## Summary
Fixes#10174 by allowing match cases to be enclosing nodes for
suppression comments. `else/elif` clauses are now also allowed to be
enclosing nodes.
## Test Plan
I've added the offending code from the original issue to the `RUF028`
snapshot test, and I've also expanded it to test the allowed `else/elif`
clause.
## Summary
This fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7868.
Support isort's `default-section` feature which allows any imports that
match sections that are not in `section-order` to be mapped to a
specifically named section.
https://pycqa.github.io/isort/docs/configuration/options.html#default-section
This has a few implications:
- It is no longer required that all known sections are defined in
`section-order`.
- This is technically a bw-incompat change because currently if folks
define custom groups, and do not define a `section-order`, the code used
to add all known sections to `section-order` while emitting warnings.
**However, when this happened, users would be seeing warnings so I do
not think it should count as a bw-incompat change.**
## Test Plan
- Added a new test.
- Did not break any existing tests.
Finally, I ran the following config against Pyramid's complex codebase
that was previously using isort and this change worked there.
### pyramid's previous isort config
5f7e286b06/pyproject.toml (L22-L37)
```toml
[tool.isort]
profile = "black"
multi_line_output = 3
src_paths = ["src", "tests"]
skip_glob = ["docs/*"]
include_trailing_comma = true
force_grid_wrap = false
combine_as_imports = true
line_length = 79
force_sort_within_sections = true
no_lines_before = "THIRDPARTY"
sections = "FUTURE,THIRDPARTY,FIRSTPARTY,LOCALFOLDER"
default_section = "THIRDPARTY"
known_first_party = "pyramid"
```
### tested with ruff isort config
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.isort]
case-sensitive = true
combine-as-imports = true
force-sort-within-sections = true
section-order = [
"future",
"third-party",
"first-party",
"local-folder",
]
default-section = "third-party"
known-first-party = [
"pyramid",
]
```
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
Fixes#6611
## Summary
This lint rule spots comments that are _intended_ to suppress or enable
the formatter, but will be ignored by the Ruff formatter.
We borrow some functions the formatter uses for determining comment
placement / putting them in context within an AST.
The analysis function uses an AST visitor to visit each comment and
attach it to the AST. It then uses that context to check:
1. Is this comment in an expression?
2. Does this comment have bad placement? (e.g. a `# fmt: skip` above a
function instead of at the end of a line)
3. Is this comment redundant?
4. Does this comment actually suppress any code?
5. Does this comment have ambiguous placement? (e.g. a `# fmt: off`
above an `else:` block)
If any of these are true, a violation is thrown. The reported reason
depends on the order of the above check-list: in other words, a `# fmt:
skip` comment on its own line within a list expression will be reported
as being in an expression, since that reason takes priority.
The lint suggests removing the comment as an unsafe fix, regardless of
the reason.
## Test Plan
A snapshot test has been created.
## Summary
Currently, rule `RUF015` is not able to detect the usage of
`list(iterable).pop(0)` falling under the category of an _unnecessary
iterable allocation for accessing the first element_. This PR wants to
change that. See the underlying issue for more details.
* Provide extension to detect `list(iterable).pop(0)`, but not
`list(iterable).pop(i)` where i > 1
* Update corresponding doc
## Test Plan
* `RUF015.py` and the corresponding snap file were extended such that
their correspond to the new behaviour
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9190
---
PS: I've only been working on this ticket as I haven't seen any activity
from issue assignee @rmad17, neither in this repo nor in a fork. I hope
I interpreted his inactivity correctly. Didn't mean to steal his chance.
Since I stumbled across the underlying problem myself, I wanted to offer
a solution as soon as possible.
## Summary
It is a convention to use the `_()` alias for `gettext()`. We want to
avoid
statement expressions and assignments related to aliases of the gettext
API.
See https://docs.python.org/3/library/gettext.html for details. When one
uses `_() to mark a string for translation, the tools look for these
markers
and replace the original string with its translated counterpart. If the
string contains variable placeholders or formatting, it can complicate
the
translation process, lead to errors or incorrect translations.
## Test Plan
* Test file `RUF027_1.py` was extended such that the test reproduces the
false-positive
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10023.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Update PLR1714 to ignore `sys.platform` and `sys.version` checks.
I'm not sure if these checks or if we need to add more. Please advise.
Fixes#10017
## Test Plan
Added a new test case and ran `cargo nextest run`
## Summary
Allows, e.g.:
```python
import os
os.environ["WORLD_SIZE"] = "1"
os.putenv("CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES", "4")
import torch
```
For now, this is only allowed in preview.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10059
## Summary
Closes#10031
- Detect commented out `case` statements. Playground repro:
https://play.ruff.rs/5a305aa9-6e5c-4fa4-999a-8fc427ab9a23
- Add more support for one-line commented out code.
## Test Plan
Unit tested and tested with
```sh
cargo run -p ruff -- check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/eradicate/ERA001.py --no-cache --preview --select ERA001
```
TODO:
- [x] `cargo insta test`
## Summary
Fixes#9895
The cause for this panic came from an offset error in the code. When
analyzing a hypothetical f-string, we attempt to re-parse it as an
f-string, and use the AST data to determine, among other things, whether
the format specifiers are correct. To determine the 'correctness' of a
format specifier, we actually have to re-parse the format specifier, and
this is where the issue lies. To get the source text for the specifier,
we were taking a slice from the original file source text... even though
the AST data for the specifier belongs to the standalone parsed f-string
expression, meaning that the ranges are going to be way off. In a file
with Unicode, this can cause panics if the slice is inside a char
boundary.
