instead of
`ruff_db`, so we'd have to export some additional functionality to wire
it up with `fmt_with_hyperlink`; and the pylint format doesn't currently
render with color, so I think it might actually be machine readable
rather than human readable?
The other ouput formats (json, json-lines, junit, github, gitlab,
rdjson, azure, sarif) seem more clearly not to need the links.
Test Plan
--
I guess you can't see my cursor or the browser opening, but it works for
lint rules, which have links, and doesn't include a link for syntax
errors, which don't have valid links.
Closes#11216
Essentially the approach is to implement `Format` for a new struct
`FormatClause` which is just a clause header _and_ its body. We then
have the information we need to see whether there is a skip suppression
comment on the last child in the body and it all fits on one line.
This saga began with a regression in how we handle constraint sets where
a typevar is constrained by another typevar, which #21068 first added
support for:
```py
def mutually_constrained[T, U]():
# If [T = U ∧ U ≤ int], then [T ≤ int] must be true as well.
given_int = ConstraintSet.range(U, T, U) & ConstraintSet.range(Never, U, int)
static_assert(given_int.implies_subtype_of(T, int))
```
While working on #21414, I saw a regression in this test, which was
strange, since that PR has nothing to do with this logic! The issue is
that something in that PR made us instantiate the typevars `T` and `U`
in a different order, giving them differently ordered salsa IDs. And
importantly, we use these salsa IDs to define the variable ordering that
is used in our constraint set BDDs. This showed that our "mutually
constrained" logic only worked for one of the two possible orderings.
(We can — and now do — test this in a brute-force way by copy/pasting
the test with both typevar orderings.)
The underlying bug was in our `ConstraintSet::simplify_and_domain`
method. It would correctly detect `(U ≤ T ≤ U) ∧ (U ≤ int)`, because
those two constraints affect different typevars, and from that, infer `T
≤ int`. But it wouldn't detect the equivalent pattern in `(T ≤ U ≤ T) ∧
(U ≤ int)`, since those constraints affect the same typevar. At first I
tried adding that as yet more pattern-match logic in the ever-growing
`simplify_and_domain` method. But doing so caused other tests to start
failing.
At that point, I realized that `simplify_and_domain` had gotten to the
point where it was trying to do too much, and for conflicting consumers.
It was first written as part of our display logic, where the goal is to
remove redundant information from a BDD to make its string rendering
simpler. But we also started using it to add "derived facts" to a BDD. A
derived fact is a constraint that doesn't appear in the BDD directly,
but which we can still infer to be true. Our failing test relies on
derived facts — being able to infer that `T ≤ int` even though that
particular constraint doesn't appear in the original BDD. Before,
`simplify_and_domain` would trace through all of the constraints in a
BDD, figure out the full set of derived facts, and _add those derived
facts_ to the BDD structure. This is brittle, because those derived
facts are not universally true! In our example, `T ≤ int` only holds
along the BDD paths where both `T = U` and `U ≤ int`. Other paths will
test the negations of those constraints, and on those, we _shouldn't_
infer `T ≤ int`. In theory it's possible (and we were trying) to use BDD
operators to express that dependency...but that runs afoul of how we
were simultaneously trying to _remove_ information to make our displays
simpler.
So, I ripped off the band-aid. `simplify_and_domain` is now _only_ used
for display purposes. I have not touched it at all, except to remove
some logic that is definitely not used by our `Display` impl. Otherwise,
I did not want to touch that house of cards for now, since the display
logic is not load-bearing for any type inference logic.
For all non-display callers, we have a new **_sequent map_** data type,
which tracks exactly the same derived information. But it does so (a)
without trying to remove anything from the BDD, and (b) lazily, without
updating the BDD structure.
So the end result is that all of the tests (including the new
regressions) pass, via a more efficient (and hopefully better
structured/documented) implementation, at the cost of hanging onto a
pile of display-related tech debt that we'll want to clean up at some
point.
## Summary
This is another attempt at https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21410
that fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/19226.
