## Summary
Fixes a failing debug assertion that triggers for the following code:
```py
match some_int:
case x:=2:
pass
```
closes#14305
## Test Plan
Added problematic code example to corpus.
## Summary
Resolves#13217.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR improves the fix for `PYI055` to be able to handle nested and
mixed type unions.
It also marks the fix as unsafe when comments are present.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
`pytest-raises-too-broad (PT011)` should be raised when
`expected_exception` is provided as a keyword argument.
```python
def test_foo():
with pytest.raises(ValueError): # raises PT011
raise ValueError("Can't divide 1 by 0")
# This is minor but a valid pytest.raises call
with pytest.raises(expected_exception=ValueError): # doesn't raise PT011 but should
raise ValueError("Can't divide 1 by 0")
```
`pytest.raises` doc:
https://docs.pytest.org/en/8.3.x/reference/reference.html#pytest.raises
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Unit tests
Signed-off-by: harupy <hkawamura0130@gmail.com>
## Summary
- Emit diagnostics when looking up (possibly) unbound attributes
- More explicit test assertions for unbound symbols
- Review remaining call sites of `Symbol::ignore_possibly_unbound`. Most
of them are something like `builtins_symbol(self.db,
"Ellipsis").ignore_possibly_unbound().unwrap_or(Type::Unknown)` which
look okay to me, unless we want to emit additional diagnostics. There is
one additional case in enum literal handling, which has a TODO comment
anyway.
part of #14022
## Test Plan
New MD tests for (possibly) unbound attributes.
## Summary
This adds a new diagnostic when possibly unbound symbols are imported.
The `TODO` comment had a question mark, do I'm not sure if this is
really something that we want.
This does not touch the un*declared* case, yet.
relates to: #14022
## Test Plan
Updated already existing tests with new diagnostics
## Summary
Apart from one small functional change, this is mostly a refactoring of
the `Symbol` API:
- Rename `as_type` to the more explicit `ignore_possibly_unbound`, no
functional change
- Remove `unwrap_or_unknown` in favor of the more explicit
`.ignore_possibly_unbound().unwrap_or(Type::Unknown)`, no functional
change
- Consistently call it "possibly unbound" (not "may be unbound")
- Rename `replace_unbound_with` to `or_fall_back_to` and properly handle
boundness of the fall back. This is the only functional change (did not
have any impact on existing tests).
relates to: #14022
## Test Plan
New unit tests for `Symbol::or_fall_back_to`
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Related to #970. Implement [`shallow-copy-environ /
W1507`](https://pylint.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user_guide/messages/warning/shallow-copy-environ.html).
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Unit test
---------
Co-authored-by: Simon Brugman <sbrugman@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The implicit namespace package rule currently fails to detect cases like
the following:
```text
foo/
├── __init__.py
└── bar/
└── baz/
└── __init__.py
```
The problem is that we detect a root at `foo`, and then an independent
root at `baz`. We _would_ detect that `bar` is an implicit namespace
package, but it doesn't contain any files! So we never check it, and
have no place to raise the diagnostic.
This PR adds detection for these kinds of nested packages, and augments
the `INP` rule to flag the `__init__.py` file above with a specialized
message. As a side effect, I've introduced a dedicated `PackageRoot`
struct which we can pass around in lieu of Yet Another `Path`.
For now, I'm only enabling this in preview (and the approach doesn't
affect any other rules). It's a bug fix, but it may end up expanding the
rule.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13519.
## Summary
It's only safe to enforce the `x in "1234567890"` case if `x` is exactly
one character, since the set on the right has been reordered as compared
to `string.digits`. We can't know if `x` is exactly one character unless
it's a literal. And if it's a literal, well, it's kind of silly code in
the first place?
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13802.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Fix `await-outside-async` to allow `await` at the top-level scope of a
notebook.
```python
# foo.ipynb
await asyncio.sleep(1) # should be allowed
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
A unit test
## Summary
Resolves#13833.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run` and `cargo insta test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
This PR accounts for further subtleties in `Decimal` parsing:
- Strings which are empty modulo underscores and surrounding whitespace
are skipped
- `Decimal("-0")` is skipped
- `Decimal("{integer literal that is longer than 640 digits}")` are
skipped (see linked issue for explanation)
NB: The snapshot did not need to be updated since the new test cases are
"Ok" instances and added below the diff.
Closes#14204
## Summary
Create definitions and infer types for PEP 695 type variables.
This just gives us the type of the type variable itself (the type of `T`
as a runtime object in the body of `def f[T](): ...`), with special
handling for its attributes `__name__`, `__bound__`, `__constraints__`,
and `__default__`. Mostly the support for these attributes exists
because it is easy to implement and allows testing that we are
internally representing the typevar correctly.
This PR doesn't yet have support for interpreting a typevar as a type
annotation, which is of course the primary use of a typevar. But the
information we store in the typevar's type in this PR gives us
everything we need to handle it correctly in a future PR when the
typevar appears in an annotation.
## Test Plan
Added mdtest.
## Summary
`Ty::BuiltinClassLiteral(…)` is a sub~~class~~type of
`Ty::BuiltinInstance("type")`, so it can't be disjoint from it.
