## Summary
This PR adds support for configuring Red Knot in the `tool.knot` section
of the project's
`pyproject.toml` section. Options specified on the CLI precede the
options in the configuration file.
This PR only supports the `environment` and the `src.root` options for
now.
Other options will be added as separate PRs.
There are also a few concerns that I intentionally ignored as part of
this PR:
* Handling of relative paths: We need to anchor paths relative to the
current working directory (CLI), or the project (`pyproject.toml` or
`knot.toml`)
* Tracking the source of a value. Diagnostics would benefit from knowing
from which configuration a value comes so that we can point the user to
the right configuration file (or CLI) if the configuration is invalid.
* Schema generation and there's a lot more; see
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15491
This PR changes the default for first party codes: Our existing default
was to only add the project root. Now, Red Knot adds the project root
and `src` (if such a directory exists).
Theoretically, we'd have to add a file watcher event that changes the
first-party search paths if a user later creates a `src` directory. I
think this is pretty uncommon, which is why I ignored the complexity for
now but I can be persuaded to handle it if it's considered important.
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/15491
## Test Plan
Existing tests, new file watching test demonstrating that changing the
python version and platform is correctly reflected.
## Summary
This PR fixes the `show_*_msg` macros to pass all the tokens instead of
just a single token. This allows for using various expressions right in
the macro similar to how it would be in `format_args!`.
## Test Plan
`cargo clippy`
## Summary
Refer to the VS Code PR
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/659) for details on the
change.
This PR changes the following:
1. Add tracing span for both request (request id and method name) and
notification (method name) handler
2. Remove the `RUFF_TRACE` environment variable. This was being used to
turn on / off logging for the server
3. Similarly, remove reading the `trace` value from the initialization
options
4. Remove handling the `$/setTrace` notification
5. Remove the specialized `TraceLogWriter` used for Zed and VS Code
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/12564)
Regarding the (5) for the Zed editor, the reason that was implemented
was because there was no way of looking at the stderr messages in the
editor which has been changed. Now, it captures the stderr as part of
the "Server Logs".
(82492d74a8/crates/language_tools/src/lsp_log.rs (L548-L552))
### Question
Regarding (1), I think having just a simple trace level message should
be good for now as the spans are not hierarchical. This could be tackled
with #12744. The difference between the two:
<details><summary>Using <code>tracing::trace</code></summary>
<p>
```
0.019243416s DEBUG ThreadId(08) ruff_server::session::index::ruff_settings: Ignored path via `exclude`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/.vscode
0.026398750s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff
0.026802125s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received notification "textDocument/didOpen"
0.026930666s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received notification "textDocument/didOpen"
0.026962333s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/diagnostic" (1)
0.027042875s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/diagnostic" (2)
0.027097500s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/codeAction" (3)
0.027107458s DEBUG ruff:worker:0 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
0.027123541s DEBUG ruff:worker:3 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/organize_imports.py
0.027514875s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
0.285689833s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/codeAction" (4)
45.741101666s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received notification "textDocument/didClose"
47.108745500s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received notification "textDocument/didOpen"
47.109802041s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/diagnostic" (5)
47.109926958s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/codeAction" (6)
47.110027791s DEBUG ruff:worker:6 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
51.863679125s TRACE ruff:main ruff_server::server::api: Received request "textDocument/hover" (7)
```
</p>
</details>
<details><summary>Using <code>tracing::trace_span</code></summary>
<p>
Only logging the enter event:
```
0.018638750s DEBUG ThreadId(11) ruff_server::session::index::ruff_settings: Ignored path via `exclude`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/.vscode
0.025895791s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff
0.026378791s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didOpen"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.026531208s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didOpen"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.026567583s TRACE ruff:main request{id=1 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.026652541s TRACE ruff:main request{id=2 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.026711041s DEBUG ruff:worker:2 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/organize_imports.py
0.026729166s DEBUG ruff:worker:1 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
0.027023083s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
5.197554750s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didClose"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
6.534458000s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didOpen"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
6.535027958s TRACE ruff:main request{id=3 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
6.535271166s DEBUG ruff:worker:3 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/organize_imports.py
6.544240583s TRACE ruff:main request{id=4 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.049692458s TRACE ruff:main request{id=5 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.508142541s TRACE ruff:main request{id=6 method="textDocument/hover"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.872421958s TRACE ruff:main request{id=7 method="textDocument/hover"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
8.024498583s TRACE ruff:main request{id=8 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
13.895063666s TRACE ruff:main request{id=9 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
14.774706083s TRACE ruff:main request{id=10 method="textDocument/hover"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
16.058918958s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didChange"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
16.060562208s TRACE ruff:main request{id=11 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
16.061109083s DEBUG ruff:worker:8 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
21.561742875s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didChange"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
21.563573791s TRACE ruff:main request{id=12 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
21.564206750s DEBUG ruff:worker:4 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
21.826691375s TRACE ruff:main request{id=13 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
22.091080125s TRACE ruff:main request{id=14 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
```
</p>
</details>
**Todo**
- [x] Update documentation (I'll be adding a troubleshooting section
under "Editors" as a follow-up which is for all editors)
- [x] Check for backwards compatibility. I don't think this should break
backwards compatibility as it's mainly targeted towards improving the
debugging experience.
