## Summary
Fixes#11185Fixes#11214
Document path and package information is now forwarded to the Ruff
linter, which allows `per-file-ignores` to correctly match against the
file name. This also fixes an issue where the import sorting rule didn't
distinguish between third-party and first-party packages since we didn't
pass in the package root.
## Test Plan
`per-file-ignores` should ignore files as expected. One quick way to
check is by adding this to your `pyproject.toml`:
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores]
"__init__.py" = ["ALL"]
```
Then, confirm that no diagnostics appear when you add code to an
`__init__.py` file (besides syntax errors).
The import sorting fix can be verified by failing to reproduce the
original issue - an `I001` diagnostic should not appear in
`other_module.py`.
## Summary
Fixes#11114.
As part of the `onClose` handler, we publish an empty array of
diagnostics for the document being closed, similar to
[`ruff-lsp`](187d7790be/ruff_lsp/server.py (L459-L464)).
This prevent phantom diagnostics from lingering after a document is
closed. We'll only do this if the client doesn't support pull
diagnostics, because otherwise clearing diagnostics is their
responsibility.
## Test Plan
Diagnostics should no longer appear for a document in the Problems tab
after the document is closed.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Add support for hover menu to ruff_server, as requested in
[10595](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10595).
Majority of new code is in hover.rs.
I reused the regex from ruff-lsp's implementation. Also reused the
format_rule_text function from ruff/src/commands/rule.rs
Added capability registration in server.rs, and added the handler to
api.rs.
## Test Plan
Tested in NVIM v0.10.0-dev-2582+g2a8cef6bd, configured with lspconfig
using the default options (other than cmd pointing to my test build,
with options "server" and "--preview"). OS: Ubuntu 24.04, kernel
6.8.0-22.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jane Lewis <me@jane.engineering>
## Summary
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10984 that
implements configuration resolution for editor configuration. By 'editor
configuration', I'm referring to the client settings that correspond to
Ruff configuration/options, like `preview`, `select`, and so on. These
will be combined with 'project configuration' (configuration taken from
project files such as `pyproject.toml`) to generate the final linter and
formatter settings used by `RuffSettings`. Editor configuration takes
priority over project configuration.
In a follow-up pull request, I'll implement a new client setting that
allows project configuration to override editor configuration, as per
[this issue](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/425).
## Review guide
The first commit, e38966d8843becc7234fa7d46009c16af4ba41e9, is just
doing re-arrangement so that we can pass the right things to
`RuffSettings::resolve`. The actual resolution logic is in the second
commit, 0eec9ee75c10e5ec423bd9f5ce1764f4d7a5ad86. It might help to look
at these comments individually since the diff is rather messy.
## Test Plan
For the settings to show up in VS Code, you'll need to checkout this
branch: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/456.
To test that the resolution for a specific setting works as expected,
run through the following scenarios, setting it in project and editor
configuration as needed:
| Set in project configuration? | Set in editor configuration? |
Expected Outcome |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| No | No | The editor should behave as if the setting was set to its
default value. |
| Yes | No | The editor should behave as if the setting was set to the
value in project configuration. |
| No | Yes | The editor should behave as if the setting was set to the
value in editor configuration. |
| Yes | Yes (but distinctive from project configuration) | The editor
should behave as if the setting was set to the value in editor
configuration. |
An exception to this is `extendSelect`, which does not have an analog in
TOML configuration. Instead, you should verify that `extendSelect`
amends the `select` setting. If `select` is set in both editor and
project configuration, `extendSelect` will only append to the `select`
value in editor configuration, so make sure to un-set it there if you're
testing `extendSelect` with `select` in project configuration.
## Summary
Fixes#11059
Several major editors don't support [pull
diagnostics](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#textDocument_pullDiagnostics),
a method of sending diagnostics to the client that was introduced in
version `0.3.17` of the specification. Until now, `ruff server` has only
used pull diagnostics, which resulted in diagnostics not being available
on Neovim and Helix, which don't support pull diagnostics yet (though
Neovim `10.0` will have support for this).
`ruff server` will now utilize the older method of sending diagnostics,
known as 'publish diagnostics', when pull diagnostics aren't supported
by the client. This involves re-linting a document every time it is
opened or modified, and then sending the diagnostics generated from that
lint to the client via the `textDocument/publishDiagnostics`
notification.
