Update to [Rust
1.74](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2023/11/16/Rust-1.74.0.html) and use
the new clippy lints table.
The update itself introduced a new clippy lint about superfluous hashes
in raw strings, which got removed.
I moved our lint config from `rustflags` to the newly stabilized
[workspace.lints](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/cargo/reference/workspaces.html#the-lints-table).
One consequence is that we have to `unsafe_code = "warn"` instead of
"forbid" because the latter now actually bans unsafe code:
```
error[E0453]: allow(unsafe_code) incompatible with previous forbid
--> crates/ruff_source_file/src/newlines.rs:62:17
|
62 | #[allow(unsafe_code)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ overruled by previous forbid
|
= note: `forbid` lint level was set on command line
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
I think it's reasonable to avoid raising `INP001` for scripts, and
shebangs are one sufficient way to detect scripts.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8690.
I checked for ipython-specific builtins on python 3.11 using
```python
import json
from subprocess import check_output
builtins_python = json.loads(check_output(["python3", "-c" "import json; print(json.dumps(dir(__builtins__)))"]))
builtins_ipython = json.loads(check_output(["ipython3", "-c" "import json; print(json.dumps(dir(__builtins__)))"]))
print(sorted(set(builtins_ipython) - set(builtins_python)))
```
and updated the relevant constant and match. The list changes from
`display`
to
`__IPYTHON__`, `display`, `get_ipython`.
Followup to #8707
## Summary
This exists to power a test, but it ends up affecting the behavior of
all files in the directory. Namely, it means that these files _aren't_
excluded when you format or lint them directly, since in that case, Ruff
will fall back to looking at the `pyproject.toml` in
`crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures`, which _doesn't_ exclude
these files, unlike our top-level `pyproject.toml`.
## Summary
We already support inserting imports for `I002` -- this PR just adds the
same fix for `FA102`, which is explicitly about `from __future__ import
annotations`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8682.
## Summary
It seems like the range of an `ExprStringLiteral` can be somewhat
unreliable when the string is part of an implicit concatenation with an
f-string. Using the tokens themselves is more reliable.
Closes#8680.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7784.
## Summary
`display` is a special-cased builtin in IPython. This PR adds it to the
builtin namespace when analyzing IPython notebooks.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8702.
## Summary
This adds an autofix for PIE800 (unnecessary spread) -- whenever we see
a `**{...}` inside another dictionary literal, just delete the `**{` and
`}` to inline the key-value pairs. So `{"a": "b", **{"c": "d"}}` becomes
just `{"a": "b", "c": "d"}`.
I have enabled this just for preview mode.
## Test Plan
Updated the preview snapshot test.
## Summary
Implements
[FURB136](https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/master/docs/checks.md#furb136-use-min-max)
that checks for `if` expressions that can be replaced with `min()` or
`max()` calls. See issue #1348 for more information.
This implementation diverges from Refurb's original implementation by
retaining the order of equal values. For example, Refurb suggest that
the following expressions:
```python
highest_score1 = score1 if score1 > score2 else score2
highest_score2 = score1 if score1 >= score2 else score2
```
should be to rewritten as:
```python
highest_score1 = max(score1, score2)
highest_score2 = max(score1, score2)
```
whereas this implementation provides more correct alternatives:
```python
highest_score1 = max(score2, score1)
highest_score2 = max(score1, score2)
```
## Test Plan
Unit test checks all eight possibilities.
Testing the compatibility with the future stable black style, i realized
the `ruff_python_formatter` dev main was lacking the
`--skip-magic-trailing-comma` option. This does not affect `ruff
format`.
Usage:
```shell
cargo run --bin ruff_python_formatter -p ruff_python_formatter -- --skip-magic-trailing-comma --emit stdout scratch.py
```
## Summary
This adds a ``no-sections`` option for isort in the linter, similar to
the ``no_sections`` option that exists in upstream isort
(https://pycqa.github.io/isort/docs/configuration/options.html#no-sections)
This option puts all imports except for ``__future__`` into the same
section, and is mostly used by monorepos.
I've taken a bit of a leap in assuming that ruff wants to support the
exact same option; more than happy to refactor if you'd prefer a
different way of setting this up.
Fixes#8653
## Test Plan
I've added a test and have run it on a large Python codebase that uses
isort with --no-sections. The option is disabled by default.
While fixing #8661 I noticed that the code structure for sorting imports
could be simplified.
## Summary
- Move the logic for `force_sort_within_sections` from `isort/mod.rs` to
`isort/ordering.rs` => now there is just one line in `isort/mod.rs`:
`let imports = order_imports(import_block, settings);` which yields the
sorted imports
- Change the function signature of `order_imports` to directly return a
`Vec<EitherImport<'a>>` => no need for `OrderedImportBlock`
I think this is a bit of an improvement because the code is simpler and
there should be a bit of a speedup when setting
`force-sort-within-sections` to true. Indeed, when it's set to true
we're now directly ordering all the imports, whereas before we would
first order the straight imports, then the from imports, combine them
and finally sort the combination a second time (this is probably not
noticeable in practice though).
## Test Plan
No tests added, this is a simple refactor.
For the `PLW0129` rule, the f-string case shouldn't match against bytes
literal as f-strings cannot contain them. F-strings are made up of
either string literals or formatted expressions.
