## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This is the implementation for the new rule of `pycodestyle (E204)`. It
follows the guidlines described in the contributing site, and as such it
has a new file named `whitespace_after_decorator.rs`, a new test file
called `E204.py`, and as such invokes the `function` in the `AST
statement checker` for functions and functions in classes. Linking #2402
because it has all the pycodestyle rules.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
The file E204.py, has a `decorator` defined called wrapper, and this
decorator is used for 2 cases. The first one is when a `function` which
has a `decorator` is called in the file, and the second one is when
there is a `class` and 2 `methods` are defined for the `class` with a
`decorator` attached it.
Test file:
``` python
def foo(fun):
def wrapper():
print('before')
fun()
print('after')
return wrapper
# No error
@foo
def bar():
print('bar')
# E204
@ foo
def baz():
print('baz')
class Test:
# No error
@foo
def bar(self):
print('bar')
# E204
@ foo
def baz(self):
print('baz')
```
I am still new to rust and any suggestion is appreciated. Specially with
the way im using native ruff utilities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Fixes a few typos and consistency issues in the "Settings"
documentation:
- use "Ruff" consistently in the few places where "ruff" is used
- use double quotes in the few places where single quotes are used
- add backticks around rule codes where they are currently missing
- update a few example values where they are the same as the defaults,
for consistency
2nd commit might be controversial, as there are many options mentioned
where we don't currently link to the documentation sections, so maybe
it's done on purpose, as this will also appear in the JSON schema where
it's not desirable? If that's the case, I can easily drop it.
## Test Plan
Local testing.
## Summary
This patch inverts the defaults for
[pytest-fixture-incorrect-parentheses-style
(PT001)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/pytest-fixture-incorrect-parentheses-style/)
and [pytest-incorrect-mark-parentheses-style
(PT003)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/pytest-incorrect-mark-parentheses-style/)
to prefer dropping superfluous parentheses.
Presently, Ruff defaults to adding superfluous parentheses on pytest
mark and fixture decorators for documented purpose of consistency; for
example,
```diff
import pytest
-@pytest.mark.foo
+@pytest.mark.foo()
def test_bar(): ...
```
This behaviour is counter to the official pytest recommendation and
diverges from the flake8-pytest-style plugin as of version 2.0.0 (see
https://github.com/m-burst/flake8-pytest-style/issues/272). Seeing as
either default satisfies the documented benefit of consistency across a
codebase, it makes sense to change the behaviour to be consistent with
pytest and the flake8 plugin as well.
This change is breaking, so is gated behind preview (at least under my
understanding of Ruff versioning). The implementation of this gating
feature is a bit hacky, but seemed to be the least disruptive solution
without performing invasive surgery on the `#[option()]` macro.
Related to #8796.
### Caveat
Whilst updating the documentation, I sought to reference the pytest
recommendation to drop superfluous parentheses, but couldn't find any
official instruction beyond it being a revealed preference within the
pytest documentation code examples (as well as the linked issues from a
core pytest developer). Thus, the wording of the preference is
deliberately timid; it's to cohere with pytest rather than follow an
explicit guidance.
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
I also ran
```sh
cargo run -p ruff -- check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_pytest_style/PT001.py --no-cache --diff --select PT001
```
and compared against it with `--preview` to verify that the default does
change under preview (I also repeated this with `echo
'[tool.ruff]\npreview = true' > pyproject.toml` to verify that it works
with a configuration file).
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Implement mutable-contextvar-default (B039) which was added to
flake8-bugbear in https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear/pull/476.
This rule is similar to [mutable-argument-default
(B006)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/mutable-argument-default) and
[function-call-in-default-argument
(B008)](https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/function-call-in-default-argument),
except that it checks the `default` keyword argument to
`contextvars.ContextVar`.
```
B039.py:19:26: B039 Do not use mutable data structures for ContextVar defaults
|
18 | # Bad
19 | ContextVar("cv", default=[])
| ^^ B039
20 | ContextVar("cv", default={})
21 | ContextVar("cv", default=list())
|
= help: Replace with `None`; initialize with `.set()` after checking for `None`
```
In the upstream flake8-plugin, this rule is written expressly as a
corollary to B008 and shares much of its logic. Likewise, this
implementation reuses the logic of the Ruff implementation of B008,
namely
f765d19402/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/function_call_in_argument_default.rs (L104-L106)
and
f765d19402/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/mutable_argument_default.rs (L106)
Thus, this rule deliberately replicates B006's and B008's heuristics.
