Files
ruff/crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/narrow
TomerBin 9910ec700c [ty] Better control flow for boolean expressions that are inside if (#18010)
## Summary
With this PR we now detect that x is always defined in `use`:
```py
if flag and (x := number):
    use(x)
```

When outside if, it's still detected as possibly not defined
```py
flag and (x := number)
# error: [possibly-unresolved-reference]
use(x)
```
In order to achieve that, I had to find a way to get access to the
flow-snapshots of the boolean expression when analyzing the flow of the
if statement. I did it by special casing the visitor of boolean
expression to return flow control information, exporting two snapshots -
`maybe_short_circuit` and `no_short_circuit`. When indexing
boolean expression itself we must assume all possible flows, but when
it's inside if statement, we can be smarter than that.

## Test Plan
Fixed existing and added new mdtests.
I went through some of mypy primer results and they look fine

---------

Co-authored-by: Carl Meyer <carl@astral.sh>
2025-05-16 11:59:21 +00:00
..
2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00
2025-05-03 19:49:15 +02:00