<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Before:
<img width="1031" alt="Screen Shot 2023-08-02 at 15 57 10"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/17039389/171a21d5-01a5-4aa5-8079-4e7f8a59ade8">
After:
<img width="1031" alt="Screen Shot 2023-08-02 at 15 58 03"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/17039389/afd1b9b7-89e0-4e38-a4a6-e3255b62f021">
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Manual inspection
## Summary
This PR renames...
- `Parameter#arg` to `Parameter#name`
- `ParameterWithDefault#def` to `ParameterWithDefault#parameter` (such
that `ParameterWithDefault` has a `default` and a `parameter`)
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR renames a few AST nodes for clarity:
- `Arguments` is now `Parameters`
- `Arg` is now `Parameter`
- `ArgWithDefault` is now `ParameterWithDefault`
For now, the attribute names that reference `Parameters` directly are
changed (e.g., on `StmtFunctionDef`), but the attributes on `Parameters`
itself are not (e.g., `vararg`). We may revisit that decision in the
future.
For context, the AST node formerly known as `Arguments` is used in
function definitions. Formally (outside of the Python context),
"arguments" typically refers to "the values passed to a function", while
"parameters" typically refers to "the variables used in a function
definition". E.g., if you Google "arguments vs parameters", you'll get
some explanation like:
> A parameter is a variable in a function definition. It is a
placeholder and hence does not have a concrete value. An argument is a
value passed during function invocation.
We're thus deviating from Python's nomenclature in favor of a scheme
that we find to be more precise.
## Summary
Black allows up to one blank line _before_ a class docstring, and
enforces one blank line _after_ a class docstring. This PR implements
that handling. The cases in
`crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/statement/class_definition.py`
match Black identically.
## Summary
This PR ensures that if a function or class is the first statement in a
nested suite that _isn't_ a function or class body, we insert a leading
newline.
For example, given:
```python
def f():
if True:
def register_type():
pass
```
We _want_ to preserve the newline, whereas today, we remove it.
Note that this only applies when the function or class doesn't have any
leading comments.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6066.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
To enable the git hooks, `pre-commit install` needs to be executed.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
N/A
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing, please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR removes the `Interactive` and `FunctionType` parser modes that are unused by ruff
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing, please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR removes the `type_comment` field which our parser doesn't support.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing, please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This PR removes the type ignore node from the AST because our parser doesn't support it, and just having it around is confusing.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
`cargo build`
<!-- How was it tested? -->
**Summary** Allow passing any node to `CommentPlacement::{leading,
trailing, dangling}` without manually converting. Conversely, Restrict
the comment to the only type we actually pass.
**Test Plan** No changes.
## Summary
Previously, given:
```python
a = \
5;
```
When detecting continuations starting at the offset of the `;`, we'd
flag the previous line as a continuation. We should only flag a
continuation if there isn't leading content prior to the offset.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6214
## Summary
This PR moves the "insert empty lines" behavior out of
`JoinNodesBuilder` and into the `Suite` formatter. I find it a little
confusing that the logic is split between those two formatters right
now, and since this is _only_ used in that one place, IMO it is a bit
simpler to just inline it and use a single approach to tracking state
(right now, both are stateful).
The only other place this was used was for decorators. As a side effect,
we now remove blank lines in both of these cases, which is a known but
intentional deviation from Black (which preserves the empty line before
the comment in the first case):
```python
@foo
# Hello
@bar
def baz():
pass
@foo
@bar
def baz():
pass
```
## Summary
Very subtle bug related to the AST traversal. Given:
```python
from __future__ import annotations
from logging import getLogger
__all__ = ("getLogger",)
def foo() -> None:
pass
```
We end up visiting the `-> None` annotation, then reusing the state
snapshot when we go to visit the `__all__` exports, so when we visit
`"getLogger"`, we think we're inside of a deferred type annotation.
This PR changes all the deferred visitors to snapshot and restore the
state, which is a lot safer -- that way, the visitors avoid modifying
the current visitor state. (Previously, they implicitly left the visitor
state set to the state of the _last_ thing they visited.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6207.
**Summary** This includes two changes:
* Allow setting `-v` in `ruff_dev`, using the `ruff_cli` implementation
* `debug!` which ruff configuration strategy was used
This is a byproduct of debugging #6187.
**Test Plan** n/a
**Summary** This prevents us from turning `r'''\""'''` into
`r"""\"""""`, which is invalid syntax.
This PR fixes CI, which is currently broken on main (in a way that still
passes on linter PRs and allows merging formatter PRs, but it's bad to
have a job be red). Once merged, i'll make the formatted ecosystem
checks a required check.
**Test Plan** Added a regression test.
## Summary
This PR adds a new precedence level for the comprehension element. This fixes
the generator to not add parentheses around the comprehension element every
time.
The new precedence level is `COMPREHENSION_ELEMENT` and it should occur after
the `NAMED_EXPR` precedence level because named expressions are always parenthesized.
This matches the behavior of Python `ast.unparse` and tested with the
following snippet:
```python
import ast
code = ""
ast.unparse(ast.parse(code))
```
## Test Plan
Add a bunch of test cases for all the valid nodes at that position.
fixes: #5777
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Format bytes string
Closes#6064
## Test Plan
Added a fixture based on string's one
## Summary
We have some code to ensure that if an aliased import is used, any
submodules should be marked as used too. This comment says it best:
```rust
// If the name of a submodule import is the same as an alias of another import, and the
// alias is used, then the submodule import should be marked as used too.
//
// For example, mark `pyarrow.csv` as used in:
//
// ```python
// import pyarrow as pa
// import pyarrow.csv
// print(pa.csv.read_csv("test.csv"))
// ```
```
However, it looks like when we go to look up `pyarrow` (of `import
pyarrow as pa`), we aren't checking to ensure the resolved binding is
_actually_ an import. This was causing us to attribute `print(rm.ANY)`
to `def requests_mock` here:
```python
import requests_mock as rm
def requests_mock(requests_mock: rm.Mocker):
print(rm.ANY)
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/6180.
## Summary
Adds `global` and `nonlocal` formatting, without the "deviation from
black" outlined in the linked issue, which I'll do separately.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/4798.
## Test Plan
Added a fixture in the Ruff-specific directory since the Black fixtures
don't seem to cover this.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/5781
## Test Plan
Added cases to
`crates/ruff_python_formatter/resources/test/fixtures/ruff/expression/named_expr.py`
one-by-one and adjusted the condition as needed.
Harutaka Kawamura
Charlie Marsh
Zanie Blue
konsti
Micha Reiser
David Szotten
Konrad Listwan-Ciesielski
Dhruv Manilawala
Luc Khai Hai