This pull request includes updates to the `docs/guides/tools.md` file to
provide more detailed instructions on how to pull from a git repository
using different options, using the `git+https` scheme support.
It follows [asking a question in the Discord
chat](https://discord.com/channels/1039017663004942429/1060247592765759518/1303270516588806214)
and getting some useful guidance that was not in the docs, but makes
some very useful features of `uv` easier to discover.
## Summary
Tweaks to documentation:
* Added instructions on how to pull the latest commit from a specific
named branch.
* Added instructions on how to pull a specific tag.
* Added instructions on how to pull a specific commit.
## Summary
This commit adds Google Artifact Registry authentication instructions
for both basic HTTP authentication and keyring methods.
## Test Plan
Locally tested using both methods.
## Summary
Renovate recently gained support for updating dependencies defined using
PEP 723 (https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate/pull/31266). Since uv
supports this format, I thought it could be nice to mention support for
it in the integrations documentation as well. I took the occasion to
make the page a bit more structured as well.
## Test Plan
Ran Renovate on https://github.com/mkniewallner/renovate-pep723, which
created https://github.com/mkniewallner/renovate-pep723/pull/2 that
updates a dependency defined using PEP 723. But I'll re-run some tests
again once the changes are released on Renovate cloud GitHub app just in
case.
## Summary
This is a trivial, one line documentation change that fixes the
following documentation bug.
The current documentation suggests this for adding a git dependency
```
# Add a git dependency
uv add requests --git https://github.com/psf/requests
```
Executing what is suggested with `uv` version `0.4.18` results in this
error message
```
uv add requests --git https://github.com/psf/requests
error: unexpected argument '--git' found
```
The working approach is to add the git depency like this:
```
uv add git+https://github.com/psf/requests
```
## Test Plan
I manually tested the command suggested currently in the guide against
my change.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Documentation for GitLab integration, reliant on the new tags introduced
in https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/6053
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: David Fritzsche <9479371+davidfritzsche@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
It was all too easy to just copy the non-qualified name of the Docker
images and wonder why they couldn't be found – well, because they're on
`ghcr.io`, and you need to read the prose before the list to figure that
out.
## Test Plan
No plan.
This PR adds support for ```uv init --script```, as defined in issue
#7402 (started working on this before I saw jbvsmo's PR). Wanted to
highlight a few decisions I made that differ from the existing PR:
1. ```--script``` takes a path, instead of a path/name. This potentially
leads to a little ambiguity (I can certainly elaborate in the docs,
lmk!), but strictly allowing ```uv init --script path/to/script.py```
felt a little more natural than allowing for ```uv init --script path/to
--name script.py``` (which I also thought would prompt more questions
for users, such as should the name include the .py extension?)
2. The request is processed immediately in the ```init``` method,
sharing logic in resolving which python version to use with ```uv add
--script```. This made more sense to me — since scripts are meant to
operate in isolation, they shouldn't consider the context of an
encompassing package should one exist (I also think this decision makes
the relative codepaths for scripts/packages easier to follow).
3. No readme — readme felt a little excessive for a script, but I can of
course add it in!
---------
Co-authored-by: João Bernardo Oliveira <jbvsmo@gmail.com>
