## Summary
This PR adds type inference for key-based access on `TypedDict`s and a
new diagnostic for invalid subscript accesses:
```py
class Person(TypedDict):
name: str
age: int | None
alice = Person(name="Alice", age=25)
reveal_type(alice["name"]) # revealed: str
reveal_type(alice["age"]) # revealed: int | None
alice["naem"] # Unknown key "naem" - did you mean "name"?
```
## Test Plan
Updated Markdown tests
* [x] basic handling
* [x] parse and discover `@warnings.deprecated` attributes
* [x] associate them with function definitions
* [x] associate them with class definitions
* [x] add a new "deprecated" diagnostic
* [x] ensure diagnostic is styled appropriately for LSPs
(DiagnosticTag::Deprecated)
* [x] functions
* [x] fire on calls
* [x] fire on arbitrary references
* [x] classes
* [x] fire on initializers
* [x] fire on arbitrary references
* [x] methods
* [x] fire on calls
* [x] fire on arbitrary references
* [ ] overloads
* [ ] fire on calls
* [ ] fire on arbitrary references(??? maybe not ???)
* [ ] only fire if the actual selected overload is deprecated
* [ ] dunder desugarring (warn on deprecated `__add__` if `+` is
invoked)
* [ ] alias supression? (don't warn on uses of variables that deprecated
items were assigned to)
* [ ] import logic
* [x] fire on imports of deprecated items
* [ ] suppress subsequent diagnostics if the import diagnostic fired (is
this handled by alias supression?)
* [x] fire on all qualified references (`module.mydeprecated`)
* [x] fire on all references that depend on a `*` import
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/153
## Summary
This was originally stacked on #19129, but some of the changes I made
for JSON also impacted the Azure format, so I went ahead and combined
them. The main changes here are:
- Implementing `FileResolver` for Ruff's `EmitterContext`
- Adding `FileResolver::notebook_index` and `FileResolver::is_notebook`
methods
- Adding a `DisplayDiagnostics` (with an "s") type for rendering a group
of diagnostics at once
- Adding `Azure`, `Json`, and `JsonLines` as new `DiagnosticFormat`s
I tried a couple of alternatives to the `FileResolver::notebook` methods
like passing down the `NotebookIndex` separately and trying to reparse a
`Notebook` from Ruff's `SourceFile`. The latter seemed promising, but
the `SourceFile` only stores the concatenated plain text of the
notebook, not the re-parsable JSON. I guess the current version is just
a variation on passing the `NotebookIndex`, but at least we can reuse
the existing `resolver` argument. I think a lot of this can be cleaned
up once Ruff has its own actual file resolver.
As suggested, I also tried deleting the corresponding `Emitter` files in
`ruff_linter`, but it doesn't look like git was able to follow this as a
rename. It did, however, track that the tests were moved, so the
snapshots should be easy to review.
## Test Plan
Existing Ruff tests ported to tests in `ruff_db`. I think some other
existing ruff tests also cover parts of this refactor.
---------
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
## Summary
Having a recursive type method to check whether a type is fully static
is inefficient, unnecessary, and makes us overly strict about subtyping
relations.
It's inefficient because we end up re-walking the same types many times
to check for fully-static-ness.
It's unnecessary because we can check relations involving the dynamic
type appropriately, depending whether the relation is subtyping or
assignability.
We use the subtyping relation to simplify unions and intersections. We
can usefully consider that `S <: T` for gradual types also, as long as
it remains true that `S | T` is equivalent to `T` and `S & T` is
equivalent to `S`.
One conservative definition (implemented here) that satisfies this
requirement is that we consider `S <: T` if, for every possible pair of
materializations `S'` and `T'`, `S' <: T'`. Or put differently the top
materialization of `S` (`S+` -- the union of all possible
materializations of `S`) is a subtype of the bottom materialization of
`T` (`T-` -- the intersection of all possible materializations of `T`).
In the most basic cases we can usefully say that `Any <: object` and
that `Never <: Any`, and we can handle more complex cases inductively
from there.
This definition of subtyping for gradual subtypes is not reflexive
(`Any` is not a subtype of `Any`).
