## Summary
This PR parallelizes multi-platform builds using multiple workers (hence
the new docker-build / docker-publish jobs), this seems to save about ~8
minutes.
This is partial work extracted from
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6053 than is standalone
From 8 to 16 cores, 32 to 64 GB ram. Testing on Windows first because
it's the bottleneck.
Previously tested in #2515 to no effect, maybe better now that we have a
development drive?
## Summary
This is an experimental PR to replace more unsafe calls with more rust
while still trying to keep the binary size small enough. These changes
roughly increase the size of the trampolines to about 40kb~. This is a
alternate PR to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5751.
The primary changes here include
* Switch to use rust path components for ease of path management
* Leverage `std::process::exit` for process exit and cleanup
* Use `std::io::Error::last_os_error` for IO Errors to remove
`FormatMessage` complexity
* Use `std::env::current_exe` to get the current executable instead of
`GetModuleFileNameA`
## Test Plan
Added one more existing test case to trampoline tests.
Still need to verify dunce::canonicalize is desired or not on
find_python_exe.
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
To enforce the 100 character line limit in markdown files introduced in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5635, and to automate the
formatting of markdown files, i've added prettier and formatted our
markdown files with it.
I've excluded the changelog and the generated references documentation
from this for having too many changes, but we can also include them.
I'm not particular on which style we use. My main motivations are
(major) not having to reflow markdown files myself anymore and (minor)
consistence between all markdown files. I've chosen prettier for similar
reason as we chose black, it's a single good style that's automated and
shared in the community. I do prefer prettier's style of not breaking
inside of a link name though.
This PR is in two parts, the first adds prettier to CI and documents
using it, while the second actually formats the docs. When merge
conflicts arise, we can drop the last commit and regenerate it with `npx
prettier --prose-wrap always --write BENCHMARKS.md CONTRIBUTING.md
README.md STYLE.md docs/*.md docs/concepts/**/*.md docs/guides/**/*.md
docs/pip/**/*.md`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5713
Shaves 50s or ~25% off the Ubuntu test run. Maybe 30s or 8% off macOS.
Windows already uses the GitHub distributions.
Note this is some of our only test coverage for Python version installs,
we may want to add separate coverage to compensate.
## Summary
This PR deprecates the `--isolated` flag. The treatment varies across
the APIs:
- For non-preview APIs, we warn but treat it as equivalent to
`--no-config`.
- For preview APIs, we warn and ignore it, with two exceptions...
- For `tool run` and `run` specifically, we don't even warn, because we
can't differentiate the command-specific `--isolated` from the global
`--isolated`.
Add the tests added in #5204 to CI. The crate is not part of the
workspace (it requires nightly) and is windows only, so we have to test
it separately.
---------
Co-authored-by: samypr100 <3933065+samypr100@users.noreply.github.com>
## Summary
After #5337, `fetch-download-metadata.py` fetches not just from
`python-build-standalone`, so updates the workflow to
`sync-python-releases.yml`.
Also includes `crates/uv-python/download-metadata.json` in `add-paths`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Currently, `uv` refuses to install anything on GraalPy. This is
currently blocking GraalPy testing with cibuildwheel, since manylinux
includes both `uv` and `graalpy` (but doesn't test with `uv`), whereas
cibuildwheel defaults to `uv`. See e.g.
https://github.com/pypa/cibuildwheel/actions/runs/9956369360/job/27506182952?pr=1538
where it gives
```
+ python -m build /project/sample_proj --wheel --outdir=/tmp/cibuildwheel/built_wheel --installer=uv
* Creating isolated environment: venv+uv...
* Using external uv from /usr/local/bin/uv
* Installing packages in isolated environment:
- setuptools >= 40.8.0
> /usr/local/bin/uv pip install "setuptools >= 40.8.0"
< error: Unknown implementation: `graalpy`
```
## Test Plan
I simply based the GraalPy support on PyPy and added some small tests.
I'm open to discussing how to test this. GraalPy is available for
manylinux images and with setup-python, so we should be able to add
tests against it to the CI. I locally confirmed by installing `uv` into
a GraalPy venv and then trying things like `uv pip install Pillow` and
testing those extensions.
## Summary
This approach is based on https://github.com/PrefectHQ/docs. Rather than
publishing docs in the uv repo, we push to an independent repo that's
used solely to house the docs. In Prefect's case, this allows them to
publish versioned documentation (we should do that too). For us, though,
the benefit is that we can publish the Ruff and uv docs as a single site
(docs.astral.sh).
Prefect clones the source repo and builds the documentation from the
`docs` repo (i.e., the action runs in the `docs` repo). In our case,
I've instead set it up such that the action runs in `uv` (and later in
`ruff` too), clones the `docs` repo, and puts up a PR in that separate
repo. Because of these requirements, we have to use a PAT rather than a
deploy key (as PATs cannot do GitHub-specific things like create PRs --
they can only operate over the Git CLI).
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/docs/pull/2.
## Summary
We want to have consistency between the Ruff and uv documentation for
the upcoming release. We don't love the Ruff docs, but we'd rather have
consistency and then work towards improving them both, rather than have
two very-different documentation sites that both have weaknesses.
The setup here is simpler than in Ruff as: (1) we don't yet generate any
docs from Rust and (2) we don't try to reuse the README in the uv
documentation (which adds a lot of complexity in Ruff). So the change
here is mostly a 1-to-1 port to MkDocs.
## Test Plan

## Summary
This PR adds a new job to test that PyPy venvs are correctly created on
Windows and they contain all the expected binaries.
## Test Plan
Just let CI run.
## Summary
Should fix#2092.