@MichaReiser helped me get something working in a very helpful pairing
session. I pushed one additional commit moving the comments back from
leading comments to trailing comments, which I think retains more of the
input formatting.
I was inspired by Dylan's PR (#21185) to make one of these tables:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col">Input</th>
<th scope="col">Main</th>
<th scope="col">PR</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><pre lang="python">
if (
not
# comment
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa +
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
):
pass
</pre></td>
<td><pre lang="python">
if (
# comment
not aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
):
pass
</pre></td>
<td><pre lang="python">
if (
not
# comment
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
):
pass
</pre></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><pre lang="python">
if (
# unary comment
not
# operand comment
(
# comment
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
)
):
pass
</pre></td>
<td><pre lang="python">
if (
# unary comment
# operand comment
not (
# comment
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
)
):
pass
</pre></td>
<td><pre lang="python">
if (
# unary comment
not
# operand comment
(
# comment
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
)
):
pass
</pre></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><pre lang="python">
if (
not # comment
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
):
pass
</pre></td>
<td><pre lang="python">
if ( # comment
not aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
):
pass
</pre></td>
<td><pre lang="python">
if (
not aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa # comment
+ bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
):
pass
</pre></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
hopefully it helps even though the snippets are much wider here.
The two main differences are (1) that we now retain own-line comments
between the unary operator and its operand instead of moving these to
leading comments on the operator itself, and (2) that we move
end-of-line comments between the operator and operand to dangling
end-of-line comments on the operand (the last example in the table).
## Test Plan
Existing tests, plus new ones based on the issue. As I noted below, I
also ran the output from main on the unary.py file back through this
branch to check that we don't reformat code from main. This made me feel
a bit better about not preview-gating the changes in this PR.
```shell
> git show main:crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/unary.py | ruff format - | ./target/debug/ruff format --diff -
> echo $?
0
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Takayuki Maeda <takoyaki0316@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR proposes that we add a new `set_concise_message` functionality
to our `Diagnostic` construction API. When used, the concise message
that is otherwise auto-generated from the main diagnostic message and
the primary annotation will be overwritten with the custom message.
To understand why this is desirable, let's look at the `invalid-key`
diagnostic. This is how I *want* the full diagnostic to look like:
<img width="620" height="282" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3bf70f52-9d9f-4817-bc16-fb0ebf7c2113"
/>
However, without the change in this PR, the concise message would have
the following form:
```
error[invalid-key]: Unknown key "Age" for TypedDict `Person`: Unknown key "Age" - did you mean "age"?
```
This duplication is why the full `invalid-key` diagnostic used a main
diagnostic message that is only "Invalid key for TypedDict `Person`", to
make that bearable:
```
error[invalid-key] Invalid key for TypedDict `Person`: Unknown key "Age" - did you mean "age"?
```
This is still less than ideal, *and* we had to make the "full"
diagnostic worse. With the new API here, we have to make no such
compromises. We need to do slightly more work (provide one additional
custom-designed message), but we get to keep the "full" diagnostic that
we actually want, and we can make the concise message more terse and
readable:
```
error[invalid-key] Unknown key "Age" for TypedDict `Person` - did you mean "age"?
```
Similar problems exist for other diagnostics as well (I really want this
for https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21476). In this PR, I only
changed `invalid-key` and `type-assertion-failure`.
The PR here is somewhat related to the discussion in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1418, but note that we are
solving a problem that is unrelated to sub-diagnostics.
## Test Plan
Updated tests
## Summary
Add support for `Callable` special forms in implicit type aliases.
## Typing conformance
Four new tests are passing
## Ecosystem impact
* All of the `invalid-type-form` errors are from libraries that use
`mypy_extensions` and do something like `Callable[[NamedArg("x", str)],
int]`.
