The architecture of uv does not necessarily match that of the python
interpreter (#2326). In cross compiling/testing scenarios the operating
system can also mismatch. To solve this, we move arch and os detection
to python, vendoring the relevant pypa/packaging code, preventing
mismatches between what the python interpreter was compiled for and what
uv was compiled for.
To make the scripts more manageable, they are now a directory in a
tempdir and we run them with `python -m` . I've simplified the
pypa/packaging code since we're still building the tags in rust. A
`Platform` is now instantiated by querying the python interpreter for
its platform. The pypa/packaging files are copied verbatim for easier
updates except a `lru_cache()` python 3.7 backport.
Error handling is done by a `"result": "success|error"` field that allow
passing error details to rust:
```console
$ uv venv --no-cache
× Can't use Python at `/home/konsti/projects/uv/.venv/bin/python3`
╰─▶ Unknown operation system `linux`
```
I've used the [maturin sysconfig
collection](855f6d2cb1/sysconfig)
as reference. I'm unsure how to test these changes across the wide
variety of platforms.
Fixes#2326
Add a `--compile` option to `pip install` and `pip sync`.
I chose to implement this as a separate pass over the entire venv. If we
wanted to compile during installation, we'd have to make sure that
writing is exclusive, to avoid concurrent processes writing broken
`.pyc` files. Additionally, this ensures that the entire site-packages
are bytecode compiled, even if there are packages that aren't from this
`uv` invocation. The disadvantage is that we do not update RECORD and
rely on this comment from [PEP 491](https://peps.python.org/pep-0491/):
> Uninstallers should be smart enough to remove .pyc even if it is not
mentioned in RECORD.
If this is a problem we can change it to run during installation and
write RECORD entries.
Internally, this is implemented as an async work-stealing subprocess
worker pool. The producer is a directory traversal over site-packages,
sending each `.py` file to a bounded async FIFO queue/channel. Each
worker has a long-running python process. It pops the queue to get a
single path (or exists if the channel is closed), then sends it to
stdin, waits until it's informed that the compilation is done through a
line on stdout, and repeat. This is fast, e.g. installing `jupyter
plotly` on Python 3.12 it processes 15876 files in 319ms with 32 threads
(vs. 3.8s with a single core). The python processes internally calls
`compileall.compile_file`, the same as pip.
Like pip, we ignore and silence all compilation errors
(https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1559). There is a 10s timeout to
handle the case when the workers got stuck. For the reviewers, please
check if i missed any spots where we could deadlock, this is the hardest
part of this PR.
I've added `uv-dev compile <dir>` and `uv-dev clear-compile <dir>`
commands, mainly for my own benchmarking. I don't want to expose them in
`uv`, they almost certainly not the correct workflow and we don't want
to support them.
Fixes#1788Closes#1559Closes#1928
First, replace all usages in files in-place. I used my editor for this.
If someone wants to add a one-liner that'd be fun.
Then, update directory and file names:
```
# Run twice for nested directories
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
# Update files
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
```
Then add all the files again
```
# Add all the files again
git add crates
git add python/uv
# This one needs a force-add
git add -f crates/uv-trampoline
```
