Commit Graph

77 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aria Desires 45ac30a4d7
[ty] Teach `ty` the meaning of desperation (try ancestor `pyproject.toml`s as search-paths if module resolution fails) (#21745)
## Summary

This makes an importing file a required argument to module resolution,
and if the fast-path cached query fails to resolve the module, take the
slow-path uncached (could be cached if we want)
`desperately_resolve_module` which will walk up from the importing file
until it finds a `pyproject.toml` (arbitrary decision, we could try
every ancestor directory), at which point it takes one last desperate
attempt to use that directory as a search-path. We do not continue
walking up once we've found a `pyproject.toml` (arbitrary decision, we
could keep going up).

Running locally, this fixes every broken-for-workspace-reasons import in
pyx's workspace!

* Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1539
* Improves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/839

## Test Plan

The workspace tests see a huge improvement on most absolute imports.
2025-12-03 15:04:36 -05:00
David Peter 1f4f8d9950
[ty] Fix flow of associated member states during star imports (#21776)
## Summary

Star-imports can not just affect the state of symbols that they pull in,
they can also affect the state of members that are associated with those
symbols. For example, if `obj.attr` was previously narrowed from `int |
None` to `int`, and a star-import now overwrites `obj`, then the
narrowing on `obj.attr` should be "reset".

This PR keeps track of the state of associated members during star
imports and properly models the flow of their corresponding state
through the control flow structure that we artificially create for
star-imports.

See [this
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1355#issuecomment-3607125005)
for an explanation why this caused ty to see certain `asyncio` symbols
as not being accessible on Python 3.14.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1355

## Ecosystem impact

```diff
async-utils (https://github.com/mikeshardmind/async-utils)
- src/async_utils/bg_loop.py:115:31: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to bound method `set_task_factory` is incorrect: Expected `_TaskFactory | None`, found `def eager_task_factory[_T_co](loop: AbstractEventLoop | None, coro: Coroutine[Any, Any, _T_co@eager_task_factory], *, name: str | None = None, context: Context | None = None) -> Task[_T_co@eager_task_factory]`
- Found 30 diagnostics
+ Found 29 diagnostics

mitmproxy (https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy)
+ mitmproxy/utils/asyncio_utils.py:96:60: warning[unused-ignore-comment] Unused blanket `type: ignore` directive
- test/conftest.py:37:31: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to bound method `set_task_factory` is incorrect: Expected `_TaskFactory | None`, found `def eager_task_factory[_T_co](loop: AbstractEventLoop | None, coro: Coroutine[Any, Any, _T_co@eager_task_factory], *, name: str | None = None, context: Context | None = None) -> Task[_T_co@eager_task_factory]`
```

All of these seem to be correct, they give us a different type for
`asyncio` symbols that are now imported from different
`sys.version_info` branches (where we previously failed to recognize
some of these as statically true/false).

```diff
dd-trace-py (https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py)
- ddtrace/contrib/internal/asyncio/patch.py:39:12: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function `unwrap` is incorrect: Expected `WrappedFunction`, found `def create_task[_T](self, coro: Coroutine[Any, Any, _T@create_task] | Generator[Any, None, _T@create_task], *, name: object = None) -> Task[_T@create_task]`
+ ddtrace/contrib/internal/asyncio/patch.py:39:12: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function `unwrap` is incorrect: Expected `WrappedFunction`, found `def create_task[_T](self, coro: Generator[Any, None, _T@create_task] | Coroutine[Any, Any, _T@create_task], *, name: object = None) -> Task[_T@create_task]`
```

Similar, but only results in a diagnostic change.

## Test Plan

Added a regression test
2025-12-03 17:52:31 +01:00
Brent Westbrook 2250fa6f98
Fix syntax error false positives for `await` outside functions (#21763)
## Summary

Fixes #21750 and a related bug in `PLE1142`. We were not properly
considering generators to be valid `await` contexts, which caused the
`F704` issue. One of the tests I added for this also uncovered an issue
in `PLE1142` for comprehensions nested within async generators because
we were only checking the current scope rather than traversing the
nested context.

## Test Plan

Both of these rules are implemented as semantic syntax errors, so I
added tests (and fixes) in both Ruff and ty.
2025-12-02 21:02:02 +00:00
Micha Reiser 644096ea8a
[ty] Fix find-references for import aliases (#21736) 2025-12-02 14:37:50 +01:00
Aria Desires c534bfaf01
[ty] Implement patterns and typevars in the LSP (#21671)
## Summary

**This is the final goto-targets with missing
goto-definition/declaration implementations!
You can now theoretically click on all the user-defined names in all the
syntax. 🎉**

This adds:

* goto definition/declaration on patterns/typevars
* find-references/rename on patterns/typevars
* fixes syntax highlighting of `*rest` patterns

This notably *does not* add:

* goto-type for patterns/typevars 
* hover for patterns/typevars (because that's just goto-type for names)

Also I realized we were at the precipice of one of the great GotoTarget
sins being resolved, and so I made import aliases also resolve to a
ResolvedDefinition. This removes a ton of cruft and prevents further
backsliding.