* A handful of new false positives because we do not support generic
specializations of implicit type aliases, yet. But other
* Everything else looks like true positives or known limitations
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fixes#21389
Avoid RUF012 false positives when reassigning a ClassVar
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Added the new reassignment scenario to
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/RUF012.py`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
Constraint sets can now track subtyping/assignability/etc of generic
callables correctly. For instance:
```py
def identity[T](t: T) -> T:
return t
constraints = ConstraintSet.always()
static_assert(constraints.implies_subtype_of(TypeOf[identity], Callable[[int], int]))
static_assert(constraints.implies_subtype_of(TypeOf[identity], Callable[[str], str]))
```
A generic callable can be considered an intersection of all of its
possible specializations, and an assignability check with an
intersection as the lhs side succeeds of _any_ of the intersected types
satisfies the check. Put another way, if someone expects to receive any
function with a signature of `(int) -> int`, we can give them
`identity`.
Note that the corresponding check using `is_subtype_of` directly does
not yet work, since #20093 has not yet hooked up the core typing
relationship logic to use constraint sets:
```py
# These currently fail
static_assert(is_subtype_of(TypeOf[identity], Callable[[int], int]))
static_assert(is_subtype_of(TypeOf[identity], Callable[[str], str]))
```
To do this, we add a new _existential quantification_ operation on
constraint sets. This takes in a list of typevars and _removes_ those
typevars from the constraint set. Conceptually, we return a new
constraint set that evaluates to `true` when there was _any_ assignment
of the removed typevars that caused the old constraint set to evaluate
to `true`.
When comparing a generic constraint set, we add its typevars to the
`inferable` set, and figure out whatever constraints would allow any
specialization to satisfy the check. We then use the new existential
quantification operator to remove those new typevars, since the caller
doesn't (and shouldn't) know anything about them.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <sharkdp@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#19350
This fixes a syntax error caused by formatting. However, the new tests reveal that there are some cases where formatting attributes with certain comments behaves strangely, both before and after this PR, so some more polish may be in order.
For example, without parentheses around the value, and both before and after this PR, we have:
```python
# unformatted
variable = (
something # a comment
.first_method("some string")
)
# formatted
variable = something.first_method("some string") # a comment
```
which is probably not where the comment ought to go.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Partially addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1562
Only suggest the keyword "as" in import statements when the user have
written `import foo a<CURSOR>` or `from foo import bar a<CURSOR>` as no
other suggestion makes sense here.
Re-uses the existing pattern for incomplete `import from` statements to
determine incomplete import alias statements and make the suggestions
more sane in those cases.
There was a potential suggestion from @BurntSushi in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1562#issue-3626853513 to move the
handling of import statements into one unified state machine but I acted
on the side of caution and fixed this with already established patterns,
pending a potential bigger re-write down the line.
## Test Plan
Added new tests and checked that it behaved reasonable in the
playground.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
This PR attempts to improve the placement of own-line comments between
branches in the setting where the comment is more indented than the
preceding node.
There are two main changes.
### First change: Preceding node has leading content
If the preceding node has leading content, we now regard the comment as
automatically _less_ indented than the preceding node, and format
accordingly.
For example,
```python
if True: preceding_node
# leading on `else`, not trailing on `preceding_node`
else: ...
```
This is more compatible with `black`, although there is a (presumably
very uncommon) edge case:
```python
if True:
this;that
# leading on `else`, but trailing in `black`
else: ...
```
I'm sort of okay with this - presumably if one wanted a comment for
those semi-colon separated statements, one should have put it _above_
them, and one wanted a comment only for `that` then it ought to have
been on the same line?
### Second change: searching for last child in body
While searching for the (recursively) last child in the body of the
preceding _branch_, we implicitly assumed that the preceding node had to
have a body to begin the recursion. But actually, in the base case, the
preceding node _is_ the last child in the body of the preceding branch.
So, for example:
```python
if True:
something
last_child_but_no_body
# leading on else for `main` but trailing in this PR
else: ...
```
### More examples
The table below is an attempt to summarize the changes in behavior. The
rows alternate between an example snippet with `while` and the same
example with `if` - in the former case we do _not_ have an `else` node
and in the latter we do.
