## Summary
This PR updates `F811` rule to include assignment as possible shadowed
binding. This will fix issue: #11828 .
## Test Plan
Add a test file, F811_30.py, which includes a redefinition after an
assignment and a verified snapshot file.
## Summary
Addresses #11974 to add a `RUF` rule to replace `print` expressions in
`assert` statements with the inner message.
An autofix is available, but is considered unsafe as it changes
behaviour of the execution, notably:
- removal of the printout in `stdout`, and
- `AssertionError` instance containing a different message.
While the detection of the condition is a straightforward matter,
deciding how to resolve the print arguments into a string literal can be
a relatively subjective matter. The implementation of this PR chooses to
be as tolerant as possible, and will attempt to reformat any number of
`print` arguments containing single or concatenated strings or variables
into either a string literal, or a f-string if any variables or
placeholders are detected.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`.
## Examples
For ease of discussion, this is the diff for the tests:
```diff
# Standard Case
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print("This print is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Concatenated string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print("This print" " is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Positional arguments, string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional"
# Concatenated string literals combined with Positional arguments
# Expects:
# - single stringliteral concatenated with " " only between `print` and `is`
-assert True, print("This " "print", "is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Positional arguments, string literals with a variable
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This", print.__name__, "is not intentional.")
+assert True, f"This {print.__name__} is not intentional."
# Mixed brackets string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", 'is not intentional', """and should be removed""")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional and should be removed"
# Mixed brackets with other brackets inside
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " " and escaped brackets
-assert True, print("This print", 'is not "intentional"', """and "should" be 'removed'""")
+assert True, "This print is not \"intentional\" and \"should\" be 'removed'"
# Positional arguments, string literals with a separator
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with "|"
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep="|")
+assert True, "This print|is not intentional"
# Positional arguments, string literals with None as separator
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep=None)
+assert True, "This print is not intentional"
# Positional arguments, string literals with variable as separator, needs f-string
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "{U00A0}"
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep=U00A0)
+assert True, f"This print{U00A0}is not intentional"
# Unnecessary f-string
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print(f"This f-string is just a literal.")
+assert True, "This f-string is just a literal."
# Positional arguments, string literals and f-strings
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", f"is not {'intentional':s}")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# Positional arguments, string literals and f-strings with a separator
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "|"
-assert True, print("This print", f"is not {'intentional':s}", sep="|")
+assert True, f"This print|is not {'intentional':s}"
# A single f-string
# Expects:
# - single FString
-assert True, print(f"This print is not {'intentional':s}")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# A single f-string with a redundant separator
# Expects:
# - single FString
-assert True, print(f"This print is not {'intentional':s}", sep="|")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# Complex f-string with variable as separator
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "{U00A0}", all placeholders preserved
condition = "True is True"
maintainer = "John Doe"
-assert True, print("Unreachable due to", condition, f", ask {maintainer} for advice", sep=U00A0)
+assert True, f"Unreachable due to{U00A0}{condition}{U00A0}, ask {maintainer} for advice"
# Empty print
# Expects:
# - `msg` entirely removed from assertion
-assert True, print()
+assert True
# Empty print with separator
# Expects:
# - `msg` entirely removed from assertion
-assert True, print(sep=" ")
+assert True
# Custom print function that actually returns a string
# Expects:
@@ -100,4 +100,4 @@
# Use of `builtins.print`
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, builtins.print("This print should be removed.")
+assert True, "This print should be removed."
```
## Known Issues
The current implementation resolves all arguments and separators of the
`print` expression into a single string, be it
`StringLiteralValue::single` or a `FStringValue::single`. This:
- potentially joins together strings well beyond the ideal character
limit for each line, and
- does not preserve multi-line strings in their original format, in
favour of a single line `"...\n...\n..."` format.
These are purely formatting issues only occurring in unusual scenarios.
