Very basic source distribution support. What's included:
- Include and exclude patterns (hard-coded): Currently, we have
globset+walkdir in one part and glob in the other. I'll migrate
everything to globset+walkset and some custom perf optimizations to
avoid traversing irrelevant directories on top. I'll also pick a glob
syntax (or subset), PEP 639 seems like a good candidate since it's
consistent with what we already have to support.
- Add the `PKG-INFO` file with metadata: Thanks to Code Metadata 2.2,
this metadata is reliable and can be read statically by external tools.
Example output:
```
$ tar -ztvf dist/dummy-0.1.0.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 0/0 154 1970-01-01 01:00 dummy-0.1.0/PKG-INFO
-rw-rw-r-- 0/0 509 1970-01-01 01:00 dummy-0.1.0/pyproject.toml
drwxrwxr-x 0/0 0 1970-01-01 01:00 dummy-0.1.0/src/dummy
drwxrwxr-x 0/0 0 1970-01-01 01:00 dummy-0.1.0/src/dummy/submodule
-rw-rw-r-- 0/0 30 1970-01-01 01:00 dummy-0.1.0/src/dummy/submodule/impl.py
-rw-rw-r-- 0/0 14 1970-01-01 01:00 dummy-0.1.0/src/dummy/submodule/__init__.py
-rw-rw-r-- 0/0 12 1970-01-01 01:00 dummy-0.1.0/src/dummy/__init__.py
```
No tests since the source distributions don't build valid wheels yet.
## Summary
This PR pulls in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/8263 and
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/8463, which were originally merged
into the v0.5 tracking branch but can now be committed separately, as
we've made `.env` loading opt-in.
In summary:
- `.env` loading is now opt-in (`--env-file .env`).
- `.env` remains supported on `uv run`, so it's meant for providing
environment variables to the run command, rather than to uv itself.
---------
Co-authored-by: Eduardo González Vaquero <47718648+edugzlez@users.noreply.github.com>
This still utilizes the RFC 2822 datetime formatter, but utilizes new
methods [added in jiff 0.1.14] to emit timestamps in a format strictly
compatible with RFC 9110.
It seems like most HTTP servers were pretty flexible and supported RFC
2822 datetime formats, but #8747 shows at least one case where that
isn't true. Given that the [MDN docs prescribe RFC 9110], we defer to
them.
Fixes#8747
[added in jiff 0.1.14]: https://github.com/BurntSushi/jiff/pull/154
[MDN docs prescribe RFC 9110]:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/If-Modified-Since
Currently, our trampoline is used to convert `<command> [args]` to
`python <command> [args]` for script entrypoints installed into virtual
environments. For #8458, it'd be nice to convert a shim `python3.12
[args]` to `python [args]`. Here, we modify the trampolines to support
this use-case.
The only change we really need here is to avoid injecting `<command>`
into the child process. We change the "magic number" at the end of the
trampoline executables from `UVUV` to `UVSC` and `UVPY` which define
"script" and "python" variants to the trampoline. We then omit the
`<command>` injection in the latter case. We also omit writing the zip
script payload.
To support construction of the new variant, a new
`uv-trampoline-builder` crate is introduced — this avoids requirements
on `uv-install-wheel` in future work. I also use `uv-trampoline-builder`
to consolidate some of the test setup for `uv-trampoline`.
There should be no backwards compatibility concerns, since trampolines
are fully self-referential.
I rebased to fix the commits at the end, as this took many iterations to
get working via CI. This should roughly be reviewable by commit if you
prefer.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Before this PR (and since 651fe6f4e6) `uv`
depends on a git snapshot of `rust-netrc` at
544f3890b6,
with fixes from https://github.com/gribouille/netrc/pull/3 for
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/8003.
Since `rust-netrc` 0.1.2 was just released, and it includes those fixes
– plus an additional [change to support
`~`-expansion](ca0860c0a0)
– `uv` can go back to depending on published crates from crates.io.
