This is a minor documentation update to a recently added section
"Package priority" in the pip compatibility guide. The aim of this PR is
clear up two things which I think the current paragraph implies but I
don't think are (always) true:
1. That pip doesn't use provided order to prioritize resolution
2. That uv relies solely on provided order to prioritize resolution
What is true, at least for now, is pip has more heuristics than uv to
prioritize during resolution, and so I've tried to rework this to make
it clear why changing the order might help uv come to a different
resolution whereas for pip it might not make a difference.
As described in #4242, we're currently incorrectly downloading glibc
python-build-standalone on musl target, but we also can't fix this by
using musl python-build-standalone on musl targets since the musl builds
are effectively broken.
We reintroduce the libc detection previously removed in #2381, using it
to detect which libc is the current one before we have a python
interpreter. I changed the strategy a big to support an empty `PATH`
which we use in the tests.
For simplicity, i've decided to just filter out the musl
python-build-standalone archives from the list of available archive,
given this is temporary. This means we show the same error message as if
we don't have a build for the platform. We could also add a dedicated
error message for musl.
Fixes#4242
## Test Plan
Tested manually.
On my ubuntu host, python downloads continue to pass:
```
target/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/debug/uv python install
```
On alpine, we fail:
```
$ docker run -it --rm -v .:/io alpine /io/target/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl/debug/uv python install
Searching for Python installations
error: No download found for request: cpython-any-linux-x86_64-musl
```
## Summary
We now respect the `environments` field in `uv pip compile --universal`,
e.g.:
```toml
[tool.uv]
environments = ["platform_system == 'Emscripten'"]
```
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6641.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
The following Dockerfile command fails:
```
[...]
RUN --mount=from=uv,source=/uv,target=/bin/uv \
cd /opt/opencti-connector-webhook && \
uv pip install --system -r requirements.txt && \
apk del git build-base
[...]
```
Result
```
yo@opencti:~/connectors/stream/webhook$ docker build -t opencti/connector-webhook:d .
[+] Building 1.0s (3/3) FINISHED docker:default
=> [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile 0.1s
=> => transferring dockerfile: 557B 0.1s
=> ERROR [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/uv:latest 0.8s
=> [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/python:3.11-alpine 0.8s
------
> [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/uv:latest:
------
ERROR: failed to solve: uv: failed to resolve source metadata for docker.io/library/uv:latest: pull access denied, repository does not exist or may require authorization: server message: insufficient_scope: authorization failed
```
Fix:
```
[...]
RUN --mount=from=ghcr.io/astral-sh/uv,source=/uv,target=/bin/uv \
cd /opt/opencti-connector-webhook && \
uv pip install --system -r requirements.txt && \
apk del git build-base
[...]
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
```
$ docker --version
Docker version 26.0.0, build 2ae903e
$ date
Mon Aug 26 20:31:53 UTC 2024
$ docker build -t opencti/connector-webhook:e .
[+] Building 41.8s (13/13) FINISHED docker:default
=> [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile 0.0s
=> => transferring dockerfile: 587B 0.0s
=> [internal] load metadata for ghcr.io/astral-sh/uv:latest 0.5s
=> [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/python:3.11-alpine 0.5s
=> [internal] load .dockerignore 0.1s
=> => transferring context: 2B 0.0s
=> [stage-0 1/6] FROM docker.io/library/python:3.11-alpine@sha256:700b4aa84090748aafb348fc042b5970abb0a73c8f1b4fcfe0f4e3c2a4a9fcca 0.0s
=> [internal] load build context 0.1s
=> => transferring context: 130B 0.0s
=> CACHED FROM ghcr.io/astral-sh/uv:latest@sha256:f6b18f4a7408c5244374b00c8832089258d130f7a77a38807348072e714ffa0c 0.0s
=> CACHED [stage-0 2/6] COPY src /opt/opencti-connector-webhook 0.0s
=> CACHED [stage-0 3/6] RUN apk --no-cache add git build-base libmagic libffi-dev libxml2-dev libxslt-dev 0.0s
=> [stage-0 4/6] RUN --mount=from=ghcr.io/astral-sh/uv,source=/uv,target=/bin/uv cd /opt/opencti-connector-webhook && uv pip install --system -r requirements.txt 38.3s
=> [stage-0 5/6] COPY entrypoint.sh / 0.1s
=> [stage-0 6/6] RUN chmod +x /entrypoint.sh 0.8s
=> exporting to image 1.7s
=> => exporting layers 1.6s
=> => writing image sha256:aa6810f883d104c838f35e848c0d7d8b4df5c7c3929f18a88b7139d0ec892a0b 0.0s
=> => naming to docker.io/opencti/connector-webhook:e 0.0s
```
As a non-shell-wizard, I was unfamiliar with the `EOF` syntax used in
the existing example (just above the one I added). I thought including
an example where the output of `echo` is piped to `uv run` might be more
accessible. As a bonus, it should work across more shells: the `EOF`
example doesn't work in fish because fish [doesn't support
heredocs](https://fishshell.com/docs/current/fish_for_bash_users.html#heredocs),
while the `echo` example does.
Feel free to ignore if unwanted.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I used `uvx` to test my code using `pytest` it was just before the
documentation and it worked pretty fine. But when I saw the docs I was
confused as it says:
> If you are running a tool in a project and the tool requires that your
project is installed, e.g., when using `pytest` or `mypy`, you'll want
to use `uv` run instead of `uvx`. Otherwise, the tool will be run in a
virtual environment that is isolated from your project.
So to make it simple if you don't recommend using `uvx` in this
situation then here is the pull request, and if not just close this pull
request. I said that I don't have to open an issue to discuss this as
it's so simple.
## Test Plan
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Previously, we excluded these and only looked at system interpreters.
However, it makes sense for this to match the typical Python discovery
experience. We could consider swapping the default... I'm not sure what
makes more sense. If we change the default (as written now) — this could
arguably be a breaking change.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Document in guide stdin usage
alllll the easter eggs can do as well, but declined to keep consistent
with the other examples 😆
Additions to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6481
```bash
$ uv run - <<EOF
import antigravity
EOF
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6519#issuecomment-2307371063 new PR
## Summary
Small keyword fix. In the `concepts/dependencies` documentation, the
workspace example listed members under an invalid
`tool.uv.workspace.include` field.
This PR changes the key to
[`tool.uv.workspace.members`](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/reference/settings/#workspace_members)
instead.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Two small typo fixes: one in the documentation and one in a comment in
the source code I happened to come across.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Updated docs dockerfile from Debian 11 (bullseye) to latest stable
Debian 12 (bookworm).
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Docs at https://docs.astral.sh/uv/pip/compatibility/ still say:
> the future, uv will also support persistent configuration in its own
configuration file format (e.g., pyproject.toml or uv.toml or similar).
For more, see [#651](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/651).
I think that's done now (?), so updated these to link to
https://docs.astral.sh/uv/configuration/files/
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