~**Before I go on to updating the documentation, I'd appreciate initial
review on the chosen approach.**~
resolves: #14959
## Test Plan
Refer to the test plan in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/659.
Example logs at `debug` level:
```
0.010770083s DEBUG ThreadId(15) ruff_server::session::index::ruff_settings: Ignored path via `exclude`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/.vscode
0.018101916s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff
0.018559916s DEBUG ruff:worker:4 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
0.018992375s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
23.408802375s DEBUG ruff:worker:11 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
24.329127416s DEBUG ruff:worker:6 ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
```
Example logs at `trace` level:
```
0.010296375s DEBUG ThreadId(13) ruff_server::session::index::ruff_settings: Ignored path via `exclude`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/.vscode
0.017422583s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff
0.018034458s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didOpen"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.018199708s TRACE ruff:worker:0 request{id=1 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
0.018251167s DEBUG ruff:worker:0 request{id=1 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
0.018528708s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
1.611798417s TRACE ruff:worker:1 request{id=2 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
1.861757542s TRACE ruff:worker:4 request{id=3 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.027361792s TRACE ruff:worker:2 request{id=4 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.851361500s TRACE ruff:worker:5 request{id=5 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.901690875s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didChange"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.903063167s TRACE ruff:worker:10 request{id=6 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
7.903183500s DEBUG ruff:worker:10 request{id=6 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
8.702385292s TRACE ruff:main notification{method="textDocument/didChange"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
8.704106625s TRACE ruff:worker:3 request{id=7 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
8.704304875s DEBUG ruff:worker:3 request{id=7 method="textDocument/diagnostic"}: ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/playground/ruff/lsp/play.py
8.966853458s TRACE ruff:worker:9 request{id=8 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
9.229622792s TRACE ruff:worker:6 request{id=9 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
10.513111583s TRACE ruff:worker:7 request{id=10 method="textDocument/codeAction"}: ruff_server::server::api: enter
```
## Summary
This PR introduces a structured `DiagnosticId` instead of using a plain
`&'static str`. It is the first of three in a stack that implements a
basic rules infrastructure for Red Knot.
`DiagnosticId` is an enum over all known diagnostic codes. A closed enum
reduces the risk of accidentally introducing two identical diagnostic
codes. It also opens the possibility of generating reference
documentation from the enum in the future (not part of this PR).
The enum isn't *fully closed* because it uses a `&'static str` for lint
names. This is because we want the flexibility to define lints in
different crates, and all names are only known in `red_knot_linter` or
above. Still, lower-level crates must already reference the lint names
to emit diagnostics. We could define all lint-names in `DiagnosticId`
but I decided against it because:
* We probably want to share the `DiagnosticId` type between Ruff and Red
Knot to avoid extra complexity in the diagnostic crate, and both tools
use different lint names.
* Lints require a lot of extra metadata beyond just the name. That's why
I think defining them close to their implementation is important.
In the long term, we may also want to support plugins, which would make
it impossible to know all lint names at compile time. The next PR in the
stack introduces extra syntax for defining lints.
A closed enum does have a few disadvantages:
* rustc can't help us detect unused diagnostic codes because the enum is
public
* Adding a new diagnostic in the workspace crate now requires changes to
at least two crates: It requires changing the workspace crate to add the
diagnostic and the `ruff_db` crate to define the diagnostic ID. I
consider this an acceptable trade. We may want to move `DiagnosticId` to
its own crate or into a shared `red_knot_diagnostic` crate.
## Preventing duplicate diagnostic identifiers
One goal of this PR is to make it harder to introduce ambiguous
diagnostic IDs, which is achieved by defining a closed enum. However,
the enum isn't fully "closed" because it doesn't explicitly list the IDs
for all lint rules. That leaves the possibility that a lint rule and a
diagnostic ID share the same name.
I made the names unambiguous in this PR by separating them into
different namespaces by using `lint/<rule>` for lint rule codes. I don't
mind the `lint` prefix in a *Ruff next* context, but it is a bit weird
for a standalone type checker. I'd like to not overfocus on this for now
because I see a few different options:
* We remove the `lint` prefix and add a unit test in a top-level crate
that iterates over all known lint rules and diagnostic IDs to ensure the
names are non-overlapping.