## Test Plan
New `is_not_disjoint_from` test case
## Summary
Fix `Type::is_assignable_to` for union types on the left hand side (of
`.is_assignable_to`; or the right hand side of the `… = …` assignment):
`Literal[1, 2]` should be assignable to `int`.
## Test Plan
New unit tests that were previously failing.
## Summary
Minor fix to `Type::is_subtype_of` to make sure that Boolean literals
are subtypes of `int`, to match runtime semantics.
Found this while doing some property-testing experiments [1].
[1] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14178
## Test Plan
New unit test.
## Summary
Fixes#14114. I don't think I can really describe the problems with our
current architecture (and therefore the motivations for this PR) any
better than @carljm did in that issue, so I'll just copy it out here!
---
We currently represent "known instances" (e.g. special forms like
`typing.Literal`, which are an instance of `typing._SpecialForm`, but
need to be handled differently from other instances of
`typing._SpecialForm`) as an `InstanceType` with a `known` field that is
`Some(...)`.
This makes it easy to handle a known instance as if it were a regular
instance type (by ignoring the `known` field), and in some cases (e.g.
`Type::member`) that is correct and convenient. But in other cases (e.g.
`Type::is_equivalent_to`) it is not correct, and we currently have a bug
that we would consider the known-instance type of `typing.Literal` as
equivalent to the general instance type for `typing._SpecialForm`, and
we would fail to consider it a singleton type or a single-valued type
(even though it is both.)
An instance type with `known.is_some()` is semantically quite different
from an instance type with `known.is_none()`. The former is a singleton
type that represents exactly one runtime object; the latter is an open
type that represents many runtime objects, including instances of
unknown subclasses. It is too error-prone to represent these
very-different types as a single `Type` variant. We should instead
introduce a dedicated `Type::KnownInstance` variant and force ourselves
to handle these explicitly in all `Type` variant matches.
## Possible followups
There is still a little bit of awkwardness in our current design in some
places, in that we first infer the symbol `typing.Literal` as a
`_SpecialForm` instance, and then later convert that instance-type into
a known-instance-type. We could also use this `KnownInstanceType` enum
to account for other special runtime symbols such as `builtins.Ellipsis`
or `builtins.NotImplemented`.
I think these might be worth pursuing, but I didn't do them here as they
didn't seem essential right now, and I wanted to keep the diff
relatively minimal.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic`. New unit tests added for
`Type::is_subtype_of`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This adds type inference for comparison expressions involving
intersection types.
For example:
```py
x = get_random_int()
if x != 42:
reveal_type(x == 42) # revealed: Literal[False]
reveal_type(x == 43) # bool
```
closes#13854
## Test Plan
New Markdown-based tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
- Get rid of `Symbol::unwrap_or` (unclear semantics, not needed anymore)
- Introduce `Type::call_dunder`
- Emit new diagnostic for possibly-unbound `__iter__` methods
- Better diagnostics for callables with possibly-unbound /
possibly-non-callable `__call__` methods
part of: #14022closes#14016
## Test Plan
- Updated test for iterables with possibly-unbound `__iter__` methods.
- New tests for callables
## Summary
- Adds basic support for `type[C]` as a red knot `Type`. Some things
might not be supported yet, like `type[Any]`.
- Adds type narrowing for `issubclass` checks.
closes#14117
## Test Plan
New Markdown-based tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Implementation for one of the rules in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/1348
Refurb only deals only with classes with a single base, however the rule
is valid for any base.
(`str, Enum` is common prior to `StrEnum`)
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
Flake8-builtins provides two checks for arguments (really, parameters)
of a function shadowing builtins: A002 checks function definitions, and
A006 checks lambda expressions. This PR ensures that A002 is restricted
to functions rather than lambda expressions.
Closes#14135 .
## Summary
I mirrored some of the idioms that @AlexWaygood used in the MRO work.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/14096.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Related to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13979#discussion_r1828305790,
this PR removes the `current_unpack` state field from
`SemanticIndexBuilder` and passes the `Unpack` ingredient via the
`CurrentAssignment` -> `DefinitionNodeRef` conversion to finally store
it on `DefintionNodeKind`.
This involves updating the lifetime of `AnyParameterRef` (parameter to
`declare_parameter`) to use the `'db` lifetime. Currently, all AST nodes
stored on various enums are marked with `'a` lifetime but they're always
utilized using the `'db` lifetime.
This also removes the dedicated `'a` lifetime parameter on
`add_definition` which is currently being used in `DefinitionNodeRef`.
As mentioned, all AST nodes live through the `'db` lifetime so we can
remove the `'a` lifetime parameter from that method and use the `'db`
lifetime instead.
FURB157 suggests replacing expressions like `Decimal("123")` with
`Decimal(123)`. This PR extends the rule to cover cases where the input
string to `Decimal` can be easily transformed into an integer literal.
For example:
```python
Decimal("1__000") # fix: `Decimal(1000)`
```
Note: we do not implement the full decimal parsing logic from CPython on
the grounds that certain acceptable string inputs to the `Decimal`
constructor may be presumed purposeful on the part of the developer. For
example, as in the linked issue, `Decimal("١٢٣")` is valid and equal to
`Decimal(123)`, but we do not suggest a replacement in this case.