## Test Plan
The easiest way to test that this PR works is to check if diagnostics
show up on Neovim `<=0.9`.
## Summary
The server now requests a [workspace diagnostic
refresh](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/lsp/3.17/specification/#diagnostic_refresh)
when a configuration file gets changed. This means that diagnostics for
all open files will be automatically re-requested by the client on a
config change.
## Test Plan
You can test this by opening several files in VS Code, setting `select`
in your file configuration to `[]`, and observing that the diagnostics
go away once the file is saved (besides any `Pylance` diagnostics).
Restore it to what it was before, and you should see the diagnostics
automatically return once a save happens.
## Summary
Fixes#10866.
Introduces the `show_err_msg!` macro which will send a message to be
shown as a popup to the client via the `window/showMessage` LSP method.
## Test Plan
Insert various `show_err_msg!` calls in common code paths (for example,
at the beginning of `event_loop`) and confirm that these messages appear
in your editor.
To test that panicking works correctly, add this to the top of the `fn
run` definition in
`crates/ruff_server/src/server/api/requests/execute_command.rs`:
```rust
panic!("This should appear");
```
Then, try running a command like `Ruff: Format document` from the
command palette (`Ctrl/Cmd+Shift+P`). You should see the following
messages appear:
## Summary
Fixes#10780.
The server now send code actions to the client with a Ruff-specific
kind, `source.*.ruff`. The kind filtering logic has also been reworked
to support this.
## Test Plan
Add this to your `settings.json` in VS Code:
```json
{
"[python]": {
"editor.codeActionsOnSave": {
"source.organizeImports.ruff": "explicit",
},
}
}
```
Imports should be automatically organized when you manually save with
`Ctrl/Cmd+S`.
## Summary
Configuration is no longer the property of a workspace but rather of
individual documents. Just like the Ruff CLI, each document is
configured based on the 'nearest' project configuration. See [the Ruff
documentation](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/configuration/#config-file-discovery)
for more details.
To reduce the amount of times we resolve configuration for a file, we
have an index for each workspace that stores a reference-counted pointer
to a configuration for a given folder. If another file in the same
folder is opened, the configuration is simply re-used rather than us
re-resolving it.
## Guide for reviewing
The first commit is just the restructuring work, which adds some noise
to the diff. If you want to quickly understand what's actually changed,
I recommend looking at the two commits that come after it.
f7c073d441 makes configuration a property
of `DocumentController`/`DocumentRef`, moving it out of `Workspace`, and
it also sets up the `ConfigurationIndex`, though it doesn't implement
its key function, `get_or_insert`. In the commit after it,
fc35618f17, we implement `get_or_insert`.
## Test Plan
The best way to test this would be to ensure that the behavior matches
the Ruff CLI. Open a project with multiple configuration files (or add
them yourself), and then introduce problems in certain files that won't
show due to their configuration. Add those same problems to a section of
the project where those rules are run. Confirm that the lint rules are
run as expected with `ruff check`. Then, open your editor and confirm
that the diagnostics shown match the CLI output.
As an example - I have a workspace with two separate folders, `pandas`
and `scipy`. I created a `pyproject.toml` file in `pandas/pandas/io` and
a `ruff.toml` file in `pandas/pandas/api`. I changed the `select` and
`preview` settings in the sub-folder configuration files and confirmed
that these were reflected in the diagnostics. I also confirmed that this
did not change the diagnostics for the `scipy` folder whatsoever.
## Summary
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10764.
Support for diagnostics, quick fixes, and source actions can now be
disabled via client settings.
## Test Plan
### Manual Testing
Set up your workspace as described in the test plan in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10764, up to step 2. You don't
need to add a debug statement.
The configuration for `folder_a` and `folder_b` should be as follows:
`folder_a`:
```json
{
"ruff.codeAction.fixViolation": {
"enable": true
}
}
```
`folder_b`
```json
{
"ruff.codeAction.fixViolation": {
"enable": false
}
}
```
Finally, open up your VS Code User Settings and un-check the `Ruff > Fix
All` setting.
1. Open a Python file in `folder_a` that has existing problems. The
problems should be highlighted, and quick fix should be available.
`source.fixAll` should not be available as a source action.