Additionally, the autofix will tolerate `print` calls that were
previously invalid:
```python
assert True, print("this", "should not be allowed", sep=42)
```
This will be transformed into
```python
assert True, f"this{42}should not be allowed"
```
which some could argue is an alteration of behaviour.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Documentation mentions:
> PEP 563 enabled the use of a number of convenient type annotations,
such as `list[str]` instead of `List[str]`
but it meant [PEP 585](https://peps.python.org/pep-0585/) instead.
[PEP 563](https://peps.python.org/pep-0563/) is the one defining `from
__future__ import annotations`.
## Test Plan
No automated test required, just verify that
https://peps.python.org/pep-0585/ is the correct reference.
## Summary
I look at the token stream a lot, not specifically in the playground but
in the terminal output and it's annoying to scroll a lot to find
specific location. Most of the information is also redundant.
The final format we end up with is: `<kind> <range> (flags = ...)` e.g.,
`String 0..4 (flags = BYTE_STRING)` where the flags part is only
populated if there are any flags set.
## Summary
Fixes#11651.
Fixes#11851.
We were double-closing a notebook document from the index, once in
`textDocument/didClose` and then in the `notebookDocument/didClose`
handler. The second time this happens, taking a snapshot fails.
I've rewritten how we handle snapshots for closing notebooks / notebook
cells so that any failure is simply logged instead of propagating
upwards. This implementation works consistently even if we don't receive
`textDocument/didClose` notifications for each specific cell, since they
get closed (and the diagnostics get cleared) in the notebook document
removal process.
## Test Plan
1. Open an untitled, unsaved notebook with the `Create: New Jupyter
Notebook` command from the VS Code command palette (`Ctrl/Cmd + Shift +
P`)
2. Without saving the document, close it.
3. No error popup should appear.
4. Run the debug command (`Ruff: print debug information`) to confirm
that there are no open documents
## Summary
This PR does some housekeeping into moving certain structs into related
modules. Specifically,
1. Move `LexicalError` from `lexer.rs` to `error.rs` which also contains
the `ParseError`
2. Move `Token`, `TokenFlags` and `TokenValue` from `lexer.rs` to
`token.rs`
## Summary
This PR removes the duplication around `is_trivia` functions.
There are two of them in the codebase:
1. In `pycodestyle`, it's for newline, indent, dedent, non-logical
newline and comment
2. In the parser, it's for non-logical newline and comment
The `TokenKind::is_trivia` method used (1) but that's not correct in
that context. So, this PR introduces a new `is_non_logical_token` helper
method for the `pycodestyle` crate and updates the
`TokenKind::is_trivia` implementation with (2).
This also means we can remove `Token::is_trivia` method and the
standalone `token_source::is_trivia` function and use the one on
`TokenKind`.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
Closes#11914.
This PR introduces a snapshot test that replays the LSP requests made
during a document formatting request, and confirms that the notebook
document is updated in the expected way.
## Summary
Fixes#11911.
`shellexpand` is now used on `logFile` to expand the file path, allowing
the usage of `~` and environment variables.
## Test Plan
1. Set `logFile` in either Neovim or Helix to a file path that needs
expansion, like `~/.config/helix/ruff_logs.txt`.
2. Ensure that `RUFF_TRACE` is set to `messages` or `verbose`
3. Open a Python file in Neovim/Helix
4. Confirm that a file at the path specified was created, with the
expected logs.
## Summary
This PR updates the logical line rules entry-point function to only run
the logic if any of the rules within that group is enabled.
Although this shouldn't really give any performance improvements, it's
better not to do additional work if we can. This is also consistent with
how other rules are run.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
This PR avoids moving back the lexer for a triple-quoted f-string during
the re-lexing phase.
The reason this is a problem is that for a triple-quoted f-string the
newlines are part of the f-string itself, specifically they'll be part
of the `FStringMiddle` token. So, if we moved the lexer back, there
would be a `Newline` token whose range would be in between an
`FStringMiddle` token. This creates a panic in downstream usage.
fixes: #11937
## Test Plan
Add test cases and validate the snapshots.
## Summary
This PR avoids the `depth` counter when detecting indentation from
non-logical lines because it seems to never be used. It might have been
a leftover when the logic was added originally in #11608.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
This PR updates the linter to show all the parse errors as diagnostics
instead of just the first one.
