Commit Graph

24 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Waygood 5a2aba237b
[ty] Improve diagnostics for unsupported binary operations and unsupported augmented assignments (#21947)
## Summary

This PR takes the improvements we made to unsupported-comparison
diagnostics in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21737, and extends
them to other `unsupported-operator` diagnostics.

## Test Plan

Mdtests and snapshots
2025-12-12 21:53:29 +00:00
Luca Chiodini 5a9d6a91ea
[ty] Uniformly use "not supported" in diagnostics (#21916) 2025-12-11 15:03:55 +00:00
David Peter 7bf50e70a7
[ty] Generics: Respect typevar bounds when matching against a union (#21893)
## Summary

Respect typevar bounds and constraints when matching against a union.
For example:

```py
def accepts_t_or_int[T_str: str](x: T_str | int) -> T_str:
    raise NotImplementedError

reveal_type(accepts_t_or_int("a"))  # ok, reveals `Literal["a"]`
reveal_type(accepts_t_or_int(1))  # ok, reveals `Unknown`

class Unrelated: ...

# error: [invalid-argument-type] "Argument type `Unrelated` does not
# satisfy upper bound `str` of type variable `T_str`"
accepts_t_or_int(Unrelated())
```

Previously, the last call succeed without any errors. Worse than that,
we also incorrectly solved `T_str = Unrelated`, which often lead to
downstream errors.

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1837

## Ecosystem impact

Looks good!

* Lots of removed false positives, often because we previously selected
a wrong overload for a generic function (because we didn't respect the
typevar bound in an earlier overload).
* We now understand calls to functions accepting an argument of type
`GenericPath: TypeAlias = AnyStr | PathLike[AnyStr]`. Previously, we
would incorrectly match a `Path` argument against the `AnyStr` typevar
(violating its constraints), but now we match against `PathLike`.

## Performance

Another regression on `colour`. This package uses `numpy` heavily. And
`numpy` is the codebase that originally lead me to this bug. The fix
here allows us to infer more precise `np.array` types in some cases, so
it's reasonable that we just need to perform more work.

The fix here also requires us to look at more union elements when we
would previously short-circuit incorrectly, so some more work needs to
be done in the solver.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-12-10 14:58:57 +01:00
David Peter aea2bc2308
[ty] Infer type variables within generic unions (#21862)
## Summary

This PR allows our generics solver to find a solution for `T` in cases
like the following:
```py
def extract_t[T](x: P[T] | Q[T]) -> T:
    raise NotImplementedError

reveal_type(extract_t(P[int]()))  # revealed: int
reveal_type(extract_t(Q[str]()))  # revealed: str
```

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1772
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1314

## Ecosystem

The impact here looks very good!

It took me a long time to figure this out, but the new diagnostics on
bokeh are actually true positives. I should have tested with another
type-checker immediately, I guess. All other type checkers also emit
errors on these `__init__` calls. MRE
[here](https://play.ty.dev/5c19d260-65e2-4f70-a75e-1a25780843a2) (no
error on main, diagnostic on this branch)

A lot of false positives on home-assistant go away for calls to
functions like
[`async_listen`](180053fe98/homeassistant/core.py (L1581-L1587))
which take a `event_type: EventType[_DataT] | str` parameter. We can now
solve for `_DataT` here, which was previously falling back to its
default value, and then caused problems because it was used as an
argument to an invariant generic class.

## Test Plan

New Markdown tests
2025-12-09 16:22:59 +01:00
Ibraheem Ahmed 3ed537e9f1
[ty] Support `type[T]` with type variables (#21650)
## Summary

Adds support for `type[T]`, where `T` is a type variable.

- Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/501
- Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/783
- Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/662
2025-11-28 09:20:24 +01:00
Ibraheem Ahmed 1d6ae8596a
[ty] Prefer exact matches when solving constrained type variables (#21165)
## Summary

The solver is currently order-dependent, and will choose a supertype
over the exact type if it appears earlier in the list of constraints. We
could be smarter and try to choose the most precise subtype, but I
imagine this is something the new constraint solver will fix anyways,
and this fixes the issue showing up on
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21070.
2025-10-31 10:58:09 -04:00
Alex Waygood 7064c38e53
[ty] Filter out `revealed-type` and `undefined-reveal` diagnostics from mdtest snapshots (#20820) 2025-10-12 18:39:32 +00:00
Shunsuke Shibayama dc64c08633
[ty] bidirectional type inference using function return type annotations (#20528)
## Summary

Implements bidirectional type inference using function return type
annotations.

This PR was originally proposed to solve astral-sh/ty#1167, but this
does not fully resolve it on its own.
Additionally, I believe we need to allow dataclasses to generate their
own `__new__` methods, [use constructor return types ​​for
inference](5844c0103d/crates/ty_python_semantic/src/types.rs (L5326-L5328)),
and a mechanism to discard type narrowing like `& ~AlwaysFalsy` if
necessary (at a more general level than this PR).