To fix this, we now slice from the temporary source we created earlier
to parse the literal as an f-string.
## Test Plan
The RUF027 snapshot test was amended to include a string with format
specifiers which we _should_ be calling out. This is to ensure we do
slice format specifiers from the source text correctly.
## Summary
Ignore `async for` loops when checking the SIM113 rule.
Closes#9995
## Test Plan
A new test case was added to SIM113.py with an async for loop.
## Summary
Implement [implicit readlines
(FURB129)](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/implicit_readlines.py)
lint.
## Notes
I need a help/an opinion about suggested implementations.
This implementation differs from the original one from `refurb` in the
following way. This implementation checks syntactically the call of the
method with the name `readlines()` inside `for` {loop|generator
expression}. The implementation from refurb also
[checks](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/refurb/checks/iterable/implicit_readlines.py#L43)
that callee is a variable with a type `io.TextIOWrapper` or
`io.BufferedReader`.
- I do not see a simple way to implement the same logic.
- The best I can have is something like
```rust
checker.semantic().binding(checker.semantic().resolve_name(attr_expr.value.as_name_expr()?)?).statement(checker.semantic())
```
and analyze cases. But this will be not about types, but about guessing
the type by assignment (or with) expression.
- Also this logic has several false negatives, when the callee is not a
variable, but the result of function call (e.g. `open(...)`).
- On the other side, maybe it is good to lint this on other things,
where this suggestion is not safe, and push the developers to change
their interfaces to be less surprising, comparing with the standard
library.
- Anyway while the current implementation has false-positives (I
mentioned some of them in the test) I marked the fixes to be unsafe.
## Summary
Accept 0.0 and 1.0 as common magic values. This is in line with the
pylint behaviour, and I think makes sense conceptually.
## Test Plan
Test cases were added to
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pylint/magic_value_comparison.py`
## Summary
This PR ensures that if a list `x` is modified within a `for` loop, we
avoid flagging `list(x)` as unnecessary. Previously, we only detected
calls to exactly `.append`, and they couldn't be nested within other
statements.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9925.
## Summary
If these are defined within class scopes, they're actually attributes of
the class, and can be accessed through the class itself.
(We preserve our existing behavior for `.pyi` files.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9948.
## Summary
Currently these rules apply the heuristic that if the original sequence
doesn't have a newline in between the final sequence item and the
closing parenthesis, the autofix won't add one for you. The feedback
from @ThiefMaster, however, was that this was producing slightly unusual
formatting -- things like this:
```py
__all__ = [
"b", "c",
"a", "d"]
```
were being autofixed to this:
```py
__all__ = [
"a",
"b",
"c",
"d"]
```
When, if it was _going_ to be exploded anyway, they'd prefer something
like this (with the closing parenthesis on its own line, and a trailing comma added):
```py
__all__ = [
"a",
"b",
"c",
"d",
]
```
I'm still pretty skeptical that we'll be able to please everybody here
with the formatting choices we make; _but_, on the other hand, this
_specific_ change is pretty easy to make.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`. I also ran the autofixes for RUF022 and RUF023 on CPython
to check how they looked; they looked fine to me.
## Summary
If a generic appears multiple times on the right-hand side, we should
only include it once on the left-hand side when rewriting.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9904.
## Summary
This review contains a fix for
[D405](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/capitalize-section-name/)
(capitalize-section-name)
The problem is that Ruff considers the sub-section header as a normal
section if it has the same name as some section name. For instance, a
function/method has an argument named "parameters". This only applies if
you use Numpy style docstring.
See: [ISSUE](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9806)
The following will not raise D405 after the fix:
```python
def some_function(parameters: list[str]):
"""A function with a parameters parameter
Parameters
----------
parameters:
A list of string parameters
"""
...
```
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Mikko Leppänen <mikko.leppanen@vaisala.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Fixes#9857.
## Summary
Statements like `logging.info("Today it is: {day}")` will no longer be
ignored by RUF027. As before, statements like `"Today it is:
{day}".format(day="Tuesday")` will continue to be ignored.
## Test Plan
The snapshot tests were expanded to include new cases. Additionally, the
snapshot tests have been split in two to separate positive cases from
negative cases.
## Summary
Django's `mark_safe` can also be used as a decorator, so we should
detect usages of `@mark_safe` for the purpose of the relevant Bandit
rule.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9780.
These are for descriptors which affects the behavior of the object _as a
property_; I do not think they should be called directly but there is no
alternative when working with the object directly.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9789
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixes#8151
This PR implements a new rule, `RUF027`.
## What it does
Checks for strings that contain f-string syntax but are not f-strings.
### Why is this bad?
An f-string missing an `f` at the beginning won't format anything, and
instead treat the interpolation syntax as literal.
### Example
```python
name = "Sarah"
dayofweek = "Tuesday"
msg = "Hello {name}! It is {dayofweek} today!"
