## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/957
As explained in https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/957, literal
union types for recursively defined values can be widened early to
speed up the convergence of fixed-point iterations.
This PR achieves this by embedding a marker in `UnionType` that
distinguishes whether a value is recursively defined.
This also allows us to identify values that are not recursively
defined, so I've increased the limit on the number of elements in a
literal union type for such values.
Edit: while this PR doesn't provide the significant performance
improvement initially hoped for, it does have the benefit of allowing
the number of elements in a literal union to be raised above the salsa
limit, and indeed mypy_primer results revealed that a literal union of
220 elements was actually being used.
## Test Plan
`call/union.md` has been updated
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1587
## Summary
Perform cycle normalization on typevar bounds and constraints (similar
to how it was already done for typevar defaults) in order to ensure
convergence in cyclic cases.
There might be another fix here that could avoid the cycle in many more
cases, where we don't eagerly evaluate typevar bounds/constraints on
explicit specialization, but just accept the given specialization and
later evaluate to see whether we need to emit a diagnostic on it. But
the current fix here is sufficient to solve the problem and matches the
patterns we use to ensure cycle convergence elsewhere, so it seems good
for now; left a TODO for the other idea.
This fix is sufficient to make us not panic, but not sufficient to get
the semantics fully correct; see the TODOs in the tests. I have ideas
for fixing that as well, but it seems worth at least getting this in to
fix the panic.
## Test Plan
Test that previously panicked now does not.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
This makes auto-import include modules in suggestions.
In this initial implementation, we permit this to include submodules as
well. This is in contrast to what we do in `import ...` completions.
It's easy to change this behavior, but I think it'd be interesting to
run with this for now to see how well it works.
The existing importer functionality always required
an import request with a module and a member in that
module. But we want to be able to insert import statements
for a module itself and not any members in the module.
This is basically changing `member: &str` to an
`Option<&str>` and fixing the fallout in a way that
makes sense for module-only imports.
I think changes to this value are generally noise. It's hard to tell
what it means and it isn't especially actionable. We already have an
eval running in CI for completion ranking, so I don't think it's
terribly important to care about ranking here in e2e tests _generally_.
A completion lacking a module reference doesn't necessarily mean that
the symbol is defined within the current module. I believe the intent
here is that it means that no import is required to use it.
These are all improvements here with one slight regression on
`reveal_type` ranking. The previous completions offered were:
```
$ cargo r -q -p ty_completion_eval show-one ty-extensions-lower-stdlib
ENOTRECOVERABLE (module: errno)
REG_WHOLE_HIVE_VOLATILE (module: winreg)
SQLITE_NOTICE_RECOVER_WAL (module: _sqlite3)
SupportsGetItemViewable (module: _typeshed)
removeHandler (module: unittest.signals)
reveal_mro (module: ty_extensions)
reveal_protocol_interface (module: ty_extensions)
reveal_type (module: typing) (*, 8/10)
_remove_original_values (module: _osx_support)
_remove_universal_flags (module: _osx_support)
-----
found 10 completions
```
And now they are:
```
$ cargo r -q -p ty_completion_eval show-one ty-extensions-lower-stdlib
ENOTRECOVERABLE (module: errno)
REG_WHOLE_HIVE_VOLATILE (module: winreg)
SQLITE_NOTICE_RECOVER_WAL (module: sqlite3)
SQLITE_NOTICE_RECOVER_WAL (module: sqlite3.dbapi2)
removeHandler (module: unittest)
removeHandler (module: unittest.signals)
reveal_mro (module: ty_extensions)
reveal_protocol_interface (module: ty_extensions)
reveal_type (module: typing) (*, 9/9)
-----
found 9 completions
```
Some completions were removed (because they are now considered
unexported) and some were added (likely do to better re-export support).
This particular case probably warrants more special attention anyway.
So I think this is fine. (It's only a one-ranking regression.)
This applies recursively. So if *any* component of a module name starts
with a `_`, then symbols from that module are excluded from auto-import.
The exception is when it's a module within first party code. Then we
want to include it in auto-import.
