## Summary
Replace `--frozen` with `--locked` in Docker integration guide.
`--locked` additionally validates that `uv.lock` is "fresh"/up to date,
which will catch errors if the user accidentally updated
`pyproject.toml` but did not run `uv lock` before building the
container. This is probably a better/safer default to recommend to users
to avoid surprising/incorrect behavior.
## References
- External guides already recommend using `--locked` instead of
`--frozen`
- https://hynek.me/articles/docker-uv/
- @zanieb seemed to indicate they might agree that `--locked` would be
better to avoid surprises
- https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10793#issuecomment-2743956736
## Test Plan
Used `--locked` in `uv` Python projects using Docker and validated that
it works as expected.
Currently, for users to specify at the command line whether to use
uv-managed or system Python interpreters, they use the
`--python-preference` parameter, which takes four possible values. This
is more complex than necessary since the normal case is to either say
"only managed" or "not managed". This PR hides the old
`--python-preference` parameter from help and documentation and adds two
new flags: `--managed-python` and `--no-managed-python` to capture the
"only managed" and "not managed" cases.
I have successfully tested this locally but currently cannot add
snapshot tests because of problems with distinguishing managed vs.
system interpreters in CI (and non-determinism when run on different
developers' machines). The `--python-preference` test in
`tool-install.rs` is currently ignored for this reason. See #5144 and
#7473.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Update this example snippet adding test.pypi.org as a publishing index
to mark the index with `explicit = true`. This will help prevent users
from unexpected behavior if no other indices are defined and users don't
select a different index selection algorithm (with `--index-strategy`).
When `test.pypi.org` is the selected index for package management,
packages resolve to odd versions like 0.0.1 and `uv` spits out lots of
errors.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
N/A, documentation only change
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
Follow up to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/11888 with added
support for uv tool run.
Changes
* Added functionality for running windows scripts in previous PR was
moved from run.rs to uv_shell::runnable.
* EXE was added as a supported type, this simplified integration across
both uv run and uvx while retaining a backwards compatible behavior and
properly prioritizing .exe over others. Name was adjusted to runnable as
a result to better represent intent.
## Test Plan
New tests added.
## Documentation
Added new documentation.
## Summary
This is roughly equivalent, but gets the non-`+cpu` macOS build from the
PyTorch index rather than PyPI. It seems a bit simpler? Though up for
debate.
## Summary
Closes#9867.
Update alternative indexes documentation to use `[[tool.uv.index]]` and
the associated environment variables instead of `UV_INDEX`.
This also globally reworks the documentation by:
- adding AWS CodeArtifact keyring example
- adding packages publishing examples for all providers
- making it more consistent for all providers
It might be best to show how to publish packages only once for all
providers, but the publish URL usually being different than the URL used
to retrieve packages, even if this duplicates things, it might still be
more straightforward for users to see exactly what is needed for each
provider.
## Test Plan
Manually tested retrieving packages from AWS CodeArtifact and GCP
Artifact Registry using both token and keyring.
Could not test:
- Publishing packages
- Azure Artifacts (not using it at all)
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Just to add the section for installing and upgrading uv tool, specifying
the Python version, in the document.
Originally, it was planned to add a markdown block (header) for
representation, but it was felt to be a bit redundant, so it ended up
being like this.
close https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11536
## Test Plan
Run doc server with strict mode in local. (``mkdocs serve -f
mkdocs.public.yml --strict``)
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Signed-off-by: FishAlchemist <48265002+FishAlchemist@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Initially it seemed like `app.py` might be slightly more desirable but
people seem to overwhelmingly favour `main.py` as a good "generic" name.
Fixes#7782
## Summary
The [current scripts docs
page](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/guides/scripts/) doesn't include detail
on how to use a custom package index when setting up a script. I believe
this might be because it didn't use to work (see #6688 ) but it now does
(thanks for that, by the way! 😄)
Given it's a useful feature, I suggest adding a quick example to the
scripts page, with the details of authentication, etc. left to the main
`indexes.md` doc.
I'd also suggests that this closes#6688, though it doesn't actually add
that feature - that appears to have already been done :)
## Test Plan
No testing is needed, I think!
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Use `UV_INDEX` instead of the deprecated `UV_EXTRA_INDEX_URL`.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
It is a minor documentation change.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
It turns out activating the kernel does not change `VIRTUAL_ENV`, so we
still install into the environment the Jupyter environment, rather than
the project environment.
Unfortunately, after this change, we do still show a warning on `uv
add`:
```
warning: `VIRTUAL_ENV=/Users/crmarsh/.cache/uv/archive-v0/3bddKDdYXuX2w57Fu6itL` does not match the project environment path `.venv` and will be ignored
```
`uv pip install` works without warning.
