## Summary
Addressing this [issue](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5147) by
adding the capability for Symbolic linking as a link mode when
installing or syncing dependencies.
## Summary
Write the project guide that was added in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5135.
I tried to expand on details as much as I felt was necessary for someone
new to python package managers (which was myself a couple months ago).
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Currently, `uv` refuses to install anything on GraalPy. This is
currently blocking GraalPy testing with cibuildwheel, since manylinux
includes both `uv` and `graalpy` (but doesn't test with `uv`), whereas
cibuildwheel defaults to `uv`. See e.g.
https://github.com/pypa/cibuildwheel/actions/runs/9956369360/job/27506182952?pr=1538
where it gives
```
+ python -m build /project/sample_proj --wheel --outdir=/tmp/cibuildwheel/built_wheel --installer=uv
* Creating isolated environment: venv+uv...
* Using external uv from /usr/local/bin/uv
* Installing packages in isolated environment:
- setuptools >= 40.8.0
> /usr/local/bin/uv pip install "setuptools >= 40.8.0"
< error: Unknown implementation: `graalpy`
```
## Test Plan
I simply based the GraalPy support on PyPy and added some small tests.
I'm open to discussing how to test this. GraalPy is available for
manylinux images and with setup-python, so we should be able to add
tests against it to the CI. I locally confirmed by installing `uv` into
a GraalPy venv and then trying things like `uv pip install Pillow` and
testing those extensions.
## Summary
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5124.
## Test Plan
Ran `cargo run -- help pip compile` on my Windows machine, which failed
before but succeeds after this change.
## Summary
You can now use `uv run --locked` to assert that the lockfile doesn't
change, or `uv run --frozen` to run without attempting to update the
lockfile at all.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5185.
As user, you specify a list of extras. Internally, we decompose this
into one virtual package per extra. We currently leak this abstraction
by writing one entry per extra to the lockfile:
```toml
[[distribution]]
name = "foo"
version = "4.39.0.dev0"
source = { editable = "." }
dependencies = [
{ name = "pandas" },
{ name = "pandas", extra = "excel" },
{ name = "pandas", extra = "hdf5" },
{ name = "pandas", extra = "html", marker = "os_name != 'posix'" },
{ name = "pandas", extra = "output-formatting", marker = "os_name == 'posix'" },
{ name = "pandas", extra = "plot", marker = "os_name == 'posix'" },
]
```
Instead, we should merge the extras into a list of extras, creating a
more concise lockfile:
```toml
[[distribution]]
name = "foo"
version = "4.39.0.dev0"
source = { editable = "." }
dependencies = [
{ name = "pandas", extra = ["excel", "hdf5"] },
{ name = "pandas", extra = ["html"], marker = "os_name != 'posix'" },
{ name = "pandas", extra = ["output-formatting", "plot"], marker = "os_name == 'posix'" },
]
```
The base package is now implicitly included, as it is in PEP 508.
Fixes#4888
## Summary
Makes the `tools()` return value include per-tool errors. This makes it
easy to skip (rather than failing) in `uv tool list`, _and_ improves `uv
tool uninstall` to remove those invalid tools, rather than leaving them
around. (We already had that behavior for `uv tool uninstall ruff` with
an invalid `ruff`, but `uv tool uninstall --all` just left them.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5151.
Search for all `python3.x` minor versions in PATH, skipping those we
already know we can use.
For example, let's say `python` and `python3` are Python 3.10. When a
user requests `>= 3.11`, we still need to find a `python3.12` in PATH.
We do so with a regex matcher.
Fixes#4709
Warn when there is a direct dependency without a lower bound and
`--resolution lowest` is set.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
"Bare" made sense when we had a variant that seeded the environment, but
now that the crate _only_ creates a bare environment, lets drop that
terminology.
## Summary
Hashes will be validated if present, but aren't required (since, e.g.,
some registries will omit them, as will Git dependencies and such).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5168.
## Summary
This is an alternative to `--require-hashes` which will validate a hash
if it's present, but ignore requirements that omit hashes or are absent
from the lockfile entirely.
So, e.g., transitive dependencies that are missing will _not_ error; nor
will dependencies that are included but lack a hash.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3305.
## Summary
We only need to store one hash -- it should be the "strongest" hash. In
practice, most registries (like PyPI) only serve one, and we only
compute a SHA256 hash for direct URLs.