Closes#13807
## Summary
- Store the expression type for annotations that are starred expressions
(see [discussion
here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14091#discussion_r1828332857))
- Use `self.store_expression_type(…)` consistently throughout, as it
makes sure that no double-insertion errors occur.
closes#14115
## Test Plan
Added an invalid-syntax example to the corpus which leads to a panic on
`main`. Also added a Markdown test with a valid-syntax example that
would lead to a panic once we implement function parameter inference.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Adds more precise type inference for `… is …` and `… is not …` identity
checks in some limited cases where we statically know the answer to be
either `Literal[True]` or `Literal[False]`.
I found this helpful while working on type inference for comparisons
involving intersection types, but I'm not sure if this is at all useful
for real world code (where the answer is most probably *not* statically
known). Note that we already have *type narrowing* for identity tests.
So while we are already able to generate constraints for things like `if
x is None`, we can now — in some limited cases — make an even stronger
conclusion and infer that the test expression itself is `Literal[False]`
(branch never taken) or `Literal[True]` (branch always taken).
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
Handling `Literal` type in annotations.
Resolves: #13672
## Implementation
Since Literals are not a fully defined type in typeshed. I used a trick
to figure out when a special form is a literal.
When we are inferring assignment types I am checking if the type of that
assignment was resolved to typing.SpecialForm and the name of the target
is `Literal` if that is the case then I am re creating a new instance
type and set the known instance field to `KnownInstance:Literal`.
**Why not defining a new type?**
From this [issue](https://github.com/python/typeshed/issues/6219) I
learned that we want to resolve members to SpecialMethod class. So if we
create a new instance here we can rely on the member resolving in that
already exists.
## Tests
https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/spec/literal.html#equivalence-of-two-literals
Since the type of the value inside Literal is evaluated as a
Literal(LiteralString, LiteralInt, ...) then the equality is only true
when types and value are equal.
https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/spec/literal.html#legal-and-illegal-parameterizations
The illegal parameterizations are mostly implemented I'm currently
checking the slice expression and the slice type to make sure it's
valid.
https://typing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/spec/literal.html#shortening-unions-of-literals
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR enables red-knot to support type narrowing based on `and` and
`or` conditionals, including nested combinations and their negation (for
`elif` / `else` blocks and for `not` operator). Part of #13694.
In order to address this properly (hopefully 😅), I had to run
`NarrowingConstraintsBuilder` functions recursively. In the first commit
I introduced a minor refactor - instead of mutating `self.constraints`,
the new constraints are now returned as function return values. I also
modified the constraints map to be optional, preventing unnecessary
hashmap allocations.
Thanks @carljm for your support on this :)
The second commit contains the logic and tests for handling boolean ops,
with improvements to intersections handling in `is_subtype_of` .
As I'm still new to Rust and the internals of type checkers, I’d be more
than happy to hear any insights or suggestions.
Thank you!
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Encountered this while running red-knot benchmarks on the `black`
codebase.
Fixes two of the issues in #13478.
## Test Plan
Added a regression test.
## Summary
Removes `Type::None` in favor of `KnownClass::NoneType.to_instance(…)`.
closes#13670
## Performance
There is a -4% performance regression on our red-knot benchmark. This is due to the fact that we now have to import `_typeshed` as a module, and infer types.
## Test Plan
Existing tests pass.
## Summary
This PR adds a new salsa query and an ingredient to resolve all the
variables involved in an unpacking assignment like `(a, b) = (1, 2)` at
once. Previously, we'd recursively try to match the correct type for
each definition individually which will result in creating duplicate
diagnostics.
This PR still doesn't solve the duplicate diagnostics issue because that
requires a different solution like using salsa accumulator or
de-duplicating the diagnostics manually.
Related: #13773
## Test Plan
Make sure that all unpack assignment test cases pass, there are no
panics in the corpus tests.
## Todo
- [x] Look at the performance regression
## Summary
The `commented-out-code` rule (ERA001) from `eradicate` is currently
flagging a very common idiom that marks Python strings as another
language, to help with syntax highlighting:
This PR adds this idiom to the list of allowed exceptions to the rule.
## Test Plan
I've added some additional test cases.
## Summary
Like https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/14063, but ensures that we
catch cases like `{1, True}` in which the items hash to the same value
despite not being identical.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13944
## Test Plan
Standard snapshot testing
flake8-simplify surprisingly only has a single test case
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Removing more TODOs from the augmented assignment test suite. Now, if
the _target_ is a union, we correctly infer the union of results:
```python
if flag:
f = Foo()
else:
f = 42.0
f += 12
```
## Summary
One of the follow-ups from augmented assignment inference, now that
`Type::Unbound` has been removed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
- Remove `Type::Unbound`
- Handle (potential) unboundness as a concept orthogonal to the type
system (see new `Symbol` type)
- Improve existing and add new diagnostics related to (potential)
unboundness
closes#13671
## Test Plan
- Update existing markdown-based tests
- Add new tests for added/modified functionality
## Summary
This PR fixes a panic which can occur in an unpack assignment when:
* (number of target expressions) - (number of tuple types) > 2
* There's a starred expression
The reason being that the `insert` panics because the index is greater
than the length.