```
It should instead be:
```python
name = "Sarah"
dayofweek = "Tuesday"
msg = f"Hello {name}! It is {dayofweek} today!"
```
## Heuristics
Since there are many possible string literals which contain syntax
similar to f-strings yet are not intended to be,
this lint will disqualify any literal that satisfies any of the
following conditions:
1. The string literal is a standalone expression. For example, a
docstring.
2. The literal is part of a function call with keyword arguments that
match at least one variable (for example: `format("Message: {value}",
value = "Hello World")`)
3. The literal (or a parent expression of the literal) has a direct
method call on it (for example: `"{value}".format(...)`)
4. The string has no `{...}` expression sections, or uses invalid
f-string syntax.
5. The string references variables that are not in scope, or it doesn't
capture variables at all.
6. Any format specifiers in the potential f-string are invalid.
## Test Plan
I created a new test file, `RUF027.py`, which is both an example of what
the lint should catch and a way to test edge cases that may trigger
false positives.
## Summary
It turns out we saw a panic in cases when dedenting blocks like the `def
wrapper` here:
```python
def instrument_url(f: UrlFuncT) -> UrlFuncT:
# TODO: Type this with ParamSpec to preserve the function signature.
if not INSTRUMENTING: # nocoverage -- option is always enabled; should we remove?
return f
else:
def wrapper(
self: "ZulipTestCase", url: str, info: object = {}, **kwargs: Union[bool, str]
) -> HttpResponseBase:
```
Since we relied on the first line to determine the indentation, instead
of the first non-empty line.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Often, when fixing, we need to dedent a block of code (e.g., if we
remove an `if` and dedent its body). Today, we use LibCST to parse and
adjust the indentation, which is really expensive -- but this is only
really necessary if the block contains a multiline string, since naively
adjusting the indentation for such a string can change the whitespace
_within_ the string.
This PR uses a simple dedent implementation for cases in which the block
doesn't intersect with a multi-line string (or an f-string, since we
don't support tracking multi-line strings for f-strings right now).
We could improve this even further by using the ranges to guide the
dedent function, such that we don't apply the dedent if the line starts
within a multiline string. But that would also need to take f-strings
into account, which is a little tricky.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Follow-up to #9754 and #9689. Alternative to #9714.
Marks `TRY200` as removed and redirects to `B904` instead of marking as
deprecated and suggesting `B904` instead.
## Summary
This rule was added to `flake8-type-checking` as `TC010`. We're about to
stabilize it, so we might as well use the correct code.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9573.
## Summary
This rule was added to flake8-bugbear. In general, we tend to prefer
redirecting to prominent plugins when our own rules are reimplemented
(since more projects have `B` activated than `RUF`).
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
# Conflicts:
# crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/mod.rs
## Summary
Just like #6537 and #6538 but for the `default` second parameter to
`getenv()`.
Also rename "BAD" to "BAR" in the tests, since those strings shouldn't
trigger the rule.
## Test Plan
Added passing and failing examples to `invalid_envvar_default.py`.
## Summary
This review contains a fix for
[ASYNC101](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/open-sleep-or-subprocess-in-async-function/)
(open-sleep-or-subprocess-in-async-function)
The problem is that ruff does not take open calls from pathlib.Path into
account in async functions. Path.open() call is still a blocking call.
In addition, PTH123 suggests to use pathlib.Path instead of os.open. So
this might create an additional confusion.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6892
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
Tweaks PLR2004 to show the literal source text, rather than the constant
value.
I noticed this when I had a hexadecimal constant, and the linter turned
it into base-10.
Now, if you have `0x300`, it will show `0x300` instead of `768`.
Also, added backticks around the constant in the output message.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Given:
```python
from dataclasses import InitVar, dataclass
@dataclass
class C:
i: int
j: int = None
database: InitVar[DatabaseType] = None
def __post_init__(self, database):
if self.j is None and database is not None:
self.j = database.lookup('j')
c = C(10, database=my_database)
```
We should avoid marking `InitVar` as typing-only, since it _is_ required
by the dataclass at runtime.
Note that by default, we _already_ don't flag this, since the
`@dataclass` member is needed at runtime too -- so it's only a problem
with `strict` mode.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9666.
## Summary
Per https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9570:
> `dtype` are a bit of a strange beast, but definitely best thought of
as instances, not classes, and they are meant to be comparable not just
to their own class, but also to the corresponding scalar types (e.g.,
`x.dtype == np.float32`) and strings (e.g., `x.dtype == ['i1,i4']`;
basically, `__eq__` always tries to do `dtype(other)`.
This PR thus allows comparisons to `dtype` in preview.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9570.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This review contains a fix for
[RET504](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/unnecessary-assign/)
(unnecessary-assign)
The problem is that Ruff suggests combining a return statement inside
contextlib.suppress. Even though it is an unsafe fix it might lead to an
invalid code that is not equivalent to the original one.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5909
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
This review contains a fix for
[PIE810](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/multiple-starts-ends-with/)
(multiple-starts-ends-with)
The problem is that ruff suggests combining multiple startswith/endswith
calls into a single call even though there might be a call with tuple of
strs. This leads to calling startswith/endswith with tuple of tuple of
strs which is incorrect and violates startswith/endswith conctract and
results in runtime failure.
