I'm a little wary here, in the sense that it might be silly to have a
command that does something so simple that's covered by `uv workspace
metadata`? but I think this could be stabilized much faster than `uv
workspace metadata` and makes it easier to write scripts against
workspace members.
---------
Co-authored-by: liam <liam@scalzulli.com>
Addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13636
Prints the path to the workspace root by default, and any of the child
packages if requested.
I looped it into the same preview flag as `workspace metadata`, given
how closely related they are.
## Summary
```
─> uv workspace dir
/Users/mikayla/code/uv/dev-envs
─> uv workspace dir --package foo-proj
/Users/mikayla/code/uv/dev-envs/foo-proj
─> uv workspace dir --package bar-proj
error: Package `bar-proj` not found in workspace.
```
## Test Plan
Unit tests added.
---------
Signed-off-by: Mikayla Thompson <mrt@mikayla.codes>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
This adds the scaffolding for a `uv workspace metadata` command, as an
equivalent to `cargo metadata`, for integration with downstream tools. I
didn't do much here beyond emit the workspace root path and the paths of
the workspace members. I explored doing a bit more in #16638, but I
think we're actually going to want to come up with a fairly
comprehensive schema like `cargo metadata` has. I've started exploring
that too, but I don't have a concrete proposal to share yet.
I don't want this to be a top-level command because I think people would
expect `uv metadata <PACKAGE>` to show metadata about arbitrary packages
(this has been requested several times). I also think we can do other
things in the workspace namespace to make trivial integrations simpler,
like `uv workspace list` (enumerate members) and `uv workspace dir`
(show the path to the workspace root).
I don't expect this to be stable at all to start. I've both gated it
with preview and hidden it from the help. The intent is to merge so we
can iterate on it as we figure out what integrations need.
We're not sure what the best way to expose the native store to users is
yet and it's a bit weird that you can use this in the `uv auth` commands
but can't use any of the other keyring provider options. The simplest
path forward is to just not expose it to users as a keyring provider,
and instead frame it as a preview alternative to the plaintext uv
credentials store. We can revisit the best way to expose configuration
before stabilization.
Note this pull request retains the _internal_ keyring provider
implementation — we can refactor it out later but I wanted to avoid a
bunch of churn here.
As a frontend to Ruff's formatter.
There are some interesting choices here, some of which may just be
temporary:
1. We pin a default version of Ruff, so `uv format` is stable for a
given uv version
2. We install Ruff from GitHub instead of PyPI, which means we don't
need a Python interpreter or environment
3. We do not read the Ruff version from the dependency tree
See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19665 for a prototype of the
LSP integration.
Revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/9130
Previously, we allowed scoping conflicting extras or groups to specific
packages, e.g. ,`{ package = "foo", extra = "bar" }` for a conflict in
`foo[bar]`. Now, we allow dropping the `extra` or `group` bit and using
`{ package = "foo" }` directly which declares a conflict with `foo`'s
production dependencies.
This means you can declare conflicts between workspace members, e.g.:
```
[tool.uv]
conflicts = [[{ package = "foo" }, { package = "bar" }]]
```
would not allow `foo` and `bar` to be installed at the same time.
Similarly, a conflict can be declared between a package and a group:
```
[tool.uv]
conflicts = [[{ package = "foo" }, { group = "lint" }]]
```
which would mean, e.g., that `--only-group lint` would be required for
the invocation.
As with our existing support for conflicting extras, there are
edge-cases here where the resolver will _not_ fail even if there are
conflicts that render a particular install target unusable. There's test
coverage for some of these. We'll still error at install-time when the
conflicting groups are selected. Due to the likelihood of bugs in this
feature, I've marked it as a preview feature.
I would not recommend reading the commits as there's some slop from not
wanting to rebase Andrew's branch.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
Zanie Blue
Mikayla Thompson