2. Open a Python file in `folder_b` that has existing problems. The
problems should be highlighted, but quick fixes should not be available
for any of them. `source.fixAll` should not be available as a source
action.
3. Open up your VS Code Workspace Settings (second tab under the search
bar) and un-check `Ruff > Lint: Enable`
4. Both files you tested in steps 1 and 2 should now lack any visible
diagnostics. `source.organizeImports` should still be available as a
source action.
## Summary
This builds off of the work in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10652 to implement a command
executor, backwards compatible with the commands from the previous LSP
(`ruff.applyAutofix`, `ruff.applyFormat` and
`ruff.applyOrganizeImports`).
This involved a lot of refactoring and tweaks to the code action
resolution code - the most notable change is that workspace edits are
specified in a slightly different way, using the more general `changes`
field instead of the `document_changes` field (which isn't supported on
all LSP clients). Additionally, the API for synchronous request handlers
has been updated to include access to the `Requester`, which we use to
send a `workspace/applyEdit` request to the client.
## Test Plan
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/7932e30f-d944-4e35-b828-1d81aa56c087
## Summary
Fixes#10618.
This PR introduces a proper API for sending requests to the client and
handling any response sent back. Dynamic capability registration now
uses this new API, fixing an issue where a much more simplistic response
handler silently flushes a code action request that needed a response.
## Test Plan
#10618 can no longer be reproduced. No errors about unhandled responses
should appear in the extension output, and you should see this new log
when the server starts:
```
<DATE> <TIME> [info] <DURATION> INFO ruff_server::server Configuration file watcher successfully registered
```
## Summary
Fixes#10366.
`ruff server` now registers a file watcher on the client side using the
LSP protocol, and listen for events on configuration files. On such an
event, it reloads the configuration in the 'nearest' workspace to the
file that was changed.
## Test Plan
N/A
## Summary
I used `codespell` and `gramma` to identify mispellings and grammar
errors throughout the codebase and fixed them. I tried not to make any
controversial changes, but feel free to revert as you see fit.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR introduces the `ruff_server` crate and a new `ruff server`
command. `ruff_server` is a re-implementation of
[`ruff-lsp`](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp), written entirely in
Rust. It brings significant performance improvements, much tighter
integration with Ruff, a foundation for supporting entirely new language
server features, and more!
This PR is an early version of `ruff_lsp` that we're calling the
**pre-release** version. Anyone is more than welcome to use it and
submit bug reports for any issues they encounter - we'll have some
documentation on how to set it up with a few common editors, and we'll
also provide a pre-release VSCode extension for those interested.
This pre-release version supports:
- **Diagnostics for `.py` files**
- **Quick fixes**
- **Full-file formatting**
- **Range formatting**
- **Multiple workspace folders**
- **Automatic linter/formatter configuration** - taken from any
`pyproject.toml` files in the workspace.
Many thanks to @MichaReiser for his [proof-of-concept
work](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/7262), which was important
groundwork for making this PR possible.
## Architectural Decisions
I've made an executive choice to go with `lsp-server` as a base
framework for the LSP, in favor of `tower-lsp`. There were several
reasons for this:
1. I would like to avoid `async` in our implementation. LSPs are mostly
computationally bound rather than I/O bound, and `async` adds a lot of
complexity to the API, while also making harder to reason about
execution order. This leads into the second reason, which is...
2. Any handlers that mutate state should be blocking and run in the
event loop, and the state should be lock-free. This is the approach that
`rust-analyzer` uses (also with the `lsp-server`/`lsp-types` crates as a
framework), and it gives us assurances about data mutation and execution
order. `tower-lsp` doesn't support this, which has caused some
[issues](https://github.com/ebkalderon/tower-lsp/issues/284) around data
races and out-of-order handler execution.
3. In general, I think it makes sense to have tight control over
scheduling and the specifics of our implementation, in exchange for a
slightly higher up-front cost of writing it ourselves. We'll be able to
fine-tune it to our needs and support future LSP features without
depending on an upstream maintainer.
## Test Plan
The pre-release of `ruff_server` will have snapshot tests for common
document editing scenarios. An expanded test suite is on the roadmap for
future version of `ruff_server`.
Jane Lewis
Micha Reiser
Nolan
Auguste Lalande