## Test Plan

`mdtest/bidirectional.md` is added.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
2025-10-11 00:38:35 +00:00
Alex Waygood 0639da2552
[ty] `~T` should never be assignable to `T` (#20606)
## Summary

Currently we do not emit an error on this code:

```py
from ty_extensions import Not

def f[T](x: T, y: Not[T]) -> T:
    x = y
    return x
```

But we should do! `~T` should never be assignable to `T`.

This fixes a small regression introduced in
14fe1228e7 (diff-8049ab5af787dba29daa389bbe2b691560c15461ef536f122b1beab112a4b48aR1443-R1446),
where a branch that previously returned `false` was replaced with a
branch that returns `C::always_satisfiable` -- the opposite of what it
used to be! The regression occurred because we didn't have any tests for
this -- so I added some tests in this PR that fail on `main`. I only
spotted the problem because I was going through the code of
`has_relation_to_impl` with a fine toothcomb for
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/20602 😄
2025-10-02 07:52:47 +01:00
David Peter 130a794c2b
[ty] Add tests for nested generic functions (#20631)
## Summary

Add two simple tests that we recently discussed with @dcreager. They
demonstrate that the `TypeMapping::MarkTypeVarsInferable` operation
really does need to keep track of the binding context.

## Test Plan

Made sure that those tests fail if we create
`TypeMapping::MarkTypeVarsInferable(None)`s everywhere.
2025-09-30 08:44:18 +02:00
David Peter 742f8a4ee6
[ty] Use `C[T]` instead of `C[Unknown]` for the upper bound of `Self` (#20479)
### Summary

This PR includes two changes, both of which are necessary to resolve
https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1196:

* For a generic class `C[T]`, we previously used `C[Unknown]` as the
upper bound of the `Self` type variable. There were two problems with
this. For one, when `Self` appeared in contravariant position, we would
materialize its upper bound to `Bottom[C[Unknown]]` (which might
simplify to `C[Never]` if `C` is covariant in `T`) when accessing
methods on `Top[C[Unknown]]`. This would result in `invalid-argument`
errors on the `self` parameter. Also, using an upper bound of
`C[Unknown]` would mean that inside methods, references to `T` would be
treated as `Unknown`. This could lead to false negatives. To fix this,
we now use `C[T]` (with a "nested" typevar) as the upper bound for
`Self` on `C[T]`.
* In order to make this work, we needed to allow assignability/subtyping
of inferable typevars to other types, since we now check assignability
of e.g. `C[int]` to `C[T]` (when checking assignability to the upper
bound of `Self`) when calling an instance-method on `C[int]` whose
`self` parameter is annotated as `self: Self` (or implicitly `Self`,
following https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18007).

closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1196
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/1208


### Test Plan

Regression tests for both issues.
2025-09-23 14:02:25 +02:00
Alex Waygood 0e3697a643
[ty] Minor fixes to `Protocol` tests (#20347) 2025-09-11 14:42:13 +00:00
Alex Waygood 662d18bd05
[ty] Add precise inference for unpacking a TypeVar if the TypeVar has an upper bound with a precise tuple spec (#19985) 2025-08-19 22:11:30 +01:00
Douglas Creager dc84645c36
[ty] Use separate Rust types for bound and unbound type variables (#19796)
This PR creates separate Rust types for bound and unbound type
variables, as proposed in https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/926.

Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/926

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-08-11 15:29:58 -04:00
Alex Waygood 8489816edc
[ty] Improve ability to solve TypeVars when they appear in unions (#19829) 2025-08-08 17:50:37 +01:00
Douglas Creager 585ce12ace
[ty] `typing.Self` is bound by the method, not the class (#19784)
This fixes our logic for binding a legacy typevar with its binding
context. (To recap, a legacy typevar starts out "unbound" when it is
first created, and each time it's used in a generic class or function,
we "bind" it with the corresponding `Definition`.)

We treat `typing.Self` the same as a legacy typevar, and so we apply
this binding logic to it too. Before, we were using the enclosing class
as its binding context. But that's not correct — it's the method where
`typing.Self` is used that binds the typevar. (Each invocation of the
method will find a new specialization of `Self` based on the specific
instance type containing the invoked method.)

This required plumbing through some additional state to the
`in_type_expression` method.

This also revealed that we weren't handling `Self`-typed instance
attributes correctly (but were coincidentally not getting the expected
false positive diagnostics).
2025-08-06 17:26:17 -04:00
Douglas Creager 06cd249a9b
[ty] Track different uses of legacy typevars, including context when rendering typevars (#19604)
This PR introduces a few related changes:

- We now keep track of each time a legacy typevar is bound in a
different generic context (e.g. class, function), and internally create
a new `TypeVarInstance` for each usage. This means the rest of the code
can now assume that salsa-equivalent `TypeVarInstance`s refer to the
same typevar, even taking into account that legacy typevars can be used
more than once.