Notice that:
1. On `main` our handling of `if` vs. `while` is not consistent, whereas
it is consistent in the present PR
2. We disagree with `black` in all cases except that last example on
`main`, but agree in all cases for the present PR (though see above for
a wonky edge case where we disagree).
<table>
<tr>
<th>Original
</th>
<th><code>main</code> </th>
<th>This
PR </th>
<th><code>black</code> </th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
else:
# comment
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True: pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True: pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True: pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
else:
# comment
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
while True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True: pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
<td>
<pre lang="python">
if True:
pass
# comment
else:
pass
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
## Summary
Follow up from https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21411. Again,
there are more things that could be improved here (like the diagnostics
for `lists`, or extending what we have for `dict` to `OrderedDict` etc),
but that will have to be postponed.
## Summary
We previously only allowed models to overwrite the
`{eq,order,kw_only,frozen}_defaults` of the dataclass-transformer, but
all other standard-dataclass parameters should be equally supported with
the same behavior.
## Test Plan
Added regression tests.
## Summary
Not a high-priority task... but it _is_ a weekend :P
This PR improves our diagnostics for invalid exceptions. Specifically:
- We now give a special-cased ``help: Did you mean
`NotImplementedError`` subdiagnostic for `except NotImplemented`, `raise
NotImplemented` and `raise <EXCEPTION> from NotImplemented`
- If the user catches a tuple of exceptions (`except (foo, bar, baz):`)
and multiple elements in the tuple are invalid, we now collect these
into a single diagnostic rather than emitting a separate diagnostic for
each tuple element
- The explanation of why the `except`/`raise` was invalid ("must be a
`BaseException` instance or `BaseException` subclass", etc.) is
relegated to a subdiagnostic. This makes the top-level diagnostic
summary much more concise.
## Test Plan
Lots of snapshots. And here's some screenshots:
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
<img width="1770" height="1520" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f27fd61-c74d-4ddf-ad97-ea4fd24d06fd"
/>
<img width="1916" height="1392" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83e5027c-8798-48a6-a0ec-1babfc134000"
/>
<img width="1696" height="588" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1bc16048-6eb4-4dfa-9ace-dd271074530f"
/>
</details>
## Summary
Allow metaclass-based and baseclass-based dataclass-transformers to
overwrite the default behavior using class arguments:
```py
class Person(Model, order=True):
# ...
```
## Conformance tests
Four new tests passing!
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
This PR updates the constraint implication type relationship to work on
compound types as well. (A compound type is a non-atomic type, like
`list[T]`.)
The goal of constraint implication is to check whether the requirements
of a constraint imply that a particular subtyping relationship holds.
Before, we were only checking atomic typevars. That would let us verify
that the constraint set `T ≤ bool` implies that `T` is always a subtype
of `int`. (In this case, the lhs of the subtyping check, `T`, is an
atomic typevar.)
But we weren't recursing into compound types, to look for nested
occurrences of typevars. That means that we weren't able to see that `T
≤ bool` implies that `Covariant[T]` is always a subtype of
`Covariant[int]`.
Doing this recursion means that we have to carry the constraint set
along with us as we recurse into types as part of `has_relation_to`, by
adding constraint implication as a new `TypeRelation` variant. (Before
it was just a method on `ConstraintSet`.)
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <sharkdp@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Currently our diagnostic only covers the range of the thing being
subscripted:
<img width="1702" height="312" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e630431-e846-46ca-93c1-139f11aaba11"
/>
But it should probably cover the _whole_ subscript expression (arguably
the more "incorrect" bit is the `["foo"]` part of this expression, not
the `x` part of this expression!)
## Test Plan
Added a snapshot
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook
<36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Extends literal promotion to apply to any generic method, as opposed to
only generic class constructors. This PR also improves our literal
promotion heuristics to only promote literals in non-covariant position
in the return type, and avoid promotion if the literal is present in
non-covariant position in any argument type.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1357.
