When a process is running and another calls `uv cache clean` or `uv
cache prune` we currently deadlock - sometimes until the CI timeout
(https://github.com/astral-sh/setup-uv/issues/588). To avoid this, we
add a default 5 min timeout waiting for a lock. 5 min balances allowing
in-progress builds to finish, especially with larger native
dependencies, while also giving timely errors for deadlocks on (remote)
systems.
Commit 1 is a refactoring.
This branch also fixes a problem with the logging where acquired and
released resources currently mismatch:
```
DEBUG Acquired lock for `https://github.com/tqdm/tqdm`
DEBUG Using existing Git source `https://github.com/tqdm/tqdm`
DEBUG Released lock at `C:\Users\Konsti\AppData\Local\uv\cache\git-v0\locks\16bb813afef8edd2`
```
Clarify `--project` flag help text to indicate project discovery
Update the help text for `--project` from "Run the command within
the given project directory" to "Discover a project in the given
directory" to better reflect its actual behavior.
The `--project` flag affects file discovery (pyproject.toml, uv.toml,
etc.) but does not change the working directory. Users should use
`--directory` for changing the working directory.
Fixes#16718
## Summary
This change updates the guide about integration with pytorch to include
the CUDA 13.0 variant.
## Test Plan
I generated the documentation and verified that it looked correct.
## Summary
* Updates existing references to use EnvVars where usage was missing.
* Adds missing entries to env var usages, e.g. new env var declarations
in uv-trampoline, tests, etc.
* Note: this doesn't affect trampoline sizes as the end result is the
same
* Fixes versioning of `UV_HIDE_BUILD_OUTPUT`.
## Test Plan
Existing Tests. Compiled the trampolines locally to verify zero changes
(size, binary).
## Question
Will this complicate the crates publishing release process? I'm not
certain yet if it will be an issue for uv-trampoline (non-workspace
member) to reference a uv workspace member from a bump & release
perspective wrt lock files. If so, I'll revert the uv-trampoline changes
but keep the others.
## Summary
Follow up to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/15563
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13485
This is a first-pass at adding support for conditional support for Git
LFS between git sources, initial feedback welcome.
e.g.
```
[tool.uv.sources]
test-lfs-repo = { git = "https://github.com/zanieb/test-lfs-repo.git", lfs = true }
```
For context previously a user had to set `UV_GIT_LFS` to have uv fetch
lfs objects on git sources. This env var was all or nothing, meaning you
must always have it set to get consistent behavior and it applied to all
git sources. If you fetched lfs objects at a revision and then turned
off lfs (or vice versa), the git db, corresponding checkout lfs
artifacts would not be updated properly. Similarly, when git source
distributions were built, there would be no distinction between sources
with lfs and without lfs. Hence, it could corrupt the git, sdist, and
archive caches.
In order to support some sources being LFS enabled and other not, this
PR adds a stateful layer roughly similar to how `subdirectory` works but
for `lfs` since the git database, the checkouts and the corresponding
caching layers needed to be LFS aware (requested vs installed). The
caches also had to isolated and treated entirely separate when handling
LFS sources.
Summary
* Adds `lfs = true` or `lfs = false` to git sources in pyproject.toml
* Added `lfs=true` query param / fragments to most relevant url structs
(not parsed as user input)
* In the case of uv add / uv tool, `--lfs` is supported instead
* `UV_GIT_LFS` environment variable support is still functional for
non-project entrypoints (e.g. uv pip)
* `direct-url.json` now has an custom `git_lfs` entry under VcsInfo
(note, this is not in the spec currently -- see caveats).
* git database and checkouts have an different cache key as the sources
should be treated effectively different for the same rev.
* sdists cache also differ in the cache key of a built distribution if
it was built using LFS enabled revisions to distinguish between non-LFS
same revisions. This ensures the strong assumption for archive-v0 that
an unpacked revision "doesn't change sources" stays valid.
Caveats
* `pylock.toml` import support has not been added via git_lfs=true,
going through the spec it wasn't clear to me it's something we'd support
outside of the env var (for now).
* direct-url struct was modified by adding a non-standard `git_lfs`
field under VcsInfo which may be undersirable although the PEP 610 does
say `Additional fields that would be necessary to support such VCS
SHOULD be prefixed with the VCS command name` which could be interpret
this change as ok.
* There will be a slight lockfile and cache churn for users that use
`UV_GIT_LFS` as all git lockfile entries will get a `lfs=true` fragment.
The cache version does not need an update, but LFS sources will get
their own namespace under git-v0 and sdist-v9/git hence a cache-miss
will occur once but this can be sufficient to label this as breaking for
workflows always setting `UV_GIT_LFS`.
## Test Plan
Some initial tests were added. More tests likely to follow as we reach
consensus on a final approach.
For IT test, we may want to move to use a repo under astral namespace in
order to test lfs functionality.
Manual testing was done for common pathological cases like killing LFS
fetch mid-way, uninstalling LFS after installing an sdist with it and
reinstalling, fetching LFS artifacts in different commits, etc.
PSA: Please ignore the docker build failures as its related to depot
OIDC issues.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
## Summary
I noticed that after first installing the free-threaded version, then
the gil version of 3.14, I wasn't able
to install greenlet, because it doesn't ship with wheels for the
free-threaded version (I think it isn't
safe for it to use that interpreter). I noticed that the change made in
3.14 wasn't updated in the docs.