For example, this rule assumes that all functions are mutable unless
otherwise qualified. If improvements are to be made to B039 heuristics,
they should probably be made to B006 and B008 as well (whilst trying to
match the upstream implementation).
This rule does not have an autofix as it is unknown where the ContextVar
next used (and it might not be within the same file).
Closes#12054
## Test Plan
`cargo nextest run`
## Summary
This rule removes `PLR1701` and redirects it to `SIM101`.
In addition to that, the `SIM101` autofix has been fixed to add padding
if required.
### `PLR1701` has bugs
It also seems that the implementation of `PLR1701` is incorrect in
multiple scenarios. For example, the following code snippet:
```py
# There are two _different_ variables `a` and `b`
if isinstance(a, int) or isinstance(b, bool) or isinstance(a, float):
pass
# There's another condition `or 1`
if isinstance(self.k, int) or isinstance(self.k, float) or 1:
pass
```
is fixed to:
```py
# Fixed to only considering variable `a`
if isinstance(a, (float, int)):
pass
# The additional condition is not present in the fix
if isinstance(self.k, (float, int)):
pass
```
Playground: https://play.ruff.rs/6cfbdfb7-f183-43b0-b59e-31e728b34190
## Documentation Preview
### `PLR1701`
<img width="1397" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-25 at 11 14 40"
src="https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/assets/67177269/779ee84d-7c4d-4bb8-a3a4-c2b23a313eba">
## Test Plan
Remove the test cases for `PLR1701`, port the padding test case to
`SIM101` and update the snapshot.
## Summary
Addresses #11974 to add a `RUF` rule to replace `print` expressions in
`assert` statements with the inner message.
An autofix is available, but is considered unsafe as it changes
behaviour of the execution, notably:
- removal of the printout in `stdout`, and
- `AssertionError` instance containing a different message.
While the detection of the condition is a straightforward matter,
deciding how to resolve the print arguments into a string literal can be
a relatively subjective matter. The implementation of this PR chooses to
be as tolerant as possible, and will attempt to reformat any number of
`print` arguments containing single or concatenated strings or variables
into either a string literal, or a f-string if any variables or
placeholders are detected.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`.
## Examples
For ease of discussion, this is the diff for the tests:
```diff
# Standard Case
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print("This print is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Concatenated string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print("This print" " is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Positional arguments, string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional"
# Concatenated string literals combined with Positional arguments
# Expects:
# - single stringliteral concatenated with " " only between `print` and `is`
-assert True, print("This " "print", "is not intentional.")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional."
# Positional arguments, string literals with a variable
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This", print.__name__, "is not intentional.")
+assert True, f"This {print.__name__} is not intentional."
# Mixed brackets string literals
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", 'is not intentional', """and should be removed""")
+assert True, "This print is not intentional and should be removed"
# Mixed brackets with other brackets inside
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " " and escaped brackets
-assert True, print("This print", 'is not "intentional"', """and "should" be 'removed'""")
+assert True, "This print is not \"intentional\" and \"should\" be 'removed'"
# Positional arguments, string literals with a separator
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with "|"
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep="|")
+assert True, "This print|is not intentional"
# Positional arguments, string literals with None as separator
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep=None)
+assert True, "This print is not intentional"
# Positional arguments, string literals with variable as separator, needs f-string
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "{U00A0}"
-assert True, print("This print", "is not intentional", sep=U00A0)
+assert True, f"This print{U00A0}is not intentional"
# Unnecessary f-string
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, print(f"This f-string is just a literal.")
+assert True, "This f-string is just a literal."
