## Summary
Adding parentheses to a tuple in a subscript with elements that include
slice expressions causes a syntax error. For example, `d[(1,2,:)]` is a
syntax error.
So, when `lint.ruff.parenthesize-tuple-in-subscript = true` and the
tuple includes a slice expression, we skip this check and fix.
Closes#12766.
> ~Builtins are also more efficient than `for` loops.~
Let's not promise performance because this code transformation does not
deliver.
Benchmark written by @dcbaker
> `any()` seems to be about 1/3 as fast (Python 3.11.9, NixOS):
```python
loop = 'abcdef'.split()
found = 'f'
nfound = 'g'
def test1():
for x in loop:
if x == found:
return True
return False
def test2():
return any(x == found for x in loop)
def test3():
for x in loop:
if x == nfound:
return True
return False
def test4():
return any(x == nfound for x in loop)
if __name__ == "__main__":
import timeit
print('for loop (found) :', timeit.timeit(test1))
print('for loop (not found):', timeit.timeit(test3))
print('any() (found) :', timeit.timeit(test2))
print('any() (not found) :', timeit.timeit(test4))
```
```
for loop (found) : 0.051076093994197436
for loop (not found): 0.04388196699437685
any() (found) : 0.15422860698890872
any() (not found) : 0.15568504799739458
```
I have retested with longer lists and on multiple Python versions with
similar results.
Implements the new fixable lint rule `RUF031` which checks for the use or omission of parentheses around tuples in subscripts, depending on the setting `lint.ruff.parenthesize-tuple-in-getitem`. By default, the use of parentheses is considered a violation.
## Summary
Follow-up from https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12725, this is
just a small refactor to use a wrapper struct instead of type alias for
workspace settings index. This avoids the need to have the
`register_workspace_settings` as a static method on `Index` and instead
is a method on the new struct itself.
## Summary
This PR updates the server to ignore non-file workspace URL.
This is to avoid crashing the server if the URL scheme is not "file".
We'd still raise an error if the URL to file path conversion fails.
Also, as per the docs of
[`to_file_path`](https://docs.rs/url/2.5.2/url/struct.Url.html#method.to_file_path):
> Note: This does not actually check the URL’s scheme, and may give
nonsensical results for other schemes. It is the user’s responsibility
to check the URL’s scheme before calling this.
resolves: #12660
## Test Plan
I'm not sure how to test this locally but the change is small enough to
validate on its own.
## Summary
This PR updates the `red_knot` CLI to make the subcommand optional.
## Test Plan
Run the following commands:
* `cargo run --bin red_knot --
--current-directory=~/playground/ruff/type_inference` (no subcommand
requirement)
* `cargo run --bin red_knot -- server` (should start the server)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Resolves#12636
Consider docstrings which begin with the word "Returns" as having
satisfactorily documented they're returns. For example
```python
def f():
"""Returns 1."""
return 1
```
is valid.
## Test Plan
Added example to test fixture.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
Removes set comprehension as a violation for `sum` when checking `C419`,
because set comprehension may de-duplicate entries in a generator,
thereby modifying the value of the sum.
Closes#12690.
## Summary
Make it a violation of `C409` to call `tuple` with a list or set
comprehension, and
implement the (unsafe) fix of calling the `tuple` with the underlying
generator instead.
Closes#12648.
## Test Plan
Test fixture updated, cargo test, docs checked for updated description.
## Summary
Adds autofix for `RUF007`
## Test Plan
`cargo test`, however I get errors for `test resolver::tests::symlink
... FAILED` which seems to not be my fault
## Summary
Fixes#12630.
DOC501 and DOC502 now understand functions with constructs like this to
be explicitly raising `TypeError` (which should be documented in a
function's docstring):
```py
try:
foo():
except TypeError:
...
raise
```
I made an exception for `Exception` and `BaseException`, however.
Constructs like this are reasonably common, and I don't think anybody
would say that it's worth putting in the docstring that it raises "some
kind of generic exception":
```py
try:
foo()
except BaseException:
do_some_logging()
raise
```
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p ruff_linter --lib`
## Summary
Please see
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12605#discussion_r1699957443 for
a description of the issue.
They way I fixed it is to get the *last* timeout item in the `with`, and
if it's an `async with` and there are items after it, then don't trigger
the lint.
## Test Plan
Updated the fixture with some more cases.
Changes the red-knot benchmark to run on the stdlib "tomllib" library
(which is self-contained, four files, uses type annotations) instead of
on very small bits of handwritten code.
Also remove the `without_parse` benchmark: now that we are running on
real code that uses typeshed, we'd either have to pre-parse all of
typeshed (slow) or find some way to determine which typeshed modules
will be used by the benchmark (not feasible with reasonable complexity.)
## Test Plan
`cargo bench -p ruff_benchmark --bench red_knot`
## Summary
This PR separates the current `red_knot` crate into two crates:
1. `red_knot` - This will be similar to the `ruff` crate, it'll act as
the CLI crate
2. `red_knot_workspace` - This includes everything except for the CLI
functionality from the existing `red_knot` crate
Note that the code related to the file watcher is in
`red_knot_workspace` for now but might be required to extract it out in
the future.