Note however that import aliases are, in general, completely jacked up
when it comes to find-references/renames (both before and after this
PR). Previously you could try to rename an import alias and it just
wouldn't do anything. With this change we instead refuse to even let you
try to rename it.

Sorting out why import aliases are jacked up is an ongoing thing I hope
to handle in a followup.

## Test Plan

You'll surely not regret checking in 86 snapshot tests
2025-11-28 13:41:21 +00:00
Aria Desires 209ea06592
Implement goto-definition and find-references for global/nonlocal statements (#21616)
## Summary

The implementation here is to just record the idents of these statements
in `scopes_by_expression` (which already supported idents but only ones
that happened to appear in expressions), so that `definitions_for_name`
Just Works.

goto-type (and therefore hover) notably does not work on these
statements because the typechecker does not record info for them. I am
tempted to just introduce `type_for_name` which runs
`definitions_for_name` to find other expressions and queries the
inferred type... but that's a bit whack because it won't be the computed
type at the right point in the code. It probably wouldn't be
particularly expensive to just compute/record the type at those nodes,
as if they were a load, because global/nonlocal is so scarce?

## Test Plan

Snapshot tests added/re-enabled.
2025-11-25 08:56:57 -05:00
Bhuminjay Soni 8529d79a70
[ty] name is parameter and global is a syntax error (#21312)
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <alex.waygood@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-11-14 18:15:34 +00:00
Alex Waygood 5f501374c4
[ty] Support attribute-expression `TYPE_CHECKING` conditionals (#21449) 2025-11-14 13:11:49 +00:00
Shunsuke Shibayama 9dd666d677
[ty] fix global symbol lookup from eager scopes (#21317)
## Summary

cf. https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/20962

In the following code, `foo` in the comprehension was not reported as
unresolved:

```python
# error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `foo` used when not defined"
foo
foo = [
    # no error!
    # revealed: Divergent
    reveal_type(x) for _ in () for x in [foo]
]

baz = [
    # error: [unresolved-reference] "Name `baz` used when not defined"
    # revealed: Unknown
    reveal_type(x) for _ in () for x in [baz]
]
```

In fact, this is a more serious bug than it looks: for `foo`,
[`explicit_global_symbol` is
called](6cc3393ccd/crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types/infer/builder.rs (L8052)),
causing a symbol that should actually be `Undefined` to be reported as
being of type `Divergent`.

This PR fixes this bug. As a result, the code in
`mdtest/regression/pr_20962_comprehension_panics.md` no longer panics.

## Test Plan

`corpus\cyclic_symbol_in_comprehension.py` is added.
New tests are added in `mdtest/comprehensions/basic.md`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-11-12 10:15:51 -08:00
Shaygan Hooshyari 988c38c013
[ty] Skip eagerly evaluated scopes for attribute storing (#20856)
## Summary

Fix https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/664

This PR adds support for storing attributes in comprehension scopes (any
eager scope.)

For example in the following code we infer type of `z` correctly:

```py
class C:
    def __init__(self):
        [None for self.z in range(1)]
reveal_type(C().z) # previously [unresolved-attribute] but now shows Unknown | int
```

The fix works by adjusting the following logics:

To identify if an attriute is an assignment to self or cls we need to
check the scope is a method. To allow comprehension scopes here we skip
any eager scope in the check.
Also at this stage the code checks if self or the first method argument
is shadowed by another binding that eager scope to prevent this:

```py
class D:
    g: int

class C:
    def __init__(self):
        [[None for self.g in range(1)] for self in [D()]]
reveal_type(C().g) # [unresolved-attribute]
```

When determining scopes that attributes might be defined after
collecting all the methods of the class the code also returns any
decendant scope that is eager and only has eager parents until the
method scope.

When checking reachability of a attribute definition if the attribute is
defined in an eager scope we use the reachability of the first non eager
scope which must be a method. This allows attributes to be marked as
reachable and be seen.


There are also which I didn't add support for:

```py
class C:
    def __init__(self):
        def f():
            [None for self.z in range(1)]
        f()

reveal_type(C().z) # [unresolved-attribute]
```

In the above example we will not even return the comprehension scope as
an attribute scope because there is a non eager scope (`f` function)
between the comprehension and the `__init__` method

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-11-11 14:45:34 -08:00
Aria Desires e4374f14ed
[ty] Consider `from thispackage import y` to re-export `y` in `__init__.pyi` (#21387)
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1487

This one is a true extension of non-standard semantics, and is therefore
a certified Hot Take we might conclude is simply a Bad Take (let's see
what ecosystem tests say...).
2025-11-11 14:41:14 -05:00
Aria Desires bd8812127d
[ty] support absolute `from` imports introducing local submodules in `__init__.py` files (#21372)
By resolving `.` and the LHS of the from import during semantic
indexing, we can check if the LHS is a submodule of `.`, and handle
`from whatever.thispackage.x.y import z` exactly like we do `from .x.y
import z`.

Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1484
2025-11-11 13:04:42 -05:00
Aria Desires 9ce3230add
[ty] Make implicit submodule imports only occur in global scope (#21370)
This loses any ability to have "per-function" implicit submodule
imports, to avoid the "ok but now we need per-scope imports" and "ok but
this should actually introduce a global that only exists during this
function" problems. A simple and clean implementation with no weird
corners.

Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1482
2025-11-10 18:59:48 -05:00
Aria Desires 2bc6c78e26
[ty] introduce local variables for `from` imports of submodules in `__init__.py(i)` (#21173)
This rips out the previous implementation in favour of a new
implementation with 3 rules:

- **froms are locals**: a `from..import` can only define locals, it does
not have global
side-effects. Specifically any submodule attribute `a` that's implicitly
introduced by either
`from .a import b` or `from . import a as b` (in an `__init__.py(i)`) is
a local and not a
global. If you do such an import at the top of a file you won't notice
this. However if you do
such an import in a function, that means it will only be function-scoped
(so you'll need to do
it in every function that wants to access it, making your code less
sensitive to execution
    order).

- **first from first serve**: only the *first* `from..import` in an
`__init__.py(i)` that imports a
particular direct submodule of the current package introduces that
submodule as a local.
Subsequent imports of the submodule will not introduce that local. This
reflects the fact that
in actual python only the first import of a submodule (in the entire
execution of the program)
introduces it as an attribute of the package. By "first" we mean "the
first time in this scope
(or any parent scope)". This pairs well with the fact that we are
specifically introducing a
local (as long as you don't accidentally shadow or overwrite the local).

- **dot re-exports**: `from . import a` in an `__init__.pyi` is
considered a re-export of `a`
(equivalent to `from . import a as a`). This is required to properly
handle many stubs in the
    wild. Currently it must be *exactly* `from . import ...`.
    
This implementation is intentionally limited/conservative (notably,
often requiring a from import to be relative). I'm going to file a ton
of followups for improvements so that their impact can be evaluated
separately.


Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/133
2025-11-10 23:04:56 +00:00
Bhuminjay Soni cddc0fedc2
[syntax-error]: no binding for nonlocal PLE0117 as a semantic syntax error (#21032)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

This PR ports PLE0117 as a semantic syntax error.

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->
Tests previously written

---------

Signed-off-by: 11happy <soni5happy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
2025-11-05 19:13:28 +00:00
Aria Desires 172e8d4ae0
[ty] Support implicit imports of submodules in `__init__.pyi` (#20855)
This is a second take at the implicit imports approach, allowing `from .
import submodule` in an `__init__.pyi` to create the
`mypackage.submodule` attribute everyhere.

This implementation operates inside of the
available_submodule_attributes subsystem instead of as a re-export rule.

The upside of this is we are no longer purely syntactic, and absolute
from imports that happen to target submodules work (an intentional
discussed deviation from pyright which demands a relative from import).
Also we don't re-export functions or classes.

The downside(?) of this is star imports no longer see these attributes
(this may be either good or bad. I believe it's not a huge lift to make
it work with star imports but it's some non-trivial reworking).

I've also intentionally made `import mypackage.submodule` not trigger
this rule although it's trivial to change that.

I've tried to cover as many relevant cases as possible for discussion in
the new test file I've added (there are some random overlaps with
existing tests but trying to add them piecemeal felt confusing and
weird, so I just made a dedicated file for this extension to the rules).

Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/133

<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->
2025-10-31 14:29:24 +00:00
Bhuminjay Soni 3dd78e711e
[syntax-errors] Name is parameter and global (#20426)
## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This PR implements a new semantic syntax error where name is parameter &
global.

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->
I have written inline test as directed in #17412

---------

Signed-off-by: 11happy <soni5happy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <36778786+ntBre@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-10-21 16:51:16 +00:00
Alex Waygood c7e2bfd759
[ty] `continue` and `break` statements outside loops are syntax errors (#20944)
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
2025-10-17 17:13:40 +00:00
Bhuminjay Soni 2b729b4d52
[syntax-errors]: break outside loop F701 (#20556)
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff/ty! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title? (Please prefix
with `[ty]` for ty pull
  requests.)
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->

This PR implements https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/break-outside-loop/
(F701) as a semantic syntax error.

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->

---------

Signed-off-by: 11happy <soni5happy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Brent Westbrook <brentrwestbrook@gmail.com>
2025-10-13 20:00:59 +00:00
Carl Meyer 8248193ed9
[ty] defer inference of legacy TypeVar bound/constraints/defaults (#20598)
## Summary

This allows us to handle self-referential bounds/constraints/defaults
without panicking.

Handles more cases from https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/256

This also changes the way we infer the types of legacy TypeVars. Rather
than understanding a constructor call to `typing[_extension].TypeVar`
inside of any (arbitrarily nested) expression, and having to use a
special `assigned_to` field of the semantic index to try to best-effort
figure out what name the typevar was assigned to, we instead understand
the creation of a legacy `TypeVar` only in the supported syntactic
position (RHS of a simple un-annotated assignment with one target). In
any other position, we just infer it as creating an opaque instance of
`typing.TypeVar`. (This behavior matches all other type checkers.)

So we now special-case TypeVar creation in `TypeInferenceBuilder`, as a
special case of an assignment definition, rather than deeper inside call
binding. This does mean we re-implement slightly more of
argument-parsing, but in practice this is minimal and easy to handle
correctly.