However the following will be valid and fixed correctly =>
```python
x = ("hello", "world")
y = "h"
z = "w"
msg = "hello world"
if msg.startswith(x) or msg.startswith(y) or msg.startswith(z) :
sys.exit(1)
```
```
ruff --fix --select PIE810 --unsafe-fixes
```
=>
```python
if msg.startswith(x) or msg.startswith((y,z)):
sys.exit(1)
```
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8906
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
This rule was just incorrect, it didn't match the examples in the docs.
(It's a very rarely-used rule since it's not included in any of the
conventions.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9452.
## Summary
Add a rule for defaultdict(default_factory=callable). Instead suggest
using defaultdict(callable).
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9509
If a user tries to bind a "non-callable" to default_factory, the rule
ignores it. Another option would be to warn that it's probably not what
you want. Because Python allows the following:
```python
from collections import defaultdict
defaultdict(default_factory=1)
```
this raises after you actually try to use it:
```python
dd = defaultdict(default_factory=1)
dd[1]
```
=>
```bash
KeyError: 1
```
Instead using callable directly in the constructor it will raise (not
being a callable):
```python
from collections import defaultdict
defaultdict(1)
```
=>
```bash
TypeError: first argument must be callable or None
```
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
When we are analyzing the implicit return rule this change add an
additional check to verify if the call expression has been annotated
with NoReturn type from typing module.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5474
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
Checks for unnecessary `dict` comprehension when creating a new
dictionary from iterable. Suggest to replace with
`dict.fromkeys(iterable)`
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9592
## Test Plan
```bash
cargo test
```
## Summary
This PR introduces a new rule to sort `__slots__` and `__match_args__`
according to a [natural sort](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_sort_order), as was
requested in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/1198#issuecomment-1881418365.
The implementation here generalises some of the machinery introduced in
3aae16f1bd
so that different kinds of sorts can be applied to lists of string
literals. (We use an "isort-style" sort for `__all__`, but that isn't
really appropriate for `__slots__` and `__match_args__`, where nearly
all items will be snake_case.) Several sections of code have been moved
from `sort_dunder_all.rs` to a new module, `sorting_helpers.rs`, which
`sort_dunder_all.rs` and `sort_dunder_slots.rs` both make use of.
`__match_args__` is very similar to `__all__`, in that it can only be a
tuple or a list. `__slots__` differs from the other two, however, in
that it can be any iterable of strings. If slots is a dictionary, the
values are used by the builtin `help()` function as per-attribute
docstrings that show up in the output of `help()`. (There's no
particular use-case for making `__slots__` a set, but it's perfectly
legal at runtime, so there's no reason for us not to handle it in this
rule.)
Note that we don't do an autofix for multiline `__slots__` if `__slots__` is a dictionary: that's out of scope. Everything else, we can nearly always fix, however.
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`.
I also ran this rule on CPython, and the diff looked pretty good
---
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
Implement rule `mutable-fromkeys-value` (`RUF023`).
Autofixes
```python
dict.fromkeys(foo, [])
```
to
```python
{key: [] for key in foo}
```
The fix is marked as unsafe as it changes runtime behaviour. It also
uses `key` as the comprehension variable, which may not always be
desired.
Closes#4613.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR detects whether PLR0917 is being applied to a method or class
method, and if so, it ignores the first argument for the purposes of
counting the number of positional arguments.
## Test Plan
New tests have been added to the corresponding fixture.
Closes#9552.
## Summary
Long ago, we had a single `ruff` crate. We started to break that up, and
at some point, we wanted to separate the CLI from the core library. So
we created `ruff_cli`, which created a `ruff` binary. Later, the `ruff`
crate was renamed to `ruff_linter` and further broken up into additional
crates.
(This is all from memory -- I didn't bother to look through the history
to ensure that this is 100% correct :))
Now that `ruff` no longer exists, this PR renames `ruff_cli` to `ruff`.
The primary benefit is that the binary target and the crate name are now
the same, which helps with downstream tooling like `cargo-dist`, and
also removes some complexity from the crate and `Cargo.toml` itself.
## Test Plan
- Ran `rm -rf target/release`.
- Ran `cargo build --release`.
- Verified that `./target/release/ruff` was created.
## Summary
#5920 with a fix for the erroneous slice in `module_name`. Fixes#9547.
## Test Plan
Added `import bbb.ccc._ddd as eee` to the test fixture to ensure it no
longer panics.
`cargo test`
## Summary
This implements the rule proposed in #1198 (though it doesn't close the
issue, as there are some open questions about configuration that might
merit some further discussion).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`. I also ran this PR branch on the CPython
codebase with `--fix --select=RUF022 --preview `, and the results looked
pretty good to me.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
## Summary
This PR is a more holistic fix for
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9534 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9159.
When we visit the AST, we track nodes that we need to visit _later_
(deferred nodes). For example, when visiting a function, we defer the
function body, since we don't want to visit the body until we've visited
the rest of the statements in the containing scope.
However, deferred nodes can themselves contain deferred nodes... For
example, a function body can contain a lambda (which contains a deferred
body). And then there are rarer cases, like a lambda inside of a type
annotation.
The aforementioned issues were fixed by reordering the deferral visits
to catch common cases. But even with those fixes, we still fail on cases
like:
```python
from __future__ import annotations
import re
from typing import cast
cast(lambda: re.match, 1)
```
Since we don't expect lambdas to appear inside of type definitions.
