## Summary
Follow-up release for Ruff v0.10 that now includes the following two
changes that we intended to ship but slipped:
* Changes to how the Python version is inferred when a `target-version`
is not specified (#16319)
* `blanket-noqa` (`PGH004`): Also detect blanked file-level noqa
comments (and not just line level comments).
## Test plan
I verified that the binary built on this branch respects the
`requires-python` setting
([logs](https://www.diffchecker.com/qyJWYi6W/), left: v0.10, right:
v0.11)
## Summary
This PR adds support for an optional list of paths that should be
checked to `knot check`.
E.g. to only check the `src` directory
```sh
knot check src
```
The default is to check all files in the project but users can reduce
the included files by specifying one or multiple optional paths.
The main two challenges with adding this feature were:
* We now need to show an error when one of the provided paths doesn't
exist. That's why this PR now collects errors from the project file
indexing phase and adds them to the output diagnostics. The diagnostic
looks similar to ruffs (see CLI test)
* The CLI should pick up new files added to included folders. For
example, `knot check src --watch` should pick up new files that are
added to the `src` folder. This requires that we now filter the files
before adding them to the project. This is a good first step to
supporting `include` and `exclude`.
The PR makes two simplifications:
1. I didn't test the changes with case-insensitive file systems. We may
need to do some extra path normalization to support those well. See
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/16400
2. Ideally, we'd accumulate the IO errors from the initial indexing
phase and subsequent incremental indexing operations. For example, we
should preserve the IO diagnostic for a non existing `test.py` if it was
specified as an explicit CLI argument until the file gets created and we
should show it again when the file gets deleted. However, this is
somewhat complicated because we'd need to track which files we revisited
(or were removed because the entire directory is gone). I considered
this too low a priority as it's worth dealing with right now.
The implementation doesn't support symlinks within the project but that
is the same as Ruff and is unchanged from before this PR.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14193
## Test Plan
Added CLI and file watching integration tests. Manually testing.
## Summary
Follow-up to #16035.
`check_docs_formatted.py` will now report backtick-quoted shortcut links
in rule documentation. It uses a regular expression to find them. Such a
link:
* Starts with `[`, followed by <code>\`</code>, then a "name" sequence
of at least one non-backtick non-newline character, followed by another
<code>\`</code>, then ends with `]`.
* Is not followed by either a `[` or a `(`.
* Is not placed within a code block.
If the name is a known Ruff option name, that link is not considered a
violation.
## Test Plan
Manual.
## Summary
Resolves#12321.
The physical-line-based `RUF054` checks for form feed characters that
are preceded by only tabs and spaces, but not any other characters,
including form feeds.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
## Summary
Resolves#15016.
## Test Plan
Generate the docs with:
```console
uv run --with-requirements docs/requirements-insiders.txt scripts/generate_mkdocs.py
```
and, check whether the mapping was created in `mkdocs.generated.yml` and run the server using:
```console
uvx --with-requirements docs/requirements-insiders.txt -- mkdocs serve -f mkdocs.insiders.yml -o
```
## Summary
This PR gets rid of the `requirements.in` and `requirements.txt` files
in the `scripts/fuzz-parser` directory, and replaces them with
`pyproject.toml` and `uv.lock` files. The script is renamed from
`fuzz-parser` to `py-fuzzer` (since it can now also be used to fuzz
red-knot as well as the parser, following
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14566), and moved from the
`scripts/` directory to the `python/` directory, since it's now a
(uv)-pip-installable project in its own right.
I've been resisting this for a while, because conceptually this script
just doesn't feel "complicated" enough to me for it to be a full-blown
package. However, I think it's time to do this. Making it a proper
package has several advantages:
- It means we can run it from the project root using `uv run` without
having to activate a virtual environment and ensure that all required
dependencies are installed into that environment
- Using a `pyproject.toml` file means that we can express that the
project requires Python 3.12+ to run properly; this wasn't possible
before
- I've been running mypy on the project locally when I've been working
on it or reviewing other people's PRs; now I can put the mypy config for
the project in the `pyproject.toml` file
## Test Plan
I manually tested that all the commands detailed in
`python/py-fuzzer/README.md` work for me locally.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <sharkdp@users.noreply.github.com>
We should probably get rid of this entirely and subsume it's
functionality in the normal ecosystem checks? I don't think we're using
the black comparison tests anymore, but maybe someone wants it?
There are a few major parts to this:
1. Making the formatter script idempotent, so it can be run repeatedly
and is robust to changing commits
2. Reducing the overhead of the git operations, minimizing the data
transfer
3. Parallelizing all the git operations by repository
This reduces the setup time from 80s to 16s (locally).
The initial motivation for idempotency was to include the repositories
in the GitHub Actions cache. I'm not sure it's worth it yet — they're
about 1GB and would consume our limited cache space. Regardless, it
improves correctness for local invocations.
The total runtime of the job is reduced from ~4m to ~3m.
I also made some cosmetic changes to the output paths and such.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This PR updates the metadata in the YAML frontmatter of the mkdocs
documentation to include the rule short code as a tag, so it can be
easily searched.