## Summary
- Always restore the previous `deferred_state` after parsing a type
expression: we don't want that state leaking out into other contexts
where we shouldn't be deferring expression inference
- Always defer the right-hand-side of a PEP-613 type alias in a stub
file, allowing for forward references on the right-hand side of `T:
TypeAlias = X | Y` in a stub file
Addresses @carljm's review in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21401#discussion_r2524260153
## Test Plan
I added a regression test for a regression that the first version of
this PR introduced (we need to make sure the r.h.s. of a PEP-613
`TypeAlias`es is always deferred in a stub file)
## Summary
We currently fail to account for the type context when inferring generic
classes constructed with `__new__`, or synthesized `__init__` for
dataclasses.
There are a few places in Python where it is known that new names are
being introduced and thus we probably shouldn't offer completions. We
already handle this today for things like `class <CURSOR>` and `def
<CURSOR>`. But we didn't handle `as <CURSOR>`, which can appear in
`import`, `with`, `except` and `match` statements. Indeed, these are
exactly the 4 cases where the `as` keyword can occur. So we look for the
presence of `as` and suppress completions based on that.
While we're here, we also make the implementation a bit more robust with
respect to suppressing completions when the user hasn't typed anything.
Namely, previously, we'd still offer completions in a `class <CURSOR>`
context. But it looks like LSP clients (at least, VS Code) doesn't ask
for completions here, so we were "saved" incidentally. This PR detects
this case and suppresses completions there so we don't rely on LSP
client behavior to handle that case correctly.
Fixesastral-sh/ty#1287
## Summary
Infer the first argument `type` inside `Annotated[type, …]` as a type
expression. This allows us to support stringified annotations inside
`Annotated`.
## Ecosystem
* The removed diagnostic on `prefect` shows that we now understand the
`State.data` type annotation in
`src/prefect/client/schemas/objects.py:230`, which uses a stringified
annotation in `Annoated`. The other diagnostics are downstream changes
that result from this, it seems to be a commonly used data type.
* `artigraph` does something like `Annotated[cast(Any,
field_info.annotation), *field_info.metadata]` which I'm not sure we
need to allow? It's unfortunate since this is probably supported at
runtime, but it seems reasonable that they need to add a `# type:
ignore` for that.
* `pydantic` uses something like `Annotated[(self.annotation,
*self.metadata)]` but adds a `# type: ignore`
## Test Plan
New Markdown test
## Summary
Typeshed has a (fake) `__getattr__` method on `types.ModuleType` with a
return type of `Any`. We ignore this method when accessing attributes on
module *literals*, but with this PR, we respect this method when dealing
with `ModuleType` itself. That is, we allow arbitrary attribute accesses
on instances of `types.ModuleType`. This is useful because dynamic
import mechanisms such as `importlib.import_module` use `ModuleType` as
a return type.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1346
## Ecosystem
Massive reduction in diagnostics. The few new diagnostics are true
positives.
## Test Plan
Added regression test.
## Summary
Add synthetic members to completions on dataclasses and dataclass
instances.
Also, while we're at it, add support for `__weakref__` and
`__match_args__`.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1542
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
Support various legacy `typing` special forms (`List`, `Dict`, …) in
implicit type aliases.
## Ecosystem impact
A lot of true positives (e.g. on `alerta`)!
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
Support `type[…]` in implicit type aliases, for example:
```py
SubclassOfInt = type[int]
reveal_type(SubclassOfInt) # GenericAlias
def _(subclass_of_int: SubclassOfInt):
reveal_type(subclass_of_int) # type[int]
```
part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/221
## Typing conformance
```diff
-specialtypes_type.py:138:5: error[type-assertion-failure] Argument does not have asserted type `type[Any]`
-specialtypes_type.py:140:5: error[type-assertion-failure] Argument does not have asserted type `type[Any]`
```
Two new tests passing ✔️
```diff
-specialtypes_type.py:146:1: error[unresolved-attribute] Object of type `GenericAlias` has no attribute `unknown`
```
An `TA4.unknown` attribute on a PEP 613 alias (`TA4: TypeAlias =
type[Any]`) is being accessed, and the conformance suite expects this to
be an error. Since we currently use the inferred type for these type
aliases (and possibly in the future as well), we treat this as a direct
access of the attribute on `type[Any]`, which falls back to an access on
`Any` itself, which succeeds. 🔴
```
+specialtypes_type.py:152:16: error[invalid-type-form] `typing.TypeVar` is not a generic class
+specialtypes_type.py:156:16: error[invalid-type-form] `typing.TypeVar` is not a generic class
```
New errors because we don't handle `T = TypeVar("T"); MyType = type[T];
MyType[T]` yet. Support for this is being tracked in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/221🔴
## Ecosystem impact
Looks mostly good, a few known problems.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
## Summary
Allow users of `mdtest.py` to press enter to rerun all mdtests without
recompiling (thanks @AlexWaygood).