This PR modifies the `Checker` to keep visiting until all the deferred
stacks are empty. We _already_ do this for any one kind of deferred
node; now, we do it for _all_ of them at a level above.
## Summary
This is effectively the same problem as
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/9175. And this just papers over
it again, though I'm gonna try a more holistic fix in a follow-up PR.
The _real_ fix here is that we need to continue to visit deferred items
until they're exhausted since, e.g., we still get this case wrong
(flagging `re` as unused):
```python
import re
cast(lambda: re.match, 1)
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9534.
## Summary
Closes#9508 .
Add `__prepare__` method to dunder method list in
`is_known_dunder_method`.
## Test Plan
1. add "__prepare__" method to `Apple` class in
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pylint/bad_dunder_method_name.py.
2. run `cargo test`
Implements SIM113 from #998
Added tests
Limitations
- No fix yet
- Only flag cases where index variable immediately precede `for` loop
@charliermarsh please review and let me know any improvements
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
We haven't found time to flip this on, so feels like it's best to remove
it for now -- can always restore from source when we get back to it.
## Summary
Closes#9319, implements the [`SIM911` rule from
`flake8-simplify`](https://github.com/MartinThoma/flake8-simplify/pull/183).
#### Note
I wasn't sure whether or not to include
```rs
if checker.settings.preview.is_disabled() {
return;
}
```
at the beginning of the function with violation logic if the rule's
already declared as part of `RuleGroup::Preview`.
I've seen both variants, so I'd appreciate some feedback on that :)
## Summary
This PR attempts to improve `builtin-attribute-shadowing` (`A003`), a
rule which has been repeatedly criticized, but _does_ have value (just
not in the current form).
Historically, this rule would flag cases like:
```python
class Class:
id: int
```
This led to an increasing number of exceptions and special-cases to the
rule over time to try and improve it's specificity (e.g., ignore
`TypedDict`, ignore `@override`).
The crux of the issue is that given the above, referencing `id` will
never resolve to `Class.id`, so the shadowing is actually fine. There's
one exception, however:
```python
class Class:
id: int
def do_thing() -> id:
pass
```
Here, `id` actually resolves to the `id` attribute on the class, not the
`id` builtin.
So this PR completely reworks the rule around this _much_ more targeted
case, which will almost always be a mistake: when you reference a class
member from within the class, and that member shadows a builtin.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6524.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7806.
Fixes#8721
## Summary
This implements the rule proposed in #8721, as RUF021. `and` always
binds more tightly than `or` when chaining the two together.
(This should definitely be autofixable, but I'm leaving that to a
followup PR for now.)
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`
## Summary
On `main`, we flag redefinitions in cases like:
```python
import os
x = 1
if x > 0:
import os
```
That is, we consider these to be in the "same branch", since they're not
in disjoint branches. This matches Flake8's behavior, but it seems to
lead to false positives.
## Summary
Given a docstring like:
```python
def func(x: int, args: tuple[int]):
"""Toggle the gizmo.
Args:
x: Some argument.
args: Some other arguments.
"""
```
We were considering the `args:` descriptor to be an indented docstring
section header (since `Args:`) is a valid header name. This led to very
confusing diagnostics.
This PR makes the parsing a bit more lax in this case, such that if we
see a nested header that's more deeply indented than the preceding
header, and the preceding section allows sub-items (like `Args:`), we
avoid treating the nested item as a section header.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9426.
I just fixed this false negative in flake8-pyi
(https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-pyi/pull/460), and then realised ruff
has the exact same bug! Luckily it's a very easy fix.
(The bug is that unused protocols go undetected if they're generic.)
## Summary
Ensures that any lint rules that include line locations render them as
relative to the cell (and include the cell number) when inside a Jupyter
notebook.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6672.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR adds an autofix for the newly added PYI058 rule (added in
#9313). ~~The PR's current implementation is that the fix is only
available if the fully qualified name of `Generator` or `AsyncGenerator`
is being used:~~
- ~~`-> typing.Generator` is converted to `-> typing.Iterator`;~~
- ~~`-> collections.abc.AsyncGenerator[str, Any]` is converted to `->
collections.abc.AsyncIterator[str]`;~~
- ~~but `-> Generator` is _not_ converted to `-> Iterator`. (It would
require more work to figure out if `Iterator` was already imported or
not. And if it wasn't, where should we import it from? `typing`,
`typing_extensions`, or `collections.abc`? It seems much more
complicated.)~~
The fix is marked as always safe for `__iter__` or `__aiter__` methods
in `.pyi` files, but unsafe for all such methods in `.py` files that
have more than one statement in the method body.
This felt slightly fiddly to accomplish, but I couldn't _see_ any
utilities in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/tree/main/crates/ruff_linter/src/fix
that would have made it simpler to implement. Lmk if I'm missing
something, though -- my first time implementing an autofix! :)
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`.
## Summary
We had an early `continue` in this loop, and we weren't setting
`comparator = next;` when continuing... This PR removes the early
continue altogether for clarity.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9374.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR implements Y058 from flake8-pyi -- this is a new flake8-pyi rule
that was released as part of `flake8-pyi 23.11.0`. I've followed the
Python implementation as closely as possible (see
858c0918a8),
except that for the Ruff version, the rule also applies to `.py` files
as well as for `.pyi` files. (For `.py` files, we only emit the
diagnostic in very specific situations, however, as there's a much
higher likelihood of emitting false positives when applying this rule to
a `.py` file.)