Ref: #13684
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
This has been tested locally using the documentation provided
[here](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/contributing/#mkdocs) for generating
docs.
This generates docs that now have the tags section:
```markdown
---
description: Checks for abstract classes without abstract methods.
tags:
- B024
---
# abstract-base-class-without-abstract-method (B024)
... trimmed
```
I've also verified that this gives the ability to get straight to the
page via search when serving mkdocs locally.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Previously, this would fail with
```
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'is_file'
```
if I tried to use the `--knot-path` option. I wish we had a type checker
for Python*.
## Test Plan
```sh
uv run benchmark --knot-path ~/.cargo-target/release/red_knot
```
\* to be fair, this would probably require special handling for
`argparse` in the typechecker.
## Summary
Now that Ruff provides a formatter, there is no need to rely on Black to
check that the docs are formatted correctly in
`check_docs_formatted.py`. This PR swaps out Black for the Ruff
formatter and updates inconsistencies between the two.
This PR will be a precursor to another PR
([branch](https://github.com/calumy/ruff/tree/format-pyi-in-docs)),
updating the `check_docs_formatted.py` script to check for pyi files,
fixing #11568.
## Test Plan
- CI to check that the docs are formatted correctly using the updated
script.
## Summary
Running `mkdocs server -f mkdocs.insiders.yml` gave warnings about these
broken links.
## Test plan
I built the docs locally and verified that the updated links work
properly.
Since `ruff-lsp` has been (semi-)deprecated for sometime, it wouldn't
make sense to mention it in the most prominent sections of the `README`.
Instead, they should point to the new <i>[Editor
Integrations](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/editors/)</i> documentation
page.
## Summary
@zanieb noticed while we were discussing #12595 that this flag is now
unnecessary, so remove it and the flags which reference it.
## Test Plan
Question for maintainers: is there a test to add *or* remove here? (I’ve
opened this as a draft PR with that in view!)
## Summary
These are the first rules implemented as part of #458, but I plan to
implement more.
Specifically, this implements `docstring-missing-exception` which checks
for raised exceptions not documented in the docstring, and
`docstring-extraneous-exception` which checks for exceptions in the
docstring not present in the body.
## Test Plan
Test fixtures added for both google and numpy style.
## Summary
This PR adds documentation for the Ruff language server.
It mainly does the following:
1. Combines various READMEs containing instructions for different editor
setup in their respective section on the online docs
2. Provide an enumerated list of server settings. Additionally, it also
provides a section for VS Code specific options.
3. Adds a "Features" section which enumerates all the current
capabilities of the native server
For (2), the settings documentation is done manually but a future
improvement (easier after `ruff-lsp` is deprecated) is to move the docs
in to Rust struct and generate the documentation from the code itself.
And, the VS Code extension specific options can be generated by diffing
against the `package.json` in `ruff-vscode` repository.
### Structure
1. Setup: This section contains the configuration for setting up the
language server for different editors
2. Features: This section contains a list of capabilities provided by
the server along with short GIF to showcase it
3. Settings: This section contains an enumerated list of settings in a
similar format to the one for the linter / formatter
4. Migrating from `ruff-lsp`
> [!NOTE]
>
> The settings page is manually written but could possibly be
auto-generated via a macro similar to `OptionsMetadata` on the
`ClientSettings` struct
resolves: #11217
## Test Plan
Generate and open the documentation locally using:
1. `python scripts/generate_mkdocs.py`
2. `mkdocs serve -f mkdocs.insiders.yml`
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This is the implementation for the new rule of `pycodestyle (E204)`. It
follows the guidlines described in the contributing site, and as such it
has a new file named `whitespace_after_decorator.rs`, a new test file
called `E204.py`, and as such invokes the `function` in the `AST
statement checker` for functions and functions in classes. Linking #2402
because it has all the pycodestyle rules.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
The file E204.py, has a `decorator` defined called wrapper, and this
decorator is used for 2 cases. The first one is when a `function` which
has a `decorator` is called in the file, and the second one is when
there is a `class` and 2 `methods` are defined for the `class` with a
`decorator` attached it.
Test file:
``` python
def foo(fun):
def wrapper():
print('before')
fun()
print('after')
return wrapper
# No error
@foo
def bar():
print('bar')
# E204
@ foo
def baz():
print('baz')
class Test:
# No error
@foo
def bar(self):
print('bar')
# E204
@ foo
def baz(self):
print('baz')
```
I am still new to rust and any suggestion is appreciated. Specially with
the way im using native ruff utilities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Unfortunately `demisto/content` uses an explicit `select` for `E999`, so
it will _always_ fail in preview. And they're on a fairly old version.
I'd like to keep checking it, but seems easiest for now to just disable
it.
In response, I've added a few new repos.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
Dylan
Zanie Blue
Micha Reiser
Brent Westbrook
InSync
Dhruv Manilawala
Dylan
Calum Young
renovate[bot]
Enoch Kan
Alex Waygood
Connor Skees
cmp0xff
Harry Reeder
David Peter
Charlie Marsh
Chris Krycho
Auguste Lalande
Javier Kauer