This is easier to implement if we also make the RHS of a simple (no
unpacking) one-target assignment statement no longer a standalone
expression. Which is fine to do, because simple one-target assignments
don't need to infer the RHS more than once. This is a bonus performance
(0-3% across various projects) and significant memory-usage win, since
most assignment statements are simple one-target assignment statements,
meaning we now create many fewer standalone-expression salsa
ingredients.

This change does mean that inference of manually-constructed
`TypeAliasType` instances can no longer find its Definition in
`assigned_to`, which regresses go-to-definition for these aliases. In a
future PR, `TypeAliasType` will receive the same treatment that
`TypeVar` did in this PR (moving its special-case inference into
`TypeInferenceBuilder` and supporting it only in the correct syntactic
position, and lazily inferring its value type to support recursion),
which will also fix the go-to-definition regression. (I decided a
temporary edge-case regression is better in this case than doubling the
size of this PR.)

This PR also tightens up and fixes various aspects of the validation of
`TypeVar` creation, as seen in the tests.

We still (for now) treat all typevars as instances of `typing.TypeVar`,
even if they were created using `typing_extensions.TypeVar`. This means
we'll wrongly error on e.g. `T.__default__` on Python 3.11, even if `T`
is a `typing_extensions.TypeVar` instance at runtime. We share this
wrong behavior with both mypy and pyrefly. It will be easier to fix
after we pull in https://github.com/python/typeshed/pull/14840.

There are some issues that showed up here with typevar identity and
`MarkTypeVarsInferable`; the fix here (using the new `original` field
and `is_identical_to` methods on `BoundTypeVarInstance` and
`TypeVarInstance`) is a bit kludgy, but it can go away when we eliminate
`MarkTypeVarsInferable`.

## Test Plan

Added and updated mdtests.

### Conformance suite impact

The impact here is all positive:

* We now correctly error on a legacy TypeVar with exactly one constraint
type given.
* We now correctly error on a legacy TypeVar with both an upper bound
and constraints specified.

### Ecosystem impact

Basically none; in the setuptools case we just issue slightly different
errors on an invalid TypeVar definition, due to the modified validation
code.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
2025-10-09 21:08:37 +00:00
Takayuki Maeda 666f53331f
[`ruff`] Fix minor typos in doc comments (#20623) 2025-09-29 08:56:23 +02:00
Shunsuke Shibayama 08a561fc05
[ty] more precise lazy scope place lookup (#19932)
## Summary

This is a follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19321.

Now lazy snapshots are updated to take into account new bindings on
every symbol reassignment.

```python
def outer(x: A | None):
    if x is None:
        x = A()

    reveal_type(x)  # revealed: A

    def inner() -> None:
        # lazy snapshot: {x: A}
        reveal_type(x)  # revealed: A
    inner()

def outer() -> None:
    x = None

    x = 1

    def inner() -> None:
        # lazy snapshot: {x: Literal[1]} -> {x: Literal[1, 2]}
        reveal_type(x)  # revealed: Literal[1, 2]
    inner()

    x = 2
```

Closes astral-sh/ty#559.

## Test Plan

Some TODOs in `public_types.md` now work properly.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-09-08 21:08:35 +00:00
Alex Waygood 5d52902e18
[ty] Implement the legacy PEP-484 convention for indicating positional-only parameters (#20248)
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-09-05 17:56:06 +01:00
Shunsuke Shibayama 0e5577ab56
[ty] fix lazy snapshot sweeping in nested scopes (#19908)
## Summary

This PR closes astral-sh/ty#955.

## Test Plan

New test cases in `narrowing/conditionals/nested.md`.
2025-08-14 17:52:52 -07:00
Carl Meyer 5a570c8e6d
[ty] fix deferred name loading in PEP695 generic classes/functions (#19888)
## Summary

For PEP 695 generic functions and classes, there is an extra "type
params scope" (a child of the outer scope, and wrapping the body scope)
in which the type parameters are defined; class bases and function
parameter/return annotations are resolved in that type-params scope.

This PR fixes some longstanding bugs in how we resolve name loads from
inside these PEP 695 type parameter scopes, and also defers type
inference of PEP 695 typevar bounds/constraints/default, so we can
handle cycles without panicking.

We were previously treating these type-param scopes as lazy nested
scopes, which is wrong. In fact they are eager nested scopes; the class
`C` here inherits `int`, not `str`, and previously we got that wrong:

```py
Base = int

class C[T](Base): ...

Base = str
```

But certain syntactic positions within type param scopes (typevar
bounds/constraints/defaults) are lazy at runtime, and we should use
deferred name resolution for them. This also means they can have cycles;
in order to handle that without panicking in type inference, we need to
actually defer their type inference until after we have constructed the
`TypeVarInstance`.

PEP 695 does specify that typevar bounds and constraints cannot be
generic, and that typevar defaults can only reference prior typevars,
not later ones. This reduces the scope of (valid from the type-system
perspective) cycles somewhat, although cycles are still possible (e.g.
`class C[T: list[C]]`). And this is a type-system-only restriction; from
the runtime perspective an "invalid" case like `class C[T: T]` actually
works fine.

