Close#6314
## Summary
Continuing from #7592. Created a new PR to rebase the old branch with
`main`, cleaned up test errors, and improved readability.
## Test Plan
Same test cases as in #7592.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
I updated the Github Actions integration guide to run Github's
`setup-python` before Astral's `setup-uv`, as `setup-uv`'s
`activate-environment: true` doesn't work with the original ordering.
There is a discussion about this behavior in the `setup-uv` repo
[here](https://github.com/astral-sh/setup-uv/issues/479).
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Update the documentation for the Github Actions integration. Caveat: I'm
unsure if there are any other reasons where the original ordering (that
is,`setup-uv` before `setup-python`) might be preferred.
## Test Plan
Tested in a private Github Actions push, as documented in the
aforementioned discussion on `setup-uv`'s repo. Confirmed that removing
`source .venv/bin/activate` and replacing it with `activate-environment:
true` now works in this ordering (but didn't work with the original
ordering where `uv` installs before Github's `python`).
Closes#13057
Sets `UV_TOOL_BIN_DIR` to `/usr/local/bin` for all derived images to
allow `uv tool install` to work out of the box.
Note, when the default image user is overwritten (e.g. `USER <UID>`) by
a less privileged one, an alternative writable location would now need
to be set by downstream consumers to prevent issues, hence I'm labeling
this as a breaking change for 0.8.x release.
Relates to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv-docker-example/pull/55
Each image was tested to work with uv tool with `UV_TOOL_BIN_DIR` set to
`/usr/local/bin` with the default root user and alternative non-root
users to confirm breaking nature of the change.
This adds `alpha`, `beta`, `rc`, `stable`, `post`, and `dev` modes to
`uv version --bump`.
The components that `--bump` accepts are ordered as follows:
major > minor > patch > stable > alpha > beta > rc > post > dev
Bumping a component "clears" all lesser component (`alpha`, `beta`, and
`rc` all overwrite each other):
* `--bump minor` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.3.0`
* `--bump alpha` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3a5`
* `--bump dev ` on `1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3a4.post5.dev7`
In addition, `--bump` can now be repeated. The primary motivation of
this is "bump stable version and also enter a prerelease", but it
technically lets you express other things if you want them:
* `--bump patch --bump alpha` on `1.2.3` => `1.2.4a1` ("bump patch
version and go to alpha 1")
* `--bump minor --bump patch` on `1.2.3` => `1.3.1` ("bump minor version
and got to patch 1")
* `--bump minor --bump minor` on `1.2.3` => `1.4.0` ("bump minor version
twice")
The `--bump` flags are sorted by their priority, so that you don't need
to remember the priority yourself. This ordering is the only "useful"
one that preserves every `--bump` you passed, so there's no concern
about loss of expressiveness. For instance `--bump minor --bump major`
would just be `--bump major` if we didn't sort, as the major bump clears
the minor version. The ordering of `beta` after `alpha` means `--bump
alpha --bump beta` will just result in beta 1; this is the one case
where a bump request will effectively get overwritten.
The `stable` mode "bumps to the next stable release", clearing the pre
(`alpha`, `beta`, `rc`), `dev`, and `post` components from a version
(`1.2.3a4.post5.dev6` => `1.2.3`). The choice to clear `post` here is a
bit odd, in that `1.2.3.post4` => `1.2.3` is actually a version
decrease, but I think this gives a more intuitive model (as preserving
`post5` in the previous example is definitely wrong), and also
post-releases are extremely obscure so probably no one will notice. In
the cases where this behaviour isn't useful, you probably wanted to pass
`--bump patch` or something anyway which *should* definitely clear the
`post5` (putting it another way: the only cases where `--bump stable`
has dubious behaviour is when you wanted it to do a noop, which, is a
command you could have just not written at all).
In all cases we preserve the "epoch" and "local" components of a
version, so the `7!` and `+local` in `7!1.2.3+local` will never be
modified by `--bump` (you can use the raw version set mode if you want
to touch those). The preservation of `local` is another slightly odd
choice, but it's a really obscure feature (so again it mostly won't come
up) and when it's used it seems to mostly be used for referring to
variant releases, in which case preserving it tends to be correct.
Fixes#13223
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
This PR intends to enable `--torch-backend=auto` to detect Intel GPUs
automatically:
- On Linux, detection is performed using the `lspci` command via
`Display controller` id.
- On Windows, ~~detection is done via a `powershell` query to
`Win32_VideoController`~~. Skip support for now—revisit once a better
solution is available.
Currently, Intel GPUs (XPU) do not rely on specific driver or toolkit
versions to distribute different PyTorch wheels.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
On Linux:
~~On Windows:
~~
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This change adds a link to PyPI FAQ about API tokens on the package
publishing guide page. To me it wasn't clear what are meant in this
section of the docs and it required a little bit of research. Adding
explicit link might help beginners.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Bychkov <dbychkov@alarislabs.com>
## Summary
Allows `--torch-backend=auto` to detect AMD GPUs. The approach is fairly
well-documented inline, but I opted for `rocm_agent_enumerator` over
(e.g.) `rocminfo` since it seems to be the recommended approach for
scripting:
https://rocm.docs.amd.com/projects/rocminfo/en/latest/how-to/use-rocm-agent-enumerator.html.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/14086.