Closes#11154.
## Summary
Maybe slightly controversial because it's more verbose, but we really
want to limit these indexes to Linux and Windows, rather than ignoring
them on Darwin. E.g., we'd also want to ignore them on other platforms.
Further down, I use markers that look like this in the more complete
examples, so this feels more consistent.
This PR rewords the instructions for using uv in a container. I'm a new
user and was somewhat confused by it, so I've rewritten it as I'd have
liked to have read it.
It makes it more clear what distroless means, to avoid confusion with
other projects that ship OS files with an image with its tag name clear
of qualifiers(`astral-sh/uv`, in this case). An example of that is
caddy, which ships with alpine.
This also modifies the original example to use a distroful image instead
of distroless one while #8635 doesn't get resolved.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
The latter issue has been closed in favour of the former, so just link
the one issue Dependabot is using to track this.
## Test Plan
N/A
---
Thanks!
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
As requested in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6565, this adds a
tip discussing the ability to pin the image to a specific SHA digest and
why it may be useful.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Start serving the documentation locally
```shell
uvx --with-requirements docs/requirements.txt -- mkdocs serve -f mkdocs.public.yml
```
Then navigate to http://127.0.0.1:8000/uv/guides/integration/docker/ to
see the tool tip being rendered properly
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Added missing `repos:` line to make the example config complete
---------
Co-authored-by: Rajesh Veeranki <rveeranki@d4q74qfn2y.agoda.local>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
rooster should pick those up, but those 2 references were added to 0.5.8
while a 0.5.9 was already released
(f5add0ca5e),
so they never got bumped automatically.
I've searched for other cases like this in the documentation on other
versions, just in case, and it seems that this is the only case.
* Previously had uv python install, then uv sync --all-extras --dev
* If we are going to use sync for dev dependencies, then the install
step is unneccessary
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
## Summary
This is yet another variation on
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/9928, with a few minor changes:
1. It only applies to local versions (e.g., `2.5.1+cpu`).
2. It only _considers_ the non-local version as an alternative (e.g.,
`2.5.1`).
3. It only _considers_ the non-local alternative if it _does_ support
the unsupported platform.
4. Instead of failing, it falls back to using the local version.
So, this is far less strict, and is effectively designed to solve
PyTorch but nothing else. It's also not user-configurable, except by way
of using `environments` to exclude platforms.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonne <jonne.haapalainen@gmail.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Existing documentation on how to apply a matrix strategy over the python
version in a github workflow is incomplete and possibly misleading. This
PR deletes the existing section and creates a new one to reflect current
best practice. See https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9376.
## Test Plan
N/A, only docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
When going through the docs at
https://docs.astral.sh/uv/guides/install-python/#automatic-python-downloads,
when you try to copy and paste the example on Windows, in either
PowerShell or cmd.exe the example won't work.
Inverting the quotes fixes it, and still works on other shells (I only
tried bash under wsl)
## Test Plan
On any windows system, from powershell, running the example yields the
following error:
```
> uv run --python 3.12 python -c 'print("hello world")'
File "<string>", line 1
print(hello world)
^^^^^^^^^^^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax. Perhaps you forgot a comma?
```
on cmd.exe
```
> uv run --python 3.12 python -c 'print("hello world")'
```
(there is no output)
Inverting the quotes on powershell
```
> uv run --python 3.12 python -c "print('hello world')"
hello world
```
on cmd.exe
```
> uv run --python 3.12 python -c "print('hello world')"
hello world
```
<!-- How was it tested? -->
When publishing, we currently ask the user to set `--publish-url` to the
upload URL and `--check-url` to the simple index URL, or the equivalent
configuration keys. But that's redundant with the `[[tool.uv.index]]`
declaration. Instead, we extend `[[tool.uv.index]]` with a `publish-url`
entry and allow passing `uv publish --index <name>`.
`uv publish --index <name>` requires the `pyproject.toml` to be present
when publishing, unlike using `--publish-url ... --check-url ...` which
can be used e.g. in CI without a checkout step. `--index` also always
uses the check URL feature to aid upload consistency.
The documentation tries to explain both approaches together, which
overlap for the check URL feature.
Fixes#8864
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Update the docs for the GitLab integration, to make it clear that an
entrypoint has to be specified, when a distroless image is being used.
## Test Plan
Without specifying an entrypoint when using a distroless image:
<img
src=https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/35499bd5-51d8-4016-b1d0-2d56956f82e6
width=500>
_It works if you either specify the entrypoint or if the image used in
not a distroless one._
Co-authored-by: Tsafaras <konstantinos@valuechecker.ai>
- Adds a collapsible section for the project concept
- Splits the project concept document into several child documents.
