## Summary
This PR updates the `ruff.printDebugInformation` command to return the
info as string in the response. Currently, we send a `window/logMessage`
request with the info but that has the disadvantage that it's not
visible to the user directly.
What `rust-analyzer` does with it's `rust-analyzer/status` request which
returns it as a string which then the client can just display it in a
separate window. This is what I'm thinking of doing as well.
Other editors can also benefit from it by directly opening a temporary
file with this information that the user can see directly.
There are couple of options here:
1. Keep using the command, keep the log request and return the string
2. Keep using the command, remove the log request and return the string
3. Create a new request similar to `rust-analyzer/status` which returns
a string
This PR implements (1) but I'd want to move towards (2) and remove the
log request completely. We haven't advertised it as such so this would
only require updating the VS Code extension to handle it by opening a
new document with the debug content.
## Test plan
For VS Code, refer to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/694.
For Neovim, one could do:
```lua
local function execute_ruff_command(command)
local client = vim.lsp.get_clients({
bufnr = vim.api.nvim_get_current_buf(),
name = name,
method = 'workspace/executeCommand',
})[1]
if not client then
return
end
client.request('workspace/executeCommand', {
command = command,
arguments = {
{ uri = vim.uri_from_bufnr(0) }
},
function(err, result)
if err then
-- log error
return
end
vim.print(result)
-- Or, open a new window with the `result` content
end
}
```
## Summary
This PR updates the server capabilities to include the commands that
Ruff supports. This is similar to how there's a list of possible code
actions supported by the server.
I noticed this when I was trying to find whether Helix supported
workspace commands or not based on Jane's comment
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/11831#discussion_r1634984921)
and I found the `:lsp-workspace-command` in the editor but it didn't
show up anything in the picker.
So, I looked at the implementation in Helix
(9c479e6d2d/helix-term/src/commands/typed.rs (L1372-L1384))
which made me realize that Ruff doesn't provide this in its
capabilities. Currently, this does require `ruff` to be first in the
list of language servers in the user config but that should be resolved
by https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/10176. So, the following
config should work:
```toml
[[language]]
name = "python"
# Ruff should come first until https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/10176 is released
language-servers = ["ruff", "pyright"]
```
## Test Plan
1. Neovim's server capabilities output should include the supported
commands:
```
executeCommandProvider = {
commands = { "ruff.applyFormat", "ruff.applyAutofix", "ruff.applyOrganizeImports", "ruff.printDebugInformation" },
workDoneProgress = false
},
```
2. Helix should now display the commands to pick from when
`:lsp-workspace-command` is invoked:
<img width="832" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-13 at 08 47 14"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/67177269/09048ecd-c974-4e09-ab56-9482ff3d780b">
## Summary
Fixes#11744.
We now show a distinct popup message when we fail to get a document
snapshot during command execution. This message more clearly
communicates the issue to the user, instead of a generic "ruff
encountered an error" message.
## Test Plan
Try running `Fix all auto-fixable problems` on an incompatible file (for
example: `settings.json`). You should see the following popup message:
<img width="456" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-11 at 11 47 16 AM"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/3a28e3d7-3896-4dd0-b117-f87300dd3b68">
## Summary
Closes#11715.
Introduces a new command, `ruff.printDebugInformation`. This will print
useful information about the status of the server to `stderr`.
Right now, the information shown by this command includes:
* The path to the server executable
* The version of the executable
* The text encoding being used
* The number of open documents and workspaces
* A list of registered configuration files
* The capabilities of the client
## Test Plan
First, checkout and use [the corresponding `ruff-vscode`
PR](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/495).
Running the `Print debug information` command in VS Code should show
something like the following in the Output channel:
<img width="991" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-11 at 11 41 46 AM"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/ab93c009-bb7b-4291-b057-d44fdc6f9f86">
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11587.
## Test Plan
- Added a lint error to `test_server.py` in `vscode-ruff`.
- Validated that, prior to this change, diagnostics appeared in the
file.