This is an error case and so practically it should occur very rarely.
The solution is to resize the types vector to match the number of
expressions and then insert the starred expression type.
## Test Plan
Add a new test case.
## Summary
This PR creates a new `TypeCheckDiagnosticsBuilder` for the
`TypeCheckDiagnostics` struct. The main motivation behind this is to
separate the helpers required to build the diagnostics from the type
inference builder itself. This allows us to use such helpers outside of
the inference builder like for example in the unpacking logic in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13979.
## Test Plan
`cargo insta test`
## Summary
These cases aren't handled correctly yet -- some of them are waiting on
refactors to `Unbound` before fixing. Part of #12699.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
I noticed that augmented assignments on floats were yielding "not
supported" diagnostics. If the dunder isn't bound at all, we should use
binary operator semantics, rather than treating it as not-callable.
## Summary
Minor follow-up to #13917 — thanks @AlexWaygood for the post-merge
review.
- Add
SliceLiteralType::as_tuple
- Use .expect() instead of SAFETY
comment
- Match on ::try_from
result
- Add TODO comment regarding raising a diagnostic for `"foo"["bar":"baz"]`
## Summary
This PR adds support for heterogenous `tuple` annotations to red-knot.
It does the following:
- Extends `infer_type_expression` so that it understands tuple
annotations
- Changes `infer_type_expression` so that `ExprStarred` nodes in type
annotations are inferred as `Todo` rather than `Unknown` (they're valid
in PEP-646 tuple annotations)
- Extends `Type::is_subtype_of` to understand when one heterogenous
tuple type can be understood to be a subtype of another (without this
change, the PR would have introduced new false-positive errors to some
existing mdtests).
## Summary
- Add a new `Type::SliceLiteral` variant
- Infer `SliceLiteral` types for slice expressions, such as
`<int-literal>:<int-literal>:<int-literal>`.
- Infer "sliced" literal types for subscript expressions using slices,
such as `<string-literal>[<slice-literal>]`.
- Infer types for expressions involving slices of tuples:
`<tuple>[<slice-literal>]`.
closes#13853
## Test Plan
- Unit tests for indexing/slicing utility functions
- Markdown-based tests for
- Subscript expressions `tuple[slice]`
- Subscript expressions `string_literal[slice]`
- Subscript expressions `bytes_literal[slice]`
## Summary
This does two things:
- distribute negated intersections when building up intersections (i.e.
going from `A & ~(B & C)` to `(A & ~B) | (A & ~C)`) (fixing #13931)
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR adds type narrowing in `and` and `or` expressions, for example:
```py
class A: ...
x: A | None = A() if bool_instance() else None
isinstance(x, A) or reveal_type(x) # revealed: None
```
## Test Plan
New mdtests 😍
## Summary
After #13918 has landed, narrowing constraint negation became easy, so
adding support for `not` operator.
## Test Plan
Added a new mdtest file for `not` expression.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
As python uses short-circuiting boolean operations in runtime, we should
mimic that logic in redknot as well.
For example, we should detect that in the following code `x` might be
undefined inside the block:
```py
if flag or (x := 1):
print(x)
```
## Test Plan
Added mdtest suit for boolean expressions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Add support for type narrowing in elif and else scopes as part of
#13694.
## Test Plan
- mdtest
- builder unit test for union negation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
`ruff check` has not been the default in a long time. However, the help
message and code comment still designate it as the default. The remark
should have been removed in the deprecation PR #10169.
## Test Plan
Not tested.
## Summary
Add type narrowing for `isinstance(object, classinfo)` [1] checks:
```py
x = 1 if flag else "a"
if isinstance(x, int):
reveal_type(x) # revealed: Literal[1]
```
closes#13893
[1] https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#isinstance
## Test Plan
New Markdown-based tests in `narrow/isinstance.md`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR updates the fix generation logic for auto-quoting an annotation
to generate an edit even when there's a quote character present.
The logic uses the visitor pattern, maintaining it's state on where it
is and generating the string value one node at a time. This can be
considered as a specialized form of `Generator`. The state required to
maintain is whether we're currently inside a `typing.Literal` or
`typing.Annotated` because the string value in those types should not be
un-quoted i.e., `Generic[Literal["int"]]` should become
`"Generic[Literal['int']]`, the quotes inside the `Literal` should be
preserved.
Fixes: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9137
## Test Plan
Add various test cases to validate this change, validate the snapshots.
There are no ecosystem changes to go through.
---------
Signed-off-by: Shaygan <hey@glyphack.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
A minor quality-of-life improvement: add
[`#[track_caller]`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/codegen.html#the-track_caller-attribute)
attribute to `Type::expect_xyz()` methods and some `TypeInference` methods such that the panic-location
is reported one level higher up in the stack trace.
before: reports location inside the `Type::expect_class_literal()`
method. Not very useful.
```
thread 'types::infer::tests::deferred_annotation_builtin' panicked at crates/red_knot_python_semantic/src/types.rs:304:14:
Expected a Type::ClassLiteral variant
```
after: reports location at the `Type::expect_class_literal()` call site,
where the error was made.
