Reduces the number of implementation branches handling `Range:full`,
deferring it to `PackageRange`.
Improves some user-facing messages, e.g. saying `all versions of
<package>` instead of `<package>*`.
Changes the member names of the `PackageRangeKind` enum — they were not
very clear.
## Summary
Installs the seed packages you get with `virtualenv`, but opt-in rather
than opt-out.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/852.
## Test Plan
```
❯ ./scripts/benchmarks/venv.sh
+ hyperfine --runs 20 --warmup 3 --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' './target/release/puffin venv' --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' 'virtualenv --without-pip .venv' --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' 'python -m venv --without-pip .venv'
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/puffin venv
Time (mean ± σ): 4.6 ms ± 0.2 ms [User: 2.4 ms, System: 3.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 4.3 ms … 4.9 ms 20 runs
Warning: Command took less than 5 ms to complete. Note that the results might be inaccurate because hyperfine can not calibrate the shell startup time much more precise than this limit. You can try to use the `-N`/`--shell=none` option to disable the shell completely.
Benchmark 2: virtualenv --without-pip .venv
Time (mean ± σ): 73.3 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 57.4 ms, System: 14.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 72.8 ms … 74.0 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 3: python -m venv --without-pip .venv
Time (mean ± σ): 22.5 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 17.0 ms, System: 4.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 22.0 ms … 23.2 ms 20 runs
Summary
'./target/release/puffin venv' ran
4.92 ± 0.20 times faster than 'python -m venv --without-pip .venv'
16.00 ± 0.63 times faster than 'virtualenv --without-pip .venv'
+ hyperfine --runs 20 --warmup 3 --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' './target/release/puffin venv --seed' --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' 'virtualenv .venv' --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' 'python -m venv .venv'
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/puffin venv --seed
Time (mean ± σ): 20.2 ms ± 0.4 ms [User: 8.6 ms, System: 15.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 19.7 ms … 21.2 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: virtualenv .venv
Time (mean ± σ): 135.1 ms ± 2.4 ms [User: 66.7 ms, System: 65.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 133.2 ms … 142.8 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 3: python -m venv .venv
Time (mean ± σ): 1.656 s ± 0.014 s [User: 1.447 s, System: 0.186 s]
Range (min … max): 1.641 s … 1.697 s 20 runs
Summary
'./target/release/puffin venv --seed' ran
6.67 ± 0.17 times faster than 'virtualenv .venv'
81.79 ± 1.70 times faster than 'python -m venv .venv'
```
## Summary
Our current setup uses the legacy `setup.py`-based builds if a
`pyproject.toml` file isn't present. This matches pip's behavior.
However, `pypa/build` uses PEP 517-based builds in such cases, and it
looks like pip plans to make that the default
(https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/9175), with the limiting factor
being performance issues related to isolated builds.
This is now the default behavior, but the `--legacy-setup-py` flag
allows users to opt-in to using `setup.py` directly for distributions
that lack a `pyproject.toml`.
## Summary
This PR adds support for `prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel`, which
allows us to determine source distribution metadata without building the
source distribution. This represents an optimization for the resolver,
as we can skip the expensive build phase for build backends that support
it.
For reference, `prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel` seems to be supported
by:
- `hatchling` (as of
[1.0.9](https://hatch.pypa.io/latest/history/hatchling/#hatchling-v1.9.0)).
- `flit`
- `setuptools`
In fact, it seems to work for every backend _except_ those using legacy
`setup.py`.
Closes#599.
## Summary
If pre-releases are available for a package that we otherwise couldn't
resolve, we now show a hint that includes one of the example versions.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/811.
Adjusts display of "no versions available" in error messages to be
consistent with other package/range pairings i.e. we usually display
"<package-name><range>".
This PR builds on #780 by making both version parsing faster, and
perhaps more importantly, making version comparisons much faster.