I debated whether to implement the PEP 695 restrictions as a way to
avoid some cycles up-front, but I ended up deciding against that; I'd
rather model the runtime name-resolution semantics accurately, and
implement the PEP 695 restrictions as a separate diagnostic on top.
(This PR doesn't yet implement those diagnostics, thus some `# TODO:
error` in the added tests.)

Introducing the possibility of cyclic typevars made typevar display
potentially stack overflow. For now I've handled this by simply removing
typevar details (bounds/constraints/default) from typevar display. This
impacts display of two kinds of types. If you `reveal_type(T)` on an
unbound `T` you now get just `typing.TypeVar` instead of
`typing.TypeVar("T", ...)` where `...` is the bound/constraints/default.
This matches pyright and mypy; pyrefly uses `type[TypeVar[T]]` which
seems a bit confusing, but does include the name. (We could easily
include the name without cycle issues, if there's a syntax we like for
that.)

It also means that displaying a generic function type like `def f[T:
int](x: T) -> T: ...` now displays as `f[T](x: T) -> T` instead of `f[T:
int](x: T) -> T`. This matches pyright and pyrefly; mypy does include
bound/constraints/defaults of typevars in function/callable type
display. If we wanted to add this, we would either need to thread a
visitor through all the type display code, or add a `decycle` type
transformation that replaced recursive reoccurrence of a type with a
marker.

## Test Plan

Added mdtests and modified existing tests to improve their correctness.

After this PR, there's only a single remaining py-fuzzer seed in the
0-500 range that panics! (Before this PR, there were 10; the fuzzer
likes to generate cyclic PEP 695 syntax.)

## Ecosystem report

It's all just the changes to `TypeVar` display.
2025-08-13 15:51:59 -07:00
Ibraheem Ahmed 21ac16db85
[ty] Avoid overcounting shared memory usage (#19773)
## Summary

Use a global tracker to avoid double counting `Arc` instances.
2025-08-06 15:32:02 -04:00
Shunsuke Shibayama 351121c5c5
[ty] fix incorrect lazy scope narrowing (#19744)
## Summary

This is a follow-up to #19321.

Narrowing constraints introduced in a class scope were not applied even
when they can be applied in lazy nested scopes. This PR fixes so that
they are now applied.
Conversely, there were cases where narrowing constraints were being
applied in places where they should not, so it is also fixed.

## Test Plan

Some TODOs in `narrow/conditionals/nested.md` are now work correctly.
2025-08-04 20:32:08 -07:00
David Peter 739c94f95a
[ty] Support as-patterns in reachability analysis (#19728)
## Summary

Support `as` patterns in reachability analysis:

```py
from typing import assert_never


def f(subject: str | int):
    match subject:
        case int() as x:
            pass
        case str():
            pass
        case _:
            assert_never(subject)  # would previously emit an error
```

Note that we still don't support inferring correct types for the bound
name (`x`).

Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/928

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-08-04 20:13:50 +02:00
David Peter eb02aa5676
[ty] Async for loops and async iterables (#19634)
## Summary

Add support for `async for` loops and async iterables.

part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/151

## Ecosystem impact

```diff
- boostedblob/listing.py:445:54: warning[unused-ignore-comment] Unused blanket `type: ignore` directive
```

This is correct. We now find a true positive in the `# type: ignore`'d
code.

All of the other ecosystem hits are of the type

```diff
trio (https://github.com/python-trio/trio)
+ src/trio/_core/_tests/test_guest_mode.py:532:24: error[not-iterable] Object of type `MemorySendChannel[int] | MemoryReceiveChannel[int]` may not be iterable
```

The message is correct, because only `MemoryReceiveChannel` has an
`__aiter__` method, but `MemorySendChannel` does not. What's not correct
is our inferred type here. It should be `MemoryReceiveChannel[int]`, not
the union of the two. This is due to missing unpacking support for tuple
subclasses, which @AlexWaygood is working on. I don't think this should
block merging this PR, because those wrong types are already there,
without this PR.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests and snapshot tests for diagnostics.
2025-07-30 17:40:24 +02:00
David Peter 4ecf1d205a
[ty] Support `async`/`await`, `async with` and `yield from` (#19595)
## Summary

- Add support for the return types of `async` functions
- Add type inference for `await` expressions
- Add support for `async with` / async context managers
- Add support for `yield from` expressions

This PR is generally lacking proper error handling in some cases (e.g.
illegal `__await__` attributes). I'm planning to work on this in a
follow-up.

part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/151

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/736

## Ecosystem

There are a lot of true positives on `prefect` which look similar to:
```diff
prefect (https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefect)
+ src/integrations/prefect-aws/tests/workers/test_ecs_worker.py:406:12: error[unresolved-attribute] Type `str` has no attribute `status_code`
```

This is due to a wrong return type annotation
[here](e926b8c4c1/src/integrations/prefect-aws/tests/workers/test_ecs_worker.py (L355-L391)).

```diff
mitmproxy (https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy)
+ test/mitmproxy/addons/test_clientplayback.py:18:1: error[invalid-argument-type] Argument to function `asynccontextmanager` is incorrect: Expected `(...) -> AsyncIterator[Unknown]`, found `def tcp_server(handle_conn, **server_args) -> Unknown | tuple[str, int]`
```


[This](a4d794c59a/test/mitmproxy/addons/test_clientplayback.py (L18-L19))
is a true positive. That function should return
`AsyncIterator[Address]`, not `Address`.

