## Summary
At present, our versioning policy forbids the addition of safe fixes to
stable rules outside of a minor release, so we've accumulated a bunch of
new fixes that are behind `--preview`, and can be ungated in v0.2.0.
To find these, I just grepped for `preview.is_enabled()` and identified
all such cases. I then audited the `preview_rules` test fixtures and
removed any tests that existed only to test this autofix behavior.
# Conflicts:
# crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_simplify/snapshots/ruff_linter__rules__flake8_simplify__tests__SIM114_SIM114.py.snap
# crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_simplify/snapshots/ruff_linter__rules__flake8_simplify__tests__preview__SIM114_SIM114.py.snap
## Summary
The logic that detects continuations assumed that tokens themselves
cannot span multiple lines. However, strings _can_ -- even single-quoted
strings.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9323.
## Summary
It's common to interleave a `sys.path` modification between imports at
the top of a file. This is a frequent cause of `# noqa: E402` false
positives, as seen in the ecosystem checks. This PR modifies E402 to
omit such modifications when determining the "import boundary".
(We could consider linting against `sys.path` modifications, but that
should be a separate rule.)
Closes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5557.
## Summary
If a string has a Unicode prefix, we can't add the `r` prefix on top of
that -- we need to remove and replace it. (The Unicode prefix is
redundant anyway in Python 3.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8967.
## Summary
This PR updates the `E402` rule to work at cell level for Jupyter
notebooks. This is enabled only in preview to gather feedback.
The implementation basically resets the import boundary flag on the
semantic model when we encounter the first statement in a cell.
Another potential solution is to introduce `E403` rule that is
specifically for notebooks that works at cell level while `E402` will be
disabled for notebooks.
## Test Plan
Add a notebook with imports in multiple cells and verify that the rule
works as expected.
resolves: #8669
## Summary
This PR updates the `E703` rule to avoid flagging any semicolons if
they're present after the last expression in a notebook cell. These are
intended to hide the cell output.
Part of #8669
## Test Plan
Add test notebook and update the snapshots.
## Summary
Adds an extra check to F632 to check for any `is` comparisons to a
mutable initialisers.
Implements #8589 .
Example:
```Python
named_var = {}
if named_var is {}: # F632 (fix)
pass
```
The if condition will always evaluate to False because it checks on
identity and it's impossible to take the same identity as a hard coded
list/set/dict initializer.
## Test Plan
Multiple test cases were added to ensure the rule works + doesn't flag
false positives + the fix works correctly.
## Summary
This PR introduces a new `pycodestyl.max-line-length` option that allows overriding the global `line-length` option for `E501` only.
This is useful when using the formatter and `E501` together, where the formatter uses a lower limit and `E501` is only used to catch extra-long lines.
Closes#7644
## Considerations
~~Our fix infrastructure asserts in some places that the fix doesn't exceed the configured `line-width`. With this change, the question is whether it should use the `pycodestyle.max-line-width` or `line-width` option to make that decision.
I opted for the global `line-width` for now, considering that it should be the lower limit. However, this constraint isn't enforced and users not using the formatter may only specify `pycodestyle.max-line-width` because they're unaware of the global option (and it solves their need).~~
~~I'm interested to hear your thoughts on whether we should use `pycodestyle.max-line-width` or `line-width` to decide on whether to emit a fix or not.~~
Edit: The linter users `pycodestyle.max-line-width`. The `line-width` option has been removed from the `LinterSettings`
## Test Plan
Added integration test. Built the documentation and verified that the links are correct.
## Summary
This PR updates our E721 implementation and semantics to match the
updated `pycodestyle` logic, which I think is an improvement.
Specifically, we now allow `type(obj) is int` for exact type
comparisons, which were previously impossible. So now, we're largely
just linting against code like `type(obj) == int`.
This change is gated to preview mode.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7904.
## Test Plan
Updated the test fixture and ensured parity with latest Flake8.
## Summary
This PR modifies the `line-too-long` and `doc-line-too-long` rules to
ignore lines that are too long due to the presence of a pragma comment
(e.g., `# type: ignore` or `# noqa`). That is, if a line only exceeds
the limit due to the pragma comment, it will no longer be flagged as
"too long". This behavior mirrors that of the formatter, thus ensuring
that we don't flag lines under E501 that the formatter would otherwise
avoid wrapping.
As a concrete example, given a line length of 88, the following would
_no longer_ be considered an E501 violation:
```python
# The string literal is 88 characters, including quotes.
"shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:sh" # type: ignore
```
This, however, would:
```python
# The string literal is 89 characters, including quotes.
"shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:shape:sha" # type: ignore
```
In addition to mirroring the formatter, this also means that adding a
pragma comment (like `# noqa`) won't _cause_ additional violations to
appear (namely, E501). It's very common for users to add a `# type:
ignore` or similar to a line, only to find that they then have to add a
suppression comment _after_ it that was required before, as in `# type:
ignore # noqa: E501`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/7471.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Stack Summary
This stack splits `Settings` into `FormatterSettings` and `LinterSettings` and moves it into `ruff_workspace`. This change is necessary to add the `FormatterSettings` to `Settings` without adding `ruff_python_formatter` as a dependency to `ruff_linter` (and the linter should not contain the formatter settings).
A quick overview of our settings struct at play:
* `Options`: 1:1 representation of the options in the `pyproject.toml` or `ruff.toml`. Used for deserialization.
* `Configuration`: Resolved `Options`, potentially merged from multiple configurations (when using `extend`). The representation is very close if not identical to the `Options`.
* `Settings`: The resolved configuration that uses a data format optimized for reading. Optional fields are initialized with their default values. Initialized by `Configuration::into_settings` .
The goal of this stack is to split `Settings` into tool-specific resolved `Settings` that are independent of each other. This comes at the advantage that the individual crates don't need to know anything about the other tools. The downside is that information gets duplicated between `Settings`. Right now the duplication is minimal (`line-length`, `tab-width`) but we may need to come up with a solution if more expensive data needs sharing.
This stack focuses on `Settings`. Splitting `Configuration` into some smaller structs is something I'll follow up on later.
## PR Summary
This PR extracts the linter-specific settings into a new `LinterSettings` struct and adds it as a `linter` field to the `Settings` struct. This is in preparation for moving `Settings` from `ruff_linter` to `ruff_workspace`
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Zanie
Steve C
Charlie Marsh
Dhruv Manilawala
Jesse Serrao
Micha Reiser