Overall, these changes result in a considerable improvement for the
`boto3.in` workload. Here's the status quo:
```
$ time puffin pip-compile --no-build --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/requirements/boto3.in
Resolved 31 packages in 34.56s
real 34.579
user 34.004
sys 0.413
maxmem 2867 MB
faults 0
```
And now with this PR:
```
$ time puffin pip-compile --no-build --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/requirements/boto3.in
Resolved 31 packages in 9.20s
real 9.218
user 8.919
sys 0.165
maxmem 463 MB
faults 0
```
This particular workload gets stuck in pubgrub doing resolution, and
thus benefits mightily from a faster `Version::cmp` routine. With that
said, this change does also help a fair bit with "normal" runs:
```
$ hyperfine -w10 \
"puffin-base pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in" \
"puffin-cmparc pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in"
Benchmark 1: puffin-base pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in
Time (mean ± σ): 337.5 ms ± 3.9 ms [User: 310.5 ms, System: 73.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 333.6 ms … 343.4 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: puffin-cmparc pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in
Time (mean ± σ): 189.8 ms ± 3.0 ms [User: 168.1 ms, System: 78.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 185.0 ms … 196.2 ms 15 runs
Summary
puffin-cmparc pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in ran
1.78 ± 0.03 times faster than puffin-base pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in
```
There is perhaps some future work here (detailed in the commit
messages), but I suspect it would be more fruitful to explore ways of
making resolution itself and/or deserialization faster.
Fixes#373, Closes#396
Uses new metadata added in https://github.com/zanieb/packse/pull/61 to
assert that resolution succeeded or failed _and_ that the installed
package versions match the expected result.
Previously, we just pulled the latest commit from `main` on every
update. This causes problems when you do not intend to update the
scenarios as in #787.
This bumps to the latest `packse` commit without new scenarios.
Adds support for a `PUFFIN_NO_WRAP` environment variable which disables
line wrapping in `miette` output.
We set this variable in the scenario tests to improve the readability of
snapshots.
I contributed the ability to disable line wrapping upstream at
https://github.com/zkat/miette/pull/328
This fixes a compilation error with tests on current `main`. I didn't
track down the exact provenance, but I'd guess it's the result of a
botched merge. (i.e., Two or more PRs that pass CI independently, but
when merged cause failures.)
Following #757, improves the script for generating scenario test cases
with:
- A requirements file
- Support for downloading packse scenarios from GitHub dynamically
- Running rustfmt on the generated test file
- Updating snapshots / running tests
As mentioned in #746, instead of just installing the scenario root we
will unpack the root dependencies into the install command to allow
better coverage of direct user requests with scenarios.
I added display of the package tree provided by each scenario.
Use a mustache template for iterative replacements.
Adds tests using packse test scenarios! Uses `test.pypi.org` as a
backing index.
Tests are generated by a simple Python script. Requires
https://github.com/zanieb/packse/pull/49.
This opens us to a slight attack surface, as we cannot force use of
`test.pypi.org` only and someone could register these package names on
the real `pypi.org` index with malicious content. I could publish these
packages there too.
## Summary
This PR modifies the resolver to treat the Python version as a package,
which allows for better error messages (since we no longer treat
incompatible packages as if they "don't exist at all").
There are a few tricky pieces here...
First, we need to track both the interpreter's Python version and the
_target_ Python version, because we support resolving for other versions
via `--python 3.7`.
Second, we allow using incompatible wheels during resolution, as long as
there's a compatible source distribution. So we still need to test for
`requires-python` compatibility when selecting distributions.
This could use more testing, but it feels like an area where `packse`
would be more productive than writing PyPI tests.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/406.
The test creates a cache from multiple sources and injects faults (once
using invalid data and once by making the files unreadable on the fs
level), then resolves again.
I didn't test git because it has its own locking and correctness logic.
The main drawback is that this test is slow (2.5s for me), we could
`#[ignore]` it.
We now show the fully-resolved URL, rather than the URL as given by the
user, _everywhere_ except for the output resolution file (which should
retain relative paths, unexpanded environment variables, etc.).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/687.
Separate branch for rebasing #677 onto main because i don't trust the
rebase enough to force push.
Closes#677.
---
If you install `black` from PyPI, then `-e ../black`, we need to
uninstall the existing `black`. This sounds simple, but that in turn
requires that we _know_ `-e ../black` maps to the package `black`, so
that we can mark it for uninstallation in the install plan. This, in
turn, means that we need to build editable dependencies prior to the
install plan.
This is just a bunch of reorganization to fix that specific bug
(installing multiple versions of `black` if you run through the above
workflow): we now run through the list of editables upfront, mark those
that are already installed, build those that aren't, and then ensure
that `InstallPlan` correctly removes those that need to be removed, etc.
Closes#676.
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Per the title: adds support for `-e` installs to `puffin pip-install`.
There were some challenges here around threading the editable installs
to the right places. Namely, we want to build _once_, then reuse the
editable installs from the resolution. At present, we were losing the
`editable: true` flag on the `Dist` that came back through the
resolution, so it required some changes to the resolver.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/672.