I looked through almost all of the other new diagnostics and they all
look like known problems or true positives.

## Typing conformance

The typing conformance diff looks good.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-07-30 11:51:21 +02:00
Micha Reiser b033fb6bfd
[ty] Split `ScopedPlaceId` into `ScopedSymbolId` and `ScopedMemberId` (#19497) 2025-07-25 13:54:33 +02:00
Shunsuke Shibayama b124e182ca
[ty] improve lazy scope place lookup (#19321)
Co-authored-by: David Peter <sharkdp@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@oddbird.net>
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
2025-07-25 07:11:11 +00:00
David Peter 2a00eca66b
[ty] Exhaustiveness checking & reachability for `match` statements (#19508)
## Summary

Implements proper reachability analysis and — in effect — exhaustiveness
checking for `match` statements. This allows us to check the following
code without any errors (leads to *"can implicitly return `None`"* on
`main`):

```py
from enum import Enum, auto

class Color(Enum):
    RED = auto()
    GREEN = auto()
    BLUE = auto()

def hex(color: Color) -> str:
    match color:
        case Color.RED:
            return "#ff0000"
        case Color.GREEN:
            return "#00ff00"
        case Color.BLUE:
            return "#0000ff"
```

Note that code like this already worked fine if there was a
`assert_never(color)` statement in a catch-all case, because we would
then consider that `assert_never` call terminal. But now this also works
without the wildcard case. Adding a member to the enum would still lead
to an error here, if that case would not be handled in `hex`.

What needed to happen to support this is a new way of evaluating match
pattern constraints. Previously, we would simply compare the type of the
subject expression against the patterns. For the last case here, the
subject type would still be `Color` and the value type would be
`Literal[Color.BLUE]`, so we would infer an ambiguous truthiness.

Now, before we compare the subject type against the pattern, we first
generate a union type that corresponds to the set of all values that
would have *definitely been matched* by previous patterns. Then, we
build a "narrowed" subject type by computing `subject_type &
~already_matched_type`, and compare *that* against the pattern type. For
the example here, `already_matched_type = Literal[Color.RED] |
Literal[Color.GREEN]`, and so we have a narrowed subject type of `Color
& ~(Literal[Color.RED] | Literal[Color.GREEN]) = Literal[Color.BLUE]`,
which allows us to infer a reachability of `AlwaysTrue`.

<details>

<summary>A note on negated reachability constraints</summary>

It might seem that we now perform duplicate work, because we also record
*negated* reachability constraints. But that is still important for
cases like the following (and possibly also for more realistic
scenarios):

```py
from typing import Literal

def _(x: int | str):
    match x:
        case None:
            pass # never reachable
        case _:
            y = 1

    y
```

</details>

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/99

## Test Plan

* I verified that this solves all examples from the linked ticket (the
first example needs a PEP 695 type alias, because we don't support
legacy type aliases yet)
* Verified that the ecosystem changes are all because of removed false
positives
* Updated tests
2025-07-23 22:45:45 +02:00
David Peter 3d17897c02
[ty] Fix narrowing and reachability of class patterns with arguments (#19512)
## Summary

I noticed that our type narrowing and reachability analysis was
incorrect for class patterns that are not irrefutable. The test cases
below compare the old and the new behavior:

```py
from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass
class Point:
    x: int
    y: int

class Other: ...

def _(target: Point):
    y = 1

    match target:
        case Point(0, 0):
            y = 2
        case Point(x=0, y=1):
            y = 3
        case Point(x=1, y=0):
            y = 4
    
    reveal_type(y)  # revealed: Literal[1, 2, 3, 4]    (previously: Literal[2])


def _(target: Point | Other):
    match target:
        case Point(0, 0):
            reveal_type(target)  # revealed: Point
        case Point(x=0, y=1):
            reveal_type(target)  # revealed: Point    (previously: Never)
        case Point(x=1, y=0):
            reveal_type(target)  # revealed: Point    (previously: Never)
        case Other():
            reveal_type(target)  # revealed: Other    (previously: Other & ~Point)
```

## Test Plan

New Markdown test
2025-07-23 18:45:03 +02:00
Andrew Gallant 4573a0f6a0 [ty] Make `Module` a Salsa ingredient
We want to write queries that depend on `Module` for caching. While it
seems it can be done without making `Module` an ingredient, it seems it
is best practice to do so.

[best practice to do so]: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19408#discussion_r2215867301
2025-07-23 09:46:40 -04:00
Douglas Creager 88de5727df
[ty] Garbage-collect reachability constraints (#19414)
This is a follow-on to #19410 that further reduces the memory usage of
our reachability constraints. When finishing the building of a use-def
map, we walk through all of the "final" states and mark only those
reachability constraints as "used". We then throw away the interior TDD
nodes of any reachability constraints that weren't marked as used.