* We only render `[lint]` as the error code and add a note to the
diagnostic mentioning the lint rule. This is similar to clippy and has
the advantage that the header line remains short
(`lint/some-long-rule-name` is very long ;))
* Any other form of adjusting the diagnostic rendering to make the
distinction clear
I think we can defer this decision for now because the `DiagnosticId`
contains all the relevant information to change the rendering
accordingly.
## Why `Lint` and not `LintRule`
I see three kinds of diagnostics in Red Knot:
* Non-suppressable: Reveal type, IO errors, configuration errors, etc.
(any `DiagnosticId`)
* Lints: code-related diagnostics that are suppressable.
* Lint rules: The same as lints, but they can be enabled or disabled in
the configuration. The majority of lints in Red Knot and the Ruff
linter.
Our current implementation doesn't distinguish between lints and Lint
rules because we aren't aware of a suppressible code-related lint that
can't be configured in the configuration. The only lint that comes to my
mind is maybe `division-by-zero` if we're 99.99% sure that it is always
right. However, I want to keep the door open to making this distinction
in the future if it proves useful.
Another reason why I chose lint over lint rule (or just rule) is that I
want to leave room for a future lint rule and lint phase concept:
* lint is the *what*: a specific code smell, pattern, or violation
* the lint rule is the *how*: I could see a future `LintRule` trait in
`red_knot_python_linter` that provides the necessary hooks to run as
part of the linter. A lint rule produces diagnostics for exactly one
lint. A lint rule differs from all lints in `red_knot_python_semantic`
because they don't run as "rules" in the Ruff sense. Instead, they're a
side-product of type inference.
* the lint phase is a different form of *how*: A lint phase can produce
many different lints in a single pass. This is a somewhat common pattern
in Ruff where running one analysis collects the necessary information
for finding many different lints
* diagnostic is the *presentation*: Unlike a lint, the diagnostic isn't
the what, but how a specific lint gets presented. I expect that many
lints can use one generic `LintDiagnostic`, but a few lints might need
more flexibility and implement their custom diagnostic rendering (at
least custom `Diagnostic` implementation).
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
...and remove periods from messages that don't span more than a single
sentence.
This is more consistent with how we present user-facing messages in uv
(which has a defined style guide).
## Summary
This PR simplifies the virtual file support in the red knot core,
specifically:
* Update `File::add_virtual_file` method to `File::virtual_file` which
will always create a new virtual file and override the existing entry in
the lookup table
* Add `VirtualFile` which is a wrapper around `File` and provides
methods to increment the file revision / close the virtual file
* Add a new `File::try_virtual_file` to lookup the `VirtualFile` from
`Files`
* Add `File::sync_virtual_path` which takes in the `SystemVirtualPath`,
looks up the `VirtualFile` for it and calls the `sync` method to
increment the file revision
* Removes the `virtual_path_metadata` method on `System` trait
## Test Plan
- [x] Make sure the existing red knot tests pass
- [x] Updated code works well with the LSP
## Summary
This PR adds support for `textDocument/didChange` notification.
There seems to be a bug (probably in Salsa) where it panics with:
```
2024-08-22 15:33:38.802 [info] panicked at /Users/dhruv/.cargo/git/checkouts/salsa-61760caba2b17ca5/f608ff8/src/tracked_struct.rs:377:9:
two concurrent writers to Id(4800), should not be possible
```
## Test Plan
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81055feb-ba8e-4acf-ad2f-94084a3efead
## Summary
This PR adds basic support for files outside of any workspace in the red
knot server.
This also limits the red knot server to only work in a single workspace.
The server will not start if there are multiple workspaces.
## Test Plan
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/de601387-0ad5-433c-9d2c-7b6ae5137654
## Summary
This PR removes notebook sync support from server capabilities because
it isn't tested, it'll be added back once we actually add full support
for notebook.
## Summary
This PR adds very basic support for using the line / column information
from the diagnostic message. This makes it easier to validate
diagnostics in an editor as oppose to going through the diff one
diagnostic at a time and confirming it at the location.
## Summary
This PR adds support for VS Code specific cell metadata to consider when
collecting valid code cells.
For context, Ruff only runs on valid code cells. These are the code
cells that doesn't contain cell magics. Previously, Ruff only used the
notebook's metadata to determine whether it's a Python notebook. But, in
VS Code, a notebook's preferred language might be Python but it could
still contain code cells for other languages. This can be determined
with the `metadata.vscode.languageId` field.
### References:
* https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/identifiers
* e6c009a3d4/extensions/ipynb/src/serializers.ts (L104-L107)
*
e6c009a3d4/extensions/ipynb/src/serializers.ts (L117-L122)
This brings us one step closer to fixing #12281.
## Test Plan
Add test cases for `is_valid_python_code_cell` and an integration test
case which showcase running it end to end. The test notebook contains a
JavaScript code cell and a Python code cell.
Micha Reiser
Dhruv Manilawala
Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos
Charlie Marsh
Alex Waygood