Note that this doesn't affect the parse error displayed as error log
message. This will be removed in a follow-up PR.
### Breaking?
I don't think this is a breaking change even though this might give more
diagnostics. The main reason is that this shouldn't affect any users
because it'll only give additional diagnostics in the case of multiple
syntax errors.
## Test Plan
Add an integration test case which would raise more than one parse
error.
## Summary
This PR updates the re-lexing logic to avoid consuming the trailing
whitespace and move the lexer explicitly to the last newline character
encountered while moving backwards.
Consider the following code snippet as taken from the test case
highlighted with whitespace (`.`) and newline (`\n`) characters:
```py
# There are trailing whitespace before the newline character but those whitespaces are
# part of the comment token
f"""hello {x # comment....\n
# ^
y = 1\n
```
The parser is at `y` when it's trying to recover from an unclosed `{`,
so it calls into the re-lexing logic which tries to move the lexer back
to the end of the previous line. But, as it consumed all whitespaces it
moved the lexer to the location marked by `^` in the above code snippet.
But, those whitespaces are part of the comment token. This means that
the range for the two tokens were overlapping which introduced the
panic.
Note that this is only a bug when there's a comment with a trailing
whitespace otherwise it's fine to move the lexer to the whitespace
character. This is because the lexer would just skip the whitespace
otherwise. Nevertheless, this PR updates the logic to move it explicitly
to the newline character in all cases.
fixes: #11929
## Test Plan
Add test cases and update the snapshot. Make sure that it doesn't panic
on the code snippet in the linked issue.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
related to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5306
The check right now only checks in the first 1024 bytes, and that's
really not enough when there's a docstring at the beginning of a file.
A more proper fix might be needed, which might be more complex (and I
don't have the `rust` skills to implement that). But this temporary
"fix" might enable more users to use this.
Context: We want to use this rule in
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/ and we got blocked because
of this hardcoded rule (which TBH took us quite a while to figure out
why it was failing since it's not documented).
## Test Plan
This is already kinda tested, modified the test for the new byte number.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
This PR removes most of the syntax errors from the test cases. This
would create noise when https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/11901 is
complete. These syntax errors are also just noise for the test itself.
## Test Plan
Update the snapshots and verify that they're still the same.
## Summary
This PR is a follow-up on #11845 to add the re-lexing logic for normal
list parsing.
A normal list parsing is basically parsing elements without any
separator in between i.e., there can only be trivia tokens in between
the two elements. Currently, this is only being used for parsing
**assignment statement** and **f-string elements**. Assignment
statements cannot be in a parenthesized context, but f-string can have
curly braces so this PR is specifically for them.
I don't think this is an ideal recovery but the problem is that both
lexer and parser could add an error for f-strings. If the lexer adds an
error it'll emit an `Unknown` token instead while the parser adds the
error directly. I think we'd need to move all f-string errors to be
emitted by the parser instead. This way the parser can correctly inform
the lexer that it's out of an f-string and then the lexer can pop the
current f-string context out of the stack.
## Test Plan
Add test cases, update the snapshots, and run the fuzzer.
## Summary
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/496.
Cells are no longer removed from the notebook index when a notebook gets
updated, but rather when `textDocument/didClose` is called for them.
This solves an issue where their premature removal from the notebook
cell index would cause their URL to be un-queryable in the
`textDocument/didClose` handler.
## Test Plan
Create and then delete a notebook cell in VS Code. No error should
appear.
## Summary
This PR implements the re-lexing logic in the parser.
This logic is only applied when recovering from an error during list
parsing. The logic is as follows:
1. During list parsing, if an unexpected token is encountered and it
detects that an outer context can understand it and thus recover from
it, it invokes the re-lexing logic in the lexer
2. This logic first checks if the lexer is in a parenthesized context
and returns if it's not. Thus, the logic is a no-op if the lexer isn't
in a parenthesized context
3. It then reduces the nesting level by 1. It shouldn't reset it to 0
because otherwise the recovery from nested list parsing will be
incorrect
4. Then, it tries to find last newline character going backwards from
the current position of the lexer. This avoids any whitespaces but if it
encounters any character other than newline or whitespace, it aborts.