# Positional arguments, string literals and f-strings
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with " "
-assert True, print("This print", f"is not {'intentional':s}")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# Positional arguments, string literals and f-strings with a separator
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "|"
-assert True, print("This print", f"is not {'intentional':s}", sep="|")
+assert True, f"This print|is not {'intentional':s}"
# A single f-string
# Expects:
# - single FString
-assert True, print(f"This print is not {'intentional':s}")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# A single f-string with a redundant separator
# Expects:
# - single FString
-assert True, print(f"This print is not {'intentional':s}", sep="|")
+assert True, f"This print is not {'intentional':s}"
# Complex f-string with variable as separator
# Expects:
# - single FString concatenated with "{U00A0}", all placeholders preserved
condition = "True is True"
maintainer = "John Doe"
-assert True, print("Unreachable due to", condition, f", ask {maintainer} for advice", sep=U00A0)
+assert True, f"Unreachable due to{U00A0}{condition}{U00A0}, ask {maintainer} for advice"
# Empty print
# Expects:
# - `msg` entirely removed from assertion
-assert True, print()
+assert True
# Empty print with separator
# Expects:
# - `msg` entirely removed from assertion
-assert True, print(sep=" ")
+assert True
# Custom print function that actually returns a string
# Expects:
@@ -100,4 +100,4 @@
# Use of `builtins.print`
# Expects:
# - single StringLiteral
-assert True, builtins.print("This print should be removed.")
+assert True, "This print should be removed."
```
## Known Issues
The current implementation resolves all arguments and separators of the
`print` expression into a single string, be it
`StringLiteralValue::single` or a `FStringValue::single`. This:
- potentially joins together strings well beyond the ideal character
limit for each line, and
- does not preserve multi-line strings in their original format, in
favour of a single line `"...\n...\n..."` format.
These are purely formatting issues only occurring in unusual scenarios.
Additionally, the autofix will tolerate `print` calls that were
previously invalid:
```python
assert True, print("this", "should not be allowed", sep=42)
```
This will be transformed into
```python
assert True, f"this{42}should not be allowed"
```
which some could argue is an alteration of behaviour.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This PR implements the [consider dict
items](https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/user_guide/messages/convention/consider-using-dict-items.html)
rule from Pylint. Enabling this rule flags:
```python
ORCHESTRA = {
"violin": "strings",
"oboe": "woodwind",
"tuba": "brass",
"gong": "percussion",
}
for instrument in ORCHESTRA:
print(f"{instrument}: {ORCHESTRA[instrument]}")
for instrument in ORCHESTRA.keys():
print(f"{instrument}: {ORCHESTRA[instrument]}")
for instrument in (inline_dict := {"foo": "bar"}):
print(f"{instrument}: {inline_dict[instrument]}")
```
For not using `items()` to extract the value out of the dict. We ignore
the case of an assignment, as you can't modify the underlying
representation with the value in the list of tuples returned.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
`cargo test`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Implement support for RDJson output for `ruff check`, as requested in
#8655.
## Test Plan
Tested using a snapshot test. Same approach as for e.g. the JSON output
formatter.
## Additional info
I tried to keep the implementation close to the JSON implementation.
I had to deviate a bit to make the `suggestions` key work: If there are
no suggestions, then setting `suggestions` to `null` is invalid
according to the JSONSchema. Therefore, I opted for a slightly more
complex implementation, that skips the `suggestions` key entirely if
there are no fixes available for the given diagnostic. Maybe it would
have been easier to set `"suggestions": []`, but I ended up doing it
this way.
I didn't consider notebooks, as I _think_ that RDJson doesn't work with
notebooks. This should be confirmed, and if so, there should be some
form of warning or error emitted when trying to output diagnostics for a
notebook.
I also didn't consider `ruff format`, as this comment:
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8655#issuecomment-1811446160
suggests that that wouldn't be compatible.
I'm new to Rust, any feedback is appreciated. 🙂 I
implemented this in order to have a productive rainy saturday afternoon,
I'm not knowledgeable about RDJson beyond the sources linked in the
issue.
## Summary
This PR implements the rule B901, which is part of the opinionated rules
of `flake8-bugbear`.
This rule seems to be desired in `ruff` as per
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/3758 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/2954#issuecomment-1441162976.
## Test Plan
As this PR was made closely following the
[CONTRIBUTING.md](8a25531a71/CONTRIBUTING.md),
it tests using the snapshot approach, that is described there.
## Sources
The implementation is inspired by [the original implementation in the
`flake8-bugbear`
repository](d1aec4cbef/bugbear.py (L1092)).
The error message and [test
file](d1aec4cbef/tests/b901.py)
where also copied from there.
The documentation I came up with on my own and needs improvement. Maybe
the example given in
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/2954#issuecomment-1441162976
could be used, but maybe they are too complex, I'm not sure.
## Open Questions
- [ ] Documentation. (See above.)
- [x] Can I access the parent in a visitor?