(This helps because we build up quite a few intermediate TDD nodes when
constructing complex reachability constraints. These nodes can never be
accessed if they were _only_ used as an intermediate TDD node. The
marking step ensures that we keep any nodes that ended up being referred
to in some accessible use-def map state.)
2025-07-21 14:16:27 -04:00
David Peter b8dec79182
[ty] Implicit instance attributes declared `Final` (#19462)
## Summary

Adds proper type inference for implicit instance attributes that are
declared with a "bare" `Final` and adds `invalid-assignment` diagnostics
for all implicit instance attributes that are declared `Final` or
`Final[…]`.

## Test Plan

New and updated MD tests.

## Ecosystem analysis

```diff
pytest (https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest)
+ error[invalid-return-type] src/_pytest/fixtures.py:1662:24: Return type does not match returned value: expected `Scope`, found `Scope | (Unknown & ~None & ~((...) -> object) & ~str) | (((str, Config, /) -> Unknown) & ~((...) -> object) & ~str) | (Unknown & ~str)
```

The definition of the `scope` attribute is [here](

5f99385635/src/_pytest/fixtures.py (L1020-L1028)).
Looks like this is a new false positive due to missing `TypeAlias`
support that is surfaced here because we now infer a more precise type
for `FixtureDef._scope`.
2025-07-21 20:01:07 +02:00
Jack O'Connor e9a64e5825
[ty] make `del x` force local resolution of `x` in the current scope (#19389)
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/769.

**Updated:** The preferred approach here is to keep the SemanticIndex
simple (`del` of any name marks that name "bound" in the current scope)
and to move complexity to type inference (free variable resolution stops
when it finds a binding, unless that binding is declared `nonlocal`). As
part of this change, free variable resolution will now union the types
it finds as it walks in enclosing scopes. This approach is still
incomplete, because it doesn't consider inner scopes or sibling scopes,
but it improves the common case.

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-07-18 14:58:32 -07:00
Dhruv Manilawala 99d0ac60b4
[ty] Track open files in the server (#19264)
## Summary

This PR updates the server to keep track of open files both system and
virtual files.

This is done by updating the project by adding the file in the open file
set in `didOpen` notification and removing it in `didClose`
notification.

This does mean that for workspace diagnostics, ty will only check open
files because the behavior of different diagnostic builder is to first
check `is_file_open` and only add diagnostics for open files. So, this
required updating the `is_file_open` model to be `should_check_file`
model which validates whether the file needs to be checked based on the
`CheckMode`. If the check mode is open files only then it will check
whether the file is open. If it's all files then it'll return `true` by
default.

Closes: astral-sh/ty#619

## Test Plan

### Before

There are two files in the project: `__init__.py` and `diagnostics.py`.

In the video, I'm demonstrating the old behavior where making changes to
the (open) `diagnostics.py` file results in re-parsing the file:


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c2ac0ecd-9c77-42af-a924-c3744b146045

### After

Same setup as above.

In the video, I'm demonstrating the new behavior where making changes to
the (open) `diagnostics.py` file doesn't result in re-parting the file:


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7b82fe92-f330-44c7-b527-c841c4545f8f
2025-07-18 19:33:35 +05:30
Matthew Mckee cbe94b094b
[ty] Support empty function bodies in `if TYPE_CHECKING` blocks (#19372)
## Summary

Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/339

Supports having a blank function body inside `if TYPE_CHECKING` block or
in the elif or else of a `if not TYPE_CHECKING` block.

```py
if TYPE_CHECKING:
    def foo() -> int: ...

if not TYPE_CHECKING: ...
else:     
    def bar() -> int: ...
```

## Test Plan

Update `function/return_type.md`

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-07-16 14:48:04 -06:00
Micha Reiser e506296cec
[ty] Make use of salsa `Lookup` when interning values (#19347) 2025-07-15 09:54:43 +02:00
Micha Reiser 3560f86450
[ty] Use an interval map for scopes by expression (#19025) 2025-07-14 13:50:58 +02:00
Jack O'Connor 78bd73f25a [ty] add support for `nonlocal` statements 2025-07-11 09:44:54 -07:00
Micha Reiser 492f5bf2aa
[ty] Remove countme from salsa-structs (#19257) 2025-07-10 11:45:09 +00:00
Abhijeet Prasad Bodas f4bd74ab6a
[ty] Correctly handle calls to functions marked as returning `Never` / `NoReturn` (#18333)
## Summary

`ty` does not understand that calls to functions which have been
annotated as having a return type of `Never` / `NoReturn` are terminal.

This PR fixes that, by adding new reachability constraints when call
expressions are seen. If the call expression evaluates to `Never`, the
code following it will be considered to be unreachable. Note that, for
adding these constraints, we only consider call expressions at the
statement level, and that too only inside function scopes. This is
because otherwise, the number of such constraints becomes too high, and
evaluating them later on during type inference results in a major
performance degradation.

Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/180

## Test Plan

New mdtests.

