## Summary
We stopped releasing this a while ago and no longer advertise it
anywhere. IMO, we should remove it so that we stop paying the cost of
maintaining it. If we want to revive it, we can always do so from Git.
Bumps
[dawidd6/action-download-artifact](https://github.com/dawidd6/action-download-artifact)
from 2 to 3.
<details>
<summary>Release notes</summary>
<p><em>Sourced from <a
href="https://github.com/dawidd6/action-download-artifact/releases">dawidd6/action-download-artifact's
releases</a>.</em></p>
<blockquote>
<h2>v3.0.0</h2>
<p>Node was updated from 16 to 20.
Node 20 requires <code>glibc>=2.28</code>.</p>
<h2>v2.28.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.27.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.26.1</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.26.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.25.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.24.4</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.24.3</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.24.2</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.24.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.23.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.22.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.21.1</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.21.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.20.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.19.0</h2>
<p>No release notes provided.</p>
<h2>v2.18.0</h2>
<!-- raw HTML omitted -->
</blockquote>
<p>... (truncated)</p>
</details>
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="e7466d1a75"><code>e7466d1</code></a>
build(deps): bump <code>@actions/artifact</code> from 1.1.2 to 2.0.0
(<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/dawidd6/action-download-artifact/issues/260">#260</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="f29d1b6a89"><code>f29d1b6</code></a>
node_modules: upgrade</li>
<li><a
href="587cee61f5"><code>587cee6</code></a>
action: node16 -> node20 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/dawidd6/action-download-artifact/issues/259">#259</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="1cf761fba6"><code>1cf761f</code></a>
build(deps): bump undici from 5.25.4 to 5.28.2 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/dawidd6/action-download-artifact/issues/258">#258</a>)</li>
<li><a
href="d44631c448"><code>d44631c</code></a>
build(deps): bump <code>@actions/github</code> from 5.1.1 to 6.0.0 (<a
href="https://redirect.github.com/dawidd6/action-download-artifact/issues/252">#252</a>)</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/dawidd6/action-download-artifact/compare/v2...v3">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
Add a release's version number to the names of archives containing
binaries that are attached to that GitHub release.
This makes it possible for users to easily tell archives from different
downloaded releases apart.
See also: #8961
## Test Plan
The workflow was tested in my fork. The example release can be found at:
[https://github.com/tobbez/ruff/releases/tag/v0.1.7](https://github.com/tobbez/ruff/releases/tag/v0.1.7).
To allow the workflow run to succeed in the fork while testing, I had to
use a small commit to prevent interaction with external services (ghcr,
PyPI, and the ruff-pre-commit repository):
```diff
diff --git a/.github/workflows/release.yaml b/.github/workflows/release.yaml
index 86eac6ebc..56b9fa908 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/release.yaml
+++ b/.github/workflows/release.yaml
@@ -463,10 +463,12 @@ jobs:
id-token: write
steps:
- uses: actions/download-artifact@v3
+ if: false
with:
name: wheels
path: wheels
- name: Publish to PyPi
+ if: false
uses: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1
with:
skip-existing: true
@@ -517,6 +519,7 @@ jobs:
tag_name: v${{ inputs.tag }}
docker-publish:
+ if: false
# This action doesn't need to wait on any other task, it's easy to re-tag if something failed and we're validating
# the tag here also
name: Push Docker image ghcr.io/astral-sh/ruff
@@ -575,6 +578,7 @@ jobs:
# After the release has been published, we update downstream repositories
# This is separate because if this fails the release is still fine, we just need to do some manual workflow triggers
update-dependents:
+ if: false
name: Update dependents
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: publish-release
```
Those workflow jobs are however not modified by this PR, so they should
not be affected.
This dockerfile creates a minimal docker container that runs ruff
```console
$ docker run -v .:/io --rm ruff check --select G004 .
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:51:26: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:55:22: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:84:13: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:177:18: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:200:18: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:354:18: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
scripts/check_ecosystem.py:477:18: G004 Logging statement uses f-string
Found 7 errors.
```
```console
$ docker image ls ruff
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
ruff latest 505876b0f817 2 minutes ago 16.2MB
```
Test repo: https://github.com/konstin/release-testing2
Successful build:
https://github.com/konstin/release-testing2/actions/runs/6862107104/job/18659155108
The package:
https://github.com/konstin/release-testing2/pkgs/container/release-testing2
After merging this, i have to manually push the first image and connect
it the repo in the github UI or the action will fail due to lack of
permissions
Open questions:
* Test arm version: Anyone working on an aarch64 linux machine? I don't
see this failing or a high-priority deployment (the vast majority of
linux users is on x86), but it would be nice to have it tested one.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
I'd rather not be the only one who can easily generate our changelog
entries so I invested some time to get Rooster a bit further along and
add instructions.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
For example, https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8512 doesn't need
ecosystem check
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8076
Follow-up to #8358
Doubles the amount of ecosystem checks we do, adding separate groups for
the stable sections.
