Commit Graph

74 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Waygood 9d8cba4e8b
[ty] Improve disjointness inference for `NominalInstanceType`s and `SubclassOfType`s (#18864)
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-06-24 20:27:37 +00:00
Douglas Creager ea812d0813
[ty] Homogeneous and mixed tuples (#18600)
We already had support for homogeneous tuples (`tuple[int, ...]`). This
PR extends this to also support mixed tuples (`tuple[str, str,
*tuple[int, ...], str str]`).

A mixed tuple consists of a fixed-length (possibly empty) prefix and
suffix, and a variable-length portion in the middle. Every element of
the variable-length portion must be of the same type. A homogeneous
tuple is then just a mixed tuple with an empty prefix and suffix.

The new data representation uses different Rust types for a fixed-length
(aka heterogeneous) tuple. Another option would have been to use the
`VariableLengthTuple` representation for all tuples, and to wrap the
"variable + suffix" portion in an `Option`. I don't think that would
simplify the method implementations much, though, since we would still
have a 2×2 case analysis for most of them.

One wrinkle is that the definition of the `tuple` class in the typeshed
has a single typevar, and canonically represents a homogeneous tuple.
When getting the class of a tuple instance, that means that we have to
summarize our detailed mixed tuple type information into its
"homogeneous supertype". (We were already doing this for heterogeneous
types.)

A similar thing happens when concatenating two mixed tuples: the
variable-length portion and suffix of the LHS, and the prefix and
variable-length portion of the RHS, all get unioned into the
variable-length portion of the result. The LHS prefix and RHS suffix
carry through unchanged.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
2025-06-20 18:23:54 -04:00
InSync 20d73dd41c
[ty] Report when a dataclass contains more than one `KW_ONLY` field (#18731)
## Summary

Part of [#111](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/111).

After this change, dataclasses with two or more `KW_ONLY` field will be
reported as invalid. The duplicate fields will simply be ignored when
computing `__init__`'s signature.

## Test Plan

Markdown tests.
2025-06-19 19:42:31 -07:00
Alex Waygood 685eac10e5
Revert "[ty] Offer "Did you mean...?" suggestions for unresolved `from` imports and unresolved attributes (#18705)" (#18721) 2025-06-17 15:48:09 +01:00
Alex Waygood 913f136d33
[ty] Offer "Did you mean...?" suggestions for unresolved `from` imports and unresolved attributes (#18705)
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
2025-06-17 11:10:34 +01:00
InSync 6d56ee803e
[ty] Add partial support for `TypeIs` (#18589)
## Summary

Part of [#117](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/117).

`TypeIs[]` is a special form that allows users to define their own
narrowing functions. Despite the syntax, `TypeIs` is not a generic and,
on its own, it is meaningless as a type.
[Officially](https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/narrowing.html#typeis),
a function annotated as returning a `TypeIs[T]` is a <i>type narrowing
function</i>, where `T` is called the <i>`TypeIs` return type</i>.

A `TypeIs[T]` may or may not be bound to a symbol. Only bound types have
narrowing effect:

```python
def f(v: object = object()) -> TypeIs[int]: ...

a: str = returns_str()

if reveal_type(f()):   # Unbound: TypeIs[int]
	reveal_type(a)     # str

if reveal_type(f(a)):  # Bound:   TypeIs[a, int]
	reveal_type(a)     # str & int
```

Delayed usages of a bound type has no effect, however:

```python
b = f(a)

if b:
	reveal_type(a)     # str
```

A `TypeIs[T]` type:

* Is fully static when `T` is fully static.
* Is a singleton/single-valued when it is bound.
* Has exactly two runtime inhabitants when it is unbound: `True` and
`False`.
  In other words, an unbound type have ambiguous truthiness.
It is possible to infer more precise truthiness for bound types;
however, that is not part of this change.

`TypeIs[T]` is a subtype of or otherwise assignable to `bool`. `TypeIs`
is invariant with respect to the `TypeIs` return type: `TypeIs[int]` is
neither a subtype nor a supertype of `TypeIs[bool]`. When ty sees a
function marked as returning `TypeIs[T]`, its `return`s will be checked
against `bool` instead. ty will also report such functions if they don't
accept a positional argument. Addtionally, a type narrowing function
call with no positional arguments (e.g., `f()` in the example above)
will be considered invalid.

## Test Plan

Markdown tests.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-06-13 15:27:45 -07:00
Alex Waygood ce8b744f17
[ty] Only calculate information for unresolved-reference subdiagnostic if we know we'll emit the diagnostic (#18465)
## Summary

This optimizes some of the logic added in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18444. In general, we only
calculate information for subdiagnostics if we know we'll actually emit
the diagnostic. The check to see whether we'll emit the diagnostic is
work we'll definitely have to do whereas the the work to gather
information for a subdiagnostic isn't work we necessarily have to do if
the diagnostic isn't going to be emitted at all.

This PR makes us lazier about gathering the information we need for the
subdiagnostic, and moves all the subdiagnostic logic into one function
rather than having some `unresolved-reference` subdiagnostic logic in
`infer.rs` and some in `diagnostic.rs`.

## Test Plan

`cargo test -p ty_python_semantic`
2025-06-04 20:41:00 +01:00
Douglas Creager 2c3b3d3230
[ty] Create separate `FunctionLiteral` and `FunctionType` types (#18360)
This updates our representation of functions to more closely match our
representation of classes.

The new `OverloadLiteral` and `FunctionLiteral` classes represent a
function definition in the AST. If a function is generic, this is
unspecialized. `FunctionType` has been updated to represent a function
type, which is specialized if the function is generic. (These names are
chosen to match `ClassLiteral` and `ClassType` on the class side.)

