David Peter 948549fcdc [red-knot] Test: Hashable/Sized => A/B (#14769) ...

## Summary

Minor change that uses two plain classes `A` and `B` instead of
`typing.Sized` and `typing.Hashable`.

The motivation is twofold: I remember that I was confused when I first
saw this test. Was there anything specific to `Sized` and `Hashable`
that was relevant here? (there is, these classes are not overlapping;
and you can build a proper intersection from them; but that's true for
almost all non-builtin classes).

I now ran into another problem while working on #14758: `Sized` and
`Hashable` are protocols that we don't fully understand yet. This
causing some trouble when trying to infer whether these are fully-static
types or not.

2024-12-04 15:00:27 +01:00

..

resources

[red-knot] Deeper understanding of LiteralString (#14649)

2024-12-03 03:31:58 +00:00

src

[red-knot] Test: Hashable/Sized => A/B (#14769)

2024-12-04 15:00:27 +01:00

tests

mdtest: include test name in printed rerun command (#14684)

2024-11-30 11:01:06 +00:00

build.rs

Modernize build scripts (#13837)

2024-10-20 22:35:35 +01:00

Cargo.toml

[red-knot] Property tests (#14178)

2024-12-03 13:54:54 +01:00