## Summary
This PR adds an `exclude-dependencies` setting that allows users to omit
a dependency during resolution. It's effectively a formalized version of
the `flask ; python_version < '0'` hack that we've suggested to users in
various issues.
Closes#12616.
## Summary
We allow space-delimiting for `--env-file`, but Clap doesn't support any
form of escaping, so as-is, there's no way to provide a `.env` file in a
directory that contains a space. We now do the splitting ourselves and
respect escapes.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/15806.
## Summary
We support `--no-editable` on the CLI, but now that workspace members
and path dependencies can be marked as `editable = false`, I think it
makes sense for `--editable` to override that.
## Summary
This implements the iOS part of
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8029
FYI: @freakboy3742
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Create a venv with uv and run `cargo run pip install --python-platform
arm64-apple-ios pillow`. Then the iOS binary of pillow should be
installed inside the venv.
## Summary
This implements the Android part of
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8029
FYI: @freakboy3742 @mhsmith
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Create a venv with uv and run `cargo run pip install --python-platform
aarch64-linux-android pybase64`. Then the Android binary of pybase64
should be installed inside the venv.
We're not sure what the best way to expose the native store to users is
yet and it's a bit weird that you can use this in the `uv auth` commands
but can't use any of the other keyring provider options. The simplest
path forward is to just not expose it to users as a keyring provider,
and instead frame it as a preview alternative to the plaintext uv
credentials store. We can revisit the best way to expose configuration
before stabilization.
Note this pull request retains the _internal_ keyring provider
implementation — we can refactor it out later but I wanted to avoid a
bunch of churn here.
Adds a default plain text storage mechanism to `uv auth`.
While we'd prefer to use the system store, the "native" keyring support
is experimental still and I don't want to ship an unusable interface.
@geofft also suggested that the story for secure credential storage is
much weaker on Linux than macOS and Windows and felt this approach would
be needed regardless.
We'll switch over to using the native keyring by default in the future.
On Linux, we can now fallback to a plaintext store the secret store is
not configured, which is a nice property.
Right now, we store credentials in a TOML file in the uv state
directory. I expect to also read from the uv config directory in the
future, but we don't need it immediately.
Picks up the work from
- #14559
- https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14896
There are some high-level changes from those pull requests
1. We do not stash seen credentials in the keyring automatically
2. We use `auth login` and `auth logout` (for future consistency)
3. We add a `token` command for showing the credential that will be used
As well as many smaller changes to API, messaging, testing, etc.
---------
Co-authored-by: John Mumm <jtfmumm@gmail.com>
## Summary
We (and I'm sure many others) are currently doing a lot of RISC-V work
in QEMU. It is possible to significantly improve the speed of
Python-related builds by taking care of the environment setup using an
AMD64 `uv` binary (bypassing binfmt/qemu-system emulation).
Some approx numbers from local testing in riscv64 Ubuntu in QEMU:
| Resolver arch | Command | Time |
| --- | --- | --- |
| riscv64 | `pip install --upgrade --break-system-packages
--index-url=https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/riseproject%2Fpython%2Fwheel_builder/packages/pypi/simple
openai-harmony` | 15s |
| riscv64 | `uv pip install --upgrade --system --break-system-packages
--index-url=https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/riseproject%2Fpython%2Fwheel_builder/packages/pypi/simple
openai-harmony` | 5s |
| amd64 | `uv pip install --python-platform=riscv64-unknown-linux
--upgrade --system --break-system-packages
--index-url=https://gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/riseproject%2Fpython%2Fwheel_builder/packages/pypi/simple
openai-harmony` | 4s |
The numbers from some larger internal packages with deeper dependency
trees are much more pronounced - 3m6 vs 43s vs 8s, in one example.
Manylinux 2.39 is specified, as it's the first (only?) RISC-V manylinux
## Test Plan
Locally, in QEMU.
`$ docker run --platform linux/riscv64 -it ubuntu:latest`, get amd64
libc into LD_LIBRARY_PATH, tests as above
## Summary
This is causing some cyclic dependencies issues for me, because these
can be used in virtually _any_ crate (like `uv-install-wheel`), which
then means that all of `uv-configuration` becomes a dependency, etc. I
think this should be a leaf crate so that we can safely depend on it
anywhere.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Closes#14866. Adds a `no-install-local` flag to the sync and export
commands that excludes locally defined packages from being installed.
This helps with if you're caching your virtual environment. You can
exclude local packages since they're more likely to change between
builds.
## Test Plan
snapshot test: `sync::no_install_local`
CI
## Notes
I made an `InstallOptions` struct to avoid a crate isolation issue I was
running into while implementing.
Thanks for maintaining this project!
## Summary
After #15395, I realized that we didn't actually need a separate struct
for this since we now pass it around as an `Option`. (The key change
from #15395 is that when combining, we treat the options as a single
unit.)