## Test Plan
```
root@rocm-jupyter-gpu-mi300x1-192gb-devcloud-atl1:~# ./uv-linux-libc-11fb582c5c046bae09766ceddd276dcc5bb41218/uv pip install torch --torch-backend=auto
Resolved 11 packages in 251ms
Prepared 2 packages in 6ms
Installed 11 packages in 257ms
+ filelock==3.18.0
+ fsspec==2025.5.1
+ jinja2==3.1.6
+ markupsafe==3.0.2
+ mpmath==1.3.0
+ networkx==3.5
+ pytorch-triton-rocm==3.3.1
+ setuptools==80.9.0
+ sympy==1.14.0
+ torch==2.7.1+rocm6.3
+ typing-extensions==4.14.0
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Replace wrong `cuda124` version to the correct `cuda128` version in
torch docs
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
> NOTE: The PRs that were merged into this feature branch have all been
independently reviewed. But it's also useful to see all of the changes
in their final form. I've added comments to significant changes
throughout the PR to aid discussion.
This PR introduces transparent Python version upgrades to uv, allowing
for a smoother experience when upgrading to new patch versions.
Previously, upgrading Python patch versions required manual updates to
each virtual environment. Now, virtual environments can transparently
upgrade to newer patch versions.
Due to significant changes in how uv installs and executes managed
Python executables, this functionality is initially available behind a
`--preview` flag. Once an installation has been made upgradeable through
`--preview`, subsequent operations (like `uv venv -p 3.10` or patch
upgrades) will work without requiring the flag again. This is
accomplished by checking for the existence of a minor version symlink
directory (or junction on Windows).
### Features
* New `uv python upgrade` command to upgrade installed Python versions
to the latest available patch release:
```
# Upgrade specific minor version
uv python upgrade 3.12 --preview
# Upgrade all installed minor versions
uv python upgrade --preview
```
* Transparent upgrades also occur when installing newer patch versions:
```
uv python install 3.10.8 --preview
# Automatically upgrades existing 3.10 environments
uv python install 3.10.18
```
* Support for transparently upgradeable Python `bin` installations via
`--preview` flag
```
uv python install 3.13 --preview
# Automatically upgrades the `bin` installation if there is a newer patch version available
uv python upgrade 3.13 --preview
```
* Virtual environments can still be tied to a patch version if desired
(ignoring patch upgrades):
```
uv venv -p 3.10.8
```
### Implementation
Transparent upgrades are implemented using:
* Minor version symlink directories (Unix) or junctions (Windows)
* On Windows, trampolines simulate paths with junctions
* Symlink directory naming follows Python build standalone format: e.g.,
`cpython-3.10-macos-aarch64-none`
* Upgrades are scoped to the minor version key (as represented in the
naming format: implementation-minor version+variant-os-arch-libc)
* If the context does not provide a patch version request and the
interpreter is from a managed CPython installation, the `Interpreter`
used by `uv python run` will use the full symlink directory executable
path when available, enabling transparently upgradeable environments
created with the `venv` module (`uv run python -m venv`)
New types:
* `PythonMinorVersionLink`: in a sense, the core type for this PR, this
is a representation of a minor version symlink directory (or junction on
Windows) that points to the highest installed managed CPython patch
version for a minor version key.
* `PythonInstallationMinorVersionKey`: provides a view into a
`PythonInstallationKey` that excludes the patch and prerelease. This is
used for grouping installations by minor version key (e.g., to find the
highest available patch installation for that minor version key) and for
minor version directory naming.
### Compatibility
* Supports virtual environments created with:
* `uv venv`
* `uv run python -m venv` (using managed Python that was installed or
upgraded with `--preview`)
* Virtual environments created within these environments
* Existing virtual environments from before these changes continue to
work but aren't transparently upgradeable without being recreated
* Supports both standard Python (`python3.10`) and freethreaded Python
(`python3.10t`)
* Support for transparently upgrades is currently only available for
managed CPython installations
Closes#7287Closes#7325Closes#7892Closes#9031Closes#12977
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I follow the advices from the IDE spell checker and grammar checker, fix
some typos, and improve the docs.
Extends https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/13841 — I'll drop that
commit later after that pull request merges but it's small.
I find the split into a "Configuration" section awkward and don't think
it's helping us. Everything moved into the "Concepts" section, except
the "Environment variables" page which definitely belongs in the
reference and the "Installer" page which is fairly niche and seems
better in the reference.
Before / After
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80d8304b-17da-4900-a5f4-c3ccac96fcc5"
width="400">
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
This change adds a new integration guide, on using uv with marimo
notebooks. It is similar to but simpler than the existing Jupyter guide,
since marimo stores notebooks as Python files and also integrates
tightly with uv for package management.
