## Summary
Fix the two version json tests to account for the possibility that uv
was built outside a git checkout (e.g. from an unpacked git archive) and
therefore does not have the commit info available. This approach uses
separate snapshots for the two cases, as suggested in discussion of pull
request #13251.
Fixes#13212
## Test Plan
1. `cargo test` in a git clone.
2. `cargo clean`, moved `.git` away, `cargo test` again.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aria Desires <aria.desires@gmail.com>
This adopts the logic from `uv remove` for locking and syncing, as the
scope of the changes made are ultimately similar. Unlike `uv remove`
there is no support for modifying PEP723 scripts, as these are not
versioned.
In doing this the `version` command gains a truckload of args for
configuring lock/sync behaviour. Presumably most of these are passed via
settings or env files, and not of particular concern.
The most interesting additions are:
* `--frozen`: makes `uv version` work ~exactly as it did before this PR
* `--locked`: errors if the lockfile is out of date
* `--no-sync`: updates the lockfile, but doesn't run the equivalent of
`uv sync`
* `--package name`: a convenience for referring to a package in the
workspace
Note that the existing `--dry-run` flag effectively implies `--frozen` for sets and bumps.
Fixes#13254Fixes#13548
In platform discovery we're parsing the output of the ELF interpreter,
e.g., `/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2`. This file is ld, not ldd, which was
incorrectly named in the code.
An alternative is naming everything ELF interpreter instead of ld.so.
## Summary
This test started failing, and it fails at least back to v0.6, so I
don't think it's on our end. I'm wondering if all the wheels here were
yanked? They're visible in the lockfile, but not on PyPI:
https://pypi.org/project/av/9.2.0/#files. So to get this passing, let's
just unpin it.
Edit: Ahh, ok. It looks like the project ran out of space, so they
removed wheels for all the older versions:
https://github.com/PyAV-Org/PyAV/issues/1879.
## Summary
Without the `git` feature, it fails with:
```
error: Failed to initialize Git repository at `/home/mgorny/.local/share/uv/tests/.tmp01wGGK/temp/preserve_executable_bit`
stdout:
stderr: error: `git` operations are not allowed — are you missing a cfg for the `git` feature?
```
## Test Plan
cargo test --features python --profile=fast-build --no-default-features
## Summary
Using "all extras" in `uv remove` will cause errors for projects with
conflicting extras. Now that we have a concept of "default extras", it
seems better to respect those defaults like we do for dependency groups.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/12770.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
I've compared all the activator scripts here with the original ones in
https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/tree/main/src/virtualenv/activation
and only the bash/POSIX script here was yielding a VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT
value with parenthesis and a trailing space, which should be part of the
shell prompt (PS1 for bash/POSIX) but not of the VIRTUAL_ENV_PROMPT
value itself. This fixes that small inconsistency. Fixes#13456
This reverts commit 0ec2d4e434
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I didn't test this locally.
Rustfmt introduces a lot of formatting changes in the 2024 edition. To
not break everything all at once, we split out the set of formatting
changes compatible with both the 2021 and 2024 edition by first
formatting with the 2024 style, and then again with the currently used
2021 style.
Notable changes are the formatting of derive macro attributes and lines
with overly long strings and adding trailing semicolons after statements
consistently.
We may run on case-sensitive file systems (Linux, generally) or on
case-insensitive file systems (Windows, generally), while modules in
Python may be lower or upper case. For robustness over filesystem
casing, we require an explicit module name for modules with upper cases.
Fixes#13419
Love this tooling! Small adjustment to help on error messaging 🙏
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The previous message was missing the word **“like,”** which made it read
a tad awkwardly.
This PR inserts the missing word so the error reads naturally:
**After:**
```
$ uvx ch1.py
error: It looks like you tried to run a Python script at `ch1.py`, which is not supported by `uvx`
hint: Use `uv run ch1.py` instead
```
**Before:**
```
$ uvx ch1.py
error: It looks you tried to run a Python script at `ch1.py`, which is not supported by `uvx`
hint: Use `uv run ch1.py` instead
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
- `cargo run -- uvx examples/ch1.py` shows the updated message (see
“After” above).
- `cargo test` passes.