We're likely to run into GitHub comment length restrictions if there are
significant deviations. However, it should not be common for changes in
stable and preview to occur at the same time, nor should it be common
for linter and formatter changes to occur at the same time.
**Summary** Simplify CI by ensuring that the source distribution is
always built with the rust version that has been explicitly tested. See
discussion in #8389Closes#8389
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie <contact@zanie.dev>
Co-authored-by: Stijn de Gooijer <stijndegooijer@gmail.com>
Until https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8076 is ready, it seems
beneficial to get feedback on preview mode changes.
Tested locally, updated logs to output the flags passed to `ruff` and
verified `--preview` is used.
Changes the title and adds some notes re the old formatter ecosystem
checks in light of #8223
Does not remove it as I'm not sure where else we test for instabilities.
Closes#7239
- Refactors `scripts/check_ecosystem.py` into a new Python project at
`python/ruff-ecosystem`
- Includes
[documentation](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/zanie/ecosystem-format/python/ruff-ecosystem/README.md)
now
- Provides a `ruff-ecosystem` CLI
- Fixes bug where `ruff check` report included "fixable" summary line
- Adds truncation to `ruff check` reports
- Otherwise we often won't see the `ruff format` reports
- The truncation uses some very simple heuristics and could be improved
in the future
- Identifies diagnostic changes that occur just because a violation's
fix available changes
- We still show the diff for the line because it's could matter _where_
this changes, but we could improve this
- Similarly, we could improve detection of diagnostic changes where just
the message changes
- Adds support for JSON ecosystem check output
- I added this primarily for development purposes
- If there are no changes, only errors while processing projects, we
display a different summary message
- When caching repositories, we now checkout the requested ref
- Adds `ruff format` reports, which format with the baseline then the
use `format --diff` to generate a report
- Runs all CI jobs when the CI workflow is changed
## Known problems
- Since we must format the project to get a baseline, the permalink line
numbers do not exactly correspond to the correct range
- This looks... hard. I tried using `git diff` and some wonky hunk
matching to recover the original line numbers but it doesn't seem worth
it. I think we should probably commit the formatted changes to a fork or
something if we want great results here. Consequently, I've just used
the start line instead of a range for now.
- I don't love the comment structure — it'd be nice, perhaps, to have
separate headings for the linter and formatter.
- However, the `pr-comment` workflow is an absolute pain to change
because it runs _separately_ from this pull request so I if I want to
make edits to it I can only test it via manual workflow dispatch.
- Lines are not printed "as we go" which means they're all held in
memory, presumably this would be a problem for large-scale ecosystem
checks
- We are encountering a hard limit with the maximum comment length
supported by GitHub. We will need to move the bulk of the report
elsewhere.
## Future work
- Update `ruff-ecosystem` to support non-default projects and
`check_ecosystem_all.py` behavior
- Remove existing ecosystem check scripts
- Add preview mode toggle (#8076)
- Add a toggle for truncation
- Add hints for quick reproduction of runs locally
- Consider parsing JSON output of Ruff instead of using regex to parse
the text output
- Links to project repositories should use the commit hash we checked
against
- When caching repositories, we should pull the latest changes for the
ref
- Sort check diffs by path and rule code only (changes in messages
should not change order)
- Update check diffs to distinguish between new violations and changes
in messages
- Add "fix" diffs
- Remove existing formatter similarity reports
- On release pull request, compare to the previous tag instead
---------
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
Windows tests take much longer and downstream CI jobs that require the
build from the Linux tests must wait to start.
Additionally, we already have if/else logic in the test suite for
Windows tests which cannot run the same command.
This will require an update to the required checks in the repository
settings.
Adds a CI job which runs `ruff-lsp` tests against the current Ruff
build.
Avoids rebuilding Ruff at the cost of running _after_ the cargo tests
have finished. Might be worth the rebuild to get earlier feedback but I
don't expect it to fail often?
xref https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp/pull/286
## Test plan
Verified use of the development version by inspecting version output in
CI; supported by https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp/pull/289 and
#8034
Previously attempted to repair these tests at
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/6992 but I don't think we should
prioritize that and instead I would like to remove this dead code.
## Summary
We're planning to move the documentation from
[https://beta.ruff.rs/docs](https://beta.ruff.rs/docs) to
[https://docs.astral.sh/ruff](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff), for a few
reasons:
1. We want to remove the `beta` from the domain, as Ruff is no longer
considered beta software.
2. We want to migrate to a structure that could accommodate multiple
future tools living under one domain.
The docs are actually already live at
[https://docs.astral.sh/ruff](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff), but later
today, I'll add a permanent redirect from the previous to the new
domain. **All existing links will continue to work, now and in
perpetuity.**
This PR contains the code changes necessary for the updated
documentation. As part of this effort, I moved the playground and
documentation from my personal Cloudflare account to our team Cloudflare
account (hence the new `--project-name` references). After merging, I'll
also update the secrets on this repo.
Charlie Marsh
Zanie Blue
Henry Schreiner
dependabot[bot]
konsti
Torbjörn Lönnemark
Andrey
T-256
Micha Reiser