This PR changes `uv venv` so it also creates symlinks to `pypy` on Unix
and copies executables on Windows when creating a new environment using
PyPy.
I found a bit of discrepancy between creation of a venv using `python`
and `uv`, as using `python` brings all the executables with it. While
`uv` brings only those without any version number, at least on Windows.
The behaviour is different on Unix as we take the versioned symlinks
too.
Some examples below.
`python -m venv` generates the following `Scripts` folder.
```
Mode LastWriteTime Length Name
---- ------------- ------ ----
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 2031 activate
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 1029 activate.bat
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 9033 Activate.ps1
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 393 deactivate.bat
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:40 27648 libffi-8.dll
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 44290560 libpypy3.10-c.dll
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 108424 pip.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 108424 pip3.10.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 108424 pip3.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 pypy.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 pypy3.10.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 pypy3.10w.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 pypy3.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 pypyw.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 python.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 python3.10.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 python3.exe
-a---- 7/14/2024 15:41 79360 pythonw.exe
```
`uv venv` instead generates this.
```
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 3360 activate
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 2251 activate.bat
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 2627 activate.csh
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 4191 activate.fish
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 3875 activate.nu
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 2766 activate.ps1
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 2378 activate_this.py
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 1728 deactivate.bat
-a---- 7/13/2024 19:19 27648 libffi-8.dll
-a---- 7/13/2024 19:19 44290560 libpypy3.10-c.dll
-a---- 7/14/2024 16:27 1215 pydoc.bat
-a---- 7/13/2024 19:19 79360 pypy.exe
-a---- 7/13/2024 19:19 79360 pypyw.exe
-a---- 7/13/2024 19:19 79360 python.exe
-a---- 7/13/2024 19:19 79360 pythonw.exe
```
## Test Plan
To verify the correct behaviour:
1. Download and install PyPy from [official
website](https://www.pypy.org/download.html)
2. Call `uv venv -p <path_to_pypy_>`
3. Run `.\.venv\Scripts\activate` on Windows or
`./.venv/Scripts/activate` on Unix
4. Run `pypy`
I thought of writing some automated tests but I couldn't rely on `uv
python install` command to install PyPy as it's not in the list of
installable Python builds.
## Summary
Move completely off tokio's multi-threaded runtime. We've slowly been
making changes to be smarter about scheduling in various places instead
of depending on tokio's general purpose work-stealing, notably
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/3627 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4004. We now no longer benefit from
the multi-threaded runtime, as we run on all I/O on the main thread.
There's one remaining instance of `block_in_place` that can be swapped
for `rayon::spawn`.
This change is a small performance improvement due to removing some
unnecessary overhead of the multi-threaded runtime (e.g. spawning
threads), but nothing major. It also removes some noise from profiles.
## Test Plan
```
Benchmark 1: ./target/profiling/uv (resolve-warm)
Time (mean ± σ): 14.9 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 3.0 ms, System: 17.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 14.1 ms … 15.8 ms 169 runs
Benchmark 2: ./target/profiling/baseline (resolve-warm)
Time (mean ± σ): 16.1 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 3.9 ms, System: 18.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 15.1 ms … 17.3 ms 162 runs
Summary
./target/profiling/uv (resolve-warm) ran
1.08 ± 0.03 times faster than ./target/profiling/baseline (resolve-warm)
```
## Summary
Partially closes#1917
This PR picks up on some of the great work from #1864 and opted to keep
`panic_immediate_abort` (for size reasons). I split the PR in different
isolated commits in case we want to separate/cherry-pick them out.
1. The first commit ports mostly all std changes from that PR into this
PR. Binary sizes stayed the same ~16kb.
2. The second commit migrates our existing usage of windows-sys to
windows for a safer ffi calls with Results!. It also changes all large
unsafe blocks to be isolated to the actual unsafe calls, and switches
some areas to use std such as getenv port ( which seemed buggy! ) from
launcher.c. In addition, this also adds more error checking in order to
match some missing assertions from distlib's launcher.c. Note, due to
the additional .text data, the binary sizes increased to ~20.5kb, but we
can cut back on some of the added error msgs as needed.
3. The third commit switches to using xwin for building on all 3
supported trampoline targets for sanity, and adds a CI bloat check for
core::fmt and panic as a precaution. Sadly, this will invalidate the
xwin cache on the first run.
## Test Plan
Most changes were tested on a couple of local GUI apps and console apps,
also tested some of the error states manually by using SetLastError at
different points in the code and/or passing in invalid handles.
I'm not sure how far we can get with migrating some of the other calls
without increasing binary size substantially. An initial attempt at
using std::path didn't seem so bad size wise when I tried it (~1k). On
other cases, such as std::process::exit added ~10k to the total binary
size.
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
Whew this is a lot.
The user-facing changes are:
- `uv toolchain` to `uv python` e.g. `uv python find`, `uv python
install`, ...
- `UV_TOOLCHAIN_DIR` to` UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_DIR`
- `<UV_STATE_DIR>/toolchains` to `<UV_STATE_DIR>/python` (with
[automatic
migration](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4735/files#r1663029330))
- User-facing messages no longer refer to toolchains, instead using
"Python", "Python versions" or "Python installations"
The internal changes are:
- `uv-toolchain` crate to `uv-python`
- `Toolchain` no longer referenced in type names
- Dropped unused `SystemPython` type (previously replaced)
- Clarified the type names for "managed Python installations"
- (more little things)
## Summary
Updates default toolchain to
[1.79](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/06/13/Rust-1.79.0.html).
There didn't seem to be any breaking changes besides xwin now requiring
lld llvm linker.
## Test Plan
Existing tests.