- Validated that, with this change, no diagnostics were shown.
- Validated that, with this change, no diagnostics were fixed on-save.
## Summary
Previously, `ruff.applyFormat`, seen in VS Code as the command `Ruff:
Format Document`, would only format the currently active notebook cell
inside a notebook document. This PR makes `ruff.applyFormat` format the
entire notebook document at once, operating on each code cell in order.
## Test Plan
1. Open a notebook document that has multiple unformatted code cells.
2. Run `Ruff: Format Document` through the Command Palette
(`Ctrl/Cmd+Shift+P` by default)
3. Observe that all code cells in the notebook have been formatted.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/10858.
`ruff server` now supports `*.ipynb` (aka Jupyter Notebook) files.
Extensive internal changes have been made to facilitate this, which I've
done some work to contextualize with documentation and an pre-review
that highlights notable sections of the code.
`*.ipynb` cells should behave similarly to `*.py` documents, with one
major exception. The format command `ruff.applyFormat` will only apply
to the currently selected notebook cell - if you want to format an
entire notebook document, use `Format Notebook` from the VS Code context
menu.
## Test Plan
The VS Code extension does not yet have Jupyter Notebook support
enabled, so you'll first need to enable it manually. To do this,
checkout the `pre-release` branch and modify `src/common/server.ts` as
follows:
Before:
After:
I recommend testing this PR with large, complicated notebook files. I
used notebook files from [this popular
repository](https://github.com/jakevdp/PythonDataScienceHandbook/tree/master/notebooks)
in my preliminary testing.
The main thing to test is ensuring that notebook cells behave the same
as Python documents, besides the aforementioned issue with
`ruff.applyFormat`. You should also test adding and deleting cells (in
particular, deleting all the code cells and ensure that doesn't break
anything), changing the kind of a cell (i.e. from markup -> code or vice
versa), and creating a new notebook file from scratch. Finally, you
should also test that source actions work as expected (and across the
entire notebook).
Note: `ruff.applyAutofix` and `ruff.applyOrganizeImports` are currently
broken for notebook files, and I suspect it has something to do with
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11248. Once this is fixed, I
will update the test plan accordingly.
---------
Co-authored-by: nolan <nolan.king90@gmail.com>
## Summary
Fixes#11185Fixes#11214
Document path and package information is now forwarded to the Ruff
linter, which allows `per-file-ignores` to correctly match against the
file name. This also fixes an issue where the import sorting rule didn't
distinguish between third-party and first-party packages since we didn't
pass in the package root.
## Test Plan
`per-file-ignores` should ignore files as expected. One quick way to
check is by adding this to your `pyproject.toml`:
```toml
[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores]
"__init__.py" = ["ALL"]
```
Then, confirm that no diagnostics appear when you add code to an
`__init__.py` file (besides syntax errors).
The import sorting fix can be verified by failing to reproduce the
original issue - an `I001` diagnostic should not appear in
`other_module.py`.
## Summary
This is a follow-up to https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10984 that
implements configuration resolution for editor configuration. By 'editor
configuration', I'm referring to the client settings that correspond to
Ruff configuration/options, like `preview`, `select`, and so on. These
will be combined with 'project configuration' (configuration taken from
project files such as `pyproject.toml`) to generate the final linter and
formatter settings used by `RuffSettings`. Editor configuration takes
priority over project configuration.
In a follow-up pull request, I'll implement a new client setting that
allows project configuration to override editor configuration, as per
[this issue](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/issues/425).
## Review guide
The first commit, e38966d8843becc7234fa7d46009c16af4ba41e9, is just
doing re-arrangement so that we can pass the right things to
`RuffSettings::resolve`. The actual resolution logic is in the second
commit, 0eec9ee75c10e5ec423bd9f5ce1764f4d7a5ad86. It might help to look
at these comments individually since the diff is rather messy.
## Test Plan
For the settings to show up in VS Code, you'll need to checkout this
branch: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-vscode/pull/456.