The main motivation for this change is so that we can have a `red_knot
server` command. This makes it easier to test the server out without
making any changes in the VS Code extension. All we need is to specify
the `red_knot` executable path in `ruff.path` extension setting.
## Test Plan
- `cargo build`
- `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets --all-features`
- `cargo shear --fix`
## Summary
There's still a problem here. Given:
```python
class Class():
pass
# comment
# another comment
a = 1
```
We only add one newline before `a = 1` on the first pass, because
`max_precedling_blank_lines` is 1... We then add the second newline on
the second pass, so it ends up in the right state, but the logic is
clearly wonky.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11508.
I hit this `todo!` trying to run type inference over some real modules.
Since it's a one-liner to implement it, I just did that rather than
changing to `Type::Unknown`.
## Summary
@zanieb noticed while we were discussing #12595 that this flag is now
unnecessary, so remove it and the flags which reference it.
## Test Plan
Question for maintainers: is there a test to add *or* remove here? (I’ve
opened this as a draft PR with that in view!)
## Summary
This pull request adds support for logging via `$/logTrace` RPC
messages. It also enables that code path for when a client is Zed editor
or VS Code (as there's no way for us to generically tell whether a client prefers
`$/logTrace` over stderr.
Related to: #12523
## Test Plan
I've built Ruff from this branch and tested it manually with Zed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Extend `flake8-builtins` to imports, lambda-arguments, and modules to be
consistent with original checker
[flake8_builtins](https://github.com/gforcada/flake8-builtins/blob/main/flake8_builtins.py).
closes#12540
## Details
- Implement builtin-import-shadowing (A004)
- Stop tracking imports shadowing in builtin-variable-shadowing (A001)
in preview mode.
- Implement builtin-lambda-argument-shadowing (A005)
- Implement builtin-module-shadowing (A006)
- Add new option `linter.flake8_builtins.builtins_allowed_modules`
## Test Plan
cargo test
## Summary
If an import is marked as "required", we should never flag it as unused.
In practice, this is rare, since required imports are typically used for
`__future__` annotations, which are always considered "used".
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12458.
Now that we have builtins available, resolve some simple cases to the
right builtin type.
We should also adjust the display for types to include their module
name; that's not done yet here.
## Summary
This PR adds support for untitled files in the Red Knot project.
Refer to the [design
discussion](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/12336) for
more details.
### Changes
* The `parsed_module` always assumes that the `SystemVirtual` path is of
`PySourceType::Python`.
* For the module resolver, as suggested, I went ahead by adding a new
`SystemOrVendoredPath` enum and renamed `FilePathRef` to
`SystemOrVendoredPathRef` (happy to consider better names here).
* The `file_to_module` query would return if it's a
`FilePath::SystemVirtual` variant because a virtual file doesn't belong
to any module.
* The sync implementation for the system virtual path is basically the
same as that of system path except that it uses the
`virtual_path_metadata`. The reason for this is that the system
(language server) would provide the metadata on whether it still exists
or not and if it exists, the corresponding metadata.
For point (1), VS Code would use `Untitled-1` for Python files and
`Untitled-1.ipynb` for Jupyter Notebooks. We could use this distinction
to determine whether the source type is `Python` or `Ipynb`.
## Test Plan
Added test cases in #12526
Extend red-knot type inference to cover all syntax, so that inferring
types for a scope gives all expressions a type. This means we can run
the red-knot semantic lint on all Python code without panics. It also
means we can infer types for `builtins.pyi` without panics.
To keep things simple, this PR intentionally doesn't add any new type
inference capabilities: the expanded coverage is all achieved with
`Type::Unknown`. But this puts the skeleton in place for adding better
inference of all these language features.
I also had to add basic Salsa cycle recovery (with just `Type::Unknown`
for now), because some `builtins.pyi` definitions are cyclic.
To test this, I added a comprehensive corpus of test snippets sourced
from Cinder under [MIT
license](https://github.com/facebookincubator/cinder/blob/cinder/3.10/cinderx/LICENSE),
which matches Ruff's license. I also added to this corpus some
additional snippets for newer language features: all the
`27_func_generic_*` and `73_class_generic_*` files, as well as
`20_lambda_default_arg.py`, and added a test which runs semantic-lint
over all these files. (The test doesn't assert the test-corpus files are
lint-free; just that they are able to lint without a panic.)
## Summary
Right now, in the isort comment model, there's nowhere for trailing
comments on the _statement_ to go, as in:
```python
from mylib import (
MyClient,
MyMgmtClient,
) # some comment
```
If the comment is on the _alias_, we do preserve it, because we attach
it to the alias, as in:
```python
from mylib import (
MyClient,
MyMgmtClient, # some comment
)
```
Similarly, if the comment is trailing on an import statement
(non-`from`), we again attach it to the alias, because it can't be
parenthesized, as in:
```python
import foo # some comment
```
This PR adds logic to track and preserve those trailing comments.
We also no longer drop several other comments, like:
```python
from mylib import (
# some comment
MyClient
)
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12487.