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
```
$ cargo build
$ cargo run python install
$ cargo test
```
I get
```
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Snapshot Summary ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Snapshot: sha
Source: crates/uv/tests/it/build.rs:1454
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Expression: snapshot
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-old snapshot
+new results
────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
11 11 │ writing top-level names to src/project.egg-info/top_level.txt
12 12 │ writing manifest file 'src/project.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
13 13 │ reading manifest file 'src/project.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
14 14 │ writing manifest file 'src/project.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
15 │+[CACHE_DIR]/builds-v0/[TMP]/pkg_resources.html
16 │+ import pkg_resources
15 17 │ running sdist
16 18 │ running egg_info
17 19 │ writing src/project.egg-info/PKG-INFO
18 20 │ writing dependency_links to src/project.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┼┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈
35 37 │ copying src/project.egg-info/top_level.txt -> project-0.1.0/src/project.egg-info
36 38 │ Writing project-0.1.0/setup.cfg
37 39 │ Creating tar archive
38 40 │ removing 'project-0.1.0' (and everything under it)
41 │+[CACHE_DIR]/builds-v0/[TMP]/pkg_resources.html
42 │+ import pkg_resources
39 43 │ Building wheel from source distribution...
40 44 │ running egg_info
41 45 │ writing src/project.egg-info/PKG-INFO
42 46 │ writing dependency_links to src/project.egg-info/dependency_links.txt
43 47 │ writing requirements to src/project.egg-info/requires.txt
44 48 │ writing top-level names to src/project.egg-info/top_level.txt
45 49 │ reading manifest file 'src/project.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
46 50 │ writing manifest file 'src/project.egg-info/SOURCES.txt'
51 │+[CACHE_DIR]/builds-v0/[TMP]/pkg_resources.html
52 │+ import pkg_resources
47 53 │ running bdist_wheel
48 54 │ running build
49 55 │ running build_py
50 56 │ creating build
┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┼┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈
73 79 │ adding 'project-0.1.0.dist-info/WHEEL'
74 80 │ adding 'project-0.1.0.dist-info/top_level.txt'
75 81 │ adding 'project-0.1.0.dist-info/RECORD'
76 82 │ removing build/bdist.linux-x86_64/wheel
83 │+[CACHE_DIR]/builds-v0/[TMP]/pkg_resources.html
84 │+ import pkg_resources
77 85 │ Successfully built dist/project-0.1.0.tar.gz and dist/project-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
────────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
To update snapshots run `cargo insta review`
Stopped on the first failure. Run `cargo insta test` to run all snapshots.
thread 'build::sha' panicked at /home/ben/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/insta-1.40.0/src/runtime.rs:548:9:
snapshot assertion for 'sha' failed in line 1454
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures:
build::sha
test result: FAILED. 1299 passed; 1 failed; 4 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 101.18s
error: test failed, to rerun pass `-p uv --test it`
```
The sole failure looks unrelated to me, and I can reproduce it on `main`
(currently e8b8daf0fb), so I conclude that
it has nothing to do with this change.
## Summary
This PR declares and documents all environment variables that are used
in one way or another in `uv`, either internally, or externally, or
transitively under a common struct.
I think over time as uv has grown there's been many environment
variables introduced. Its harder to know which ones exists, which ones
are missing, what they're used for, or where are they used across the
code. The docs only documents a handful of them, for others you'd have
to dive into the code and inspect across crates to know which crates
they're used on or where they're relevant.
This PR is a starting attempt to unify them, make it easier to discover
which ones we have, and maybe unlock future posibilities in automating
generating documentation for them.
I think we can split out into multiple structs later to better organize,
but given the high influx of PR's and possibly new environment variables
introduced/re-used, it would be hard to try to organize them all now
into their proper namespaced struct while this is all happening given
merge conflicts and/or keeping up to date.
I don't think this has any impact on performance as they all should
still be inlined, although it may affect local build times on changes to
the environment vars as more crates would likely need a rebuild. Lastly,
some of them are declared but not used in the code, for example those in
`build.rs`. I left them declared because I still think it's useful to at
least have a reference.
Did I miss any? Are their initial docs cohesive?
Note, `uv-static` is a terrible name for a new crate, thoughts? Others
considered `uv-vars`, `uv-consts`.
## Test Plan
Existing tests
## Summary
This was brought up on Twitter recently. `dotenv` hasn't been updated in
years and doesn't build successfully anymore. Users almost always mean
to install `python-dotenv`. I think we can add helpful hints here to
point users in the right direction.
## Test Plan
uv will soon support both a build frontend (`uv build`) and a build
backend (`build-system = "uv"`). To avoid the name clash, I'm renaming
the `uv-build` crate to `uv-build-frontend`. In a follow-up PR, I will
add a `uv-build-backend` crate with the build backend implementation.