Note that the `Deprecated` symbols from `importlib.metadata` are no
longer offered because 1) `importlib.metadata` defined `__all__` and 2)
the `Deprecated` symbols aren't in it. These seem to not be a part of
its public API according to the docs, so this seems right to me.
This commit (mostly) re-implements the support for `__all__` in
ty-proper, but inside the auto-import AST scanner.
When `__all__` isn't present in a module, we fall back to conventions to
determine whether a symbol is exported or not:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/index.html
However, in keeping with current practice for non-auto-import
completions, we continue to provide sunder and dunder names as
re-exports.
When `__all__` is present, we respect it strictly. That is, a symbol is
exported *if and only if* it's in `__all__`. This is somewhat stricter
than pylance seemingly is. I felt like it was a good idea to start here,
and we can relax it based on user demand (perhaps through a setting).
This simplifies the existing visitor by DRYing it up slightly.
We also add tests for the existing functionality. In particular,
we want to add support for re-export conventions, and that
warrants more careful testing.
## Summary
I realized we don't really test `DefinitionKind::ImportFromSubmodule` in
the IDE at all, so here's a bunch of them, just recording our current
behaviour.
## Test Plan
*stares at the camera*
## Summary
I have no idea what I'm doing with the fix (all the interesting stuff is
in the second commit).
The basic problem is the compiler emits the diagnostic:
```
x: "foobar"
^^^^^^
```
Which the suppression code-action hands the end of to `Tokens::after`
which then panics because that function panics if handed an offset that
is in the middle of a token.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1748
## Test Plan
Many tests added (only the e2e test matters).
## Summary
This makes an importing file a required argument to module resolution,
and if the fast-path cached query fails to resolve the module, take the
slow-path uncached (could be cached if we want)
`desperately_resolve_module` which will walk up from the importing file
until it finds a `pyproject.toml` (arbitrary decision, we could try
every ancestor directory), at which point it takes one last desperate
attempt to use that directory as a search-path. We do not continue
walking up once we've found a `pyproject.toml` (arbitrary decision, we
could keep going up).
Running locally, this fixes every broken-for-workspace-reasons import in
pyx's workspace!
* Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1539
* Improves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/839
## Test Plan
The workspace tests see a huge improvement on most absolute imports.
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1716.
## Test plan
I added a corpus snippet that causes us to panic on `main` (I tested by
running `cargo run -p ty_python_semantic --test=corpus` without the fix
applied).
## Summary
This PR re-implements [return-in-generator
(B901)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/return-in-generator/#return-in-generator-b901)
for async generators as a semantic syntax error. This is not a syntax
error for sync generators, so we'll need to preserve both the lint rule
and the syntax error in this case.
It also updates B901 and the new implementation to catch cases where the
generator's `yield` or `yield from` expression is part of another
statement, as in:
```py
def foo():
return (yield)
```
These were previously not caught because we only looked for
`Stmt::Expr(Expr::Yield)` in `visit_stmt` instead of visiting `yield`
expressions directly. I think this modification is within the spirit of
the rule and safe to try out since the rule is in preview.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I have written tests as directed in #17412
---------
Signed-off-by: 11happy <soni5happy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: 11happy <bhuminjaysoni@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Star-imports can not just affect the state of symbols that they pull in,
they can also affect the state of members that are associated with those
symbols. For example, if `obj.attr` was previously narrowed from `int |
None` to `int`, and a star-import now overwrites `obj`, then the
narrowing on `obj.attr` should be "reset".
This PR keeps track of the state of associated members during star
imports and properly models the flow of their corresponding state
through the control flow structure that we artificially create for
star-imports.