The [original
implementation](d1aec4cbef/bugbear.py (L1100))
references the `yield` statement's parent to check if it is an
expression statement. I didn't find a way to do this in `ruff` and used
the `is_expresssion_statement` field on the visitor instead. What are
your thoughts on this? Is it possible and / or desired to access the
parent node here?
- [x] Is `Option::is_some(...)` -> `...unwrap()` the right thing to do?
Referring to [this piece of
code](9d5a280f71/crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/flake8_bugbear/rules/return_x_in_generator.rs (L91-L96)).
From my understanding, the `.unwrap()` is safe, because it is checked
that `return_` is not `None`. However, I feel like I missed a more
elegant solution that does both in one.
## Other
I don't know a lot about this rule, I just implemented it because I
found it in a
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/labels/good%20first%20issue.
I'm new to Rust, so any constructive critisism is appreciated.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
- Implements `Y066` from `flake8-pyi` as `PYI066`
- Fixes `PYI006` not being raised for `elif` clauses. This would have
conflicted with PYI006's implementation, so decided to do it in the same
PR.
## Test Plan
`cargo test` / `cargo insta review`
## Summary
Addresses #8451 by implementing rule 116 to add an unsafe fix when sleep
is used with a >24 hour interval to instead consider sleeping forever.
This rule is added as async instead as I my understanding was that these
trio rules would be moved to async anyway.
There are a couple of TODOs, which address further extending the rule by
adding support for lookups and evaluations, and also supporting `anyio`.
## Summary
* Update documentation for F401 following recent PRs
* #11168
* #11314
* Deprecate `ignore_init_module_imports`
* Add a deprecation pragma to the option and a "warn user once" message
when the option is used.
* Restore the old behavior for stable (non-preview) mode:
* When `ignore_init_module_imports` is set to `true` (default) there are
no `__init_.py` fixes (but we get nice fix titles!).
* When `ignore_init_module_imports` is set to `false` there are unsafe
`__init__.py` fixes to remove unused imports.
* When preview mode is enabled, it overrides
`ignore_init_module_imports`.
* Fixed a bug in fix titles where `import foo as bar` would recommend
reexporting `bar as bar`. It now says to reexport `foo as foo`. (In this
case we don't issue a fix, fwiw; it was just a fix title bug.)
## Test plan
Added new fixture tests that reuse the existing fixtures for
`__init__.py` files. Each of the three situations listed above has
fixture tests. The F401 "stable" tests cover:
> * When `ignore_init_module_imports` is set to `true` (default) there
are no `__init_.py` fixes (but we get nice fix titles!).
The F401 "deprecated option" tests cover:
> * When `ignore_init_module_imports` is set to `false` there are unsafe
`__init__.py` fixes to remove unused imports.
These complement existing "preview" tests that show the new behavior
which recommends fixes in `__init__.py` according to whether the import
is 1st party and other circumstances (for more on that behavior see:
#11314).
## Summary
Based on discussion in #10850.
As it stands today `RUF100` will attempt to replace code redirects with
their target codes even though this is not the "goal" of `RUF100`. This
behavior is confusing and inconsistent, since code redirects which don't
otherwise violate `RUF100` will not be updated. The behavior is also
undocumented. Additionally, users who want to use `RUF100` but do not
want to update redirects have no way to opt out.
This PR explicitly detects redirects with a new rule `RUF101` and
patches `RUF100` to keep original codes in fixes and reporting.
## Test Plan
Added fixture.
## Summary
Fixes#10463
Add `FURB192` which detects violations like this:
```python
# Bad
a = sorted(l)[0]
# Good
a = min(l)
```
There is a caveat that @Skylion007 has pointed out, which is that
violations with `reverse=True` technically aren't compatible with this
change, in the edge case where the unstable behavior is intended. For
example:
```python
from operator import itemgetter
data = [('red', 1), ('blue', 1), ('red', 2), ('blue', 2)]
min(data, key=itemgetter(0)) # ('blue', 1)
sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0))[0] # ('blue', 1)
sorted(data, key=itemgetter(0), reverse=True)[-1] # ('blue, 2')
```
This seems like a rare edge case, but I can make the `reverse=True`
fixes unsafe if that's best.
## Test Plan
This is unit tested.
## References
https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/pull/333/files
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Add pylint rule invalid-hash-returned (PLE0309)
See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 for rules
Test Plan: `cargo test`
TBD: from the description: "Strictly speaking `bool` is a subclass of
`int`, thus returning `True`/`False` is valid. To be consistent with
other rules (e.g.