## Ecosystem changes

This PR removes the following false-positives:
- "Function can implicitly return `None`, which is not assignable to
...".
- "Name `foo` used when possibly not defind" - because the branch in
which it is not defined has a `NoReturn` call, or when `foo` was
imported in a `try`, and the except had a `NoReturn` call.

---------

Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
2025-07-04 11:52:52 -07:00
Micha Reiser 5f426b9f8b
[ty] Remove `ScopedExpressionId` (#19019)
## Summary

The motivation of `ScopedExpressionId` was that we have an expression
identifier that's local to a scope and, therefore, unlikely to change if
a user makes changes in another scope. A local identifier like this has
the advantage that query results may remain unchanged even if other
parts of the file change, which in turn allows Salsa to short-circuit
dependent queries.

However, I noticed that we aren't using `ScopedExpressionId` in a place
where it's important that the identifier is local. It's main use is
inside `infer` which we always run for the entire file. The one
exception to this is `Unpack` but unpack runs as part of `infer`.

Edit: The above isn't entirely correct. We used ScopedExpressionId in
TypeInference which is a query result. Now using ExpressionNodeKey does
mean that a change to the AST invalidates most if not all TypeInference
results of a single file. Salsa then has to run all dependent queries to
see if they're affected by this change even if the change was local to
another scope.

If this locality proves to be important I suggest that we create two
queries on top of TypeInference: one that returns the expression map
which is mainly used in the linter and type inference and a second that
returns all remaining fields. This should give us a similar optimization
at a much lower cost

I also considered remove `ScopedUseId` but I believe that one is still
useful because using `ExpressionNodeKey` for it instead would mean that
all `UseDefMap` change when a single AST node changes. Whether this is
important is something difficult to assess. I'm simply not familiar
enough with the `UseDefMap`. If the locality doesn't matter for the
`UseDefMap`, then a similar change could be made and `bindings_by_use`
could be changed to an `FxHashMap<UseId, Bindings>` where `UseId` is a
thin wrapper around `NodeKey`.

Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/721
2025-07-02 17:57:32 +02:00
David Peter dac4e356eb
[ty] Use all reachable bindings for instance attributes and deferred lookups (#18955)
## Summary

Remove a hack in control flow modeling that was treating `return`
statements at the end of function bodies in a special way (basically
considering the state *just before* the `return` statement as the
end-of-scope state). This is not needed anymore now that #18750 has been
merged.

In order to make this work, we now use *all reachable bindings* for
purposes of finding implicit instance attribute assignments as well as
for deferred lookups of symbols. Both would otherwise be affected by
this change:
```py
def C:
    def f(self):
        self.x = 1  # a reachable binding that is not visible at the end of the scope
        return
```

```py
def f():
    class X: ...  # a reachable binding that is not visible at the end of the scope
    x: "X" = X()  # deferred use of `X`
    return
```

Implicit instance attributes also required another change. We previously
kept track of possibly-unbound instance attributes in some cases, but we
now give up on that completely and always consider *implicit* instance
attributes to be bound if we see a reachable binding in a reachable
method. The previous behavior was somewhat inconsistent anyway because
we also do not consider attributes possibly-unbound in other scenarios:
we do not (and can not) keep track of whether or not methods are called
that define these attributes.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/711

## Ecosystem analysis

I think this looks very positive!

* We see an unsurprising drop in `possibly-unbound-attribute`
diagnostics (599), mostly for classes that define attributes in `try …
except` blocks, `for` loops, or `if … else: raise …` constructs. There
might obviously also be true positives that got removed, but the vast
majority should be false positives.
* There is also a drop in `possibly-unresolved-reference` /
`unresolved-reference` diagnostics (279+13) from the change to deferred
lookups.
* Some `invalid-type-form` false positives got resolved (13), because we
can now properly look up the names in the annotations.
* There are some new *true* positives in `attrs`, since we understand
the `Attribute` annotation that was previously inferred as `Unknown`
because of a re-assignment after the class definition.


## Test Plan

The existing attributes.md test suite has sufficient coverage here.
2025-07-01 14:38:36 +02:00
Alex Waygood c6fd11fe36
[ty] Eagerly evaluate more constraints based on the raw AST (#19068) 2025-07-01 10:17:22 +00:00
David Peter 7d468ee58a
[ty] Model reachability of star import definitions for nonlocal lookups (#19066)
## Summary

Temporarily modify `UseDefMapBuilder::reachability` for star imports in
order for new definitions to pick up the right reachability. This was
already working for `UseDefMapBuilder::place_states`, but not for
`UseDefMapBuilder::reachable_definitions`.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/728

## Test Plan

Regression test
2025-07-01 11:06:37 +02:00
David Peter 4016521bf6
[ty] Eagerly evaluate `TYPE_CHECKING` constraints (#19044)
## Summary

Evaluate `TYPE_CHECKING` to `ALWAYS_TRUE` and `not TYPE_CHECKING` to
`ALWAYS_FALSE` during semantic index building. This is a follow-up to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18998 and is in principle just a
performance optimization. We see some (favorable) ecosystem changes
because we can eliminate definitely-unreachable branches early now and
retain narrowing constraints without solving
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/690 first.
2025-07-01 11:05:52 +02:00