## Summary
This PR adds (unsafe) fixes to the flake8-annotations rules that enforce
missing return types, offering to automatically insert type annotations
for functions with literal return values. The logic is smart enough to
generate simplified unions (e.g., `float` instead of `int | float`) and
deal with implicit returns (`return` without a value).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/1640 (though we could
open a separate issue for referring parameter types).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8213.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Fixes#8661
## Summary
Imports like `from x import y` don't have an "asname" for the module, so
they were placed before imports like `import x as w` since `None` <
`Some(s)` for any string s.
The fix is to first sort by `first_alias`, since it's `None` for `import
x as w`, and then by `asname`.
## Test Plan
I included the example from the issue to avoid future regressions.
When using the autofixer for `Q000` it does not remove the backslashes
from quotes that no longer need escaping.
This new rule checks for such backslashes (regardless whether they come
from the autofixer or not) and can remove them.
fixes#8617
## Summary
This PR extends `unnecessary-pass` (`PIE790`) to flag unnecessary
ellipsis expressions in addition to `pass` statements. A `pass` is
equivalent to a standalone `...`, so it feels correct to me that a
single rule should cover both cases.
When we look to v0.2.0, we should also consider deprecating `PYI013`,
which flags ellipses only for classes.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8602.
## Summary
PIE807 will rewrite `lambda: []` to `list` -- AFAICT though, the same
rationale also applies to dicts, so I've modified the code to also
rewrite `lambda: {}` to `dict`.
Two things I'm not sure about:
* Should this go to a new rule? This no longer actually matches the
behavior of flake8-pie, and while I think thematically it makes sense to
be part of the same rule, we could make it a standalone rule (but if so,
where should I put it and what error code should I use)?
* If we want a single rule, are there backwards compatibility concerns
with the rule name change (from `reimplemented_list_builtin` to
`reimplemented_container_builtin`?
## Test Plan
Added snapshot tests of the functionality.
## Summary
This PR implements validation in the formatter tests to ensure that we
don't modify the AST during formatting. Black has similar logic.
In implementing this, I learned that Black actually _does_ modify the
AST, and their test infrastructure normalizes the AST to wipe away those
differences. Specifically, Black changes the indentation of docstrings,
which _does_ modify the AST; and it also inserts parentheses in `del`
statements, which changes the AST too.
Ruff also does both these things, so we _also_ implement the same
normalization using a new visitor that allows for modifying the AST.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8184.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR makes `whitespace-before-punctuation` (`E203`) compatible with
the formatter by relaxing the rule a bit, as compared to the pycodestyle
implementation. It's also more consistent with PEP 8, which says:
> However, in a slice the colon acts like a binary operator, and should
have equal amounts on either side (treating it as the operator with the
lowest priority).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7259.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8642.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
It seems as though using `include!(...)` to avoid the source code copy
breaks rust-analzer. Namely, it treats the included file as unlinked,
and so any part of analysis (e.g., goto-definition) that needs that file
to reason about the code ends up failing.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
This adds redirects from, e.g., `https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/F401`
to `https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/unused-import`, which are
generated automatically when creating the documentation. Though we want
to move towards human-readable names eventually, I think this is a nice
and user-friendly change (and doesn't require any fancy infrastructure,
since the redirects are handled via a plugin and added client-side).
Closes#4710.
Previously, this rule used the range of the `self` annotation, but it's
a lot more natural to use the range of the function name (since it also
means the `# noqa` is associated with the method rather than its first
argument).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8635.
## Summary
- Close#7487
In the spirit of `flake8-boolean-trap`, any positional argument that can
accept a boolean should raise `FBT001`.
Raise `FBT001` for all annotations that accept booleans (e.g.
`Optional[bool]`, `Union[int, bool]`).
## Test Plan
Add a fixture, with an annotation using `|`, `Optional`, and `Union`,
and containing a boolean.
## Summary
Removes unnecessary commentary from the PD901 message. This does make it
different from pandas-vet, but it improves consistency with the rest of
messages.
Current Message:
> `df` is a bad variable name. Be kinder to your future self.
New Message
> `df` is a bad variable name.
## Test Plan
The relevant snapshot has been updated with the new message.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
I got an error from RUF001 and wanted to override it. How to do that was
not quite obvious. In the process I have tried to improve the
documentation for the rule and it's siblings.
## Summary
The ruff configuration section is called "format", rather than
"preview". Using the configuration as it was written in the docs gives
an error:
```
$ ruff format --check .
ruff failed
Cause: TOML parse error at line 143, column 1
|
143 | [tool.ruff.preview]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
invalid type: map, expected a boolean
```
## Test Plan
Tested running `ruff format` with the following in my `pyproject.toml`:
```toml
[tool.ruff.format]
preview = true
```
and it worked properly (using preview rules for formatting).
## Summary
Adds an extra check to F632 to check for any `is` comparisons to a
mutable initialisers.
Implements #8589 .
Example:
```Python
named_var = {}
if named_var is {}: # F632 (fix)
pass
```
The if condition will always evaluate to False because it checks on
identity and it's impossible to take the same identity as a hard coded
list/set/dict initializer.
## Test Plan
Multiple test cases were added to ensure the rule works + doesn't flag
false positives + the fix works correctly.
konsti
Charlie Marsh
Zanie Blue
Jonas Haag
Alan Du
Tuomas Siipola
Jelmer Vernooij
bluthej
doolio
Dhruv Manilawala
Adrian
Alan Du
Andrew Gallant
dependabot[bot]
Jonathan Plasse
Charlie Wilson
Bodo Graumann
Steven DeMartini
Jesse Serrao
Shantanu
Jake Park