I swear I tried three other approaches (including a fully async version)
before I settled on this solution. It is indeed silly, but works just
fine.
## Test Plan
Interactive playing around
## Summary
Further improve subscript assignment diagnostics, especially for
`dict`s:
```py
config: dict[str, int] = {}
config["retries"] = "three"
```
<img width="1276" height="274" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9762c733-8d1c-4a57-8c8a-99825071dc7d"
/>
I have many more ideas, but this looks like a reasonable first step.
Thank you @AlexWaygood for some of the suggestions here.
## Test Plan
Update tests
## Summary
This change to the mdtest runner makes it easy to run on a subset of
tests/files. For example:
```
▶ uv run crates/ty_python_semantic/mdtest.py implicit
running 1 test
test mdtest__implicit_type_aliases ... ok
test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 281 filtered out; finished in 0.83s
Ready to watch for changes...
```
Subsequent changes to either that test file or the Rust source code will
also only rerun the `implicit_type_aliases` test.
Multiple arguments can be provided, and filters can either be partial
file paths (`loops/for.md`, `loops/for`, `for`) or mangled test names
(`loops_for`):
```
▶ uv run crates/ty_python_semantic/mdtest.py implicit binary/union
running 2 tests
test mdtest__binary_unions ... ok
test mdtest__implicit_type_aliases ... ok
test result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 280 filtered out; finished in 0.85s
Ready to watch for changes...
```
## Test Plan
Tested it interactively for a while
## Summary
This PR renames the `CallableBinding::matching_overload_index` field to
`CallableBinding::matching_overload_after_parameter_matching` to clarify
the main use case of this field which is to surface type checking errors
on the matching overloads directly instead of using the
`no-matching-overload` diagnostic. This can only happen after parameter
matching as following steps could filter out this overload which should
then result in `no-matching-overload` diagnostic.
Callers should use the `matching_overload_index` _method_ to get the
matching overloads.
## Summary
We synthesize a (potentially large) set of `__setitem__` overloads for
every item in a `TypedDict`. Previously, validation of subscript
assignments on `TypedDict`s relied on actually calling `__setitem__`
with the provided key and value types, which implied that we needed to
do the full overload call evaluation for this large set of overloads.
This PR improves the performance of subscript assignment checks on
`TypedDict`s by validating the assignment directly instead of calling
`__setitem__`.
This PR also adds better handling for assignments to subscripts on union
and intersection types (but does not attempt to make it perfect). It
achieves this by distributing the check over unions and intersections,
instead of calling `__setitem__` on the union/intersection directly. We
already do something similar when validating *attribute* assignments.
## Ecosystem impact
* A lot of diagnostics change their rule type, and/or split into
multiple diagnostics. The new version is more verbose, but easier to
understand, in my opinion
* Almost all of the invalid-key diagnostics come from pydantic, and they
should all go away (including many more) when we implement
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1479
* Everything else looks correct to me. There may be some new diagnostics
due to the fact that we now check intersections.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests.
## Summary
cf. https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/20962
In the following code, `foo` in the comprehension was not reported as
unresolved:
```python
# error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `foo` used when not defined"
foo
foo = [
# no error!
# revealed: Divergent
reveal_type(x) for _ in () for x in [foo]
]
baz = [
# error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `baz` used when not defined"
# revealed: Unknown
reveal_type(x) for _ in () for x in [baz]
]
```
In fact, this is a more serious bug than it looks: for `foo`,
[`explicit_global_symbol` is
called](6cc3393ccd/crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer/builder.rs (L8052)),
causing a symbol that should actually be `Undefined` to be reported as
being of type `Divergent`.
