<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I used `uvx` to test my code using `pytest` it was just before the
documentation and it worked pretty fine. But when I saw the docs I was
confused as it says:
> If you are running a tool in a project and the tool requires that your
project is installed, e.g., when using `pytest` or `mypy`, you'll want
to use `uv` run instead of `uvx`. Otherwise, the tool will be run in a
virtual environment that is isolated from your project.
So to make it simple if you don't recommend using `uvx` in this
situation then here is the pull request, and if not just close this pull
request. I said that I don't have to open an issue to discuss this as
it's so simple.
## Test Plan
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Previously, we excluded these and only looked at system interpreters.
However, it makes sense for this to match the typical Python discovery
experience. We could consider swapping the default... I'm not sure what
makes more sense. If we change the default (as written now) — this could
arguably be a breaking change.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Document in guide stdin usage
alllll the easter eggs can do as well, but declined to keep consistent
with the other examples 😆
Additions to https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6481
```bash
$ uv run - <<EOF
import antigravity
EOF
```
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6519#issuecomment-2307371063 new PR
## Summary
Small keyword fix. In the `concepts/dependencies` documentation, the
workspace example listed members under an invalid
`tool.uv.workspace.include` field.
This PR changes the key to
[`tool.uv.workspace.members`](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/reference/settings/#workspace_members)
instead.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Two small typo fixes: one in the documentation and one in a comment in
the source code I happened to come across.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Updated docs dockerfile from Debian 11 (bullseye) to latest stable
Debian 12 (bookworm).
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Docs at https://docs.astral.sh/uv/pip/compatibility/ still say:
> the future, uv will also support persistent configuration in its own
configuration file format (e.g., pyproject.toml or uv.toml or similar).
For more, see [#651](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/651).
I think that's done now (?), so updated these to link to
https://docs.astral.sh/uv/configuration/files/
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Docs show an underscore which should be a dash in dev-dependencies:
`dev_dependencies = ["ruff==0.5.0"]`
## Summary
I followed the example in the references settings and used
dev_dependencies in my pyproject.toml but it seems like this needs to be
a dash instead of an underscore:
=> ERROR [stage-0 5/5] RUN uv sync 6.9s
------
> [stage-0 5/5] RUN uv sync:
0.085 warning: Failed to parse `pyproject.toml` during settings
discovery:
0.085 TOML parse error at line 65, column 1
0.085 |
0.085 65 | [tool.uv]
0.085 | ^^^^^^^^^
0.085 unknown field `dev_dependencies`
0.085
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I think it's important to clarify that `uvx` is simply an alias for `uv
tool run`. This distinction helps avoid confusion about when to use `uv`
versus `uvx`. I thought the [blog
post](https://astral.sh/blog/uv-unified-python-packaging) explained this
well.
Just something that I ran into, I understand others may have a different
perspective!
## Test Plan
n/a
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
resolves https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/5915, not entirely sure
if `manylinux_compatible` should be a separate field in the JSON
returned by the interpreter or there's some way to use the existing
`platform` for it.
## Test Plan
ran the below
```
rm -rf .venv
target/debug/uv venv
# commenting out the line below triggers the change..
# target/debug/uv pip install no-manylinux
target/debug/uv pip install cryptography --no-cache
```
is there an easy way to add this into the existing snapshot-based test
suite? looking around to see if there's a way that doesn't involve
something implementation-dependent like mocks.
~update: i think the output does differ between these two, so probably
we can use that.~ i lied - that "building..." output seems to be
discarded.
This is a fallback mode that we supported when we decided to use PEP 517
builds by default. I can't find a single reference to it on GitHub or in
our issue tracker, so I want to drop support for it as part of v0.3.0.