Part of: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4924
## Test Plan
I verified that changing:
```diff
diff --git a/crates/distribution-types/src/hash.rs b/crates/distribution-types/src/hash.rs
index 553a74f55..d36c62286 100644
--- a/crates/distribution-types/src/hash.rs
+++ b/crates/distribution-types/src/hash.rs
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ impl<'a> HashPolicy<'a> {
pub fn algorithms(&self) -> Vec<HashAlgorithm> {
match self {
Self::None => vec![],
- Self::Generate => vec![HashAlgorithm::Sha256],
+ Self::Generate => vec![HashAlgorithm::Sha256, HashAlgorithm::Sha512],
Self::Validate(hashes) => {
let mut algorithms = hashes.iter().map(HashDigest::algorithm).collect::<Vec<_>>();
algorithms.sort();
```
Then running `uv lock` with a URL gave me:
```toml
[[distribution]]
name = "iniconfig"
version = "2.0.0"
source = { url = "62565a6e1ceac6173dc9db836a5b46/iniconfig-2.0.0-py3-none-any.whl" }
wheels = [
{ url = "62565a6e1ceac6173dc9db836a5b46/iniconfig-2.0.0-py3-none-any.whl", hash = "sha512:44cc53a6c8dd7cf4d6d52bded308bcc4b4f85fff2ed081f60f7d4beaa86a7cde6d099e3976331232d4cbd472ad5d1781064725b0999c7cd3a2a4d42df687ee81" },
]
```
## Summary
It turns out that if `path` is a symlink,
`File::create(path)?.write_all(content.as_ref())?` will overwrite the
_target_ file. That means an entrypoint named `python` would actually
overwrite the user's source Python executable, which is symlinked into
the virtual environment.
This PR replaces that code with our atomic write method.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5152.
## Test Plan
I ran through the test plan
`https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5152`, but used an executable
named `bar` linked to `foo.txt` instead...
* Use a dedicated `ResolverMarkers` check in the fork state. This is
better than the `MarkerTree::And(Vec::new())` check.
* Report the timing correct naming universal resolution instead of two
spaces around an empty string when there are no markers.
* On resolution error, show the split that we're in. I'm not sure how to
word this, since we're doing a universal resolution until we fork, so
the trace may contain information from requirements that are not part of
this fork.
## Summary
Resolves#5139
`PythonInstallationKey` was sorted as a string, which caused `3.8` to
appear before `3.11`. This update changes the sorting of
`PythonInstallationKey` to be a descending order by version.
## Test Plan
```sh
$ cargo run -- python install 3.8 3.12
$ cargo run -- tool run -v python -V
DEBUG uv 0.2.25
warning: `uv tool run` is experimental and may change without warning.
DEBUG Searching for Python interpreter in managed installations, system path, or `py` launcher
DEBUG Searching for managed installations at `C:\Users\xx\AppData\Roaming\uv\data\python`
DEBUG Found managed Python `cpython-3.12.3-windows-x86_64-none`
DEBUG Found cpython 3.12.3 at `C:\Users\xx\AppData\Roaming\uv\data\python\cpython-3.12.3-windows-x86_64-none\install\python.exe` (managed installations)
DEBUG Using request timeout of 30s
DEBUG Using request timeout of 30s
DEBUG Acquired lock for `C:\Users\nigel\AppData\Roaming\uv\data\tools`
DEBUG Using existing environment for tool `httpx`: C:\Users\xx\AppData\Roaming\uv\data\tools\httpx
DEBUG Using existing tool `httpx`
DEBUG Running `httpx -v`
```
## Summary
A bunch of fixes and improvements on different parts of the
documentation. For Docker documentation changes, links to the relevant
documentations have been included in the commit messages.
## Summary
Fixes#5082.
Adds a new `Printer::NoProgress` that is identical to `Printer::Default`
but doesn't draw any progress bar.
## Test Plan
It seems to me that as of now it's not possible to use `insta-cmd` to
get any progress bar in the comparable output of command.
Best way to test this would be to run any command that usually shows
progress indicators like `uv pip install` with and without
`--no-progress` options.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
While playing out with `uv` preview features, I've noticed 2 issues with
the development dependencies documentation:
- it is mentioned that the feature is not implemented, but it looks like
it actually is
- despite what is said, it doesn't seem that it's possible to use a map
for development dependencies yet:
```toml
[tool.uv.dev-dependencies]
test = [
"pytest >=8.1.1,<9"
]
lint = [
"mypy >=1,<2"
]
[tool.uv]
default-dev-dependencies = ["test"]
```
```console
$ uv sync --preview
error: Failed to parse: `pyproject.toml`
Caused by: TOML parse error at line 32, column 1
|
32 | [tool.uv.dev-dependencies]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
invalid type: map, expected a sequence
```
Starting a discussion.
I find the navigation bar too long and verbose, it's overwhelming. I
think we either need to either:
- Limit the depth of the navigation bar (i.e. via `toc_depth: 2`)
- Move the table of contents out of the navigation bar over to the right
side
I prefer the second, though I think we ought to do some styling to
improve the aesthetics.