5. Now, if there's a newline character, then it needs to be re-lexed in
a logical context which means that the lexer needs to emit it as a
`Newline` token instead of `NonLogicalNewline`.
6. If the re-lexing gives a different token than the current one, the
token source needs to update it's token collection to remove all the
tokens which comes after the new current position.
It turns out that the list parsing isn't that happy with the results so
it requires some re-arranging such that the following two errors are
raised correctly:
1. Expected comma
2. Recovery context error
For (1), the following scenarios needs to be considered:
* Missing comma between two elements
* Half parsed element because the grammar doesn't allow it (for example,
named expressions)
For (2), the following scenarios needs to be considered:
1. If the parser is at a comma which means that there's a missing
element otherwise the comma would've been consumed by the first `eat`
call above. And, the parser doesn't take the re-lexing route on a comma
token.
2. If it's the first element and the current token is not a comma which
means that it's an invalid element.
resolves: #11640
## Test Plan
- [x] Update existing test snapshots and validate them
- [x] Add additional test cases specific to the re-lexing logic and
validate the snapshots
- [x] Run the fuzzer on 3000+ valid inputs
- [x] Run the fuzzer on invalid inputs
- [x] Run the parser on various open source projects
- [x] Make sure the ecosystem changes are none
## Summary
This PR updates the server capabilities to include the commands that
Ruff supports. This is similar to how there's a list of possible code
actions supported by the server.
I noticed this when I was trying to find whether Helix supported
workspace commands or not based on Jane's comment
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/11831#discussion_r1634984921)
and I found the `:lsp-workspace-command` in the editor but it didn't
show up anything in the picker.
So, I looked at the implementation in Helix
(9c479e6d2d/helix-term/src/commands/typed.rs (L1372-L1384))
which made me realize that Ruff doesn't provide this in its
capabilities. Currently, this does require `ruff` to be first in the
list of language servers in the user config but that should be resolved
by https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/10176. So, the following
config should work:
```toml
[[language]]
name = "python"
# Ruff should come first until https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/10176 is released
language-servers = ["ruff", "pyright"]
```
## Test Plan
1. Neovim's server capabilities output should include the supported
commands:
```
executeCommandProvider = {
commands = { "ruff.applyFormat", "ruff.applyAutofix", "ruff.applyOrganizeImports", "ruff.printDebugInformation" },
workDoneProgress = false
},
```
2. Helix should now display the commands to pick from when
`:lsp-workspace-command` is invoked:
<img width="832" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-13 at 08 47 14"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/67177269/09048ecd-c974-4e09-ab56-9482ff3d780b">
## Summary
This PR adds a new enum to determine the kind of terminator token i.e.,
is it actually terminates the list or is it used for error recovery.
This is important because the parser should take the error recovery
route in case the terminator token is used for better error recovery.
This will then try to re-lex the token if it's the case.
I haven't updated any reference to use this new enum as otherwise it'll
update the snapshots. I plan to do that in a follow-up PR so that it's
easier to reason about.
## Test plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
This PR separates the terminator token for f-string elements depending
on the context. A list of f-string element can occur either in a regular
f-string or a format spec of an f-string. The terminator token is
different depending on that context.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test` and verify the updated snapshots.
## Summary
This PR re-uses the `ruff_python_trivia::is_python_whitespace` in the
lexer instead of defining its own. This was mainly to avoid circular
dependency which was resolved in #11261.
## Summary
Add Constraint nodes to flow graph, and narrow types based on that (only
`is None` and `is not None` narrowing supported for now, to prototype
the structure.)
Also add simplification of zero- and one-element unions and
intersections, and flattening of intersections.
There's a lot more normalization logic needed for unions and
intersections (as is obvious from the inferred type in the added
`narrow_none` test), but this will be non-trivial and I'd rather do it
in a separate PR.