As a corollary, we also remove `is_gradual_equivalent_to` --
`is_equivalent_to` now has the meaning that `is_gradual_equivalent_to`
used to have. If necessary, we could restore an
`is_fully_static_equivalent_to` or similar (which would not do an
`is_fully_static` pre-check of the types, but would instead pass a
relation-kind enum down through a recursive equivalence check, similar
to `has_relation_to`), but so far this doesn't appear to be necessary.
Credit to @JelleZijlstra for the observation that `is_fully_static` is
unnecessary and overly restrictive on subtyping.
There is another possible definition of gradual subtyping: instead of
requiring that `S+ <: T-`, we could instead require that `S+ <: T+` and
`S- <: T-`. In other words, instead of requiring all materializations of
`S` to be a subtype of every materialization of `T`, we just require
that every materialization of `S` be a subtype of _some_ materialization
of `T`, and that every materialization of `T` be a supertype of some
materialization of `S`. This definition also preserves the core
invariant that `S <: T` implies that `S | T = T` and `S & T = S`, and it
restores reflexivity: under this definition, `Any` is a subtype of
`Any`, and for any equivalent types `S` and `T`, `S <: T` and `T <: S`.
But unfortunately, this definition breaks transitivity of subtyping,
because nominal subclasses in Python use assignability ("consistent
subtyping") to define acceptable overrides. This means that we may have
a class `A` with `def method(self) -> Any` and a subtype `B(A)` with
`def method(self) -> int`, since `int` is assignable to `Any`. This
means that if we have a protocol `P` with `def method(self) -> Any`, we
would have `B <: A` (from nominal subtyping) and `A <: P` (`Any` is a
subtype of `Any`), but not `B <: P` (`int` is not a subtype of `Any`).
Breaking transitivity of subtyping is not tenable, so we don't use this
definition of subtyping.
## Test Plan
Existing tests (modified in some cases to account for updated
semantics.)
Stable property tests pass at a million iterations:
`QUICKCHECK_TESTS=1000000 cargo test -p ty_python_semantic -- --ignored
types::property_tests::stable`
### Changes to property test type generation
Since we no longer have a method of categorizing built types as
fully-static or not-fully-static, I had to add a previously-discussed
feature to the property tests so that some tests can build types that
are known by construction to be fully static, because there are still
properties that only apply to fully-static types (for example,
reflexiveness of subtyping.)
## Changes to handling of `*args, **kwargs` signatures
This PR "discovered" that, once we allow non-fully-static types to
participate in subtyping under the above definitions, `(*args: Any,
**kwargs: Any) -> Any` is now a subtype of `() -> object`. This is true,
if we take a literal interpretation of the former signature: all
materializations of the parameters `*args: Any, **kwargs: Any` can
accept zero arguments, making the former signature a subtype of the
latter. But the spec actually says that `*args: Any, **kwargs: Any`
should be interpreted as equivalent to `...`, and that makes a
difference here: `(...) -> Any` is not a subtype of `() -> object`,
because (unlike a literal reading of `(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any)`),
`...` can materialize to _any_ signature, including a signature with
required positional arguments.
This matters for this PR because it makes the "any two types are both
assignable to their union" property test fail if we don't implement the
equivalence to `...`. Because `FunctionType.__call__` has the signature
`(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> Any`, and if we take that at face value
it's a subtype of `() -> object`, making `FunctionType` a subtype of `()
-> object)` -- but then a function with a required argument is also a
subtype of `FunctionType`, but not a subtype of `() -> object`. So I
went ahead and implemented the equivalence to `...` in this PR.
## Ecosystem analysis
* Most of the ecosystem report are cases of improved union/intersection
simplification. For example, we can now simplify a union like `bool |
(bool & Unknown) | Unknown` to simply `bool | Unknown`, because we can
now observe that every possible materialization of `bool & Unknown` is
still a subtype of `bool` (whereas before we would set aside `bool &
Unknown` as a not-fully-static type.) This is clearly an improvement.
* The `possibly-unresolved-reference` errors in sockeye, pymongo,
ignite, scrapy and others are true positives for conditional imports
that were formerly silenced by bogus conflicting-declarations (which we
currently don't issue a diagnostic for), because we considered two
different declarations of `Unknown` to be conflicting (we used
`is_equivalent_to` not `is_gradual_equivalent_to`). In this PR that
distinction disappears and all equivalence is gradual, so a declaration
of `Unknown` no longer conflicts with a declaration of `Unknown`, which
then results in us surfacing the possibly-unbound error.
