## Summary
If members define disjoint Python requirements, we should error. Right
now, it seems that it maps to unbounded and leads to weird behavior.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10835.
## Summary
I'm inferring that these are like... the older tag format? See, e.g.:
```
soxbindings-0.0.1-pp27-pypy_73-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl
soxbindings-0.0.1-pp27-pypy_73-manylinux2010_x86_64.whl
soxbindings-0.0.1-pp36-pypy36_pp73-macosx_10_9_x86_64.whl
soxbindings-0.0.1-pp36-pypy36_pp73-manylinux2010_x86_64.whl
```
## Summary
This PR extends the thinking in #10525 to platform tags, and then uses
the structured tag enums everywhere, rather than passing around strings.
I think this is a big improvement! It means we're no longer doing ad hoc
tag parsing all over the place.
## Summary
The idea here is to show both (1) an example of a compatible tag and (2)
the tags that were available, whenever we fail to resolve due to an
abscence of matching wheels.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/2777.
## Summary
This PR revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/7827 to improve
tool resolutions such that, if the resolution fails, and the selected
interpreter doesn't match the required Python version from the solve, we
attempt to re-solve with a newly-discovered interpreter that _does_
match the required Python version.
For now, we attempt to choose a Python interpreter that's greater than
the inferred `requires-python`, but compatible with the same Python
minor. This helps avoid successive failures for cases like Posting,
where choosing Python 3.13 fails because it has a dependency that lacks
source distributions and doesn't publish any Python 3.13 wheels. We
should further improve the strategy to solve _that_ case too, but this
is at least the more conservative option...
In short, if you do `uv tool instal posting`, and we find Python 3.8 on
your machine, we'll detect that `requires-python: >=3.11`, then search
for the latest Python 3.11 interpreter and re-resolve.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6381.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10282.
## Test Plan
The following should succeed:
```
cargo run python uninstall --all
cargo run python install 3.8
cargo run tool install posting
```
In the logs, we see:
```
...
DEBUG No compatible version found for: posting
DEBUG Refining interpreter with: Python >=3.11, <3.12
DEBUG Searching for Python >=3.11, <3.12 in managed installations or search path
DEBUG Searching for managed installations at `/Users/crmarsh/.local/share/uv/python`
DEBUG Skipping incompatible managed installation `cpython-3.8.20-macos-aarch64-none`
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.13.1-macos-aarch64-none` at `/opt/homebrew/bin/python3` (search path)
DEBUG Skipping interpreter at `/opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.13/bin/python3.13` from search path: does not satisfy request `>=3.11, <3.12`
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.11.7-macos-aarch64-none` at `/opt/homebrew/bin/python3.11` (search path)
DEBUG Re-resolving with Python 3.11.7
DEBUG Using request timeout of 30s
DEBUG Solving with installed Python version: 3.11.7
DEBUG Solving with target Python version: >=3.11.7
DEBUG Adding direct dependency: posting*
DEBUG Searching for a compatible version of posting (*)
...
```
## Summary
This PR makes the behavior in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/9827
the default: we try to select the latest supported package version for
each supported Python version, but we still optimize for choosing fewer
versions when stratifying by platform.
However, you can opt out with `--fork-strategy fewest`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7190.
## Summary
This PR addresses a significant limitation in the resolver whereby we
avoid choosing the latest versions of packages when the user supports a
wider range.
For example, with NumPy, the latest versions only support Python 3.10
and later. If you lock a project with `requires-python = ">=3.8"`, we
pick the last NumPy version that supported Python 3.8, and use that for
_all_ Python versions. So you get `1.24.4` for all versions, rather than
`2.2.0`. And we'll never upgrade you unless you bump your
`requires-python`. (Even worse, those versions don't have wheels for
Python 3.12, etc., so you end up building from source.)
(As-is, this is intentional. We optimize for minimizing the number of
selected versions, and the current logic does that well!)
Instead, we know recognize when a version has an elevated
`requires-python` specifier and fork. This is a new fork point, since we
need to fork once we have the package metadata, as opposed to when we
see the dependencies.
In this iteration, I've made this behavior the default. I'm sort of
undecided on whether I want to push on that... Previously, I'd suggested
making it opt-in via a setting
(https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/8686).
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8492.
## Summary
These were moved as part of a broader refactor to create a single
integration test module. That "single integration test module" did
indeed have a big impact on compile times, which is great! But we aren't
seeing any benefit from moving these tests into their own files (despite
the claim in [this blog
post](https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html),
I see the same compilation pattern regardless of where the tests are
located). Plus, we don't have many of these, and same-file tests is such
a strong Rust convention.
## Summary
If the user has an upper-bound in a `requires-python`, we don't
correctly narrow it during resolution. We should be narrowing based on
the intersection.
Closes#8297.