This PR fixes this bug. As a result, the code in
`mdtest/regression/pr_20962_comprehension_panics.md` no longer panics.
## Test Plan
`corpus\cyclic_symbol_in_comprehension.py` is added.
New tests are added in `mdtest/comprehensions/basic.md`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Fixes#21393
Now the rule checks if the index variable is initialized as an `int`
type rather than only flagging if the index variable is initialized to
`0`. I used `ResolvedPythonType` to check if the index variable is an
`int` type.
## Test Plan
Updated snapshot test for `SIM113`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Add (snapshot) tests for subscript assignment diagnostics. This is
mainly intended to establish a baseline before I hope to improve some of
these messages.
## Summary
Add support for `typing.Union` in implicit type aliases / in value
position.
## Typing conformance tests
Two new tests are passing
## Ecosystem impact
* The 2k new `invalid-key` diagnostics on pydantic are caused by
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1479#issuecomment-3513854645.
* Everything else I've checked is either a known limitation (often
related to type narrowing, because union types are often narrowed down
to a subset of options), or a true positive.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
I don't know why, but it always takes me an eternity to find the failing
project name a few lines below in the output. So I'm suggesting we just
add the project name to the assertion message.
## Summary
Fix https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/664
This PR adds support for storing attributes in comprehension scopes (any
eager scope.)
For example in the following code we infer type of `z` correctly:
```py
class C:
def __init__(self):
[None for self.z in range(1)]
reveal_type(C().z) # previously [unresolved-attribute] but now shows Unknown | int
```
The fix works by adjusting the following logics:
To identify if an attriute is an assignment to self or cls we need to
check the scope is a method. To allow comprehension scopes here we skip
any eager scope in the check.
Also at this stage the code checks if self or the first method argument
is shadowed by another binding that eager scope to prevent this:
```py
class D:
g: int
class C:
def __init__(self):
[[None for self.g in range(1)] for self in [D()]]
reveal_type(C().g) # [unresolved-attribute]
```
When determining scopes that attributes might be defined after
collecting all the methods of the class the code also returns any
decendant scope that is eager and only has eager parents until the
method scope.
When checking reachability of a attribute definition if the attribute is
defined in an eager scope we use the reachability of the first non eager
scope which must be a method. This allows attributes to be marked as
reachable and be seen.
There are also which I didn't add support for:
```py
class C:
def __init__(self):
def f():
[None for self.z in range(1)]
f()
reveal_type(C().z) # [unresolved-attribute]
```
In the above example we will not even return the comprehension scope as
an attribute scope because there is a non eager scope (`f` function)
between the comprehension and the `__init__` method
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
It looks like VS Code does this forcefully. As in, I don't think we can
override it. It also seems like a plausibly good idea. But by us doing
it too, it makes our completion evaluation framework match real world
conditions. (To the extent that "VS Code" and "real world conditions"
are the same. Which... they aren't. But it's close, since VS Code is so
popular.)
This should round out the rest of the set. I think I had hesitated doing
this before because some of these don't make sense in every context. But
I think identifying the correct context for every keyword could be quite
difficult. And at the very least, I think offering these at least as a
choice---even if they aren't always correct---is better than not doing
it at all.
Andrew Gallant
Alex Waygood
Carl Meyer
Jack O'Connor
Aria Desires
David Peter
Douglas Creager
Dan Parizher
Luca Chiodini
Micha Reiser
Brent Westbrook
Dylan
Ruchir
RasmusNygren
Matthew Mckee
Gautham Venkataraman
Hugo
chiri
github-actions[bot]
Ibraheem Ahmed
Bhuminjay Soni
Dhruv Manilawala
Shunsuke Shibayama
Nikolas Hearp
Shaygan Hooshyari