Here's a flowchart diagram for the code in the added `narrow_none` test:
The top branch is for the `if` expression in the initial assignment to
`x`; that `Constraint` node would only affect the type of `flag`, which
we don't care about in this test.
The second branch is for the `if` statement, with `Constraint` node
affecting the type of `x`.
## Test Plan
Added tests.
## Summary
Fixes#11744.
We now show a distinct popup message when we fail to get a document
snapshot during command execution. This message more clearly
communicates the issue to the user, instead of a generic "ruff
encountered an error" message.
## Test Plan
Try running `Fix all auto-fixable problems` on an incompatible file (for
example: `settings.json`). You should see the following popup message:
<img width="456" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-11 at 11 47 16 AM"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/3a28e3d7-3896-4dd0-b117-f87300dd3b68">
## Summary
Closes#11715.
Introduces a new command, `ruff.printDebugInformation`. This will print
useful information about the status of the server to `stderr`.
Right now, the information shown by this command includes:
* The path to the server executable
* The version of the executable
* The text encoding being used
* The number of open documents and workspaces
* A list of registered configuration files
* The capabilities of the client
## Test Plan
First, checkout and use [the corresponding `ruff-vscode`
PR](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/495).
Running the `Print debug information` command in VS Code should show
something like the following in the Output channel:
<img width="991" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-11 at 11 41 46 AM"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/ab93c009-bb7b-4291-b057-d44fdc6f9f86">
## Summary
Fixes#10968.
Fixes#11545.
The server's tracing system has been rewritten from the ground up. The
server now has trace level and log level settings which restrict the
tracing events and spans that get logged.
* A `logLevel` setting has been added, which lets a user set the log
level. By default, it is set to `"info"`.
* A `logFile` setting has also been added, which lets the user supply an
optional file to send tracing output (it does not have to exist as a
file yet). By default, if this is unset, tracing output will be sent to
`stderr`.
* A `$/setTrace` handler has also been added, and we also set the trace
level from the initialization options. For editors without direct
support for tracing, the environment variable `RUFF_TRACE` can override
the trace level.
* Small changes have been made to how we display tracing output. We no
longer use `tracing-tree`, and instead use
`tracing_subscriber::fmt::Layer` to format output. Thread names are now
included in traces, and I've made some adjustment to thread worker names
to be more useful.
## Test Plan
In VS Code, with `ruff.trace.server` set to its default value, no logs
from Ruff should appear.
After changing `ruff.trace.server` to either `messages` or `verbose`,
you should see log messages at `info` level or higher appear in Ruff's
output:
<img width="1005" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-10 at 10 35 04 AM"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/6050d107-9815-4bd2-96d0-e86f096a57f5">
In Helix, by default, no logs from Ruff should appear.
To set the trace level in Helix, you'll need to modify your language
configuration as follows:
```toml
[language-server.ruff]
command = "/Users/jane/astral/ruff/target/debug/ruff"
args = ["server", "--preview"]
environment = { "RUFF_TRACE" = "messages" }
```
After doing this, logs of `info` level or higher should be visible in
Helix:
<img width="1216" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-10 at 10 39 26 AM"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/8ff88692-d3f7-4fd1-941e-86fb338fcdcc">
You can use `:log-open` to quickly open the Helix log file.
In Neovim, by default, no logs from Ruff should appear.
To set the trace level in Neovim, you'll need to modify your
configuration as follows:
```lua
require('lspconfig').ruff.setup {
cmd = {"/path/to/debug/executable", "server", "--preview"},
cmd_env = { RUFF_TRACE = "messages" }
}
```
You should see logs appear in `:LspLog` that look like the following:
<img width="1490" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-11 at 11 24 01 AM"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/576cd5fa-03cf-477a-b879-b29a9a1200ff">
You can adjust `logLevel` and `logFile` in `settings`:
```lua
require('lspconfig').ruff.setup {
cmd = {"/path/to/debug/executable", "server", "--preview"},
cmd_env = { RUFF_TRACE = "messages" },
settings = {
logLevel = "debug",
logFile = "your/log/file/path/log.txt"
}
}
```
The `logLevel` and `logFile` can also be set in Helix like so:
```toml
[language-server.ruff.config.settings]
logLevel = "debug"
logFile = "your/log/file/path/log.txt"
```
Even if this log file does not exist, it should now be created and
written to after running the server:
<img width="1148" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-10 at 10 43 44 AM"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/ab533cf7-d5ac-4178-97f1-e56da17450dd">
## Summary
This PR updates the parser to remove building the `CommentRanges` and
instead it'll be built by the linter and the formatter when it's
required.