- Moves the workspace and dependencies documents to under the project
section
- Adds a mkdocs plugin for redirects, so links to the moved documents
still work
I attempted to make the minimum required changes to the contents of the
documents here. There is a lot of room for improvement on the content of
each new child document. For review purposes, I want to do that work
separately. I'd prefer if the review focused on this structure and idea
rather than the content of the files.
I expect to do this to other documentation pages that would otherwise be
very nested.
The project concept landing page and nav (collapsed by default) looks
like this now:
<img width="1507" alt="Screenshot 2024-11-14 at 11 28 45 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/88288b09-8463-49d4-84ba-ee27144b62a5">
## Summary
Now that we have all the pieces in place, this PR adds some dedicated
documentation to enable a variety of PyTorch setups.
This PR is downstream of #6523 and builds on the content in there; #6523
will merge first, and this PR will follow.
Hello there! First real docs PR for uv.
1. I expect this will be rewritten a gazillion times to have a
consistent tone with the rest of the docs, despite me trying to stick to
it as best as I could. Feel free to edit!
2. I went super on the verbose mode, while also providing a callout with
a TLDR on top. Scrap anything you feel it's redundant!
3. I placed the guide under `integrations` since Charlie added the
FastAPI integration there.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Addresses #5945
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I just looked at the docs on the dev server of mkdocs if it looked nice.
**I could not test the commands that I wrote work** outside of macOS. If
someone among contributors has a Windows/Linux laptop, it should be
enough, even for the GPU-supported versions: I expect the installation
will just break once torch checks for CUDA (perhaps even at runtime).
---------
Co-authored-by: Santiago Castro <bryant1410@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
Figured this could be helpful to mention in the documentation, as it
might not be obvious that this is possible.
## Test Plan
Tested the commands locally.
This pull request includes updates to the `docs/guides/tools.md` file to
provide more detailed instructions on how to pull from a git repository
using different options, using the `git+https` scheme support.
It follows [asking a question in the Discord
chat](https://discord.com/channels/1039017663004942429/1060247592765759518/1303270516588806214)
and getting some useful guidance that was not in the docs, but makes
some very useful features of `uv` easier to discover.
## Summary
Tweaks to documentation:
* Added instructions on how to pull the latest commit from a specific
named branch.
* Added instructions on how to pull a specific tag.
* Added instructions on how to pull a specific commit.
## Summary
This commit adds Google Artifact Registry authentication instructions
for both basic HTTP authentication and keyring methods.
## Test Plan
Locally tested using both methods.
## Summary
Renovate recently gained support for updating dependencies defined using
PEP 723 (https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/pull/31266). Since uv
supports this format, I thought it could be nice to mention support for
it in the integrations documentation as well. I took the occasion to
make the page a bit more structured as well.
## Test Plan
Ran Renovate on https://github.com/mkniewallner/renovate-pep723, which
created https://github.com/mkniewallner/renovate-pep723/pull/2 that
updates a dependency defined using PEP 723. But I'll re-run some tests
again once the changes are released on Renovate cloud GitHub app just in
case.
## Summary
This is a trivial, one line documentation change that fixes the
following documentation bug.
The current documentation suggests this for adding a git dependency
```
# Add a git dependency
uv add requests --git https://github.com/psf/requests
```
Executing what is suggested with `uv` version `0.4.18` results in this
error message
```
uv add requests --git https://github.com/psf/requests
error: unexpected argument '--git' found
```
The working approach is to add the git depency like this:
```
uv add git+https://github.com/psf/requests
```
## Test Plan
I manually tested the command suggested currently in the guide against
my change.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Documentation for GitLab integration, reliant on the new tags introduced
in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6053
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: David Fritzsche <9479371+davidfritzsche@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
It was all too easy to just copy the non-qualified name of the Docker
images and wonder why they couldn't be found – well, because they're on
`ghcr.io`, and you need to read the prose before the list to figure that
out.
## Test Plan
No plan.
Charlie Marsh
johnthagen
Zanie Blue
Shlomo
Maxime
John Mumm
Eric Johnson
samypr100
Mathieu Kniewallner
Aria Desires
FishAlchemist
Lewis
Valentin Oliver Loftsson
Martijn Pieters
Danilo Rezende
Florian Greinacher
Bob Whitelock
Ryan
Paul
3sh V
sergue1
csteiner
renovate[bot]
Udi Oron
Zach Kurtz
Jim Kutter
konsti
Konstantinos
baggiponte
RafaelWO
Chris Adams
Stevie Gayet
Aditya Pratap Singh
Sigurd Spieckermann
Volker Hilsenstein
Victorien
Jonas Vacek
Javad Zarezadeh
Aarni Koskela