Recently, rkyv 0.8 was released. Its API is a fair bit simpler now for
higher level uses (like for us in `uv`) and results in us being able to
delete a fair bit of code. This also removes our last dependency on `syn
1.0`, and thus drops that dependency.
Performance (via testing on the `transformers` example) seems to remain
about the same, which is what was expected:
```
$ hyperfine -w5 -r100 'uv lock' 'uv-ag-rkyv-update lock'
Benchmark 1: uv lock
Time (mean ± σ): 55.6 ms ± 6.4 ms [User: 30.4 ms, System: 35.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 43.0 ms … 73.1 ms 100 runs
Benchmark 2: uv-ag-rkyv-update lock
Time (mean ± σ): 56.5 ms ± 7.2 ms [User: 30.5 ms, System: 36.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 39.1 ms … 71.5 ms 100 runs
Summary
uv lock ran
1.02 ± 0.18 times faster than uv-ag-rkyv-update lock
```
Closes#7415
## Summary
This adds about 50 KB to the binary:
```
❯ du ./target/release/socks
44736 ./target/release/socks
❯ du ./target/release/uv
44632 ./target/release/uv
```
So need some input on whether it's worth supporting.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/7484.
We got user reports where users were confused about why they can't use
`[project.urls]` in `pyproject.toml` (i think that's from poetry?). This
PR adds a hint that (according to PEP 621), you need to set
`project.name` when using any `project` fields. (PEP 621 also requires
`project.version` xor `dynamic = ["version"]`, but we check that later.)
The intermediate parsing layer to tell apart syntax errors from schema
errors doesn't incur a performance penalty according to epage
(https://github.com/toml-rs/toml/issues/778#issuecomment-2310369253).
Closes#6419Closes#6760
## Summary
Replace the unmaintained `tokio-tar` crate with the `krata-tokio-tar`
fork. The latter just merged a fix necessary for the crate to work on
PowerPC, and has better chances of future maintenance.
Fixes#3423
## Test Plan
`cargo test`
This is preparatory work for the upload functionality, which needs to
read the METADATA file and attach its parsed contents to the POST
request: We move finding the `.dist-info` from `install-wheel-rs` and
`uv-client` to a new `uv-metadata` crate, so it can be shared with the
publish crate.
I don't properly know if its the right place since the upload code isn't
ready, but i'm PR-ing it now because it already had merge conflicts.
## Summary
This PR adds a more flexible cache invalidation abstraction for uv, and
uses that new abstraction to improve support for dynamic metadata.
Specifically, instead of relying solely on a timestamp, we now pass
around a `CacheInfo` struct which (as of now) contains
`Option<Timestamp>` and `Option<Commit>`. The `CacheInfo` is saved in
`dist-info` as `uv_cache.json`, so we can test already-installed
distributions for cache validity (along with testing _cached_
distributions for cache validity).
Beyond the defaults (`pyproject.toml`, `setup.py`, and `setup.cfg`
changes), users can also specify additional cache keys, and it's easy
for us to extend support in the future. Right now, cache keys can either
be instructions to include the current commit (for `setuptools_scm` and
similar) or file paths (for `hatch-requirements-txt` and similar):
```toml
[tool.uv]
cache-keys = [{ file = "requirements.txt" }, { git = true }]
```
This change should be fully backwards compatible.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6964.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6255.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6860.
(This is part of #5711)
## Summary
@BurntSushi and I spotted that the `derivative` crate is only used for
one enum in the entire codebase — however, it's a proc macro, and we pay
for the cost of (re)compiling it in many different contexts.
This replaces it with a private `Inner` core which uses the regular std
derive macros — inlining and optimizations should make this equivalent
to the other implementation, and not too hard to maintain hopefully
(versus a manual impl of `PartialEq` and `Hash` which have to be kept in
sync.)
## Test Plan
Trust CI?
Our current strategy of parsing the output of `py --list-paths` to get
the installed python versions on windows is brittle (#6524, missing
`py`, etc.) and it's slow (10ms last time i measured).
Instead, we should behave spec-compliant and read the python versions
from the registry following PEP 514.
It's not fully clear which errors we should ignore and which ones we
need to raise.
We're using the official rust-for-windows crates for accessing the
registry.
Fixes#1521Fixes#6524
