Commit Graph

61 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
konsti a7aa46acc5
Add a "choosing a build backend" section to the docs (#14295)
I think the build backend docs as a whole are now ready for review. I
only made a small change here.

---------

Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
2025-07-02 09:02:03 -05:00
Zanie Blue 87e9ccfb92
Bump version to 0.7.18 (#14402) 2025-07-01 15:30:44 -05:00
Zanie Blue b1812d111a
Edits to the build backend documentation (#14376)
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
2025-07-01 08:44:23 +00:00
Charlie Marsh 41c218a89b
Bump version to 0.7.17 (#14347) 2025-06-29 09:58:33 -04:00
Zanie Blue b6b7409d13
Bump version to 0.7.16 (#14334) 2025-06-27 16:46:36 -05:00
John Mumm 4ed9c5791b
Bump version to 0.7.15 (#14254) 2025-06-25 12:06:41 +02:00
Aria Desires 92de53f4eb
Bump version to 0.7.14 (#14218) 2025-06-23 12:48:51 -04:00
Zanie Blue 62ed17b230
Bump version to 0.7.13 (#14002) 2025-06-12 14:33:31 -05:00
konsti 7316bd01a3
Build backend: Support namespace packages (#13833)
Unlike regular packages, specifying all `__init__.py` directories for a
namespace package would be very verbose There is e.g.
https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/tree/main/src/poetry, which has
18 modules, or https://github.com/googleapis/api-common-protos which is
inconsistently nested. For both the Google Cloud SDK, there are both
packages with a single module and those with complex structures, with
many having multiple modules due to versioning through `<module>_v1`
versioning. The Azure SDK seems to use one module per package (it's not
explicitly documented but seems to follow from the process in
https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/python_design.html#azure-sdk-distribution-packages
and
ccb0e03a3d/doc/dev/packaging.md).

For simplicity with complex projects, we add a `namespace = true` switch
which disabled checking for an `__init__.py`. We only check that there's
no `<module_root>/<module_name>/__init__.py` and otherwise add the whole
`<module_root>/<module_name>` folder. This comes at the cost of
`namespace = true` effectively creating an opt-out from our usual checks
that allows creating an almost entirely arbitrary package.

For simple projects with only a single module, the module name can be
dotted to point to the target module, so the build still gets checked:

```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = "poetry.core"
```

## Alternatives

### Declare all packages

We could make `module-name` a list and allow or require declaring all
packages:

```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = ["cloud_sdk.service.storage", "cloud_sdk.service.storage_v1", "cloud_sdk.billing.storage"]
```

Or for Poetry:

```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = [
    "poetry.config",
    "poetry.console",
    "poetry.inspection",
    "poetry.installation",
    "poetry.json",
    "poetry.layouts",
    "poetry.masonry",
    "poetry.mixology",
    "poetry.packages",
    "poetry.plugins",
    "poetry.publishing",
    "poetry.puzzle",
    "poetry.pyproject",
    "poetry.repositories",
    "poetry.toml",
    "poetry.utils",
    "poetry.vcs",
    "poetry.version"
]
```

### Support multiple namespaces

We could also allow namespace packages with multiple root level module:

```toml
[tool.uv.build-backend]
module-name = ["cloud_sdk.my_ext", "local_sdk.my_ext"]
```

For lack of use cases, we delegate this to creating a workspace with one
package per module.

## Implementation

Due to the more complex options for the module name, I'm moving
verification on deserialization later, dropping the source span we'd get
from serde. We also don't show similarly named directories anymore.

---------

Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
2025-06-12 17:23:58 +00:00
Zanie Blue dc3fd46472
Bump version to 0.7.12 (#13892) 2025-06-06 19:42:06 +00:00
Zanie Blue 262ca73965
Remove the configuration section in favor of concepts / reference (#13842)
Extends https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/13841 — I'll drop that
commit later after that pull request merges but it's small.

I find the split into a "Configuration" section awkward and don't think
it's helping us. Everything moved into the "Concepts" section, except
the "Environment variables" page which definitely belongs in the
reference and the "Installer" page which is fairly niche and seems
better in the reference.

Before / After


<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80d8304b-17da-4900-a5f4-c3ccac96fcc5"
width="400">
2025-06-05 17:09:49 +00:00