* We will now issue "redundant cast" for casting from a typevar with a
gradual bound to the same typevar (the hydra-zen diagnostic). This seems
like an improvement.
* The new diagnostics in bandersnatch are interesting. For some reason
primer in CI seems to be checking bandersnatch on Python 3.10 (not yet
sure why; this doesn't happen when I run it locally). But bandersnatch
uses `enum.StrEnum`, which doesn't exist on 3.10. That makes the `class
SimpleDigest(StrEnum)` a class that inherits from `Unknown` (and
bypasses our current TODO handling for accessing attributes on enum
classes, since we don't recognize it as an enum class at all). This PR
improves our understanding of assignability to classes that inherit from
`Any` / `Unknown`, and we now recognize that a string literal is not
assignable to a class inheriting `Any` or `Unknown`.
## Summary
Part of [#111](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/111).
After this change, dataclasses with two or more `KW_ONLY` field will be
reported as invalid. The duplicate fields will simply be ignored when
computing `__init__`'s signature.
## Test Plan
Markdown tests.
## Summary
Part of [#117](https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/117).
`TypeIs[]` is a special form that allows users to define their own
narrowing functions. Despite the syntax, `TypeIs` is not a generic and,
on its own, it is meaningless as a type.
[Officially](https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/narrowing.html#typeis),
a function annotated as returning a `TypeIs[T]` is a <i>type narrowing
function</i>, where `T` is called the <i>`TypeIs` return type</i>.
A `TypeIs[T]` may or may not be bound to a symbol. Only bound types have
narrowing effect:
```python
def f(v: object = object()) -> TypeIs[int]: ...
a: str = returns_str()
if reveal_type(f()): # Unbound: TypeIs[int]
reveal_type(a) # str
if reveal_type(f(a)): # Bound: TypeIs[a, int]
reveal_type(a) # str & int
```
Delayed usages of a bound type has no effect, however:
```python
b = f(a)
if b:
reveal_type(a) # str
```
A `TypeIs[T]` type:
* Is fully static when `T` is fully static.
* Is a singleton/single-valued when it is bound.
* Has exactly two runtime inhabitants when it is unbound: `True` and
`False`.
In other words, an unbound type have ambiguous truthiness.
It is possible to infer more precise truthiness for bound types;
however, that is not part of this change.
`TypeIs[T]` is a subtype of or otherwise assignable to `bool`. `TypeIs`
is invariant with respect to the `TypeIs` return type: `TypeIs[int]` is
neither a subtype nor a supertype of `TypeIs[bool]`. When ty sees a
function marked as returning `TypeIs[T]`, its `return`s will be checked
against `bool` instead. ty will also report such functions if they don't
accept a positional argument. Addtionally, a type narrowing function
call with no positional arguments (e.g., `f()` in the example above)
will be considered invalid.
## Test Plan
Markdown tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
## Summary
I think `division-by-zero` is a low-value diagnostic in general; most
real division-by-zero errors (especially those that are less obvious to
the human eye) will occur on values typed as `int`, in which case we
don't issue the diagnostic anyway. Mypy and pyright do not emit this
diagnostic.
Currently the diagnostic is prone to false positives because a) we do
not silence it in unreachable code, and b) we do not implement narrowing
of literals from inequality checks. We will probably fix (a) regardless,
but (b) is low priority apart from division-by-zero.
I think we have many more important things to do and should not allow
false positives on a low-value diagnostic to be a distraction. Not
opposed to re-enabling this diagnostic in future when we can prioritize
reducing its false positives.
References https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/443
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
Support direct uses of `typing.TypeAliasType`, as in:
```py
from typing import TypeAliasType
IntOrStr = TypeAliasType("IntOrStr", int | str)
def f(x: IntOrStr) -> None:
reveal_type(x) # revealed: int | str
```
closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ty/issues/392
## Ecosystem
The new false positive here:
```diff
+ error[invalid-type-form] altair/utils/core.py:49:53: The first argument to `Callable` must be either a list of types, ParamSpec, Concatenate, or `...`
```
comes from the fact that we infer the second argument as a type
expression now. We silence false positives for PEP695 `ParamSpec`s, but
not for `P = ParamSpec("P")` inside `Callable[P, ...]`.
## Test Plan
New Markdown tests