```
thread 'types::infer::tests::deferred_annotation_builtin' panicked at crates/red_knot_python_semantic/src/types/infer.rs:4302:14:
Expected a Type::ClassLiteral variant
```
## Test Plan
Called `expect_class_literal()` on something that's not a
`Type::ClassLiteral` and saw that the error was reported at the call
site.
## Summary
* Rename `Type::Class` => `Type::ClassLiteral`
* Rename `Type::Function` => `Type::FunctionLiteral`
* Do not rename `Type::Module`
* Remove `*Literal` suffixes in `display::LiteralTypeKind` variants, as
per clippy suggestion
* Get rid of `Type::is_class()` in favor of `is_subtype_of(…, 'type')`;
modifiy `is_subtype_of` to support this.
* Add new `Type::is_xyz()` methods and use them instead of matching on
`Type` variants.
closes#13863
## Test Plan
New `is_subtype_of_class_literals` unit test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
- Properly treat the empty intersection as being of type `object`.
- Consequently, change the simplification method to explicitly add
`Never` to the positive side of the intersection when collapsing a type
such as `int & str` to `Never`, as opposed to just clearing both the
positive and the negative side.
- Minor code improvement in `bindings_ty`: use `peekable()` to check
whether the iterator over constraints is empty, instead of handling
first and subsequent elements separately.
fixes#13870
## Test Plan
- New unit tests for `IntersectionBuilder` to make sure the empty
intersection represents `object`.
- Markdown-based regression test for the original issue in #13870
Add the following subtype relations:
- `BooleanLiteral <: object`
- `IntLiteral <: object`
- `StringLiteral <: object`
- `LiteralString <: object`
- `BytesLiteral <: object`
Added a test case for `bool <: int`.
## Test Plan
New unit tests.
Add type narrowing for `!=` expression as stated in
#13694.
### Test Plan
Add tests in new md format.
---------
Co-authored-by: David Peter <mail@david-peter.de>
## Summary
A small fix for comparisons of multiple comparators.
Instead of comparing each comparator to the leftmost item, we should
compare it to the closest item on the left.
While implementing this, I noticed that we don’t yet narrow Yoda
comparisons (e.g., `True is x`), so I didn’t change that behavior in
this PR.
## Test Plan
Added some mdtests 🎉
## Summary
Just a drive-by change that occurred to me while I was looking at
`Type::is_subtype_of`: the existing pattern for unions on the *right
hand side*:
```rs
(ty, Type::Union(union)) => union
.elements(db)
.iter()
.any(|&elem_ty| ty.is_subtype_of(db, elem_ty)),
```
is not (generally) correct if the *left hand side* is a union.
## Test Plan
Added new test cases for `is_subtype_of` and `!is_subtype_of`
## Summary
- Consistent naming: `BoolLiteral` => `BooleanLiteral` (it's mainly the
`Ty::BoolLiteral` variant that was renamed)
I tripped over this a few times now, so I thought I'll smooth it out.
- Add a new test case for `Literal[True] <: bool`, as suggested here:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13781#discussion_r1804922827
Remove unnecessary uses of `.as_ref()`, `.iter()`, `&**` and similar, mostly in situations when iterating over variables. Many of these changes are only possible following #13826, when we bumped our MSRV to 1.80: several useful implementations on `&Box<[T]>` were only stabilised in Rust 1.80. Some of these changes we could have done earlier, however.
Implemented some points from
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12701
- Handle Unknown and Any in Unary operation
- Handle Boolean in binary operations
- Handle instances in unary operation
- Consider division by False to be division by zero
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
- Refactored comparison type inference functions in `infer.rs`: Changed
the return type from `Option` to `Result` to lay the groundwork for
providing more detailed diagnostics.
- Updated diagnostic messages.
This is a small step toward improving diagnostics in the future.
Please refer to #13787
## Test Plan
mdtest included!
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This fixes an edge case that @carljm and I missed when implementing
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13800. Namely, if the left-hand
operand is the _exact same type_ as the right-hand operand, the
reflected dunder on the right-hand operand is never tried:
```pycon
>>> class Foo:
... def __radd__(self, other):
... return 42
...
>>> Foo() + Foo()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<python-input-1>", line 1, in <module>
Foo() + Foo()
~~~~~~^~~~~~~
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'Foo' and 'Foo'
```
This edge case _is_ covered in Brett's blog at
https://snarky.ca/unravelling-binary-arithmetic-operations-in-python/,
but I missed it amongst all the other subtleties of this algorithm. The
motivations and history behind it were discussed in
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/7NZUCODEAPQFMRFXYRMGJXDSIS3WJYIV/
## Test Plan
I added an mdtest for this cornercase.