## Summary
Right now, if you put `upgrade = false` in a `uv.toml`, then pass
`--upgrade-package numpy` on the CLI, we won't upgrade NumPy. This PR
fixes that interaction by ensuring that when we "combine", we look at
those arguments holistically (i.e., we bundle `upgrade` and
`upgrade-package` into a single struct, which then goes through the
`.combine` logic), rather than combining `upgrade` and `upgrade-package`
independently.
If approved, I then need to add the same thing for `no-build-isolation`,
`reinstall`, `no-build`, and `no-binary`.
As a frontend to Ruff's formatter.
There are some interesting choices here, some of which may just be
temporary:
1. We pin a default version of Ruff, so `uv format` is stable for a
given uv version
2. We install Ruff from GitHub instead of PyPI, which means we don't
need a Python interpreter or environment
3. We do not read the Ruff version from the dependency tree
See https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/19665 for a prototype of the
LSP integration.
## Summary
This breaks up a cycle I'm running into in incorporating the build
configuration into our cache keys. This is actually a type that ends up
in the frontend build system, etc., so I think it makes more sense here
anyway (as opposed to `uv-configuration` which tend to be our own
user-facing types).
Revives https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/9130
Previously, we allowed scoping conflicting extras or groups to specific
packages, e.g. ,`{ package = "foo", extra = "bar" }` for a conflict in
`foo[bar]`. Now, we allow dropping the `extra` or `group` bit and using
`{ package = "foo" }` directly which declares a conflict with `foo`'s
production dependencies.
This means you can declare conflicts between workspace members, e.g.:
```
[tool.uv]
conflicts = [[{ package = "foo" }, { package = "bar" }]]
```
would not allow `foo` and `bar` to be installed at the same time.
Similarly, a conflict can be declared between a package and a group:
```
[tool.uv]
conflicts = [[{ package = "foo" }, { group = "lint" }]]
```
which would mean, e.g., that `--only-group lint` would be required for
the invocation.
As with our existing support for conflicting extras, there are
edge-cases here where the resolver will _not_ fail even if there are
conflicts that render a particular install target unusable. There's test
coverage for some of these. We'll still error at install-time when the
conflicting groups are selected. Due to the likelihood of bugs in this
feature, I've marked it as a preview feature.
I would not recommend reading the commits as there's some slop from not
wanting to rebase Andrew's branch.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <andrew@astral.sh>
## Summary
Make the use of `Self` consistent. Mostly done by running `cargo clippy
--fix -- -A clippy::all -W clippy::use_self`.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
No need.
Replaces https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/14092
Adds `tool.uv.extra-build-dependencies = {package = [dependency, ...]}`
which extends `build-system.requires` during package builds.
These are lowered via workspace sources, are applied to transitive
dependencies, and are included in the wheel cache shard hash.
There are some features we need to follow-up on, but are out of scope
here:
- Preferring locked versions for build dependencies
- Settings for requiring locked versions for build depencies
There are some quality of life follow-ups we should also do:
- Warn on `extra-build-dependencies` that do not apply to any packages
- Add test cases and improve error messaging when the
`extra-build-dependencies` resolve fails
-------
There ~are~ were a few open decisions to be made here
1. Should we resolve these dependencies alongside the
`build-system.requires` dependencies? Or should we resolve separately?
(I think the latter is more powerful? because you can override things?
but it opens the door to breaking your build)
2. Should we install these dependencies into the same environment? Or
should we layer it on top as we do elsewhere? (I think it's fine to
install into the same environment)
3. Should we respect sources defined in the parent project? (I think
yes, but then we need to lower the dependencies earlier — I don't think
that's a big deal, but it's not implemented)
4. Should we respect sources defined in the child project? (I think no,
this gets really complicated and seems weird to allow)
5. Should we apply this to transitive dependencies? (I think so)
---------
Co-authored-by: Aria Desires <aria.desires@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
I think this would give us better hygiene than a global flag. It makes
it easier for users to opt-in to overlapping features, such as Python
upgrades and Python bin installations and to disable warnings for
preview mode without opting in to a bunch of other features. In general,
I want to reduce the burden for putting something under preview.
The `--preview` and `--no-preview` flags are retained as global
overrides. A new `--preview-features` option is added which accepts
comma separated features or can be passed multiple times, e.g.,
`--preview-features add-bounds,pylock`. There's a `UV_PREVIEW_FEATURES`
environment variable for that option (I'm not sure if we should overload
`UV_PREVIEW`, but could be convinced).
## Summary
We don't yet support writing these, but we can at least read them
(which, e.g., allows you to install PDM-exported `pylock.toml` files
with uv, since PDM _always_ writes a default group).
Closes#14740.
## Summary
The basic idea here is that we can (should) reuse a build environment
across resolution (`prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel`) and installation.
This also happens to solve the build-PyTorch-from-source problem, since
we use a consistent build environment between the invocations.
Since `SourceDistributionBuilder` is stateless, we instead store the
builds on `BuildContext`, and we key them by various properties: the
underlying interpreter, the configuration settings, etc. This just
ensures that if we build the same package twice within a process, we
don't accidentally reuse an incompatible build (virtual) environment.