This PR does not add a separate `Type` variant for `FunctionLiteral`.
Maybe we should? Possibly as a follow-on PR?

Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/462

---------

Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2025-06-03 10:59:31 -04:00
Alex Waygood 47a2ec002e
[ty] Split `Type::KnownInstance` into two type variants (#18350) 2025-05-29 14:47:55 +01:00
Alex Waygood 6453ac9ea1
[ty] Tell the user why we inferred a certain Python version when reporting version-specific syntax errors (#18295) 2025-05-26 20:44:43 +00:00
David Peter 6392dccd24
[ty] Add warning that docs are autogenerated (#18270)
## Summary

This is a practice I followed on previous projects. Should hopefully
further help developers who want to update the documentation.

The big downside is that it's annoying to see this *as a user of the
documentation* if you don't open the Markdown file in the browser. But
I'd argue that those files don't really follow the original Markdown
spirit anyway with all the inline HTML.
2025-05-23 09:58:16 +00:00
Alex Waygood d02c9ada5d
[ty] Do not carry the generic context of `Protocol` or `Generic` in the `ClassBase` enum (#17989)
## Summary

It doesn't seem to be necessary for our generics implementation to carry
the `GenericContext` in the `ClassBase` variants. Removing it simplifies
the code, fixes many TODOs about `Generic` or `Protocol` appearing
multiple times in MROs when each should only appear at most once, and
allows us to more accurately detect runtime errors that occur due to
`Generic` or `Protocol` appearing multiple times in a class's bases.

In order to remove the `GenericContext` from the `ClassBase` variant, it
turns out to be necessary to emulate
`typing._GenericAlias.__mro_entries__`, or we end up with a large number
of false-positive `inconsistent-mro` errors. This PR therefore also does
that.

Lastly, this PR fixes the inferred MROs of PEP-695 generic classes,
which implicitly inherit from `Generic` even if they have no explicit
bases.

## Test Plan

mdtests
2025-05-22 21:37:03 -04:00
InSync bcefa459f4
[ty] Rename `call-possibly-unbound-method` to `possibly-unbound-implicit-call` (#18017) 2025-05-22 15:25:51 +00:00
Alex Waygood cb04343b3b
[ty] Split `invalid-base` error code into two error codes (#18245) 2025-05-21 18:02:39 -04:00
Alex Waygood d37592175f
[ty] Tell the user why we inferred the Python version we inferred (#18082) 2025-05-21 11:06:27 -04:00
Carl Meyer d098118e37
[ty] disable division-by-zero by default (#18220)
## Summary

I think `division-by-zero` is a low-value diagnostic in general; most
real division-by-zero errors (especially those that are less obvious to
the human eye) will occur on values typed as `int`, in which case we
don't issue the diagnostic anyway. Mypy and pyright do not emit this
diagnostic.

Currently the diagnostic is prone to false positives because a) we do
not silence it in unreachable code, and b) we do not implement narrowing
of literals from inequality checks. We will probably fix (a) regardless,
but (b) is low priority apart from division-by-zero.

I think we have many more important things to do and should not allow
false positives on a low-value diagnostic to be a distraction. Not
opposed to re-enabling this diagnostic in future when we can prioritize
reducing its false positives.

References https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/443

## Test Plan

Existing tests.
2025-05-20 14:47:56 -04:00
David Peter 4c889d5251
[ty] Support `typing.TypeAliasType` (#18156)
## Summary

Support direct uses of `typing.TypeAliasType`, as in:

```py
from typing import TypeAliasType

IntOrStr = TypeAliasType("IntOrStr", int | str)

def f(x: IntOrStr) -> None:
    reveal_type(x)  # revealed: int | str
```

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/392

## Ecosystem

The new false positive here:
```diff
+ error[invalid-type-form] altair/utils/core.py:49:53: The first argument to `Callable` must be either a list of types, ParamSpec, Concatenate, or `...`
```
comes from the fact that we infer the second argument as a type
expression now. We silence false positives for PEP695 `ParamSpec`s, but
not for `P = ParamSpec("P")` inside `Callable[P, ...]`.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-05-19 16:36:49 +02:00
David Peter 6800a9f6f3
[ty] Add type-expression syntax link to invalid-type-expression (#18104)
## Summary

Add a link to [this
page](https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/annotations.html#type-and-annotation-expressions)
when emitting `invalid-type-expression` diagnostics.
2025-05-14 18:56:44 +00:00
Alex Waygood c0f22928bd
[ty] Add a note to the diagnostic if a new builtin is used on an old Python version (#18068)
## Summary

If the user tries to use a new builtin on an old Python version, tell
them what Python version the builtin was added on, what our inferred
Python version is for their project, and what configuration settings
they can tweak to fix the error.

## Test Plan

Snapshots and screenshots:


![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/767d570e-7af1-4e1f-98cf-50e4311db511)
2025-05-13 10:08:04 -04:00
InSync 249a852a6e
[ty] Document nearly all lints (#17981) 2025-05-09 18:06:56 +01:00
Alex Waygood da8540862d
[ty] Make `unused-ignore-comment` disabled by default for now (#17955) 2025-05-08 17:21:34 +01:00
Micha Reiser 6a5533c44c
[ty] Change default severity for `unbound-reference` to `error` (#17936) 2025-05-08 17:54:46 +02:00
Micha Reiser d608eae126
[ty] Ignore `possibly-unresolved-reference` by default (#17934) 2025-05-08 17:44:56 +02:00
Micha Reiser 5eb215e8e5
[ty] Generate and add rules table (#17953) 2025-05-08 16:55:39 +02:00