## Summary
- Add `Type::is_disjoint_from` as a way to test whether two types
overlap
- Add a first set of simplification rules for intersection types
- `S & T = S` for `S <: T`
- `S & ~T = Never` for `S <: T`
- `~S & ~T = ~T` for `S <: T`
- `A & ~B = A` for `A` disjoint from `B`
- `A & B = Never` for `A` disjoint from `B`
- `bool & ~Literal[bool] = Literal[!bool]`
resolves one item in #12694
## Open questions:
- Can we somehow leverage the (anti) symmetry between `positive` and
`negative` contributions? I could imagine that there would be a way if
we had `Type::Not(type)`/`Type::Negative(type)`, but with the
`positive`/`negative` architecture, I'm not sure. Note that there is a
certain duplication in the `add_positive`/`add_negative` functions (e.g.
`S & ~T = Never` is implemented twice), but other rules are actually not
perfectly symmetric: `S & T = S` vs `~S & ~T = ~T`.
- I'm not particularly proud of the way `add_positive`/`add_negative`
turned out. They are long imperative-style functions with some
mutability mixed in (`to_remove`). I'm happy to look into ways to
improve this code *if we decide to go with this approach* of
implementing a set of ad-hoc rules for simplification.
- ~~Is it useful to perform simplifications eagerly in
`add_positive`/`add_negative`? (@carljm)~~ This is what I did for now.
## Test Plan
- Unit tests for `Type::is_disjoint_from`
- Observe changes in Markdown-based tests
- Unit tests for `IntersectionBuilder::build()`
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
Minor cleanup and consistent formatting of the Markdown-based tests.
- Removed lots of unnecessary `a`, `b`, `c`, … variables.
- Moved test assertions (`# revealed:` comments) closer to the tested
object.
- Always separate `# revealed` and `# error` comments from the code by
two spaces, according to the discussion
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13746/files#r1799385758).
This trades readability for consistency in some cases.
- Fixed some headings
## Summary
This pull request resolves some rule thrashing identified in #12427 by
allowing for unused arguments when using `NotImplementedError` with a
variable per [this
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/12427#issuecomment-2384727468).
**Note**
This feels a little heavy-handed / edge-case-prone. So, to be clear, I'm
happy to scrap this code and just update the docs to communicate that
`abstractmethod` and friends should be used in this scenario (or
similar). Just let me know what you'd like done!
fixes: #12427
## Test Plan
I added a test-case to the existing `ARG.py` file and ran...
```sh
cargo run -p ruff -- check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_unused_arguments/ARG.py --no-cache --preview --select ARG002
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR updates the language server to avoid indexing the workspace for
single-file mode.
**What's a single-file mode?**
When a user opens the file directly in an editor, and not the folder
that represents the workspace, the editor usually can't determine the
workspace root. This means that during initializing the server, the
`workspaceFolders` field will be empty / nil.
Now, in this case, the server defaults to using the current working
directory which is a reasonable default assuming that the directory
would point to the one where this open file is present. This would allow
the server to index the directory itself for any config file, if
present.
It turns out that in VS Code the current working directory in the above
scenario is the system root directory `/` and so the server will try to
index the entire root directory which would take a lot of time. This is
the issue as described in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/627. To reproduce, refer
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/627#issuecomment-2401440767.
This PR updates the indexer to avoid traversing the workspace to read
any config file that might be present. The first commit
(8dd2a31eef)
refactors the initialization and introduces two structs `Workspaces` and
`Workspace`. The latter struct includes a field to determine whether
it's the default workspace. The second commit
(61fc39bdb6)
utilizes this field to avoid traversing.
Closes: #11366
## Editor behavior
This is to document the behavior as seen in different editors. The test
scenario used has the following directory tree structure:
```
.
├── nested
│ ├── nested.py
│ └── pyproject.toml
└── test.py
```
where, the contents of the files are:
**test.py**
```py
import os
```
**nested/nested.py**
```py
import os
import math
```
**nested/pyproject.toml**
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint]
select = ["I"]
```
Steps:
1. Open `test.py` directly in the editor
2. Validate that it raises the `F401` violation
3. Open `nested/nested.py` in the same editor instance
4. This file would raise only `I001` if the `nested/pyproject.toml` was
indexed
### VS Code
When (1) is done from above, the current working directory is `/` which
means the server will try to index the entire system to build up the
settings index. This will include the `nested/pyproject.toml` file as
well. This leads to bad user experience because the user would need to
wait for minutes for the server to finish indexing.
This PR avoids that by not traversing the workspace directory in
single-file mode. But, in VS Code, this means that per (4), the file
wouldn't raise `I001` but only raise two `F401` violations because the
`nested/pyproject.toml` was never resolved.
One solution here would be to fix this in the extension itself where we
would detect this scenario and pass in the workspace directory that is
the one containing this open file in (1) above.
### Neovim
**tl;dr** it works as expected because the client considers the presence
of certain files (depending on the server) as the root of the workspace.
For Ruff, they are `pyproject.toml`, `ruff.toml`, and `.ruff.toml`. This
means that the client notifies us as the user moves between single-file
mode and workspace mode.
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13770#issuecomment-2416608055
### Helix
Same as Neovim, additional context in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13770#issuecomment-2417362097
### Sublime Text
**tl;dr** It works similar to VS Code except that the current working
directory of the current process is different and thus the config file
is never read. So, the behavior remains unchanged with this PR.
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13770#issuecomment-2417362097
### Zed
Zed seems to be starting a separate language server instance for each
file when the editor is running in a single-file mode even though all
files have been opened in a single editor instance.