## Test Plan
`cargo test`/`cargo insta review`
## Summary
Historically, we encoded this list by extracting the `__all__`. I went
to update it, but... is there really any value in it? Seems easier to
just treat `typing_extensions` as an alias for `typing`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9334.
## Summary
The logic that detects continuations assumed that tokens themselves
cannot span multiple lines. However, strings _can_ -- even single-quoted
strings.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9323.
## Summary
This PR modifies the semantics of `runtime-evaluated-decorators` to
respect decorators on both classes _and_ functions. Historically, this
only respected classes, since the common use-case is (e.g.)
`pydantic.BaseModel` -- but functions are equally valid.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9312.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
Given:
```python
from somewhere import get_cfg
def lookup_cfg(cfg_description):
cfg = get_cfg(cfg_description)
if cfg is not None:
return cfg
raise AttributeError(f"No cfg found matching {cfg_description}")
```
We were analyzing the method from last-to-first statement. So we saw the
`raise`, then assumed the method _always_ raised. In reality, though, it
_might_ return. This PR improves the branch analysis to respect these
mixed cases.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9269.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9304.
## Summary
Part of #970.
This adds Pylint's [R0244
empty_comment](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/user_guide/messages/refactor/empty-comment.html)
lint as well as an always-safe fix.
## Test Plan
The included snapshot verifies the following:
- A line containing only a non-empty comment is not changed
- A line containing leading whitespace before a non-empty comment is not
changed
- A line containing only an empty comment has its content deleted
- A line containing only leading whitespace before an empty comment has
its content deleted
- A line containing only leading and trailing whitespace on an empty
comment has its content deleted
- A line containing trailing whitespace after a non-empty comment is not
changed
- A line containing only a single newline character (i.e. a blank line)
is not changed
- A line containing code followed by a non-empty comment is not changed
- A line containing code followed by an empty comment has its content
deleted after the last non-whitespace character
- Lines containing code and no comments are not changed
- Empty comment lines within block comments are ignored
- Empty comments within triple-quoted sections are ignored
## Comparison to Pylint
Running Ruff and Pylint 3.0.3 with Python 3.12.0 against the
`empty_comment.py` file added in this PR, we see the following:
* Identical behavior:
* empty_comment.py:3:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:4:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:5:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:18:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* Differing behavior:
* Pylint doesn't ignore empty comments in block comments commonly used
for visual spacing; I decided these were fine in this implementation
since many projects use these and likely do not want them removed.
* empty_comment.py:28:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* Pylint detects "empty comments" within the triple-quoted section at
the bottom of the file, which is arguably a bug in the Pylint
implementation since these are not truly comments. These are ignored by
this implementation.
* empty_comment.py:37:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:38:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
* empty_comment.py:39:0: R2044: Line with empty comment (empty-comment)
## Summary
Hey there 👋 thanks for this great project!
On python code looking like the following
```
import yaml
from yaml.loader import SafeLoader
with MY_FILE_PATH.open("r") as my_file:
my_data = yaml.load(my_file, Loader=SafeLoader)
```
ruff reports this error:
```
S506 Probable use of unsafe loader `SafeLoader` with `yaml.load`. Allows instantiation of arbitrary objects. Consider `yaml.safe_load`.
```
This PR is an attempt to support SafeLoader being imported for either
`yaml` or `yaml.loader`
Disclaimer:
I am not familiar with Rust so this is likely not the better way of
doing it. Interested in hearing how to adapt this PR to provide similar
behavior in a better way
## Test Plan
The S506.py file was updated accordingly to cover the use cases and test
were confirmed to pass with this change.
## Summary
If `RUF100` is ignored via `per-file-ignores`, we need to avoid raising
it. `RUF100` has special "self-ignore" logic, since the rule itself
deals with `# noqa` directives. This PR wires up `per-file-ignores` to
that "self-ignore" logic.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9297.
We should avoid adding `-> None` to stubs in `.pyi` files, along with a
few other cases. (We already ignore abstract methods.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9270.
## Summary
Adds a rule to detect unions that include `typing.NoReturn` or
`typing.Never`. In such cases, the use of the bottom type is redundant.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9113.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
fixes#6956
details in issue
Following an advice in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6956#issuecomment-1817672585,
this change separates expressions to 3 levels of "constant likelihood":
* literals, empty dict and tuples... (definitely constant, level 2)
* CONSTANT_CASE vars (probably constant, 1)
* all other expressions (0)
a comparison is marked yoda if the level is strictly higher on its left
hand side
following
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6956#issuecomment-1697107822
marking compound expressions of literals (e.g. `60 * 60` ) as constants
this change current behaviour on
`SomeClass().settings.SOME_CONSTANT_VALUE > (60 * 60)` in the fixture
from error to ok
## Summary
Given a function like:
```python
def func(x: int):
if not x:
raise ValueError
else:
raise TypeError
```
We now correctly use `NoReturn` as the return type, rather than `None`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9201.
