Signed-off-by: Kemal Akkoyun <kakkoyun@gmail.com>
## Summary
This PR adds the ability to list available scripts in the environment
when `uv run` is invoked without any arguments.
It somewhat mimics the behavior of `rye run` command
(See https://rye.astral.sh/guide/commands/run).
This is an attempt to fix#4024.
## Test Plan
I added test cases. The CI pipeline should pass.
### Manuel Tests
```shell
❯ uv run
Provide a command or script to invoke with `uv run <command>` or `uv run script.py`.
The following scripts are available:
normalizer
python
python3
python3.12
See `uv run --help` for more information.
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Kemal Akkoyun <kakkoyun@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Closes#7118
This only really affects managed interpreters, as we exclude alternative
Python implementations from the search path during the
`VersionRequest::executable_names` part of discovery.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
closes#4828
First iteration for an implementation. I need to add more tests but
wanted your opinion on the implementation first.
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
Currently tested using the following command but will add tests shortly:
```console
D:\repo\uv> cargo run venv -p 3.13t && .venv\Scripts\python.exe
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.52s
Running `target\debug\uv.exe venv -p 3.13t`
Using Python 3.13.0rc1 interpreter at: C:\Users\bschoen\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python313\python3.13t.exe
Creating virtualenv at: .venv
Activate with: .venv\Scripts\activate
Python 3.13.0rc1 experimental free-threading build (tags/v3.13.0rc1:e4a3e78, Jul 31 2024, 21:06:58) [MSC v.1940 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
There are two parts to this.
The first is a restructuring and refactoring. We had some debt around
expected executable name generation, which we address here by
consolidating into a single function that generates a combination of
names. This includes a bit of extra code around free-threaded variants
because this was written on top of #7431 — I'll rebase that on top of
this.
The second addresses some bugs around alternative implementations.
Notably, `uv python list` does not discovery executables with
alternative implementation names. Now, we properly generate all of the
executable names for `VersionRequest::Any` (originally implemented in
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/7508) to properly show all the
implementations we can find:
```
❯ cargo run -q -- python list --no-python-downloads
cpython-3.12.6-macos-aarch64-none /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.12/bin/python3.12 -> ../Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.12/bin/python3.12
cpython-3.11.10-macos-aarch64-none /opt/homebrew/opt/python@3.11/bin/python3.11 -> ../Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.11/bin/python3.11
cpython-3.9.6-macos-aarch64-none /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/python3 -> ../../Library/Frameworks/Python3.framework/Versions/3.9/bin/python3
pypy-3.10.14-macos-aarch64-none /opt/homebrew/bin/pypy3 -> ../Cellar/pypy3.10/7.3.17/bin/pypy3
```
While doing both of these changes, I ended up changing the priority of
interpreter discovery slightly. For example, given that the executables
are in the same directory, do we query `python` or `python3.10` first
when you request `--python 3.10`? Previously, we'd check `python3.10`
but I think that was an incorrect optimization. I think we should always
prefer the bare name (i.e. `python`) first. Similarly, this applies to
`python` and an executable for an alternative implementation like
`pypy`. If it's not compatible with the request, we'll skip it anyway.
We might have to query more interpreters with this approach but it seems
rare.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7286 superseding
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/7508
As we support more complex Python discovery behaviors such as:
- #7431
- #7335
- #7300
`Any` is no longer accurate, we actually are looking for a reasonable
default Python version to use which may exclude the first one we find.
Separately, we need the idea of `Any` to improve behavior when listing
versions (e.g., #7286) where we do actually want to match _any_ Python
version. As a first step, we'll rename `Any` to `Default`. Then, we'll
introduce a new `Any` that actually behaves as we'd expect.
Microsoft Store Pythons do not always register themselves in the
registry, so we port
<58ce131037/PC/launcher2.c (L1744)>
and look them up on the filesystem in known locations.
## Test Plan
So far I've confirmed that we find a store Python when I use `cargo run
python list`, can we make this a part of any of the platform tests
maybe?
Our current strategy of parsing the output of `py --list-paths` to get
the installed python versions on windows is brittle (#6524, missing
`py`, etc.) and it's slow (10ms last time i measured).
Instead, we should behave spec-compliant and read the python versions
from the registry following PEP 514.
It's not fully clear which errors we should ignore and which ones we
need to raise.
We're using the official rust-for-windows crates for accessing the
registry.
Fixes#1521Fixes#6524
As described in #4242, we're currently incorrectly downloading glibc
python-build-standalone on musl target, but we also can't fix this by
using musl python-build-standalone on musl targets since the musl builds
are effectively broken.
We reintroduce the libc detection previously removed in #2381, using it
to detect which libc is the current one before we have a python
interpreter. I changed the strategy a big to support an empty `PATH`
which we use in the tests.