(Separated the logs into sections separated by a single blank line
indicating 3 different server instances that the editor started for 3
files.)
```
0.000053375s INFO main ruff_server::server: No workspace settings found for file:///Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp, using default settings
0.009448792s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp
0.009906334s DEBUG ruff:main ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/test.py
0.011775917s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
0.000060583s INFO main ruff_server::server: No workspace settings found for file:///Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested, using default settings
0.010387125s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested
0.011061875s DEBUG ruff:main ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested/nested.py
0.011545208s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
0.000059125s INFO main ruff_server::server: No workspace settings found for file:///Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested, using default settings
0.010857583s INFO main ruff_server::session::index: Registering workspace: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested
0.011428958s DEBUG ruff:main ruff_server::resolve: Included path via `include`: /Users/dhruv/projects/ruff-temp/nested/other.py
0.011893792s INFO ruff:main ruff_server::server: Configuration file watcher successfully registered
```
## Test Plan
When using the `ruff` server from this PR, we see that the server starts
quickly as seen in the logs. Next, when I switch to the release binary,
it starts indexing the root directory.
For more details, refer to the "Editor Behavior" section above.
Summary
---------
PEP 695 Generics introduce a scope inside a class statement's arguments
and keywords.
```
class C[T](A[T]): # the T in A[T] is not from the global scope but from a type-param-specfic scope
...
```
When doing inference on the class bases, we currently have been doing
base class expression lookups in the global scope. Not an issue without
generics (since a scope is only created when generics are present).
This change instead makes sure to stop the global scope inference from
going into expressions within this sub-scope. Since there is a separate
scope, `check_file` and friends will trigger inference on these
expressions still.
Another change as a part of this is making sure that `ClassType` looks
up its bases in the right scope.
Test Plan
----------
`cargo test --package red_knot_python_semantic generics` will run the
markdown test that previously would panic due to scope lookup issues
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
This reverts https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13799, and restores
the previous behavior, which I think was the most pragmatic and useful
version of the divide-by-zero error, if we will emit it at all.
In general, a type checker _does_ emit diagnostics when it can detect
something that will definitely be a problem for some inhabitants of a
type, but not others. For example, `x.foo` if `x` is typed as `object`
is a type error, even though some inhabitants of the type `object` will
have a `foo` attribute! The correct fix is to make your type annotations
more precise, so that `x` is assigned a type which definitely has the
`foo` attribute.
If we will emit it divide-by-zero errors, it should follow the same
logic. Dividing an inhabitant of the type `int` by zero may not emit an
error, if the inhabitant is an instance of a subclass of `builtins.int`
that overrides division. But it may emit an error (more likely it will).
If you don't want the diagnostic, you can clarify your type annotations
to require an instance of your safe subclass.
Because the Python type system doesn't have the ability to explicitly
reflect the fact that divide-by-zero is an error in type annotations
(e.g. for `int.__truediv__`), or conversely to declare a type as safe
from divide-by-zero, or include a "nonzero integer" type which it is
always safe to divide by, the analogy doesn't fully apply. You can't
explicitly mark your subclass of `int` as safe from divide-by-zero, we
just semi-arbitrarily choose to silence the diagnostic for subclasses,
to avoid false positives.
Also, if we fully followed the above logic, we'd have to error on every
`int / int` because the RHS `int` might be zero! But this would likely
cause too many false positives, because of the lack of a "nonzero
integer" type.
So this is just a pragmatic choice to emit the diagnostic when it is
very likely to be an error. It's unclear how useful this diagnostic is
in practice, but this version of it is at least very unlikely to cause
harm.
If the LHS is just `int` or `float` type, that type includes custom
subclasses which can arbitrarily override division behavior, so we
shouldn't emit a divide-by-zero error in those cases.
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
## Summary
Add type inference for comparisons involving union types. For example:
```py
one_or_two = 1 if flag else 2
reveal_type(one_or_two <= 2) # revealed: Literal[True]
reveal_type(one_or_two <= 1) # revealed: bool
reveal_type(one_or_two <= 0) # revealed: Literal[False]
```
closes#13779
## Test Plan
See `resources/mdtest/comparison/unions.md`
## Summary
Fixes the bug described in #13514 where an unbound public type defaulted
to the type or `Unknown`, whereas it should only be the type if unbound.
## Test Plan
Added a new test case
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
This PR adds a debug assertion that asserts that `TypeInference::extend`
is only called on results that have the same scope.
This is critical because `expressions` uses `ScopedExpressionId` that
are local and merging expressions from different
scopes would lead to incorrect expression types.
We could consider storing `scope` only on `TypeInference` for debug
builds. Doing so has the advantage that the `TypeInference` type is
smaller of which we'll have many. However, a `ScopeId` is a `u32`... so
it shouldn't matter that much and it avoids storing the `scope` both on
`TypeInference` and `TypeInferenceBuilder`
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
## Summary
This PR implements comparisons for (tuple, tuple).
It will close#13688 and complete an item in #13618 once merged.
## Test Plan
Basic tests are included for (tuple, tuple) comparisons.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Just a small simplification to remove some unnecessary complexity here.