See [this
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1355#issuecomment-3607125005)
for an explanation why this caused ty to see certain `asyncio` symbols
as not being accessible on Python 3.14.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1355
## Ecosystem impact
```diff
async-utils (https://github.com/mikeshardmind/async-utils)
- src/async_utils/bg_loop.py:115:31: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to bound method `set_task_factory` is incorrect: Expected `_TaskFactory | None`, found `def eager_task_factory[_T_co](loop: AbstractEventLoop | None, coro: Coroutine[Any, Any, _T_co@eager_task_factory], *, name: str | None = None, context: Context | None = None) -> Task[_T_co@eager_task_factory]`
- Found 30 diagnostics
+ Found 29 diagnostics
mitmproxy (https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy)
+ mitmproxy/utils/asyncio_utils.py:96:60: warning[unused-ignore-comment] Unused blanket `type: ignore` directive
- test/conftest.py:37:31: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to bound method `set_task_factory` is incorrect: Expected `_TaskFactory | None`, found `def eager_task_factory[_T_co](loop: AbstractEventLoop | None, coro: Coroutine[Any, Any, _T_co@eager_task_factory], *, name: str | None = None, context: Context | None = None) -> Task[_T_co@eager_task_factory]`
```
All of these seem to be correct, they give us a different type for
`asyncio` symbols that are now imported from different
`sys.version_info` branches (where we previously failed to recognize
some of these as statically true/false).
```diff
dd-trace-py (https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py)
- ddtrace/contrib/internal/asyncio/patch.py:39:12: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function `unwrap` is incorrect: Expected `WrappedFunction`, found `def create_task[_T](self, coro: Coroutine[Any, Any, _T@create_task] | Generator[Any, None, _T@create_task], *, name: object = None) -> Task[_T@create_task]`
+ ddtrace/contrib/internal/asyncio/patch.py:39:12: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function `unwrap` is incorrect: Expected `WrappedFunction`, found `def create_task[_T](self, coro: Generator[Any, None, _T@create_task] | Coroutine[Any, Any, _T@create_task], *, name: object = None) -> Task[_T@create_task]`
```
Similar, but only results in a diagnostic change.
## Test Plan
Added a regression test
This fixes a non-determinism that we were seeing in the constraint set
tests in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21715.
In this test, we create the following constraint set, and then try to
create a specialization from it:
```
(T@constrained_by_gradual_list = list[Base])
∨
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
```
That is, `T` is either specifically `list[Base]`, or it's any `list`.
Our current heuristics say that, absent other restrictions, we should
specialize `T` to the more specific type (`list[Base]`).
In the correct test output, we end up creating a BDD that looks like
this:
```
(T@constrained_by_gradual_list = list[Base])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ (Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ never
```
In the incorrect output, the BDD looks like this:
```
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ never
```
The difference is the ordering of the two individual constraints. Both
constraints appear in the first BDD, but the second BDD only contains `T
is any list`. If we were to force the second BDD to contain both
constraints, it would look like this:
```
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ (T@constrained_by_gradual_list = list[Base])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ never
```
This is the standard shape for an OR of two constraints. However! Those
two constraints are not independent of each other! If `T` is
specifically `list[Base]`, then it's definitely also "any `list`". From
that, we can infer the contrapositive: that if `T` is not any list, then
it cannot be `list[Base]` specifically. When we encounter impossible
situations like that, we prune that path in the BDD, and treat it as
`false`. That rewrites the second BDD to the following:
```
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ (T@constrained_by_gradual_list = list[Base])
┡━₁ never <-- IMPOSSIBLE, rewritten to never
└─₀ never
```
We then would see that that BDD node is redundant, since both of its
outgoing edges point at the `never` node. Our BDDs are _reduced_, which
means we have to remove that redundant node, resulting in the BDD we saw
above:
```
(Bottom[list[Any]] ≤ T@constrained_by_gradual_list ≤ Top[list[Any]])
┡━₁ always
└─₀ never <-- redundant node removed
```
The end result is that we were "forgetting" about the `T = list[Base]`
constraint, but only for some BDD variable orderings.
To fix this, I'm leaning in to the fact that our BDDs really do need to
"remember" all of the constraints that they were created with. Some
combinations might not be possible, but we now have the sequent map,
which is quite good at detecting and pruning those.
So now our BDDs are _quasi-reduced_, which just means that redundant
nodes are allowed. (At first I was worried that allowing redundant nodes
would be an unsound "fix the glitch". But it turns out they're real!