Unlike OS APIs, glob inclusion checks don't work when there are relative
path elements such as `./`. We normalize the path before using it for
the glob.
Fixes#13407
We were not correctly falling back to cached realm credentials when an
index URL was provided with only a username. This came up in a [later
comment](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13443#issuecomment-2881115301)
on #13443 where credentials in a pip extra index in `uv.toml` were being
ignored when the same URL (but with only a username) was used at the
command line for `--extra-index-url`. I've added a test to catch this
case.
Closes#13443
## Summary
Related to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/12492
This change makes all progress bars vertically aligned. This is still a
WIP and so is not complete, in the current design I store `max_len` in
`BarState` and update it on every `on_request_start`, however this is
problematic since order matters, and if the largest name is not sent
first, the alignment is not complete. To mitigate this we'd probably
have to update all previous bars by "iterating" through the `bars` field
in `BarState` and update all request bars.
Below is an image of what happens when the largest name
(`nvidia-cusparselt-cu12`) is not the first (in this case, it was the
second to last).

## Test Plan
There are currently no tests, and I'm not sure how to design them since
from what I gather the `uv_snapshot` facilities record the final output,
not the intermediate stages.
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
This PR redacts credentials in displayed URLs.
It mostly relies on a `redacted_url` function (and where possible
`IndexUrl::redacted`). This is a quick way to prevent leaked credentials
but it's prone to programmer error when adding new trace statements. A
better follow-on would use a `RedactedUrl` type with the appropriate
`Display` implementation. This would allow us to still extract
credentials from the URL while displaying it securely. On the plus side,
the sites where the `redacted_url` function are used serve as easy
signposts for where to use the new type in a future PR.
Closes#1714.
## Summary
We mapped both `.tgz` and `.tar.gz` to the same enum variant; later,
though, we made the assumption that a file marked with that variant
ended with exactly `.tar.gz`. Instead, we need to preserve the
originating suffix.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13372.
## Summary
If a set of wheel tags includes a dot, this code is treating the part
_after_ the dot as an extension, and thereby failing to detect that the
entry is a symlink to an archive (and thereby removing the archive).
This is all an optimization, so this code just makes it a little
targeted: we skip specific known extensions, rather than anything with
any extension.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/13270.
This follows on from #13334 to fix another case.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
If a dependency group contained any `{ include-group = "..." }` entries,
the sort detection would bail out. The root cause of the problem was
gating the sort detection behind `deps.iter().all(Value::is_str)`.
A public code search reveals that keeping include-groups at the top is
by far the most common, but keeping them at the bottom isn't uncommon.
In both of these cases, uv will now preserve the convention that is in
use.
Unless I've missed it, I don't think uv supports `uv add`ing an
include-group, and so that wasn't tested here.
## Test Plan
cargo test
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
This also omits bounds on constraints, and is useful for that. This
retains `--raw-sources` as an alias. I've had this on my mind for a
while, but https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/12946 reminded me of it
again.
## Summary
Closes#13253
## Test Plan
```sh
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.7.3, <0.8"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.7.3, <0.8` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
hint: Update `uv` by running `uv self update`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.7.3"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.7.3` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
hint: Update `uv` by running `uv self update`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = "<0.7"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `<0.7` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
❯ cat pyproject.toml | rg required
required-version = ">=0.4,<0.7"
❯ cargo run -q --features self-update --manifest-path ~/uv/Cargo.toml add black
error: Required uv version `>=0.4, <0.7` does not match the running version `0.7.2`.
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Charlie Marsh <charlie.r.marsh@gmail.com>
## Summary
The prior implementation only looks for dependencies which are sorted by
name then specifier.
I knew uv was meant to preserve sorted dependencies, but it never seemed
to work for me.
I've always used the "sort lines" feature of PyCharm/Sublime to sort
these lists, and I guess I'm not the only one. In such a case,
`flask-wtf>=1.2.1` is sorted before `flask>=3.0.2`.
After digging into the code I realised what was happening, hence this
merge request.
Maybe there's a tool I'm not aware of that people are using to sort
dependencies "properly", or are doing it by hand, but I think this is
worth supporting.
Relevant issues: https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/9076,
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/10738
## Test Plan
`cargo test`