To test that the resolution for a specific setting works as expected,
run through the following scenarios, setting it in project and editor
configuration as needed:
| Set in project configuration? | Set in editor configuration? |
Expected Outcome |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| No | No | The editor should behave as if the setting was set to its
default value. |
| Yes | No | The editor should behave as if the setting was set to the
value in project configuration. |
| No | Yes | The editor should behave as if the setting was set to the
value in editor configuration. |
| Yes | Yes (but distinctive from project configuration) | The editor
should behave as if the setting was set to the value in editor
configuration. |
An exception to this is `extendSelect`, which does not have an analog in
TOML configuration. Instead, you should verify that `extendSelect`
amends the `select` setting. If `select` is set in both editor and
project configuration, `extendSelect` will only append to the `select`
value in editor configuration, so make sure to un-set it there if you're
testing `extendSelect` with `select` in project configuration.
## Summary
Fixes#10866.
Introduces the `show_err_msg!` macro which will send a message to be
shown as a popup to the client via the `window/showMessage` LSP method.
## Test Plan
Insert various `show_err_msg!` calls in common code paths (for example,
at the beginning of `event_loop`) and confirm that these messages appear
in your editor.
To test that panicking works correctly, add this to the top of the `fn
run` definition in
`crates/ruff_server/src/server/api/requests/execute_command.rs`:
```rust
panic!("This should appear");
```
Then, try running a command like `Ruff: Format document` from the
command palette (`Ctrl/Cmd+Shift+P`). You should see the following
messages appear:
## Summary
Configuration is no longer the property of a workspace but rather of
individual documents. Just like the Ruff CLI, each document is
configured based on the 'nearest' project configuration. See [the Ruff
documentation](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/configuration/#config-file-discovery)
for more details.
To reduce the amount of times we resolve configuration for a file, we
have an index for each workspace that stores a reference-counted pointer
to a configuration for a given folder. If another file in the same
folder is opened, the configuration is simply re-used rather than us
re-resolving it.
## Guide for reviewing
The first commit is just the restructuring work, which adds some noise
to the diff. If you want to quickly understand what's actually changed,
I recommend looking at the two commits that come after it.
f7c073d441 makes configuration a property
of `DocumentController`/`DocumentRef`, moving it out of `Workspace`, and
it also sets up the `ConfigurationIndex`, though it doesn't implement
its key function, `get_or_insert`. In the commit after it,
fc35618f17, we implement `get_or_insert`.
## Test Plan
The best way to test this would be to ensure that the behavior matches
the Ruff CLI. Open a project with multiple configuration files (or add
them yourself), and then introduce problems in certain files that won't
show due to their configuration. Add those same problems to a section of
the project where those rules are run. Confirm that the lint rules are
run as expected with `ruff check`. Then, open your editor and confirm
that the diagnostics shown match the CLI output.
As an example - I have a workspace with two separate folders, `pandas`
and `scipy`. I created a `pyproject.toml` file in `pandas/pandas/io` and
a `ruff.toml` file in `pandas/pandas/api`. I changed the `select` and
`preview` settings in the sub-folder configuration files and confirmed
that these were reflected in the diagnostics. I also confirmed that this
did not change the diagnostics for the `scipy` folder whatsoever.
## Summary
This builds off of the work in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10652 to implement a command
executor, backwards compatible with the commands from the previous LSP
(`ruff.applyAutofix`, `ruff.applyFormat` and
`ruff.applyOrganizeImports`).
This involved a lot of refactoring and tweaks to the code action
resolution code - the most notable change is that workspace edits are
specified in a slightly different way, using the more general `changes`
field instead of the `document_changes` field (which isn't supported on
all LSP clients). Additionally, the API for synchronous request handlers
has been updated to include access to the `Requester`, which we use to
send a `workspace/applyEdit` request to the client.
## Test Plan
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/19577865/7932e30f-d944-4e35-b828-1d81aa56c087
Dhruv Manilawala
Jane Lewis
T-256
Micha Reiser
Charlie Marsh