When patch version isn't specified and a matching version is referenced,
it will default patch to 0 which could be unclear/confusing. This PR
warns the user of that default.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The first part of this issue
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7426. Will tackle the second part
mentioned (`~=`) in a separate PR once I know this is the correct way to
warn users.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Unit tests were added
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
As per
https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html
Before that, there were 91 separate integration tests binary.
(As discussed on Discord — I've done the `uv` crate, there's still a few
more commits coming before this is mergeable, and I want to see how it
performs in CI and locally).
## Summary
The issue here is that, if you user has a `requires-python` like `>=
3.7, != 3.8.5`, this gets expanded to the following bounds:
- `[3.7, 3.8.5)`
- `(3.8.5, ...`
We then convert this to the specific `>= 3.7, < 3.8.5, > 3.8.5`. But the
commas in that expression are conjunctions... So it's impossible to
satisfy? No version is both `< 3.8.5` and `> 3.8.5`.
Instead, we now preserve the input `requires-python` and just
concatenate the terms, only using PubGrub to compute the _bounds_.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7862.
Unlike `cp36-...`, which requires exactly CPython 3.6, `py36-none` is
compatible with all versions starting at Python 3.6.
Note that `py3x-none` should not be used. Instead, use `py3-none` with
`requires-python`.
Fixes#7800
This finally gets rid of our hack for working around "hidden"
state. We no longer do a roundtrip marker serialization and
deserialization just to avoid the hidden state.
This commit refactors how deal with `requires-python` so that instead of
simplifying markers of dependencies inside the resolver, we do it at the
edges of our system. When writing markers to output, we simplify when
there's an obvious `requires-python` context. And when reading markers
as input, we complexity markers with the relevant `requires-python`
constraint.
## Summary
We now respect the user-provided upper-bound in for `requires-python`.
So, if the user has `requires-python = "==3.11.*"`, we won't explore
forks that have `python_version >= '3.12'`, for example.
However, we continue to _only_ compare the lower bounds when assessing
whether a dependency is compatible with a given Python range.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6150.
## Summary
Normalize all `python_version` markers to their equivalent
`python_full_version` form. This avoids false positives in forking
because we currently cannot detect any relationships between the two
forms. It also avoids subtle bugs due to the truncating semantics of
`python_version`. For example, given `requires-python = ">3.12"`, we
currently simplify the marker `python_version <= 3.12` to `false`.
However, the version `3.12.1` will be truncated to `3.12` for
`python_version` comparisons, and thus it satisfies the python
requirement and evaluates to `true`.
It is possible to simplify back to `python_version` when writing markers
to the lockfile. However, the equivalent `python_full_version` markers
are often clearer and easier to simplify, so I lean towards leaving them
as `python_full_version`.
There are *a lot* of snapshot updates from this change. I'd like more
eyes on the transformation logic in `python_version_to_full_version` to
ensure that they are all correct.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6125.
## Summary
Using https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6064 as a motivating
example: at present, on main, we're not properly propagating the
`Requires-Python` simplifications. In that case, for example, we end up
solving for a branch with `python_version < 3.11`, and a branch `>=
3.11`, even though `Requires-Python` is `>=3.11`. Later, when we get to
the graph, we apply version simplification based on `Requires-Python`,
which causes us to _remove_ the `python_version < 3.11` markers
entirely, leaving us with duplicate dependencies for `pylint`.
This PR instead tries to ensure that we always apply this narrowing to
requirements and forks, so that we don't need to apply the same
simplification when constructing the graph at all.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6064.
Closes#6059.
## Summary
This PR rewrites the `MarkerTree` type to use algebraic decision
diagrams (ADD). This has many benefits:
- The diagram is canonical for a given marker function. It is impossible
to create two functionally equivalent marker trees that don't refer to
the same underlying ADD. This also means that any trivially true or
unsatisfiable markers are represented by the same constants.
- The diagram can handle complex operations (conjunction/disjunction) in
polynomial time, as well as constant-time negation.
- The diagram can be converted to a simplified DNF form for user-facing
output.
The new representation gives us a lot more confidence in our marker
operations and simplification, which is proving to be very important
(see https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5733 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5163).
Unfortunately, it is not easy to split this PR into multiple commits
because it is a large rewrite of the `marker` module. I'd suggest
reading through the `marker/algebra.rs`, `marker/simplify.rs`, and
`marker/tree.rs` files for the new implementation, as well as the
updated snapshots to verify how the new simplification rules work in
practice. However, a few other things were changed:
- [We now use release-only comparisons for `python_full_version`, where
we previously only did for
`python_version`](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/blob/ibraheem/canonical-markers/crates/pep508-rs/src/marker/algebra.rs#L522).
I'm unsure how marker operations should work in the presence of
pre-release versions if we decide that this is incorrect.
- [Meaningless marker expressions are now
ignored](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/blob/ibraheem/canonical-markers/crates/pep508-rs/src/marker/parse.rs#L502).
This means that a marker such as `'x' == 'x'` will always evaluate to
`true` (as if the expression did not exist), whereas we previously
treated this as always `false`. It's negation however, remains `false`.