## Summary
Part of #8771. flake8-pyi will emit a Y018 error for unused TypeVars,
ParamSpecs or TypeVarTuples; Ruff currently only emits PYI018 for unused
TypeVars.
This is my first "proper" Ruff PR -- let me know if there's a better way
of doing this! Not sure if the repeated calls to `match_typing_expr()`
are ideal.
## Test Plan
I manually updated the fixtures to add some unused ParamSpecs and
TypeVarTuples, and then updated the snapshots using `cargo insta
review`. All tests then passed when run using `cargo test`.
## Summary
Given `Callable[[Callable[_P, _R]], Callable[_P, _R]]` from the
originating issue, when quoting `Callable`, we quoted the inner
`[Callable[_P, _R]]`, and then created a separate edit for the outer
`Callable`. Since there's an extra level of nesting in the subscript,
the edit for `[Callable[_P, _R]]` correctly did _not_ expand to the
entire expression. However, in this case, we should discard the inner
edit, since the expression is getting quoted by the outer edit anyway.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9162.
## Summary
A common mistake is to add quotes around one member in an `X | Y`-style
type union, as in:
```python
contract_versions_list: list[ContractVersion] | 'QuerySet[ContractVersion]' | None = None
```
However, doing so will lead to a runtime error if the annotation is
runtime-evaluated. This PR lints against such patterns.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9139.
## Summary
Fix dropped union expressions for piped non-types in `PYI055` autofix
If you had `type[int] | type[str] | str`, it would have dropped the
`str`, which breaks the type!
Closes#9156
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Fix#9080
Example, where `[]` is a 2 byte non-breaking space:
```
def f():
""" Docstring header
^^^^ Real indentation is 4 chars
docstring body, over-indented
^^^^^^ Over-indentation is 6 - 4 = 2 chars due to this line
[] [] docstring body 2, further indented
^^^^^ We take these 4 chars/5 bytes to match the docstring ...
^^^ ... and these 2 chars/3 bytes to remove the `over_indented_size` ...
^^ ... but preserve this real indent
```
Given:
```python
x: DataFrame[
int
] = 1
```
We currently wrap the annotation in single quotes, which leads to a
syntax error:
```python
x: "DataFrame[
int
]" = 1
```
There are a few options for what to suggest for users here... Use triple
quotes:
```python
x: """DataFrame[
int
]""" = 1
```
Or, use an implicit string concatenation (which may require
parentheses):
```python
x: ("DataFrame["
"int"
"]") = 1
```
The solution I settled on here is to use the `Generator`, which
effectively means we write it out on a single line, like:
```python
x: "DataFrame[int]" = 1
```
It's kind of the "least opinionated" solution, but it does mean we'll
expand to a very long line in some cases.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9136.
## Summary
This allows us to fix usages like:
```python
from pandas import DataFrame
def baz() -> DataFrame:
...
```
By quoting the `DataFrame` in `-> DataFrame`. Without quotes, moving
`from pandas import DataFrame` into an `if TYPE_CHECKING:` block will
fail at runtime, since Python tries to evaluate the annotation to add it
to the function's `__annotations__`.
Unfortunately, this does require us to split our "annotation kind" flags
into three categories, rather than two:
- `typing-only`: The annotation is only evaluated at type-checking-time.
- `runtime-evaluated`: Python will evaluate the annotation at runtime
(like above) -- but we're willing to quote it.
- `runtime-required`: Python will evaluate the annotation at runtime
(like above), and some library (like Pydantic) needs it to be available
at runtime, so we _can't_ quote it.
This functionality is gated behind a setting
(`flake8-type-checking.quote-annotations`).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5559.
## Summary
Adds `find_assigned_value` a function which gets the `&Expr` assigned to
a given `id` if one exists in the semantic model.
Open TODOs:
- [ ] Handle `binding.kind.is_unpacked_assignment()`: I am bit confused
by this one. The snippet from its documentation does not appear to be
counted as an unpacked assignment and the only ones I could find for
which that was true were invalid Python like:
```python
x, y = 1
```
- [ ] How to handle AugAssign. Can we combine statements like:
```python
(a, b) = [(1, 2, 3), (4,)]
a += (6, 7)
```
to get the full value for a? Code currently just returns `None` for
these assign types
- [ ] Multi target assigns
```python
m_c = (m_d, m_e) = (0, 0)
trio.sleep(m_c) # OK
trio.sleep(m_d) # TRIO115
trio.sleep(m_e) # TRIO115
```
## Test Plan
Used the function in two rules:
- `TRIO115`
- `PERF101`
Expanded both their fixtures for explicit multi target check
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Check floating-point numbers similarly to integers in FURB163. For
example, both `math.log(x, 10)` and `math.log(x, 10.0)` should be
changed to `math.log10(x)`.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Added couple of test cases.
## Summary
E274 currently flags any keyword at the start of a line indented with
tabs. This turns out to be due to a bug in `Whitespace::trailing` that
never considers any whitespace containing a tab as indentation.
## Test Plan
Added a simple test case.
This PR allows `matplotlib.use` calls to intersperse imports without
triggering `E402`. This is a pragmatic choice as it's common to require
`matplotlib.use` calls prior to importing from within `matplotlib`
itself.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9091.
