<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
This changes the behavior a bit of the per-dependency build-isolation
override. That, if the dist name is known, it is passed into the
`SourceBuild::Setup` function. This allows for this override to work for
projects without a `pyproject.toml`, like `detectron2`, using the
specified requirement name. Previously only the `pyproject.toml` name
could be used, which these projects are lacking. An example of a
use-case is given in the *Test Plan* section.
Additionally, the `no_build_isolation_package` has been adding to
`InstallerSettingsRef` and used in `sync` and other commands, as this
was not done yet.
This is useful if you want to **non**-isolate a single package, even
ones without a proper `pyproject.toml`
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
With the following pyproject.toml.
```toml
[project]
name = "detectron-uv"
version = "0.1.0"
description = "Add your description here"
readme = "README.md"
requires-python = ">=3.12"
dependencies = [
"detectron2",
"setuptools",
"torch",
]
[build-system]
requires = ["hatchling"]
build-backend = "hatchling.build"
[tool.uv.sources]
detectron2 = { git = "https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2", rev = "bcfd464d0c810f0442d91a349c0f6df945467143" }
[tool.uv]
no-build-isolation-package = ["detectron2"]
```
The package `detectron2` is now correctly **non**-isolated. Before,
because the logic depended on getting the name from the
`pyproject.toml`, which is lacking in detectron2 you would get the
message, that the source could not be built. This was because it would
still be *isolated* in that case.
With these changes you can now install using (given that you are inside
a workspace with a venv):
```
uv pip install torch setuptools
uv sync
```
This would previously fail with something like:
```
error: Failed to prepare distributions
Caused by: Failed to fetch wheel: detectron2 @ git+https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2@bcfd464d0c810f0442d91a349c0f6df945467143
Caused by: Build backend failed to determine extra requires with `build_wheel()` with exit status: 1
--- stdout:
--- stderr:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 14, in <module>
File "/Users/tdejager/Library/Caches/uv/builds-v0/.tmptloDcZ/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 332, in get_requires_for_build_wheel
return self._get_build_requires(config_settings, requirements=[])
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/Users/tdejager/Library/Caches/uv/builds-v0/.tmptloDcZ/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 302, in _get_build_requires
self.run_setup()
File "/Users/tdejager/Library/Caches/uv/builds-v0/.tmptloDcZ/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 502, in run_setup
super().run_setup(setup_script=setup_script)
File "/Users/tdejager/Library/Caches/uv/builds-v0/.tmptloDcZ/lib/python3.12/site-packages/setuptools/build_meta.py", line 318, in run_setup
exec(code, locals())
File "<string>", line 10, in <module>
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'torch'
---
Caused by: This error likely indicates that detectron2 @ git+https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2@bcfd464d0c810f0442d91a349c0f6df945467143 depends on torch, but doesn't declare it as a build dependency. If detectron2 @ git+https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2@bcfd464d0c810f0442d91a349c0f6df945467143 is a first-party package, consider adding torch to its `build-system.requires`. Otherwise, `uv pip install torch` into the environment and re-run with `--no-build-isolation`.
```
**Edit**:
Some wording, used isolated where it should be **non**-isolated.
## Summary
Fixes: #6615
Currently, some packages are not installable with `uv`, like `ziglang`
on Linux.
Everything is described in the issue! 😄
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
I added a unit test for the problematic use case.
I also checked that previous unit test are still running in order to
ensure the backward compatibility.
## Summary
This was an oversight. The existing test was (correctly) failing, but
for the wrong reason (failing to build the package during _resolution_).
Updates the snapshot for the deployment from
https://github.com/astral-sh/pypi-proxy/pull/9 — for a while now, we've
only been failing on file requests not registry requests because the
proxy auth was setup wrong.
As a non-shell-wizard, I was unfamiliar with the `EOF` syntax used in
the existing example (just above the one I added). I thought including
an example where the output of `echo` is piped to `uv run` might be more
accessible. As a bonus, it should work across more shells: the `EOF`
example doesn't work in fish because fish [doesn't support
heredocs](https://fishshell.com/docs/current/fish_for_bash_users.html#heredocs),
while the `echo` example does.
Feel free to ignore if unwanted.
For users who were using absolute paths in the `pyproject.toml`
previously, this is a behavior change: We now convert all absolute paths
in `path` entries to relative paths. Since i assume that no-one relies
on absolute path in their lockfiles - they are intended to be portable -
I'm tagging this as a bugfix.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6438
Fixes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6371
## Summary
This PR parallelizes multi-platform builds using multiple workers (hence
the new docker-build / docker-publish jobs), this seems to save about ~8
minutes.
This is partial work extracted from
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6053 than is standalone
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
I used `uvx` to test my code using `pytest` it was just before the
documentation and it worked pretty fine. But when I saw the docs I was
confused as it says:
> If you are running a tool in a project and the tool requires that your
project is installed, e.g., when using `pytest` or `mypy`, you'll want
to use `uv` run instead of `uvx`. Otherwise, the tool will be run in a
virtual environment that is isolated from your project.
So to make it simple if you don't recommend using `uvx` in this
situation then here is the pull request, and if not just close this pull
request. I said that I don't have to open an issue to discuss this as
it's so simple.
## Test Plan
None
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Previously, we excluded these and only looked at system interpreters.
However, it makes sense for this to match the typical Python discovery
experience. We could consider swapping the default... I'm not sure what
makes more sense. If we change the default (as written now) — this could
arguably be a breaking change.
If we don't do this, and `uv run` invokes something like `uv run
--isolated uv pip install foo` uv won't mutate the isolated environment,
it'll mutate whatever outer environment it finds.
