<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
remove redundant words in comment
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Signed-off-by: jingchanglu <jingchanglu@outlook.com>
This allows you to specify requires-python on individual dependency-groups,
with the intended usecase being "oh my dev-dependencies have a higher
requires-python than my actual project".
This includes a large driveby move of the RequiresPython type to
uv-distribution-types to allow us to generate the appropriate markers at
this point in the code. It also migrates RequiresPython from
pubgrub::Range to version_ranges::Ranges, and makes several pub(crate)
items pub, as it's no longer defined in uv_resolver.
Fixes#11606
Rustfmt introduces a lot of formatting changes in the 2024 edition. To
not break everything all at once, we split out the set of formatting
changes compatible with both the 2021 and 2024 edition by first
formatting with the 2024 style, and then again with the currently used
2021 style.
Notable changes are the formatting of derive macro attributes and lines
with overly long strings and adding trailing semicolons after statements
consistently.
## Summary
This PR errors out when an Unknown Dependency Object Specifier is used
in dependency groups.
Fixes#12638
## Test Plan
The current behaviour is as follows:
```bash
➜ example git:(12638/dependency-object-specifier) ✗ cargo run -- sync
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.21s
Running `/home/luna/Documents/uv/target/debug/uv sync`
error: Failed to generate package metadata for `example==0.1.0 @ virtual+.`
Caused by: Group `bar` contains a Dependency Object Specifier, which is not supported by uv
```
And the pyproject.toml to produce this is:
```toml
[project]
name = "example"
version = "0.1.0"
description = "Add your description here"
readme = "README.md"
requires-python = ">=3.13.2"
dependencies = []
[dependency-groups]
foo = ["pyparsing"]
bar = [{set-phasers-to = "stun"}]
```
This PR is in support of #12005, where we need to import
`DependencyGroups` in the `uv-pypi-types` crate without a circular
dependency on `uv-workspace`.
## Summary
This is necessary for some future improvements to non-`[project]`
workspaces and PEP 723 scripts. It's not "breaking", but it will
invalidate lockfiles for non-`[project]` workspaces. I think that's
okay, since we consider those legacy right now, and they're really rare.
## Summary
This PR enables something like the "final boss" of PyTorch setups --
explicit support for CPU vs. GPU-enabled variants via extras:
```toml
[project]
name = "project"
version = "0.1.0"
requires-python = ">=3.13.0"
dependencies = []
[project.optional-dependencies]
cpu = [
"torch==2.5.1+cpu",
]
gpu = [
"torch==2.5.1",
]
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = [
{ index = "torch-cpu", extra = "cpu" },
{ index = "torch-gpu", extra = "gpu" },
]
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "torch-cpu"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu"
explicit = true
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "torch-gpu"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu124"
explicit = true
[tool.uv]
conflicts = [
[
{ extra = "cpu" },
{ extra = "gpu" },
],
]
```
It builds atop the conflicting extras work to allow sources to be marked
as specific to a dedicated extra being enabled or disabled.
As part of this work, sources now have an `extra` field. If a source has
an `extra`, it means that the source is only applied to the requirement
when defined within that optional group. For example, `{ index =
"torch-cpu", extra = "cpu" }` above only applies to
`"torch==2.5.1+cpu"`.
The `extra` field does _not_ mean that the source is "enabled" when the
extra is activated. For example, this wouldn't work:
```toml
[project]
name = "project"
version = "0.1.0"
requires-python = ">=3.13.0"
dependencies = ["torch"]
[tool.uv.sources]
torch = [
{ index = "torch-cpu", extra = "cpu" },
{ index = "torch-gpu", extra = "gpu" },
]
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "torch-cpu"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu"
explicit = true
[[tool.uv.index]]
name = "torch-gpu"
url = "https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu124"
explicit = true
```
In this case, the sources would effectively be ignored. Extras are
really confusing... but I think this is correct? We don't want enabling
or disabling extras to affect resolution information that's _outside_ of
the relevant optional group.
## Summary
We already support `tool.uv.dev-dependencies` in the legacy
non-`[project]` projects. This adds equivalent support for
`[dependency-groups]`, e.g.:
```toml
[tool.uv.workspace]
[dependency-groups]
lint = ["ruff"]
```
荆长逯
Aria Desires
Charlie Marsh
konsti
Chandra Kiran G
John Mumm