- We also go ahead and track the binding context of PEP 695 typevars.
That's _much_ easier to track since we have the binding context right
there during type inference.

- With that in place, we can now include the name of the binding context
when rendering typevars (e.g. `T@f` instead of `T`)
2025-08-01 12:20:32 -04:00
Alex Waygood ec3d5ebda2
[ty] Upcast heterogeneous and mixed tuples to homogeneous tuples where it's necessary to solve a `TypeVar` (#19635)
## Summary

This PR improves our generics solver such that we are able to solve the
`TypeVar` in this snippet to `int | str` (the union of the elements in
the heterogeneous tuple) by upcasting the heterogeneous tuple to its
pure-homogeneous-tuple supertype:

```py
def f[T](x: tuple[T, ...]) -> T:
    return x[0]

def g(x: tuple[int, str]):
    reveal_type(f(x))
```

## Test Plan

Mdtests. Some TODOs remain in the mdtest regarding solving `TypeVar`s
for mixed tuples, but I think this PR on its own is a significant step
forward for our generics solver when it comes to tuple types.

---------

Co-authored-by: Douglas Creager <dcreager@dcreager.net>
2025-07-30 17:12:21 +01:00
Douglas Creager ea812d0813
[ty] Homogeneous and mixed tuples (#18600)
We already had support for homogeneous tuples (`tuple[int, ...]`). This
PR extends this to also support mixed tuples (`tuple[str, str,
*tuple[int, ...], str str]`).

A mixed tuple consists of a fixed-length (possibly empty) prefix and
suffix, and a variable-length portion in the middle. Every element of
the variable-length portion must be of the same type. A homogeneous
tuple is then just a mixed tuple with an empty prefix and suffix.

The new data representation uses different Rust types for a fixed-length
(aka heterogeneous) tuple. Another option would have been to use the
`VariableLengthTuple` representation for all tuples, and to wrap the
"variable + suffix" portion in an `Option`. I don't think that would
simplify the method implementations much, though, since we would still
have a 2×2 case analysis for most of them.

One wrinkle is that the definition of the `tuple` class in the typeshed
has a single typevar, and canonically represents a homogeneous tuple.
When getting the class of a tuple instance, that means that we have to
summarize our detailed mixed tuple type information into its
"homogeneous supertype". (We were already doing this for heterogeneous
types.)

A similar thing happens when concatenating two mixed tuples: the
variable-length portion and suffix of the LHS, and the prefix and
variable-length portion of the RHS, all get unioned into the
variable-length portion of the result. The LHS prefix and RHS suffix
carry through unchanged.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
2025-06-20 18:23:54 -04:00
Chandra Kiran G d17557f0ae
[ty] Fix Inconsistent casing in diagnostic (#18084) 2025-05-14 08:26:48 +02:00
Douglas Creager fe653de3dd
[ty] Infer parameter specializations of explicitly implemented generic protocols (#18054)
Follows on from (and depends on)
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/18021.

This updates our function specialization inference to infer type
mappings from parameters that are generic protocols.

For now, this only works when the argument _explicitly_ implements the
protocol by listing it as a base class. (We end up using exactly the
same logic as for generic classes in #18021.) For this to work with
classes that _implicitly_ implement the protocol, we will have to check
the types of the protocol members (which we are not currently doing), so
that we can infer the specialization of the protocol that the class
implements.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
2025-05-13 13:13:00 -04:00
Douglas Creager 0fb94c052e
[ty] Infer parameter specializations of generic aliases (#18021)
This updates our function specialization inference to infer type
mappings from parameters that are generic aliases, e.g.:

```py
def f[T](x: list[T]) -> T: ...

reveal_type(f(["a", "b"]))  # revealed: str
```

Though note that we're still inferring the type of list literals as
`list[Unknown]`, so for now we actually need something like the
following in our tests:

```py
def _(x: list[str]):
    reveal_type(f(x))  # revealed: str
```
2025-05-12 22:12:44 -04:00
Douglas Creager f301931159
[ty] Induct into instances and subclasses when finding and applying generics (#18052)
We were not inducting into instance types and subclass-of types when
looking for legacy typevars, nor when apply specializations.

This addresses
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17832#discussion_r2081502056

```py
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import TypeVar, Any, reveal_type

S = TypeVar("S")

class Foo[T]:
    def method(self, other: Foo[S]) -> Foo[T | S]: ...  # type: ignore[invalid-return-type]

def f(x: Foo[Any], y: Foo[Any]):
    reveal_type(x.method(y))  # revealed: `Foo[Any | S]`, but should be `Foo[Any]`
```

We were not detecting that `S` made `method` generic, since we were not
finding it when searching the function signature for legacy typevars.
2025-05-12 21:53:11 -04:00
Micha Reiser b51c4f82ea
Rename Red Knot (#17820) 2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00