[PLE0305](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10962)
invalid-index-returned), ruff will raise, compared to pylint which will
not raise."
Add pylint rule invalid-length-returned (PLE0303)
See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/970 for rules
Test Plan: `cargo test`
TBD: from the description: "Strictly speaking `bool` is a subclass of
`int`, thus returning `True`/`False` is valid. To be consistent with
other rules (e.g.
[PLE0305](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/10962)
invalid-index-returned), ruff will raise, compared to pylint which will
not raise."
## Summary
This change adds a rule to detect functions declared `async` but lacking
any of `await`, `async with`, or `async for`. This resolves#9951.
## Test Plan
This change was tested by following
https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/contributing/#rule-testing-fixtures-and-snapshots
and adding positive and negative cases for each of `await` vs nothing,
`async with` vs `with`, and `async for` vs `for`.
## Summary
Implement new rule: Prefer augmented assignment (#8877). It checks for
the assignment statement with the form of `<expr> = <expr>
<binary-operator> …` with a unsafe fix to use augmented assignment
instead.
## Test Plan
1. Snapshot test is included in the PR.
2. Manually test with playground.
## Summary
This PR adds the implementation for the current
[flake8-bugbear](https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear)'s B038 rule.
The B038 rule checks for mutation of loop iterators in the body of a for
loop and alerts when found.
Rational:
Editing the loop iterator can lead to undesired behavior and is probably
a bug in most cases.
Closes#9511.
Note there will be a second iteration of B038 implemented in
`flake8-bugbear` soon, and this PR currently only implements the weakest
form of the rule.
I'd be happy to also implement the further improvements to B038 here in
ruff 🙂
See https://github.com/PyCQA/flake8-bugbear/issues/454 for more
information on the planned improvements.
## Test Plan
Re-using the same test file that I've used for `flake8-bugbear`, which
is included in this PR (look for the `B038.py` file).
Note: this is my first time using `rust` (beside `rustlings`) - I'd be
very happy about thorough feedback on what I could've done better
🙂 - Bring it on 😀
## Summary
Implement `write-whole-file` (`FURB103`), part of #1348. This is largely
a copy and paste of `read-whole-file` #7682.
## Test Plan
Text fixture added.
---------
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
Fixes#3172
## Summary
Allow prefixing [extend-]per-file-ignores patterns with `!` to negate
the pattern; listed rules / prefixes will be ignored in all files that
don't match the pattern.
## Test Plan
Added tests for the feature.
Rendered docs and checked rendered output.
## Summary
Add new rule `pyupgrade - UP042` (I picked next available number).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/discussions/3867
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/9569
It should warn + provide a fix `class A(str, Enum)` -> `class
A(StrEnum)` for py311+.
## Test Plan
Added UP042.py test.
## Notes
I did not find a way to call `remove_argument` 2 times consecutively, so
the automatic fixing works only for classes that inherit exactly `str,
Enum` (regardless of the order).
I also plan to extend this rule to support IntEnum in next PR.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Implement FURB164 in the issue #1348.
Relevant Refurb docs is here:
https://github.com/dosisod/refurb/blob/v2.0.0/docs/checks.md#furb164-no-from-float
I've changed the name from `no-from-float` to
`verbose-decimal-fraction-construction`.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I've written it in the `FURB164.py`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Add a setting `extend-allowed-calls` to allow users to define their own
list of calls which allow boolean traps.
Resolves#10485.
Resolves#10356.
## Test Plan
Extended text fixture and added setting test.
## Summary
PEP 420 says [nested namespace
packages](https://peps.python.org/pep-0420/#nested-namespace-packages)
are allowed, i.e. marking a directory as a namespace package marks all
subdirectories in the subtree as namespace packages.
`is_package` is modified to use `Path::starts_with` and the order of
checks is reversed to do in-memory checks first before hitting the disk.
## Test Plan
Added unit tests. Previously all tests were run with `namespace_packages
== &[]`. Verified that one of the tests was failing before changing the
implementation.
## Future Improvements
The `is_package_with_cache` can probably be rewritten to avoid repeated
calls to `Path::starts_with`, by caching all directories up to the
`namespace_root`:
```ruff
let namespace_root = namespace_packages
.iter()
.filter(|namespace_package| path.starts_with(namespace_package))
.min();
```
