## Summary
#5920 with a fix for the erroneous slice in `module_name`. Fixes#9547.
## Test Plan
Added `import bbb.ccc._ddd as eee` to the test fixture to ensure it no
longer panics.
`cargo test`
## Summary
This implements the rule proposed in #1198 (though it doesn't close the
issue, as there are some open questions about configuration that might
merit some further discussion).
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`. I also ran this PR branch on the CPython
codebase with `--fix --select=RUF022 --preview `, and the results looked
pretty good to me.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
## Summary
add autofix for `deprecated_log_warn` (`PGH002`)
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Right now, if you run with `explicit-preview-rules`, and use something
like `select = ["RUF017"]`, we won't actually enable fixing for that
rule, because `fixable = ["ALL"]` (the default) won't include `RUF017`
due to the `explicit-preview-rules`.
The framing in this PR is that `explicit-preview-rules` should only
affect the enablement selectors, whereas the fixable selectors should
just include all possible matching rules. I think this will lead to the
most intuitive behavior.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9282. (An alternative to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/9284.)
## Summary
This PR is a more holistic fix for
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9534 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9159.
When we visit the AST, we track nodes that we need to visit _later_
(deferred nodes). For example, when visiting a function, we defer the
function body, since we don't want to visit the body until we've visited
the rest of the statements in the containing scope.
However, deferred nodes can themselves contain deferred nodes... For
example, a function body can contain a lambda (which contains a deferred
body). And then there are rarer cases, like a lambda inside of a type
annotation.
The aforementioned issues were fixed by reordering the deferral visits
to catch common cases. But even with those fixes, we still fail on cases
like:
```python
from __future__ import annotations
import re
from typing import cast
cast(lambda: re.match, 1)
```
Since we don't expect lambdas to appear inside of type definitions.
This PR modifies the `Checker` to keep visiting until all the deferred
stacks are empty. We _already_ do this for any one kind of deferred
node; now, we do it for _all_ of them at a level above.
## Summary
This is effectively the same problem as
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/9175. And this just papers over
it again, though I'm gonna try a more holistic fix in a follow-up PR.
The _real_ fix here is that we need to continue to visit deferred items
until they're exhausted since, e.g., we still get this case wrong
(flagging `re` as unused):
```python
import re
cast(lambda: re.match, 1)
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9534.
## Summary
I found that `cargo benchmark lexer` didn't work as expected:
```shell
❯ cargo benchmark lexer
Finished bench [optimized] target(s) in 0.08s
Running benches/formatter.rs (target/release/deps/formatter-4e1d9bf9d3ba529d)
Running benches/linter.rs (target/release/deps/linter-e449086ddfd8ad8c)
```
Turns out that `cargo bench -p ruff_benchmark` is now recommended over
`cargo benchmark`, so updating the docs to reflect that.
## Summary
Closes#9508 .
Add `__prepare__` method to dunder method list in
`is_known_dunder_method`.
## Test Plan
1. add "__prepare__" method to `Apple` class in
crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/pylint/bad_dunder_method_name.py.
2. run `cargo test`
Implements SIM113 from #998
Added tests
Limitations
- No fix yet
- Only flag cases where index variable immediately precede `for` loop
@charliermarsh please review and let me know any improvements
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
For emacs users just seeking a ruff formatter, apheleia is overkill.
Instead, a melpa package
[emacs-ruff-format](https://github.com/scop/emacs-ruff-format) exists
now.
This change prepends a mention of this package, without removing
apheleia as an alternative.
## Test Plan
This is how I integrated ruff into my emacs.
## Summary
In the `logical_lines`'s `expand_indent` , respect the
`LinterSettings::tab_size` setting instead of hardcoding the size of
tabs to 8.
Also see [this
conversation](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/9266#discussion_r1447102212)
## Test Plan
Tested by running `cargo test`
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixes#8334.
`Display` has been implemented for `ruff_workspace::Settings`, which
gives a much nicer and more readable output to `--show-settings`.
Internally, a `display_settings` utility macro has been implemented to
reduce the boilerplate of the display code.
### Work to be done
- [x] A lot of formatting for `Vec<_>` and `HashSet<_>` types have been
stubbed out, using `Debug` as a fallback. There should be a way to add
generic formatting support for these types as a modifier in
`display_settings`.
- [x] Several complex types were also stubbed out and need proper
`Display` implementations rather than falling back on `Debug`.
- [x] An open question needs to be answered: how important is it that
the output be valid TOML? Some types in settings, such as a hash-map
from a glob pattern to a multi-variant enum, will be hard to rework into
valid _and_ readable TOML.
- [x] Tests need to be implemented.
## Test Plan
Tests consist of a snapshot test for the default `--show-settings`
output and a doctest for `display_settings!`.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fix the message for `__aenter__ ` in PLC2801 (introduced in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/9166)
There is no `aenter` builtin in Python, so the current message is
misleading.
I take the message from original lint
https://github.com/pylint-dev/pylint/blob/main/pylint/constants.py#L211
P.S. I think here should be more accurate synchronization with original
lint (e.g. the current implementation will not lint `__enter__` on my
first sight), but it is out-of-scope of this change.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
I noticed that there should be a missing period added to some of the new
error messages for Unnecessary dunder call:
```
sandpit\test.py:6:16: PLC2801 Unnecessary dunder call to `__getattribute__`. Access attribute directly or use getattr built-in function..
```
## Test Plan
Static analysis of the implementation, as this has no existing test
cases.
## Summary
We haven't found time to flip this on, so feels like it's best to remove
it for now -- can always restore from source when we get back to it.
## Summary
Closes#9319, implements the [`SIM911` rule from
`flake8-simplify`](https://github.com/MartinThoma/flake8-simplify/pull/183).
#### Note
I wasn't sure whether or not to include
```rs
if checker.settings.preview.is_disabled() {
return;
}
```
at the beginning of the function with violation logic if the rule's
already declared as part of `RuleGroup::Preview`.
I've seen both variants, so I'd appreciate some feedback on that :)
## Summary
This PR attempts to improve `builtin-attribute-shadowing` (`A003`), a
rule which has been repeatedly criticized, but _does_ have value (just
not in the current form).
Historically, this rule would flag cases like:
```python
class Class:
id: int
```
This led to an increasing number of exceptions and special-cases to the
rule over time to try and improve it's specificity (e.g., ignore
`TypedDict`, ignore `@override`).
The crux of the issue is that given the above, referencing `id` will
never resolve to `Class.id`, so the shadowing is actually fine. There's
one exception, however:
```python
class Class:
id: int
def do_thing() -> id:
pass
```
Here, `id` actually resolves to the `id` attribute on the class, not the
`id` builtin.
So this PR completely reworks the rule around this _much_ more targeted
case, which will almost always be a mistake: when you reference a class
member from within the class, and that member shadows a builtin.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6524.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7806.
## Summary
Sort of a random PR to make the coupling between `pyproject_config` and
`resolver` more explicit by passing it to the `Resolver`, rather than
threading it through to each individual method.
Tom Kuson
Alex Waygood
Hugo
Micha Reiser
Steve C
Charlie Marsh
yataka
dependabot[bot]
Chammika Mannakkara
port19
Hoël Bagard
pabepadu
Jane Lewis
Aleksei Latyshev
KotlinIsland
trag1c
Randy Syring
Juan Orduz
manunio