[This](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/130209) is the
paper that introduces them, though it's very difficult to read. Knuth
mentions them in §7.1.4 of
[TAOCP](https://course.khoury.northeastern.edu/csu690/ssl/bdd-knuth.pdf),
and [this paper](https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10128966) has a nice
short summary of them in §2.)
While we're here, I've added a bunch of `debug` and `trace` level log
messages to the constraint set implementation. I was getting tired of
having to add these by hands over and over. To enable them, just set
`TY_LOG` in your environment, e.g.
```sh
env TY_LOG=ty_python_semantic::types::constraints::SequentMap=trace ty check ...
```
[Note, this has an `internal` label because are still not using
`specialize_constrained` in anything user-facing yet.]
## Summary
For a type alias like the one below, where `UnknownClass` is something
with a dynamic type, we previously lost track of the fact that this
dynamic type was explicitly specialized *with a type variable*. If that
alias is then later explicitly specialized itself (`MyAlias[int]`), we
would miscount the number of legacy type variables and emit a
`invalid-type-arguments` diagnostic
([playground](https://play.ty.dev/886ae6cc-86c3-4304-a365-510d29211f85)).
```py
T = TypeVar("T")
MyAlias: TypeAlias = UnknownClass[T] | None
```
The solution implemented here is not pretty, but we can hopefully get
rid of it via https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1711. Also, once we
properly support `ParamSpec` and `Concatenate`, we should be able to
remove some of this code.
This addresses many of the `invalid-type-arguments` false-positives in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1685. With this change, there are
still some diagnostics of this type left. Instead of implementing even
more (rather sophisticated) workarounds for these cases as well, it
might be much easier to wait for full `ParamSpec`/`Concatenate` support
and then try again.
A disadvantage of this implementation is that we lose track of some
`@Todo` types and replace them with `Unknown`. We could spend more
effort and try to preserve them, but I'm unsure if this is the best use
of our time right now.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests.
## Summary
Implement default-specialization of generic type aliases (implicit or
PEP-613) if they are used in a type expression without an explicit
specialization.
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1690
## Typing conformance
```diff
-generics_defaults_specialization.py:26:5: error[type-assertion-failure] Type `SomethingWithNoDefaults[int, str]` does not match asserted type `SomethingWithNoDefaults[int, DefaultStrT]`
```
That's exactly what we want ✔️
All other tests in this file pass as well, with the exception of this
assertion, which is just wrong (at least according to our
interpretation, `type[Bar] != <class 'Bar'>`). I checked that we do
correctly default-specialize the type parameter which is not displayed
in the diagnostic that we raise.
```py
class Bar(SubclassMe[int, DefaultStrT]): ...
assert_type(Bar, type[Bar[str]]) # ty: Type `type[Bar[str]]` does not match asserted type `<class 'Bar'>`
```
## Ecosystem impact
Looks like I should have included this last week 😎
## Test Plan
Updated pre-existing tests and add a few new ones.
## Summary
This PR implements syntax error where a default type parameter is
followed by a non-default type parameter.
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17412#issuecomment-3584088217
## Test Plan
I have written inline tests as directed in #17412
---------
Signed-off-by: 11happy <bhuminjaysoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: 11happy <soni5happy@gmail.com>
This adds a new `suppression` module to the `ruff_linter` crate, similar
to the suppression
module for ty, to parse comments for ruff suppression directives, such
as `# ruff: disable[CODE]`.
## Summary
Fixes#21750 and a related bug in `PLE1142`. We were not properly
considering generators to be valid `await` contexts, which caused the
`F704` issue. One of the tests I added for this also uncovered an issue
in `PLE1142` for comprehensions nested within async generators because
we were only checking the current scope rather than traversing the
nested context.
## Test Plan
Both of these rules are implemented as semantic syntax errors, so I
added tests (and fixes) in both Ruff and ty.
Shunsuke Shibayama
Carl Meyer
Andrew Gallant
Aria Desires
Brent Westbrook
Micha Reiser
Dhruv Manilawala
Alex Waygood
Bhuminjay Soni
David Peter
William Woodruff
github-actions[bot]
Douglas Creager
Denys Zhak
Amethyst Reese
Ibraheem Ahmed