## Test Plan
N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Wade Roberts <wade.roberts@centralsquare.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Dependabot appears to run a proxy which intercepts all requests and adds
credentials — credentials are _not_ provided via the CLI or environment
variables and there's no way for a user to do so. This means that when
`authenticate = "always"` is used (or when the index URL is on a pyx
domain), uv will fail even though Dependabot may intercept the request
and add credentials.
See
https://github.com/dependabot/dependabot-core/#private-registry-credential-management
I'm a little wary here, in the sense that it might be silly to have a
command that does something so simple that's covered by `uv workspace
metadata`? but I think this could be stabilized much faster than `uv
workspace metadata` and makes it easier to write scripts against
workspace members.
---------
Co-authored-by: liam <liam@scalzulli.com>
This allows us to suggest `uv python install --upgrade 3.14` as the
canonical way to get the latest patch version of a given Python
regardless of whether it is installed already. Currently, you can do `uv
python upgrade 3.14` and it will install it, but I'd like to remove that
behavior as I find it very surprising.
## Summary
As described in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/12229, `pip
install` with `--target` or `--prefix` seem like they should install the
necessary python version if it doesn't exist, but they currently don't.
Most minimal reproduction is something like:
```
> uv python uninstall 3.13
...
> uv pip install anyio --target target-dir --python 3.13
error: No interpreter found for Python 3.13 in virtual environments, managed installations, or search path
```
This also fails without `--target`, but a venv is expected in that case,
so the with `--target`/`--prefix` is the only version that needs to be
fixed. The same mechanism occurs for `uv pip sync` as well.
## Test Plan
Added tests for install and sync that failed before fix and now pass.
---------
Signed-off-by: Mikayla Thompson <mrt@mikayla.codes>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fix suggestion for uv when used with FastAPI and Docker.
## Test Plan
The Dockerfile sets `/app` as workdir, later the CMD command points
again to `app/main.py` instead of only `main.py`, causing the following
error:
```
Path does not exist app/main.py
```
Addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13636
Prints the path to the workspace root by default, and any of the child
packages if requested.
I looped it into the same preview flag as `workspace metadata`, given
how closely related they are.
## Summary
```
─> uv workspace dir
/Users/mikayla/code/uv/dev-envs
─> uv workspace dir --package foo-proj
/Users/mikayla/code/uv/dev-envs/foo-proj
─> uv workspace dir --package bar-proj
error: Package `bar-proj` not found in workspace.
```
## Test Plan
Unit tests added.
---------
Signed-off-by: Mikayla Thompson <mrt@mikayla.codes>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/16427
This PR updates `uv version --bump` so you can pin the exact number
you’re targeting, i.e. `--bump patch=10` or `--bump dev=42`. The
command-line interface now parses those `component=value` flags, and the
bump logic actually sets the version to the number you asked for.
This adds the scaffolding for a `uv workspace metadata` command, as an
equivalent to `cargo metadata`, for integration with downstream tools. I
didn't do much here beyond emit the workspace root path and the paths of
the workspace members. I explored doing a bit more in #16638, but I
think we're actually going to want to come up with a fairly
comprehensive schema like `cargo metadata` has. I've started exploring
that too, but I don't have a concrete proposal to share yet.
I don't want this to be a top-level command because I think people would
expect `uv metadata <PACKAGE>` to show metadata about arbitrary packages
(this has been requested several times). I also think we can do other
things in the workspace namespace to make trivial integrations simpler,
like `uv workspace list` (enumerate members) and `uv workspace dir`
(show the path to the workspace root).
I don't expect this to be stable at all to start. I've both gated it
with preview and hidden it from the help. The intent is to merge so we
can iterate on it as we figure out what integrations need.
Addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/15790
## Summary
After discussion, the functionality of `--project` vs `--directory` was
quite unclear in this case, so deprecating `--project` for `init` is
probably the clearest behavior option. This is a breaking change, so it
requires being under preview before being rolled out fully.
Included in the PR now:
- new feature flag (`init --project` is deprecated if `--preview` or
`--preview-features deprecate-project-for-init` are provided)
- tests (for `--directory` behavior, as well as the current warning and
future error)
- documentation updated in docs/concepts/projects/init.md
---------
Signed-off-by: Mikayla Thompson <mrt@mikayla.codes>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Similarly to #16529 that adds `UV_NO_GROUP`, this adds
`UV_NO_DEFAULT_GROUPS` that does the same as `--no-default-groups`. This
can be useful on the CI, to disable default groups on a job without
having to set the argument in all commands that could trigger a sync
(for instance
[here](8757b318e9/.github/workflows/main.yml (L105-L116))).
## Test Plan
Snapshot tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: samypr100 <3933065+samypr100@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Fixed a typo in the docs.
Regenerated the docs, with the fix.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Zanie Blue
konsti
Oshadha Gunawardena
Matthijs Kok
Charlie Marsh
Matthew Woolf
samypr100
Zsolt Dollenstein
my1e5
William Woodruff
Tom Schafer
pythonweb2
Meitar Reihan
Mikayla Thompson
jspablo
liam
Mathieu Kniewallner
Haaris Rahman