## Summary
Fixes#8863 : Detect asyncio-dangling-task (RUF006) when discarding
return value
## Test Plan
added new two testcases, changed result of an old one that was made more
specific
## Summary
It's common to interleave a `sys.path` modification between imports at
the top of a file. This is a frequent cause of `# noqa: E402` false
positives, as seen in the ecosystem checks. This PR modifies E402 to
omit such modifications when determining the "import boundary".
(We could consider linting against `sys.path` modifications, but that
should be a separate rule.)
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5557.
Rebase of #6365 authored by @davidszotten.
## Summary
This PR updates the AST structure for an f-string elements.
The main **motivation** behind this change is to have a dedicated node
for the string part of an f-string. Previously, the existing
`ExprStringLiteral` node was used for this purpose which isn't exactly
correct. The `ExprStringLiteral` node should include the quotes as well
in the range but the f-string literal element doesn't include the quote
as it's a specific part within an f-string. For example,
```python
f"foo {x}"
# ^^^^
# This is the literal part of an f-string
```
The introduction of `FStringElement` enum is helpful which represent
either the literal part or the expression part of an f-string.
### Rule Updates
This means that there'll be two nodes representing a string depending on
the context. One for a normal string literal while the other is a string
literal within an f-string. The AST checker is updated to accommodate
this change. The rules which work on string literal are updated to check
on the literal part of f-string as well.
#### Notes
1. The `Expr::is_literal_expr` method would check for
`ExprStringLiteral` and return true if so. But now that we don't
represent the literal part of an f-string using that node, this improves
the method's behavior and confines to the actual expression. We do have
the `FStringElement::is_literal` method.
2. We avoid checking if we're in a f-string context before adding to
`string_type_definitions` because the f-string literal is now a
dedicated node and not part of `Expr`.
3. Annotations cannot use f-string so we avoid changing any rules which
work on annotation and checks for `ExprStringLiteral`.
## Test Plan
- All references of `Expr::StringLiteral` were checked to see if any of
the rules require updating to account for the f-string literal element
node.
- New test cases are added for rules which check against the literal
part of an f-string.
- Check the ecosystem results and ensure it remains unchanged.
## Performance
There's a performance penalty in the parser. The reason for this remains
unknown as it seems that the generated assembly code is now different
for the `__reduce154` function. The reduce function body is just popping
the `ParenthesizedExpr` on top of the stack and pushing it with the new
location.
- The size of `FStringElement` enum is the same as `Expr` which is what
it replaces in `FString::format_spec`
- The size of `FStringExpressionElement` is the same as
`ExprFormattedValue` which is what it replaces
I tried reducing the `Expr` enum from 80 bytes to 72 bytes but it hardly
resulted in any performance gain. The difference can be seen here:
- Original profile: https://share.firefox.dev/3Taa7ES
- Profile after boxing some node fields:
https://share.firefox.dev/3GsNXpD
### Backtracking
I tried backtracking the changes to see if any of the isolated change
produced this regression. The problem here is that the overall change is
so small that there's only a single checkpoint where I can backtrack and
that checkpoint results in the same regression. This checkpoint is to
revert using `Expr` to the `FString::format_spec` field. After this
point, the change would revert back to the original implementation.
## Review process
The review process is similar to #7927. The first set of commits update
the node structure, parser, and related AST files. Then, further commits
update the linter and formatter part to account for the AST change.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Szotten <davidszotten@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR updates the `ANN201`, `ANN202`, `ANN205`, and `ANN206` rules to
not create a fix for the return type when it's an abstract method and
the function body is empty i.e., it only contains either a pass
statement, docstring or an ellipsis literal.
fixes: #9004
## Test Plan
Add the following test cases:
- Abstract method with pass statement
- Abstract method with docstring
- Abstract method with ellipsis literal
- Abstract method with possible return type
## Summary
If a string has a Unicode prefix, we can't add the `r` prefix on top of
that -- we need to remove and replace it. (The Unicode prefix is
redundant anyway in Python 3.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8967.
## Summary
Check PEP 695 type alias definitions for `snake-case-type-alias`
(`PYI042`) and `t-suffixed-type-alias` (`PYI043`)
Related to #8771.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
- Adds `add_argument` similar to existing `remove_argument` utility to
safely add arguments to functions.
- Adds autofix for `PLW1514` as per specs requested in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8883 as a test
## Test Plan
Checks on existing fixtures as well as additional test and fixture for
Python 3.9 and lower fix
## Issue Link
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8883
Hoël Bagard
Jane Lewis
Michael Merickel
Mikko Leppänen
Shaygan Hooshyari
Justin Sexton
Micha Reiser
Robin Caloudis
Seo Sanghyeon
Arjun Munji
Charlie Marsh
Ottavio Hartman
Daniël van Noord
Adrien Ball
Asger Hautop Drewsen
Aleksei Latyshev
Auguste Lalande
Alex Waygood
Jack McIvor
Zanie Blue
Christopher Covington
Steve C
Bartosz Sławecki
Akira Noda
Tom Kuson
Thomas M Kehrenberg
yataka
Chammika Mannakkara
trag1c
qdegraaf
Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos
Mike Bernard
Mikael Arguedas
Shantanu
asafamr-mm
Tuomas Siipola
konsti
T-256
Samuel Cormier-Iijima
Simon Brugman
Dhruv Manilawala
Philipp A