## Summary
When working on improving Ruff integration with Zed I noticed that it
errors out when we try to resolve a code action of a `QUICKFIX` kind;
apparently, per @dhruvmanila we shouldn't need to resolve it, as the
edit is provided in the initial response for the code action. However,
it's possible for the `resolve` call to fill out other fields (such as
`command`).
AFAICT Helix also tries to resolve the code actions unconditionally (as
in, when either `edit` or `command` is absent); so does VSC. They can
still apply the quickfixes though, as they do not error out on a failed
call to resolve code actions - Zed does. Following suit on Zed's side
does not cut it though, as we still get a log request from Ruff for that
failure (which is surfaced in the UI).
There are also other language servers (such as
[rust-analyzer](c1c9e10f72/crates/rust-analyzer/src/handlers/request.rs (L1257)))
that fill out both `command` and `edit` fields as a part of code action
resolution.
This PR makes the resolve calls for quickfix actions return the input
value.
## Test Plan
N/A
Add support for while-loop control flow.
This doesn't yet include general support for terminals and reachability;
that is wider than just while loops and belongs in its own PR.
This also doesn't yet add support for cyclic definitions in loops; that
comes with enough of its own complexity in Salsa that I want to handle
it separately.
Add a lint rule to detect if a name is definitely or possibly undefined
at a given usage.
If I create the file `undef/main.py` with contents:
```python
x = int
def foo():
z
return x
if flag:
y = x
y
```
And then run `cargo run --bin red_knot -- --current-directory
../ruff-examples/undef`, I get the output:
```
Name 'z' used when not defined.
Name 'flag' used when not defined.
Name 'y' used when possibly not defined.
```
If I modify the file to add `y = 0` at the top, red-knot re-checks it
and I get the new output:
```
Name 'z' used when not defined.
Name 'flag' used when not defined.
```
Note that `int` is not flagged, since it's a builtin, and `return x` in
the function scope is not flagged, since it refers to the global `x`.
## Summary
This PR fixes a bug to raise a syntax error when an unparenthesized
generator expression is used as an argument to a call when there are
more than one argument.
For reference, the grammar is:
```
primary:
| ...
| primary genexp
| primary '(' [arguments] ')'
| ...
genexp:
| '(' ( assignment_expression | expression !':=') for_if_clauses ')'
```
The `genexp` requires the parenthesis as mentioned in the grammar. So,
the grammar for a call expression is either a name followed by a
generator expression or a name followed by a list of argument. In the
former case, the parenthesis are excluded because the generator
expression provides them while in the later case, the parenthesis are
explicitly provided for a list of arguments which means that the
generator expression requires it's own parenthesis.
This was discovered in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12420.
## Test Plan
Add test cases for valid and invalid syntax.
Make sure that the parser from CPython also raises this at the parsing
step:
```console
$ python3.13 -m ast parser/_.py
File "parser/_.py", line 1
total(1, 2, x for x in range(5), 6)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Generator expression must be parenthesized
$ python3.13 -m ast parser/_.py
File "parser/_.py", line 1
sum(x for x in range(10), 10)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Generator expression must be parenthesized
```
## Summary
Fix panic reported in #12428. Where a string would sometimes get split
within a character boundary. This bypasses the need to split the string.
This does not guarantee the correct formatting of the docstring, but
neither did the previous implementation.
Resolves#12428
## Test Plan
Test case added to fixture
## Summary
These are the first rules implemented as part of #458, but I plan to
implement more.
Specifically, this implements `docstring-missing-exception` which checks
for raised exceptions not documented in the docstring, and
`docstring-extraneous-exception` which checks for exceptions in the
docstring not present in the body.
## Test Plan
Test fixtures added for both google and numpy style.
When poring over traces, the ones that just include a definition or
symbol or expression ID aren't very useful, because you don't know which
file it comes from. This adds that information to the trace.
I guess the downside here is that if calling `.file(db)` on a
scope/definition/expression would execute other traced code, it would be
marked as outside the span? I don't think that's a concern, because I
don't think a simple field access on a tracked struct should ever
execute our code. If I'm wrong and this is a problem, it seems like the
tracing crate has this feature where you can record a field as
`tracing::field::Empty` and then fill in its value later with
`span.record(...)`, but when I tried this it wasn't working for me, not
sure why.
I think there's a lot more we can do to make our tracing output more
useful for debugging (e.g. record an event whenever a
definition/symbol/expression/use id is created with the details of that
definition/symbol/expression/use), this is just dipping my toes in the
water.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This PR updates D301 rule to allow inclduing escaped docstring, e.g.
`\"""Foo.\"""` or `\"\"\"Bar.\"\"\"`, within a docstring.
Related issue: #12152
## Test Plan
Add more test cases to D301.py and update the snapshot file.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Charlie Marsh
Micha Reiser
Dylan
Carl Meyer
Dhruv Manilawala
Alex Waygood
Christian Clauss
Steve C
Auguste Lalande
epenet
Ran Benita
github-actions[bot]
Chris Krycho
Eero Vaher
Piotr Osiewicz
Aleksei Latyshev
Sigurd Spieckermann
Uriya Harpeness
Mateusz Sokół
TomerBin
Sashko
ukyen