For the linter, it'll be built and owned by the `Indexer` while for the
formatter it'll be built from the `Tokens` struct and passed as an
argument.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
The fix for E203 now produces the same result as ruff format in cases
where a slice ends on a colon and the closing square bracket is on the
following line.
Refers to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10973
## Test Plan
The minimal reproduction case in the ticket was added as test case
producing no error. Additional cases with multiple spaces or a tab
before the colon where added to make sure that the rule still finds
these.
## Summary
As-is, we're using the URL path for all files, leading us to use paths
like:
```
/c%3A/Users/crmar/workspace/fastapi/tests/main.py
```
This doesn't match against per-file ignores and other patterns in Ruff
configuration.
This PR modifies the LSP to use the real file path if available, and the
virtual file path if not.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11751.
## Test Plan
Ran the LSP on Windows. In the FastAPI repo, added:
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores]
"tests/**/*.py" = ["F401"]
```
And verified that an unused import was ignored in `tests` after this
change, but not before.
## Summary
This PR removes the `result-like` dependency and instead implement the
required functionality. The motivation being that `noqa.is_enabled()` is
easier to read than `noqa.into()`.
For context, I was just trying to understand the syntax error workflow
and I saw these flags which were being converted via `into`. I always
find `into` confusing because you never know what's it being converted
into unless you know the type. Later realized that it's just a boolean
flag. After removing the usages from these two flags, it turns out that
the dependency is only being used in one rule so I thought to remove
that as well.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This PR implements the [consider dict
items](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/user_guide/messages/convention/consider-using-dict-items.html)
rule from Pylint. Enabling this rule flags:
```python
ORCHESTRA = {
"violin": "strings",
"oboe": "woodwind",
"tuba": "brass",
"gong": "percussion",
}
for instrument in ORCHESTRA:
print(f"{instrument}: {ORCHESTRA[instrument]}")
for instrument in ORCHESTRA.keys():
print(f"{instrument}: {ORCHESTRA[instrument]}")
for instrument in (inline_dict := {"foo": "bar"}):
print(f"{instrument}: {inline_dict[instrument]}")
```
For not using `items()` to extract the value out of the dict. We ignore
the case of an assignment, as you can't modify the underlying
representation with the value in the list of tuples returned.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
`cargo test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Definitions are used in symbol table and in flow graph, and aren't
inherently owned by one or the other; move them into their own
submodule.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
Add support for inferring int literal types from basic arithmetic on int
literals. Just to begin showing examples of resolving more complex
expression types, and because this will be useful in testing walrus
expressions.
## Test Plan
Added test.
## Summary
After looking at this a bit, I think it does make sense to have
`Unbound` as part of the `Definition` enum; if we are modeling `Unbound`
as a type (which currently we are), then every symbol implicitly starts
each scope with a "definition" as unbound, and the cleanest way to model
that is as a real `Definition`. We should be able to handle a definition
of "unbound" anywhere we handle definitions.
But the name `None` wasn't clear enough; changing the name to `Unbound`
and adding a doc comment.
Also change `[first].into_iter()` to `std::iter::once(first)`, from
post-land code review on a prior PR.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
Alex Waygood
Micha Reiser
renovate[bot]
ukyen
Denny Wong
Gilles Peiffer
Eric Nielsen
Dhruv Manilawala
Jane Lewis
Will Yardley
dedebenui
Adrin Jalali
psychedelicious
github-actions[bot]
Carl Meyer
Charlie Marsh
Gilles Peiffer
Philipp Thiel
Aleksei Latyshev
aditya pillai
Embers-of-the-Fire
Max Muoto