## Summary
I think this seems reasonable... Otherwise, we might not go back to PyPI
to revalidate the list of available versions despite the user passing
`--upgrade`.
## Summary
Previously, we wouldn't respect configuration files in directories
_above_ a workspace root. But this is somewhat problematic, because any
`pyproject.toml` will define a workspace root...
Instead, I think we should _start_ the search at the workspace root, but
go above it if necessary.
Closes: #5929.
See: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4295.
## Summary
Resolves#5188. Most of the changes involve creating a new function in
`tool/common.rs` to contain the common functionality previously found in
`tool/install.rs`.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
```console
❯ ./target/debug/uv tool upgrade black
warning: `uv tool upgrade` is experimental and may change without warning.
Resolved 6 packages in 25ms
Uninstalled 1 package in 3ms
Installed 1 package in 19ms
- black==23.1.0
+ black==24.4.2
Installed 2 executables: black, blackd
```
Following #5869, the documentation has some less-than-helpful
suggestions to use `uv help python` for details — we should link to the
`uv python` section instead.
## Summary
After referring to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5637 and doing
additional testing.
The default value in a stable state seems more reasonable to be
``only-system``. ``managed`` in preview.
```
cpython-3.11.9-windows-x86_64-none C:\Users\name\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python311\python.exe
cpython-3.10.14-windows-x86_64-none C:\Users\name\AppData\Roaming\uv\data\python\cpython-3.10.14-windows-x86_64-none\install\python.exe
cpython-3.10.11-windows-x86_64-none C:\Users\name\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python310\python.exe
cpython-3.9.19-windows-x86_64-none C:\Users\name\AppData\Roaming\uv\data\python\cpython-3.9.19-windows-x86_64-none\python.exe
```
test on uv 0.2.33 (build from
257007ccaf)
### Stable version
``uv venv -p 3.10`` is ``3.10.11`` (System Python)
``uv venv -p 3.9`` is ``No interpreter found``(3.9.19 for managed
Python)
``uv venv -p 3.9 --python-preference only-system`` is ``No interpreter
found``(fail)
``uv venv -p 3.9 --python-preference only-managed`` is
``3.9.19``(success)
Do not use managed Python, only use the system Python, so it can be
determined as ``only-system``.
### Preview mode
**Note:** ``3.10.14`` is managed python, ``3.10.11`` is system python.
``uv venv -p 3.11 --preview`` is ``3.11.9`` (System Python)
``uv venv -p 3.10 --preview`` is ``3.10.14``
``uv venv -p 3.10 --preview --python-preference only-managed`` is
``3.10.14``
``uv venv -p 3.10 --preview --python-preference managed`` is ``3.10.14``
``uv venv -p 3.10 --preview --python-preference system`` is ``3.10.11``
``venv -p 3.10 --preview --python-preference only-system`` is
``3.10.11``
Prioritize the managed Python and then select the system Python, so it
can be determined as ``managed``.
-----
fixed#5754
## Test Plan
Run website in local.
This PR rewrites the resolver concept and adds a resolver internals page
targeted at power users.
The new resolution concept documentation has three parts:
* An introduction for people how never heard of "resolution" before, and
a motivating example what it does. I've also shoved the part about
equally valid resolutions in there.
* Features you commonly use: Non-universal vs. universal resolution,
lowest resolution amd pre-releases.
* Expert features, we don't advertise them, you'll only need them in
complex cases when you already know and i kept them to the reference
points you need in this case: Constraints, overrides and exclude-newer.
I intentionally didn't lay out any detail of the resolution itself, the
idea is that users get a vague sense of "uv has to select fitting
versions", but then they learn the options they have to use and some
common failure points without ever coming near SAT or even graphs.
The resolution internals reference page is targeted at power users who
need to understand what is going on behind the scenes. It assumes ample
prior knowledge and exists to explain the uv-specific behaviors for
someone who already understands dependency resolution conceptually and
has interacted with their dependency tree before. I had a section on the
lockfile but removed it because it found the lockfile to be too
self-documenting.
I haven't touched the readme.
Closes#5603Closes#5238Closes#5237
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
To enforce the 100 character line limit in markdown files introduced in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/5635, and to automate the
formatting of markdown files, i've added prettier and formatted our
markdown files with it.
I've excluded the changelog and the generated references documentation
from this for having too many changes, but we can also include them.
I'm not particular on which style we use. My main motivations are
(major) not having to reflow markdown files myself anymore and (minor)
consistence between all markdown files. I've chosen prettier for similar
reason as we chose black, it's a single good style that's automated and
shared in the community. I do prefer prettier's style of not breaking
inside of a link name though.
This PR is in two parts, the first adds prettier to CI and documents
using it, while the second actually formats the docs. When merge
conflicts arise, we can drop the last commit and regenerate it with `npx
prettier --prose-wrap always --write BENCHMARKS.md CONTRIBUTING.md
README.md STYLE.md docs/*.md docs/concepts/**/*.md docs/guides/**/*.md
docs/pip/**/*.md`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Partially resolves#5561. Haven't added overrides support yet but I can
add it tomorrow if the current approach for constraints is ok.
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
Manually checked trace logs after changing the constraints.