Rather than using separate branches for subscript expressions involving
boolean literals, we can simply convert them to integer literals and
reuse the logic in the `IntLiteral` branches.
## Test Plan
`cargo test -p red_knot_python_semantic`
## Summary
This PR adds support for unpacking tuple expression in an assignment
statement where the target expression can be a tuple or a list (the
allowed sequence targets).
The implementation introduces a new `infer_assignment_target` which can
then be used for other targets like the ones in for loops as well. This
delegates it to the `infer_definition`. The final implementation uses a
recursive function that visits the target expression in source order and
compares the variable node that corresponds to the definition. At the
same time, it keeps track of where it is on the assignment value type.
The logic also accounts for the number of elements on both sides such
that it matches even if there's a gap in between. For example, if
there's a starred expression like `(a, *b, c) = (1, 2, 3)`, then the
type of `a` will be `Literal[1]` and the type of `b` will be
`Literal[2]`.
There are a couple of follow-ups that can be done:
* Use this logic for other target positions like `for` loop
* Add diagnostics for mis-match length between LHS and RHS
## Test Plan
Add various test cases using the new markdown test framework.
Validate that existing test cases pass.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
Porting infer tests to new markdown tests framework.
Link to the corresponding issue: #13696
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
- Fix a bug with `… is not …` type guards.
Previously, in an example like
```py
x = [1]
y = [1]
if x is not y:
reveal_type(x)
```
we would infer a type of `list[int] & ~list[int] == Never` for `x`
inside the conditional (instead of `list[int]`), since we built a
(negative) intersection with the type of the right hand side (`y`).
However, as this example shows, this assumption can only be made for
singleton types (types with a single inhabitant) such as `None`.
- Add support for `… is …` type guards.
closes#13715
## Test Plan
Moved existing `narrow_…` tests to Markdown-based tests and added new
ones (including a regression test for the bug described above). Note
that will create some conflicts with
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13719. I tried to establish the
correct organizational structure as proposed in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13719#discussion_r1800188105
Address a potential point of confusion that bit a contributor in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/13719
Also remove a no-longer-accurate line about bare `error: ` assertions
(which are no longer allowed) and clarify another point about which
kinds of error assertions to use.
## Summary
Fixes#13708.
Silence `undefined-reveal` diagnostic on any line including a `#
revealed:` assertion.
Add more context to un-silenced `undefined-reveal` diagnostics in mdtest
test failures. This doesn't make the failure output less verbose, but it
hopefully clarifies the right fix for an `undefined-reveal` in mdtest,
while still making it clear what red-knot's normal diagnostic for this
looks like.
## Test Plan
Added and updated tests.
This adds documentation for the new test framework.
I also added documentation for the planned design of features we haven't
built yet (clearly marked as such), so that this doc can become the sole
source of truth for the test framework design (we don't need to refer
back to the original internal design document.)
Also fixes a few issues in the test framework implementation that were
discovered in writing up the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: T-256 <132141463+T-256@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
## Summary
Adds a markdown-based test framework for writing tests of type inference
and type checking. Fixes#11664.
Implements the basic required features. A markdown test file is a suite
of tests, each test can contain one or more Python files, with
optionally specified path/name. The test writes all files to an
in-memory file system, runs red-knot, and matches the resulting
diagnostics against `Type: ` and `Error: ` assertions embedded in the
Python source as comments.
We will want to add features like incremental tests, setting custom
configuration for tests, writing non-Python files, testing syntax
errors, capturing full diagnostic output, etc. There's also plenty of
room for improved UX (colored output?).
## Test Plan
Lots of tests!
Sample of the current output when a test fails:
```
Running tests/inference.rs (target/debug/deps/inference-7c96590aa84de2a4)
running 1 test
test inference::path_1_resources_inference_numbers_md ... FAILED
failures:
---- inference::path_1_resources_inference_numbers_md stdout ----
inference/numbers.md - Numbers - Floats
/src/test.py
line 2: unexpected error: [invalid-assignment] "Object of type `Literal["str"]` is not assignable to `int`"
thread 'inference::path_1_resources_inference_numbers_md' panicked at crates/red_knot_test/src/lib.rs:60:5:
Some tests failed.
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures:
inference::path_1_resources_inference_numbers_md
test result: FAILED. 0 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.19s
error: test failed, to rerun pass `-p red_knot_test --test inference`
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
David Salvisberg
InSync
David Peter
Simon Brugman
Harutaka Kawamura
Alex Waygood
w0nder1ng
Dhruv Manilawala
Charlie Marsh
Randolf Scholz
Carl Meyer
Dylan
Michal Čihař
Micha Reiser
Lokejoke
Shaygan Hooshyari
TomerBin
Fábio D. Batista
Matt Norton
Steve C
STACIA
github-actions[bot]
Raphael Gaschignard
Tim Hatch
renovate[bot]
cake-monotone
Mihai Capotă
aditya pillai
Alex
Aditya Pratap Singh
Neil Mitchell
Matthew Spero
Zanie Blue
Alexey Preobrazhenskiy
Santhosh Solomon
Raphael Gaschignard
Sid