(Note that still drop build environments at the end of the command, and
don't attempt to reuse them across processes.)
Closes#14269.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Update [schemars
0.9.0](https://github.com/GREsau/schemars/releases/tag/v0.9.0)
There are differences in the generated JSON Schema and I will [contact
the author](https://github.com/GREsau/schemars/issues/407).
## Test Plan
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
This allows you to specify requires-python on individual dependency-groups,
with the intended usecase being "oh my dev-dependencies have a higher
requires-python than my actual project".
This includes a large driveby move of the RequiresPython type to
uv-distribution-types to allow us to generate the appropriate markers at
this point in the code. It also migrates RequiresPython from
pubgrub::Range to version_ranges::Ranges, and makes several pub(crate)
items pub, as it's no longer defined in uv_resolver.
Fixes#11606
This includes some initial work on adding Pyodide support (issue
#12729). It is enough to get
```
uv pip compile -p /path/to/pyodide --extra-index-url file:/path/to/simple-index
```
to work which should already be quite useful.
## Test Plan
* added a unit test for `pyodide_platform`
* integration tested manually with:
```
cargo run pip install \
-p /home/rchatham/Documents/programming/tmp/pyodide-venv-test/.pyodide-xbuildenv-0.29.3/0.27.4/xbuildenv/pyodide-root/dist/python \
--extra-index-url file:/home/rchatham/Documents/programming/tmp/pyodide-venv-test/.pyodide-xbuildenv-0.29.3/0.27.4/xbuildenv/pyodide-root/package_index \
--index-strategy unsafe-best-match --target blah --no-build \
numpy pydantic
```
---------
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Closes#13253
## Test Plan
```sh
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.7.3, <0.8"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.7.3, <0.8` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
hint: Update `uv` by running `uv self update`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.7.3"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.7.3` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
hint: Update `uv` by running `uv self update`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = "<0.7"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `<0.7` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.4,<0.7"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.4, <0.7` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
Add configuration documentation for the build backend and make it the
preview default.
The build backend should generally work with default configuration
unless you want specific features such as flat layout or module
renaming, there is only a dedicated configuration, but no concept or
guide page for the build backend. Once the build backend is stable, we
can update the guide documentation to explain that uv defaults to its
own build backend, but other build backends are also supported.
The uv build backend becomes the default in preview, giving it more
exposure from users and preparing it to make it the default proper. The
current documentation retains warnings that the build backend is in
preview.
To see current uses of `uv_build` on GitHub:
https://github.com/search?q=path%3A**%2Fpyproject.toml+uv_build%3E%3D0&type=code
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This adds `poetry-core` as a build backend choice.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
## Summary
Part of #8607. This is a pure refactor aimed at paving the way for
supporting the `default-extras` configuration in the `pyproject.toml`
file.
The `ExtraSpecification` struct has been refactored to align more
closely with the
[`DependencyGroups`](256b100a9e/crates/uv-configuration/src/dependency_groups.rs (L9))
struct.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.
## Summary
This PR adds `uv export` support for [PEP
751](https://peps.python.org/pep-0751). We don't yet expose a way to
consume the generated lockfile, but it's a first step.
The logic to go from `uv.lock` to "flat set of packages to include, with
markers telling us when to include them" is all shared with the
`requirements.txt` export (and extracted in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/12956). So most of the code is just
converting from our internal types to the PEP 751 schema.
Closes#12929
## Summary
Untag the `config-settings` value to support JSON schema according to
the
[docs](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/reference/settings/#config-settings).
```toml
[tool.uv]
config-settings = { editable_mode = "compat" }
```
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Verified using the "Even Better TOML" extension with paths to old and
new `uv.schema.json`.
## Notes
I could not reproduce the issue with either the `taplo` (on which Even
Better Toml is built, afaik) and `check-jsonschema` CLI tools; with both
old and new versions of the `uv.schema.json` validated the
`pyproject.toml`.
Maybe for these there is some additional regularization going on and
that's also how a breaking case ended up in the docs?
I'm unsure on how to test for this.
After about an hour, the Even better TOML VSCode extension was the only
way to reproduce failing validation.
Let me know if I can do something else.
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Currently, `uv init` works without a `git` executable, and with a
working `git` executable, but not with a broken `git`, be it from GitHub
Action's Windows CI or from the shim we insert.
`uv init` calls git twice: Once `git rev-parse` to check whether a git
repo already exists, and then `git init` (if there is no git repository
yet and no `--vcs none`).
By separately handling the cases where git failed during `git rev-parse`
doesn't work vs. where the is no repository when checking for an
existing repo work tree, we can avoid calling `git init` for broken git
and erroring. We have to hardcode the expected git command outputs to be
able to check.
Charlie Marsh
Harsh Pratap Singh
timrid
Zanie Blue
Jo Shields
Xavi Simpson
samypr100
adamnemecek
konsti
ya7010
Christopher Tee
Aria Desires
Hood Chatham
Ahmed Ilyas
Bartosz Sokorski
Max Mynter