The guide showcases four ways of using uv with marimo:
1. marimo as a standalone tool (`uvx`)
2. managing inline script metadata (an alternative to Jupyter kernels,
marimo has no concept of kernels)
3. in project environments
4. in non-project environments
## Test Plan
N/A as this is a docs-only change.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
When creating the `.pre-commit-config.yaml` from scratch, although
following https://pre-commit.com/, it might be easy to overlook that the
pre-commit repo examples need to be added below the `repos` list item to
get a valid `yaml` file.
Additionally, updated the version of the first two examples.
## Test Plan
I followed the `CONTRIBUTING.md` and the result looked fine.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Now that Python 3.14 first beta is out, I think it's worth adding
support for the official upstream RC images.
Once 3.14 is released, we can remove the `-rc-` infix from the images we
pull from.
## Test Plan
Upstream images verified to be functional with uv.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Documentation only. Adds a section in scripts.md about running uv
scripts with a shebang line
## Test Plan
n/a
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Incorrect use of the indefinite article- 'an project' instead of 'a
project'
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Was not tested due to it being a small change to docs wording without
change in formatting.
## Summary
Replace `--frozen` with `--locked` in Docker integration guide.
`--locked` additionally validates that `uv.lock` is "fresh"/up to date,
which will catch errors if the user accidentally updated
`pyproject.toml` but did not run `uv lock` before building the
container. This is probably a better/safer default to recommend to users
to avoid surprising/incorrect behavior.
## References
- External guides already recommend using `--locked` instead of
`--frozen`
- https://hynek.me/articles/docker-uv/
- @zanieb seemed to indicate they might agree that `--locked` would be
better to avoid surprises
- https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10793#issuecomment-2743956736
## Test Plan
Used `--locked` in `uv` Python projects using Docker and validated that
it works as expected.
Currently, for users to specify at the command line whether to use
uv-managed or system Python interpreters, they use the
`--python-preference` parameter, which takes four possible values. This
is more complex than necessary since the normal case is to either say
"only managed" or "not managed". This PR hides the old
`--python-preference` parameter from help and documentation and adds two
new flags: `--managed-python` and `--no-managed-python` to capture the
"only managed" and "not managed" cases.
I have successfully tested this locally but currently cannot add
snapshot tests because of problems with distinguishing managed vs.
system interpreters in CI (and non-determinism when run on different
developers' machines). The `--python-preference` test in
`tool-install.rs` is currently ignored for this reason. See #5144 and
#7473.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Update this example snippet adding test.pypi.org as a publishing index
to mark the index with `explicit = true`. This will help prevent users
from unexpected behavior if no other indices are defined and users don't
select a different index selection algorithm (with `--index-strategy`).
When `test.pypi.org` is the selected index for package management,
packages resolve to odd versions like 0.0.1 and `uv` spits out lots of
errors.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
N/A, documentation only change
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
Follow up to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/11888 with added
support for uv tool run.
Changes
* Added functionality for running windows scripts in previous PR was
moved from run.rs to uv_shell::runnable.
* EXE was added as a supported type, this simplified integration across
both uv run and uvx while retaining a backwards compatible behavior and
properly prioritizing .exe over others. Name was adjusted to runnable as
a result to better represent intent.
## Test Plan
New tests added.
## Documentation
Added new documentation.
## Summary
This is roughly equivalent, but gets the non-`+cpu` macOS build from the
PyTorch index rather than PyPI. It seems a bit simpler? Though up for
debate.
## Summary
Closes#9867.
Update alternative indexes documentation to use `[[tool.uv.index]]` and
the associated environment variables instead of `UV_INDEX`.
This also globally reworks the documentation by:
- adding AWS CodeArtifact keyring example
- adding packages publishing examples for all providers
- making it more consistent for all providers
It might be best to show how to publish packages only once for all
providers, but the publish URL usually being different than the URL used
to retrieve packages, even if this duplicates things, it might still be
more straightforward for users to see exactly what is needed for each
provider.
## Test Plan
Manually tested retrieving packages from AWS CodeArtifact and GCP
Artifact Registry using both token and keyring.
Could not test:
- Publishing packages
- Azure Artifacts (not using it at all)
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Zanie Blue
smeng9
Charlie Marsh
Aaron Ang
Ali Chaudry
samypr100
Geoffrey Thomas
Aria Desires
Arthur Kim
Yu, Guangye
theirix
Ondrej Profant
Daniel Vianna
John Mumm
dmitry-bychkov
Lucas Vittor
Jack O'Connor
FishAlchemist
Lan, Jian
Karim Abou Zeid
Abhishek Upadhye
Akshay Agrawal
konsti
Eva Müller
Arne Küderle
Reza Gharibi
Samay Kapadia
Deividas / Dunixas
johnthagen
Shlomo
Maxime
Eric Johnson
Mathieu Kniewallner