For simplicity, i've decided to just filter out the musl
python-build-standalone archives from the list of available archive,
given this is temporary. This means we show the same error message as if
we don't have a build for the platform. We could also add a dedicated
error message for musl.
Fixes#4242
## Test Plan
Tested manually.
On my ubuntu host, python downloads continue to pass:
```
target/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/debug/uv python install
```
On alpine, we fail:
```
$ docker run -it --rm -v .:/io alpine /io/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/debug/uv python install
Searching for Python installations
error: No download found for request: cpython-any-linux-x86_64-musl
```
For various reasons, I have a preference for out of tree virtual
environments. Things just work if I symlink, but I don't know that this
is guaranteed, so I thought I'd add a test for it. It looks like there's
another code path that matters (`FoundInterpreter::discover ->
PythonEnvironment::from_root`) for the higher level commands, but
couldn't spot a good place to test that.
Related discussion:
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1495#issuecomment-1950442191 /
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1578#issuecomment-1949911871
## Summary
resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5915, not entirely sure
if `manylinux_compatible` should be a separate field in the JSON
returned by the interpreter or there's some way to use the existing
`platform` for it.
## Test Plan
ran the below
```
rm -rf .venv
target/debug/uv venv
# commenting out the line below triggers the change..
# target/debug/uv pip install no-manylinux
target/debug/uv pip install cryptography --no-cache
```
is there an easy way to add this into the existing snapshot-based test
suite? looking around to see if there's a way that doesn't involve
something implementation-dependent like mocks.
~update: i think the output does differ between these two, so probably
we can use that.~ i lied - that "building..." output seems to be
discarded.
Executable name requests were being treated as explicit requests to
install into system environments, but I don't think it should be as it's
implicit what environment you'll end up in. Following #4308, we allow
multiple executables to be found so we can filter here.
Concretely, this means `--system` is required to install into a system
environment discovered with e.g. `--python=python`. The flag is still
not required for cases where we're not mutating environment.
The loose consensus is that "fetch" doesn't have much meaning and that a
boolean flag makes more sense from the command line.
1. Adds `--allow-python-downloads` (hidden, default) and
`--no-python-downloads` to the CLI to quickly enable or disable
downloads
2. Deprecates `--python-fetch` in favor of the options from (1)
3. Removes `python-fetch` in favor of a `python-downloads` setting
5. Adds a `never` variant to the enum, allowing even explicit installs
to be disabled via the configuration file
## Test plan
I tested this with various `pyproject.toml`-level settings and `uv venv
--preview --python 3.12.2` and `uv python install 3.12.2` with and
without the new CLI flags.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Currently, `uv` refuses to install anything on GraalPy. This is
currently blocking GraalPy testing with cibuildwheel, since manylinux
includes both `uv` and `graalpy` (but doesn't test with `uv`), whereas
cibuildwheel defaults to `uv`. See e.g.
https://github.com/pypa/cibuildwheel/actions/runs/9956369360/job/27506182952?pr=1538
where it gives
```
+ python -m build /project/sample_proj --wheel --outdir=/tmp/cibuildwheel/built_wheel --installer=uv
* Creating isolated environment: venv+uv...
* Using external uv from /usr/local/bin/uv
* Installing packages in isolated environment:
- setuptools >= 40.8.0
> /usr/local/bin/uv pip install "setuptools >= 40.8.0"
< error: Unknown implementation: `graalpy`
```
## Test Plan
I simply based the GraalPy support on PyPy and added some small tests.
I'm open to discussing how to test this. GraalPy is available for
manylinux images and with setup-python, so we should be able to add
tests against it to the CI. I locally confirmed by installing `uv` into
a GraalPy venv and then trying things like `uv pip install Pillow` and
testing those extensions.
Search for all `python3.x` minor versions in PATH, skipping those we
already know we can use.
For example, let's say `python` and `python3` are Python 3.10. When a
user requests `>= 3.11`, we still need to find a `python3.12` in PATH.
We do so with a regex matcher.
Fixes#4709
Whew this is a lot.
The user-facing changes are:
- `uv toolchain` to `uv python` e.g. `uv python find`, `uv python
install`, ...
- `UV_TOOLCHAIN_DIR` to` UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_DIR`
- `<UV_STATE_DIR>/toolchains` to `<UV_STATE_DIR>/python` (with
[automatic
migration](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4735/files#r1663029330))
- User-facing messages no longer refer to toolchains, instead using
"Python", "Python versions" or "Python installations"
The internal changes are:
- `uv-toolchain` crate to `uv-python`
- `Toolchain` no longer referenced in type names
- Dropped unused `SystemPython` type (previously replaced)
- Clarified the type names for "managed Python installations"
- (more little things)
Kemal Akkoyun
Zanie Blue
Bas Schoenmaeckers
konsti
Shantanu
Chan Kang
Charlie Marsh
Tim Felgentreff
Jo