- [Unsatisfiable markers are written as `python_version <
'0'`](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/blob/ibraheem/canonical-markers/crates/pep508-rs/src/marker/tree.rs#L1329).
- The `PubGrubSpecifier` type has been moved to the new `uv-pubgrub`
crate, shared by `pep508-rs` and `uv-resolver`. `pep508-rs` also depends
on the `pubgrub` crate for the `Range` type, we probably want to move
`pubgrub::Range` into a separate crate to break this, but I don't think
that should block this PR (cc @konstin).
There is still some remaining work here that I decided to leave for now
for the sake of unblocking some of the related work on the resolver.
- We still use `Option<MarkerTree>` throughout uv, which is unnecessary
now that `MarkerTree::TRUE` is canonical.
- The `MarkerTree` type is now interned globally and can potentially
implement `Copy`. However, it's unclear if we want to add more
information to marker trees that would make it `!Copy`. For example, we
may wish to attach extra and requires-python environment information to
avoid simplifying after construction.
- We don't currently combine `python_full_version` and `python_version`
markers.
- I also have not spent too much time investigating performance and
there is probably some low-hanging fruit. Many of the test cases I did
run actually saw large performance improvements due to the markers being
simplified internally, reducing the stress on the old `normalize`
routine, especially for the extremely large markers seen in
`transformers` and other projects.
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5660,
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5179.
## Summary
Right now, if you have a `requirements.txt` with a pre-release, but the
`requirements.in` does not have a pre-release marker for that dependency
we drop the pre-release. (In the selector, we end up returning
`AllowPrerelease::IfNecessary`, the default.)
I played with a few ways of solving this... The first was to remove that
guard altogether. But if we do that,
`universal_transitive_disjoint_prerelease_requirement` fails (we use
`1.17.0rc1` in both forks, when it should only apply to one of the two).
The second was to do that, but also avoid pushing pre-releases as
preferences when we solve a fork. But then
`universal_disjoint_prereleases` fails, because we return a different
pre-release in each fork.
Finally, I settled on allowing existing pre-releases in forks if they
have no markers on them, i.e., they are "global" preferences. I believe
this is true IFF the preference came from an existing lockfile.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5729.
## Summary
As-is, if you have a workspace with mixed `requires-python`
requirements, resolution will _never_ succeed, since we'll use the union
as the `requires-python` bound (i.e., take the lowest value), and fail
when we see the package that only supports some more narrow range.
This PR modifies the behavior to take the intersection (i.e., the
highest value), so if you have one package that supports Python 3.12 and
later, and another that supports Python 3.8 and later, we lock for
Python 3.12. If you try to sync or run with Python 3.8, we raise an
error, since the lockfile will be incompatible with that request.
Konsti has a write-up in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5594
that outlines what could be a longer-term strategy.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5578.
## Summary
First part of: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4926. We should
solve forks that _don't_ expand the world of supported versions (e.g.,
`python_version >= '3.11'` enables us to select new packages, since we
narrow the supported version range).
## Summary
Prefers, in order:
- The major-minor version of an interpreter discovered via `--python`.
- The `requires-python` from the workspace.
- The major-minor version of the default interpreter.
If the `--python` request is a version or a version range, we use that
without fetching an interpreter.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5299.
## Summary
Given `Requires-Python: ">=3.12.3"`, we were rejecting wheels like
`dearpygui-1.11.1-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl`, since `3.12.0` is not
included in `>=3.12.3`. We instead need to test against the major-minor
version of `Requires-Python`.
The easiest way to do this, I think, is the use the `RequiresPython`
struct, which has a single bound that we can truncate the major-minor.
This also means that we now allow
`dearpygui-1.11.1-cp312-cp312-win_amd64.whl` for specifiers like
`Requires-Python: "==3.10.*"`. This is incorrect on the surface, but it
does match our semantics for `Requires-Python` elsewhere: we treat it as
a lower bound.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5287.
## Summary
In marker normalization, we now remove any markers that are redundant
with the `requires-python` specifier (i.e., always true for the given
Python requirement).
For example, given `iniconfig ; python_version >= '3.7'`, we can remove
the `python_version >= '3.7'` marker when resolving with
`--python-version 3.8`.
Closes#4852.
## Summary
There are a few ideas at play here:
1. pip always strips versions to the release when evaluating against a
`Requires-Python`, so we now do the same. That means, e.g., using
`3.13.0b0` will be accepted by a project with `Requires-Python: >=
3.13`, which does _not_ adhere to PEP 440 semantics but is somewhat
intuitive.
2. Because we know we'll only be evaluating against release-only
versions, we can use different semantics in PubGrub that let us collapse
ranges. For example, `python_version >= '3.10' or python_version <
'3.10'` can be collapsed to the truthy marker.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4714.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4272.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4719.
Charlie Marsh
konsti
Ian Paul
Amos Wenger
Andrew Gallant
Ibraheem Ahmed
Zanie Blue